|
Madcosby posted:
You wouldn't be saying that if they were your arguments. 
DapperDon fucked around with this message at 22:45 on Dec 5, 2016 |
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 22:42
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 17, 2024 00:30 |
|
|
He's been right exactly once, not much to get used to really. That's even the same number of times Moma has been right.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Love how the word 'hipster' has lost all sense of meaning and now means 'person I disagree with personally'.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:He's been right exactly once, not much to get used to really. That's even the same number of times Moma has been right. He's so right we'll need a new German word for it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5gnt9i/how_to_tell_newcomers_or_those_interested_how/ In which we discuss how SC will totally not be p2w, and backers tell each other that even though there will be advantages to owning bigger and more specialized ships than just an Aurora, it still doesn't mean CIG has implemented a p2w model.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 22:55
|
|
|
No need for new words, they already have Hochstapler Maybe if you defend him really, really hard he'll make you Warprince 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:01
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:No need for new words, they already have Hochstapler That's MeLKoR, silly
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:06
|
|
|
nawledgelambo posted:You think one of the artists is trying to tell the backers something? I was sure this was shopped, but no. It's real. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IC_XUn_BF7k&t=153s That's creative genius, right there. Hats off to whoever slipped that label into the model.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
AP posted:As I understand it Derek was right that the original release of 2.6 to evocati didn't include Star Marine, moma was talking poo poo or trying to get Derek to break the NDA to prove him wrong. The 2nd option seems the more likely to me for him making so much fuss over something that doesn't matter at all, everyone knows Star Marine will be poo poo and so it will be proved, eventually, beyond all doubt. loving lol. SM was in there and was playable, but not to every evocati tester. You don't have it nor have access to it, so you wouldn't know. I don't blame you otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
AP posted:https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/805872968979062785 In other words, Derek is right, but I (and Derek) will not post how he's right. But, believe us: he's right. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
Madcosby posted:Wow this thread is garbo lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:13
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:So the new Caterpillar looks interesting: It currently cannot fit the P85x, which is also flyable in evocati. It's really made for dragonflies right now - hoping that will change.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:loving lol. SM was in there and was playable, but not to every evocati tester. You don't have it nor have access to it, so you wouldn't know. I don't blame you otherwise. So what you're saying is that in a way you were both right, and therefore both wrong, and I should just ban everyone?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:loving lol. SM was in there and was playable, but not to every evocati tester holy poo poo lol, CIG has an evocati evocati PTU secrect jeshush build?loving lol. We most go deeper.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It currently cannot fit the P85x, which is also flyable in evocati. It's really made for dragonflies right now - hoping that will change. It looks loving stupid 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:18
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It currently cannot fit the P85x, which is also flyable in evocati. It's really made for dragonflies right now - hoping that will change. That's pretty garbage. Being able to carry around your other ships and flaunt it to your friends is basically the only reason to have multiple ships.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
I for one welcome Star Marine and the inevitable wealth of funny pics that'll accompany it
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:No need for new words, they already have Hochstapler I think you meant Baron Münchhausen: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baron_Munchausen. He's certainly going beyond Hyperbole now and then.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
I too am glad Star Marine got released without a single hold up or hitch
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Trains and caterpillars actually don't at all work the same way, don't try to detach a wagon from a caterpillar
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:holy poo poo lol, CIG has an evocati evocati PTU secrect jeshush build?loving lol.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:holy poo poo lol, CIG has an evocati evocati PTU secrect jeshush build?loving lol. It's like Inception. Or a giant pile of lies. Starception
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Beet Wagon posted:So what you're saying is that in a way you were both right, and therefore both wrong, and I should just ban everyone? I guess in this case probate both for 2 days. (But use a  .jpg as reason).
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I too am glad Star Marine got released without a single hold up or hitch It truly signals a new era in Star Citizen's development, one that is absolutely not a dead end
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Also LOL at the idea of another level of Evocati in this open development quagmire.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Trains and caterpillars actually don't at all work the same way, don't try to detach a wagon from a caterpillar also no matter how long you wait a train will never transform into a beautiful butterfly
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
If they threw away Illfonic's work, does that mean Star Marine's just been in development for a bit over a year? And really, isn't it another full game like SQ42, PU, AC, ArcCorp and the Starmap?
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Mr Fronts posted:I was sure this was shopped, but no. It's real. Maybe that is one of those unique identifiers MoMA was warning us about Stay safe, non avocado offline leaker ghost  e:fb again 
Thoatse fucked around with this message at 23:29 on Dec 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:24
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Also LOL at the idea of another level of Evocati in this open development quagmire. No. From what was told to me, evocati were testing different builds. In a day, they send out multiple builds. Some are more focused on flight dynamics while others on FPS gameplay. The evocati have their own chat, discord, ptu forums, etc. They're all in one test group, but testing different things. The results are tabulated and they'll use those to streamline the builds so that the can get it out to PTU quicker.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Also LOL at the idea of another level of Evocati in this open development quagmire. "Sure, you're Evocati, but are you Dodecatuple Secret Evocati? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:25
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:They shat up the pipelines well they did
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It currently cannot fit the P85x, which is also flyable in evocati. It's really made for dragonflies right now - hoping that will change. You and me both brother.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
you know what this thread needs, another 60,000 posts about if star marine was technically ready by a specific date or the semantics of what "Released" and "in" mean in relation to it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:also no matter how long you wait a train will never transform into a beautiful butterfly ha joke's on you 
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:26
|
|
|
Mr Fronts posted:I was sure this was shopped, but no. It's real. Wow, that thing turns pretty good for a ship that's supposed to be a massive freight hauler. Almost like the physics are totally hosed or something...
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No. From what was told to me, evocati were testing different builds. In a day, they send out multiple builds. Some are more focused on flight dynamics while others on FPS gameplay. The evocati have their own chat, discord, ptu forums, etc. They're all in one test group, but testing different things. The results are tabulated and they'll use those to streamline the builds so that the can get it out to PTU quicker. please do explain how they could put out different builds a day at a 30 gig download and still test poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
This thread desperately needs AssRapistDude420
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No. From what was told to me, evocati were testing different builds. In a day, they send out multiple builds. Some are more focused on flight dynamics while others on FPS gameplay. The evocati have their own chat, discord, ptu forums, etc. They're all in one test group, but testing different things. The results are tabulated and they'll use those to streamline the builds so that the can get it out to PTU quicker. Open development in a nutshell
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:No. From what was told to me, evocati were testing different builds. In a day, they send out multiple builds. Some are more focused on flight dynamics while others on FPS gameplay. The evocati have their own chat, discord, ptu forums, etc. They're all in one test group, but testing different things. The results are tabulated and they'll use those to streamline the builds so that the can get it out to PTU quicker. I hope this is true because this is the stupidest loving thing I've ever heard especially for such minor poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 17, 2024 00:30 |
|
|
AP posted:https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/805872968979062785 More coming soon 2 weeeks 
Kakarot fucked around with this message at 23:36 on Dec 5, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 5, 2016 23:31
|
|
