|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z8wkEFzhWc we did it, reddit e: fixed video Daztek fucked around with this message at 10:38 on Dec 6, 2016 |
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 10:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 16:44 |
|
|
AP posted:Hey Moma, thanks for being entirely predictable and disappearing. Take the toxx, MoMA
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 10:27
|
|
|
Just discovered I missed the sale because I wasn't really playing it. Would have bought a Reclaimer. I consoled myself by buying a Cutlass. 
Rocksicles fucked around with this message at 11:25 on Dec 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 10:34
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A21wxZKiao8 If you meet me online by Grubs Tavern I will show you where the treasure is hidden.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 10:36
|
|
|
Daztek posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z8wkEFzhWc I'm the complete lack of anything resembling physics or mass in relation to the ships.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 10:50
|
|
|
Moma, want to try for a bonus round? I say someone in the image above recently left CIG.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:03
|
|
|
I'm the completely simulated physics of the ship engines.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:06
|
|
|
AP posted:Moma, want to try for a bonus round? I know where I would put my money on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:27
|
|
|
AP posted:Moma, want to try for a bonus round?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:28
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Community Subscribers? We have a winner
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:31
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSPd2PXAW6k&t=913s It's me, the fun game.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 11:59
|
|
|
Mental. Illness.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:06
|
|
|
Raskolnikov posted:Mental. Illness. Yes. How can I be of assistance.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:17
|
|
|
In a nice touch as we approach Christmas - this Shitizen is hopeful Croberts will be able to create an authentic Alpine feel for his immersion... https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5glb6c/dear_cig_please_do_snow_right/?ref=share&ref_source=link
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:30
|
|
|
AP posted:Moma, want to try for a bonus round? Is it the ugly guy?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:33
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Is it the ugly guy? So that means Alexis is safe from your guess then.....
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:39
|
|
|
Daztek posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5grftr/any_other_young_dads_stoked_to_multicrew_with/ LMAO literally just took a pic of that to post here gotta get those gunners trained from a young age  oh, and be your space janitors Kakarot fucked around with this message at 12:44 on Dec 6, 2016 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:42
|
|
|
ripptide posted:So that means Alexis is safe from your guess then..... Hey, dont be mean to Money
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:47
|
|
|
Kakarot posted:Hey, dont be mean to Money It's not money.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 12:58
|
|
|
They are already playing the This explains so much.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:15
|
|
|
I have been completely out of the loop with this game. Wasn't Squadron 42 promised to be released before the end of the year? Especially by the diehard defenders who said it was all but guaranteed?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:39
|
|
|
Unfunny Poster posted:I have been completely out of the loop with this game. Wasn't Squadron 42 promised to be released before the end of the year? Especially by the diehard defenders who said it was all but guaranteed? It's been released and it's great, evocati testers are doing missions and having a great time right now, I'm sure they'd tell us all about it but there's a strict NDA to prevent spoilers. If you're in the evocati tester group and it's not working for you, that's because only some evocati users have it (obviously).
