Decrepus posted:

Moma is a funny and good poster and his chastisement of beer was so powerful I would be surprised if Beer didn't spit blood and almost die.

Lladre posted:

Ahahahahaah. Never change RSI.

thatguy posted:

Unless you're some cinematic CryEngine/Photoshop/After Effects magician you aren't going to be faking something like that. The only logical answer is that Derek and all his "sources" are wrong and/or lying (hilarious) or someone from CIG made this (even more hilarious) to gently caress with people.

Sappo569 posted:

If SM was actually out and playable in any form aside from hacking it into the game .... don't you think there would be a howl of delight from the backers ?

NDA aside there would be so many people willing to risk their account being deleted simply to prove all the evil smarties wrong

They'd even spin it with a "well I can just buy another completionist package anyways I don't care if they ban me"

quote:

And we're right back at square one:

1 - Ben says he doesn't know if SM is in the build or not
2 - Some express astonishment at this rather ludicrous (at best) revelation
3 - I go further to explain why it's ludicrous for someone in his position to not know if SM is enabled in a build or not
4 - Some express that it's possible that he doesn't know. A notion that's just as ridiculous as #1

Meanwhile...

1 - CIG refuses to go on record saying whether or not SM is "enabled" for testing in 2.6; and backers don't have access to the release notes
2 - Some backers are busy playing defense and obfuscation for CIG. Another day in the verse
3 - Other backers are somehow, in the same vein as #2, inferring that because the SM assets exist (which they should if it was being worked on and awaiting official release) and can be hacked, that means "Star Marine is in 2.6" (as hilarious as that sounds)

Finally, in the past, Evocati have released screen shots, videos etc - regardless of them agreeing to an NDA. Yet, in this regard, thus far, NONE of that has happened. It seems to me that if they were intent on proving people (especially that dsmart fellow) wrong, it's something they would have done by now, ended the discussion, and proven me wrong.

I'm right. I know I'm right. SM is not enabled for official gameplay in 2.6. It's a hill that I'm going to die on; seeing as I'm already sitting at the top of it.

VengerTL posted:

https://vid.me/qMmY

https://vid.me/sg6a

The cover system in part 2 looks pretty good, seems responsive and snappy (35seconds into part 2)

D_Smart posted:

Someone made a Star Citizen progress chart

aleksendr posted:

I cant understand the sound desing. Why are some sounds clear and some other like my head is underwater ? Pick a style and stick with it.

AP posted:

I disagree, I think you thought the 20k coffee machine was a minor thing and buried it in the middle of a blog.

This shows intent, if Star Marine multiplayer isn't enabled, if CIG produced the source video for the GIF internally then how did it leak as part of a deception to let idiots like moma think that multiplayer Star Marine was enabled? Who benefits most if Citizens think there's more progress happening than there is, with a sale coming up in December?

kikkelivelho posted:

quote:

D_Smart posted:
Someone made a Star Citizen progress chart

Can you really measure CIG's progress objectively when you don't actually know what state Squadron 42 is in and how much PU work they've completed behind the scenes? The chart is also clearly wrong on a number of known topics. for example: VR support has been in since the Hangar module yet the chart claims this isn't the case. Did you make this Derek?

D_Smart posted:

Someone made a Star Citizen progress chart

SharkTattoos posted:

I know I spent 750 dollars on ships that are nothing but a picture, but I can see big progress with the inclusion of files into the patcher for my FPS.

Quick question - does anyone know if LTI from my ship covers my fps shooter man or will I need to stock up on UEC to pay the death fee in star marine. THX!

D_Smart posted:

I am not entirely sure how the coffee machine plays into this.

D_Smart posted:

At this point, all we can do is wait and see what comes next. Until then, my stance will remain unchanged. And I'm going to say it again - for the record - the 2.6 build that myself and others have had access to DOES NOT HAVE STAR MARINE ENABLED FOR PLAY.

AP posted:

I think sometimes you are understandably focused on the technical aspects of the mess that is Star Citizen, that you miss the importance of simple things that resonate wrongness more to the less technically minded.

The 20k coffee pot and sliding space doors are things anyone can easily and immediately understand as being wrong. While I still can't get my head round your comments on all the 64 bit large world stuff. I think that's why people make a lot more references to the simple wrong stuff when talking about Star Citizen.

D_Smart posted:

Which part of "Someone" did you miss exactly?

kikkelivelho posted:

It's called a vacuum, maybe you've heard of it? Atmosphere dependent sounds aren't really a new thing in games but they sound really good here.

aleksendr posted:

Then tell me why i can perfectly hear the sound of gear rattling when the player get down a stair or the " *pin click* *fwoosh*" of a thrown grenade while only the gun sound is in "Vacuum".

thatguy posted:

If you take out all the junk before the gameplay starts it still leaves 500 frames to edit. Even if you consider that probably half of them are duplicates because Star Citizen doesn't run at 60 FPS that's 250 frames to manually edit in Photoshop.

D_Smart posted:

I am not entirely sure how the coffee machine plays into this.

D1E posted:

Likely that a Greenie demerit point will be assessed for publicly disagreeing with your Warlord.

Are you sure you want to do this?

D1E posted:

Likely that a Greenie demerit point will be assessed for publicly disagreeing with your Warlord.

Are you sure you want to do this?

King of Cheeses posted:

This MP4 that was posted despite being recorded at 50fps has just over 40 actual unique frames of gameplay. Many video frames are just the same game play frame.

AP posted: