|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzJ5APiFuDE
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
Breetai posted:Love how the word 'hipster' has lost all sense of meaning and now means 'person I disagree with personally'. hipster, n Person who thinks they're cool on the internet but they aren't because I'm mad at them for not hating the same people I do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:00
|
|
|
Daztek posted:His letter to the Escapist  It's not technically what I meant, but I'll allow it 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYfkOQKtF2c
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
sorla78 posted:what's the toxx? If moma takes a toxx he's betting that I can't link a recent SQ42 leaver, he's trying to change it to an important leaver now and wiggle out of it. Just so there's no doubt, I think this person could be useful to keep around so I'll let him toxx for someone who could be argued to be an important member of the SQ42 development team.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jr5ryYYcldw
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:Don't be stupid, as reddit pointed out, this is most reasonable explanation Haha! Honesty dial slipped into a game that is based on lies to get people's money as fast as possible. "Uh... yeah! It's a uh reference to this movie that talked about honesty!" Sure it is. Sure it is.  I hope that artist is lurking, feeling smug right now that somebody noticed his artistic communication with the outside world. Hopefully getting a better job too. Stay safe artist ghost. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:03
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlK29ADWCBw
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:04
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcCXjNviZP4
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
Seriously, all those vids might as well be encapsulated by this overarching one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1Ch6N8QT00
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
Scruffpuff posted:I always felt it a strange argument to make. It doesn't matter if SM was in 2.6 or not - what matters is that we were teased for over a year with SM gameplay that was suddenly completely scrapped (we're talking weeks, not months...), then SM was cancelled, then Chris said it was already in the game, then it was announced that it was coming back, and then they hacked together the shittiest Minimum Viable Shooter CryMod that the inept team at CIG could hack out over a couple of months - and it has nothing to do with Star Citizen proper. I just want to recognize that this was well written and pretty much describes the situation openly and honestly, which is why it is going to be completely ignored so that Smart-sama and Moma can have a slapfight about "what's in the first build". The early release videos show it basically being no better than Dust514. Frankly, I can't wait till it gets released. It's going to be buggy as poo poo and we'll finally get some FRESH OC to talk about. It will also be great to watch fanboys bend over backwards claiming how Crobbler broke all bounds of a what an FPS could be.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV6EWhMOy3s
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:07
|
|
|
MoMA don't take the toxx over some dumb turnover bullshit. Take the toxx that Derek has been wrong about everything about Star Marine for the past week.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psAXbQ9GjYI
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:09
|
|
|
thatguy posted:MoMA don't take the toxx over some dumb turnover bullshit. Take the toxx that Derek has been wrong about everything about Star Marine for the past week. He added wiggle room to that too now by saying not all evocati could access Star Marine on the first release, that wasn't how he was originally arguing it. Also check this. ManofManyAliases posted:loving lol. SM was in there and was playable, but not to every evocati tester. You don't have it nor have access to it, so you wouldn't know. I don't blame you otherwise. Yet, according to him he didn't have access to evocati either. The guy is full of poo poo and should toxx on dirty leavers to prove me wrong.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:11
|
|
|
I'll see you, and I'll raise you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeJn_qeTw30 It's pretty much an SC round up really.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
poo poo those are all really creepy , like call the police they're probably on at least 1 watch list creepy
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:13
|
|
|
Scruffpuff posted:I always felt it a strange argument to make. It doesn't matter if SM was in 2.6 or not - what matters is that we were teased for over a year with SM gameplay that was suddenly completely scrapped (we're talking weeks, not months...), then SM was cancelled, then Chris said it was already in the game, then it was announced that it was coming back, and then they hacked together the shittiest Minimum Viable Shooter CryMod that the inept team at CIG could hack out over a couple of months - and it has nothing to do with Star Citizen proper. It would humiliate Chris more to release fuckall this year than to release a mediocre shooter nobody wants. Chris must be desperate for the appearance of progress as much as the backers are. The guy is part of his own confidence scam, he absolutely has to believe his will and talent can make this into a billion dollar franchise  It also conveniently moves the topic away from just how much money has been wasted up to this point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:16
|
|
|
Derek on a Wednesday posted:There's no way people are playing Star Marine right now! Everything is broken and sucks and is poo poo and there's no way CIG would be even semi-competent enough to release a broken shitpile of a FPS in an engine designed to produce FPS. Mark my words there is no possible way that people are playing Star Marine right now and they won't be able to for at least two weeks! There's only one video of gameplay in the past 24 hours so clearly it's hacked footage Photoshopped together so don't worry about that. Derek on a Thursday posted:Well, well, well it looks like CIG just released Star Marine right now and not yesterday. As usual I predicted this in my July blog. Since it was just released as I started typing this that means that not only have I not been wrong but I've actually been right twice in rapid succession.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
Scruffpuff posted:I always felt it a strange argument to make. It doesn't matter if SM was in 2.6 or not - what matters is that we were teased for over a year with SM gameplay that was suddenly completely scrapped (we're talking weeks, not months...), then SM was cancelled, then Chris said it was already in the game, then it was announced that it was coming back, and then they hacked together the shittiest Minimum Viable Shooter CryMod that the inept team at CIG could hack out over a couple of months - and it has nothing to do with Star Citizen proper. ^this was a good post 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:18