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:46
|
|
|
Unfunny Poster posted:I have been completely out of the loop with this game. Wasn't Squadron 42 promised to be released before the end of the year? Especially by the diehard defenders who said it was all but guaranteed? Yes, but then they failed to even show anything from it during their CitizenCon in November (although they promised to show something, and allegedly they were preparing something). They did show powerpoint slides that revealed that they have about nothing actually done for it and everything is pending. Now, it is TBD (and people assume it's going to be next year, but only the prelude, because apparently, gently caress, this garbage that is still unsure to be made, (let alone be successful) has already planned DLC and episodes and sequels.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:47
|
|
|
Unfunny Poster posted:I have been completely out of the loop with this game. Wasn't Squadron 42 promised to be released before the end of the year? Especially by the diehard defenders who said it was all but guaranteed? Sir, you got the wrong thread, sorry. We only scream at the videogame here. Downvote and move on.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:49
|
|
|
I can't understand the level of cognitive dissonance required for Shitizens to look at what is currently playable of Star Marine (an FPS game) and think that Squadron 42 (an FPS game) can be anywhere near complete, as CIG claim.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 13:52
|
|
|
GazChap posted:I can't understand the level of cognitive dissonance required for Shitizens to look at what is currently playable of Star Marine (an FPS game) and think that Squadron 42 (an FPS game) can be anywhere near complete, as CIG claim. Considering there are literally people arguing on reddit that the November 2014 release date wasn't actually a release date (or a date at all), since it didn't say which day they were going to release it... Yeah, I get it
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 14:15
|
|
|
GazChap posted:I can't understand the level of cognitive dissonance required for Shitizens to look at what is currently playable of Star Marine (an FPS game) and think that Squadron 42 (an FPS game) can be anywhere near complete, as CIG claim.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 14:21
|
|
|
AP posted:Moma, want to try for a bonus round? Is it the dude standing in the back whose facial expressions says: God drat you bunch of disgusting manchildren, I am so glad I am out soon you pathetic losers. Not you Money, you are kinda ok, but the others are filthy scammers."?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 14:25
|
|
|
I hear CiG uses the worst kind of electricity.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 14:28
|
|
|
Toast finally get paralegaled for the TOS?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 14:35
|
|
|
Hopper posted:Is it the dude standing in the back whose facial expressions says: that's my guess as well by process of elimination. i know that the others don't actually do any work that will look bad on their cv when cig collapses. ben and the hobo don't even have careers in any particular field to begin with
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 15:03
|
|
|
GazChap posted:I can't understand the level of cognitive dissonance required for Shitizens to look at what is currently playable of Star Marine (an FPS game) and think that Squadron 42 (an FPS game) can be anywhere near complete, as CIG claim. There is a secret build where everything works. They are also building 3.0 totally separated from 2.6 because magic. It will all come together like everybody expects due to incredible and genius planning and resource management. The pieces will cling together like Lego bricks and function as both Sq42 and Star Citizen both come to life under the watchful gaze of Chris "Cokeman" Roberts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 15:06
|
|
|
Daztek posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z8wkEFzhWc Two minutes, twenty-nine seconds of video and about 80 frames. I realize some parts are sped up, but Jesus Christ that was hard to watch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 15:08
|
|
|
Daztek posted:https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5grftr/any_other_young_dads_stoked_to_multicrew_with/ See, my son, see, my daughter, one day you will have to provide healthcare or desing products for those who where raised by backers, while they complain they have no jobs and its the government fault.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 15:27
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:There is a secret build where everything works. This is unironically not only what the backers think, but what Chris Roberts himself thinks. In Chris Roberts' version of reality, "Zoom! Enhance!" is a thing. If something is visible, no matter how bad it is, you can "fix" it over time, making the lovely thing good, and making the broken thing function. It's just a matter of throwing enough money at the problem.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 15:32
|
|
|
AP posted:Moma, want to try for a bonus round? Thomas Hennessy at the back, he left CIG sometime in October
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 16:01
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Agreed. I think what's the issue for me is that there are people out there theory-crafting this whole thing away, as if I don't have better things to do with my time but to make stuff up - and blatantly lie - for the hell of it. Derek, you delusional old man you: SM WAS in the build. I watched it with mine own eyes, dearest. I watched as my friend played it against 15 others, leaning around corners (because, 'lo and behold: they instituted cover mechanics). I also watched it as they released an FPS ONLY BUILD to further enhance the testing. I also watched this:  ...which is the latest build to hit evocati. But you know this right? You know all of this because of your seventy-billion evocati accounts, correct? GTFO delusional-Derek.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 16:25
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:It looks loving stupid What possible purpose does that catwalk serve that chops the available vertical storage in half? When you look at it from the outside the entire thing looks stupid in every way with relation to ship size vs cargo payload. Don't even get me started on the detachable cockpit/module thing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 16:27
|
|
|
AP posted:Hey Moma, thanks for being entirely predictable and disappearing. "WHOA GUYS - 1 person in 300+ is leaving! Sky is falling!" You're going tooooo fast on Derek's Delusional Train. Better slow it down a bit.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 16:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 16:44 |
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:...which is the latest build to hit evocati. But you know this right? You know all of this because of your seventy-billion evocati accounts, correct? Still more angered by some guy on the internet with an opinion rather than the fact that it's taken them 130+ million and five years to almost make an fps shooter in a basic fps tailored engine.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 16:31
|
|