|
|
|
AP posted:He added wiggle room to that too now by saying not all evocati could access Star Marine on the first release, that wasn't how he was originally arguing it. Also check this. Yeah, that's how they're all walking it back now because to them, nothing's worse than for them to accept the fact that I was right. About anything. There's another (now blocked) rear end-clown over on FDev who is single-handedly pushing the same narrative; having been busted numerous times already that his "proof" was pure and utter bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:21
|
|
|
I never said any of those things. Do that again, and you will be blocked.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:22
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I never said any of those things. Do that again, and you will be blocked. The horror 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:holy poo poo lol, CIG has an evocati evocati PTU secrect jeshush build?loving lol. It's evocatis all the way down. I know it from good sources that there is an evocati layer already testing 4.0.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:29
|
|
|
loving LOL AP I never said that Derek was never right. I said that TheAgent is right more often, and also that Derek lies out of his rear end and is a giant douche. All of which are true. Also, him claiming that SC would fail is only common sense to anyone halfway paying to what a bunch of utter gently caress-ups CIG has been over the past few years. I'll remind you all that he claimed the same thing about ED as well.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I never said any of those things. Do that again, and you will be blocked. This is the type of post that deserves to be mocked site wide. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:38
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:It currently cannot fit the P85x, which is also flyable in evocati. It's really made for dragonflies right now - hoping that will change. Hate to tell you this, ol' Toasty, but they probably won't be refactoring the size of that ship.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
Derek Smart has only ever developed lovely games, therefore Star Citizen will be the BDSSE! And furthermore, if you check my July blog...
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:53
|
|
|
Milky Moor posted:Hate to tell you this, ol' Toasty, but they probably won't be refactoring the size of that ship. yeah, it's not like they can just stretch the x axis in Maya or something to make it bigger, I imagine it's the size they think it should be. Guess what MoMA, CIG doesn't give a poo poo about what they fans want
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:55
|
|
|
Derek was wrong about 2.6 as well as Spectrum being released to the Evocati on November 29th.D_Smart posted:It's already 4PM EST. I haven't heard of any "whole spectrum of good news", Toast. What'd I miss? D_Smart posted:I have an account in Evocati, as do 7 of my contacts. Nobody has received an invite. Not a word on Reddit or RSI forum. So I'm thinking this is a False Flag op that MoMa is running and trying to ride the wave due to some anon poster who may just be posting bullshit. MoMA was right. Man of Many Aliases posted:There's actually a whole spectrum of good news for tonight. Confirmation: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5flh6t/260_and_spectrum_closed_testing_update/?st=iwcsdvgk&sh=264e1a76
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:57
|
|
|
I'll make more effortposts like this about things Derek was wrong about after dinner.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 01:58
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I never said any of those things. Do that again, and you will be blocked. nice meltdown
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
thatguy posted:Derek was wrong about 2.6 as well as Spectrum being released to the Evocati on November 29th. I would hate to have you as attorney because your definition of "right" has more holes than my favorite sock. Fact (pay attention): MoMa only talked about Evocati build rolling out. Since nobody (not even MoMa who doesn't even have access) had received the invite at the time, I pointed out that it could be a FF op. The debate - at the time - had NOTHING to do with SM being in it or not. Aside from the fact that the CIG schedule already had a date, and the build was expected - despite being moved twice. So MoMa saying that Evocati builds were going out - and they did - has NO bearing on ANYTHING. The entire discussion is about whether or not SM was in that 11-30 release. It wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:01
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I never said any of those things. Do that again, and you will be blocked.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I would hate to have you as attorney because your definition of "right" has more holes than my favorite sock. bears, beets, battlestar galactica
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I would hate to have you as attorney because your definition of "right" has more holes than my favorite sock. D_Smart posted:The debate - at the time - had NOTHING to do with SM being in it or not. D_Smart posted:Aside from the fact that the CIG schedule already had a date, and the build was expected - despite being moved twice. D_Smart posted:The entire discussion is about whether or not SM was in that 11-30 release. It wasn't.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
 If you people stopped asking CIG wouldn't have to lie!  I'll never stop laughing at "it's just an internal roadmap". Like "they're not lying, they're incompetent" is so much better.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:11
|
|
|
I feel that MoMA is winning this argument
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:15
|
|
|
lol at anyone who is such a sperg they feel the need to forum police derek smart.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 20:40 |
|
|
thatguy posted:Fact (pay attention): You were wrong. You're still pissing up a tree. YOU: Derek was wrong about 2.6 as well as Spectrum being released to the Evocati on November 29th. quote:D_Smart posted: ME: How does me saying I haven't heard anything, amount to me being "wrong"? quote:D_Smart posted: ME: How does me saying that nobody (including myself) I know, has received an invite, amount to me being "wrong"? YOU: quote:MoMA was right. ME: wtf has that got to do with me; let alone amount to me being "wrong"? Q.E.D: If MoMa was right about 2.6 going out to Evocati, it has nothing to do with me. So whether I'm right or wrong, is patently immaterial. Your turn. D_Smart fucked around with this message at 02:25 on Dec 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 02:21
|
|