|
Infinitum posted:Why that's famed lurker, and local hearthrob, Jonathan Fisk hey im the famous lurker gently caress you jon
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 21:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:57 |
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Also, for the record, I'm 2x effective in Gym #2 tomorrow AND I'll get my first evolution. Might make me a target for tonight, but I want to be THE VERY BEST so I'm risking it. I'd vote tobbs for this
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 21:56
|
|
|
You seem to have got the wrong impression. My read on Infinitum is indifferent, I just feel like the way that Met pushed him is really scummy.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
Also my reason for the low postcount is the same as it always is: My timezone means I tend to be asleep when most of the activity happens.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:11
|
|
|
I'd go with a lurker lynch over a no-lynch. I said yesterday that I don't see the Met case, and that's still the case today. I don't agree with SSV's read on Met but I don't think SSV is a good lynch candidate for today either.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:13
|
|
|
Holy poo poo that doublepost is weird. Kinda  after people were talking about me and TQ being scum
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
##vote Fisk
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:27
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:My posting career has been marked by periods of extremely high posting and periods of picking spots Fisk, you got anything to add here? Now would be a good time to for a period of extremely high posting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:32
|
|
|
would vote Tobbs for plagiarism and fisk for quality of life
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:39
|
|
|
give head or get dead posted:Holy poo poo that doublepost is weird. Kinda Weird how?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:40
|
|
|
The Slasher/Tobbs doublepost was odd. I feel better about Tobbs' version than I do Slasher's but I don't know how to read Slasher as a player at this point.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:46
|
|
|
IllegallySober posted:The Slasher/Tobbs doublepost was odd. I feel better about Tobbs' version than I do Slasher's but I don't know how to read Slasher as a player at this point. what a scummy non-syatement
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 22:53
|
|
|
IllegallySober I don't think I have time to sway people on you rn but I'm watching you 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:09
|
|
|
The SSV case is dumb imo and I think Tobbs looks scummy for it and for the earlier pact with tpink about nominating each other for gym challenges, and I say that because tpink's posting looks like a bunch of white noise me-too stuff just to show he's here.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:17
|
|
|
##unvote Again, won't be around for deadline tonight so will basically be on whoever I vote in a couple hours
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
in conclusion, tobbs and tpink = scum ##vote Tobbs
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:20
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:The SSV case is dumb imo and I think Tobbs looks scummy for it and for the earlier pact with tpink about nominating each other for gym challenges, and I say that because tpink's posting looks like a bunch of white noise me-too stuff just to show he's here. You are dumb imo SSV not town lynch his rear end Dunno why taste is better but I'll vote him if it comes down to it. I'd rather lynch a scummy lurker than a lurker on who admittedly nobody has a read.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:You are dumb imo yeah, probably
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:22
|
|
|
Like, look at bird's case and vote? Zero content OMGUS Not town play If my case on SSV is bad, then say LITERALLY ANYTHING ABOUT IT
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:23
|
|
|
Your vote is predicated on SSV voting Met and then explaining why later, with the explanation being a solid reason for why Met's original case didn't make much sense. I think that is a bad case. I think it is also bad that you tried to make a challenge pact. That's it. Is it the strongest of cases? No. But given that you're currently trying to steer a bad lynch in the waning hours, I'm inclined to lean on you. That said, re-reading your posts about gym challenges has given me second thought and I'll be back momentarily to make a further decision. tpink is still tpinging my scumdar in any event
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:31
|
|
|
Better. But people who vote and then flail about while trying to explain their votes are almost always scum, that's why I voted SSV. His explanation and buddying are shady AF and he deserves scrutiny this game.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:37
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:Your vote is predicated on SSV voting Met and then explaining why later, with the explanation being a solid reason for why Met's original case didn't make much sense. Based on what? My "white noise" posting as opposed to yours, I guess? I just re-read your posts, and I got bad news for you, friend.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:40
|
|
|
tpink posted:Based on what? My "white noise" posting as opposed to yours, I guess? I just re-read your posts, and I got bad news for you, friend. is it a tumour? 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:45
|
|
|
SLASHER HAWKE posted:is it a tumour? I'm afraid it's terminal. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
tpink posted:Based on what? My "white noise" posting as opposed to yours, I guess? I just re-read your posts, and I got bad news for you, friend. As I've said before, trying to be a part of challenge pact is scummy to me because it's both self serving and potentially dangerous to town. And, while I haven't pushed much by myself, I think I've made my opinions clear on all the issues on the table whereas you've never been first or second opinion on anything. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ also my tumor is benign, damnit
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:56
|
|
|
apparently my shruggie guy has cancer though
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:As I've said before, trying to be a part of challenge pact is scummy to me because it's both self serving and potentially dangerous to town. And, while I haven't pushed much by myself, I think I've made my opinions clear on all the issues on the table whereas you've never been first or second opinion on anything. That would be a fair point except I specifically said that I shouldn't be put in yesterday's challenge because I was worth one point for that particular gym and that we should instead put in someone with an advantage - so, ya know, the opposite of what you said about me being self-serving etc.: tpink posted:Hmm, I still don't know if there's any reason not to reveal my type, but I'll hold off on the specifics for now -- but I'll also say that for this gym, I am also worth one point, so I should probably sit it out in favor of someone with an advantage. i am the bird posted:¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (And I think that tumor is spreading, sorry. )
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
this game is making me angry
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
I'm not going to fake content to stay alive. Pushing a lurker lynch is typically a lazy scum move, so make hay there later.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
Absurd Revolver posted:this game is making me angry That's a lot of white noise you have there too.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
ahh its 12:30 AM rn and i have no clue who to vote brb
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
I would note I'm a one shot, so there would be actual utility out of lynching me tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:34
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:I'm not going to fake content to stay alive. Pushing a lurker lynch is typically a lazy scum move, so make hay there later. No, you're confused. Not posting is a lazy scum move.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:I'm not going to fake content to stay alive. Pushing a lurker lynch is typically a lazy scum move, so make hay there later. how about providing some real content?
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
tpink posted:That would be a fair point except I specifically said that I shouldn't be put in yesterday's challenge because I was worth one point for that particular gym and that we should instead put in someone with an advantage - so, ya know, the opposite of what you said about me being self-serving etc.: Sure, that's true. But I don't see how that erases the earlier attempt at pacts. ##unvote for the moment because Tobbs later claims about his type and evolution during the challenge seem legit and townie-like Apparently I am the only one who finds the early pact shenanigans to be bad but I guess they can also be read as not having read the OP very carefully
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
mfcrocker posted:how about providing some real content? I don't believe in D1.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Dunno why taste is better but I'll vote him if it comes down to it who is taste by the way? some y'all got prior names that I don't know apparently
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:37
|
|
|
i am the bird posted:who is taste by the way? some y'all got prior names that I don't know apparently Oh, Jonathan Fisk is Taste, TremTa, Tremendous Taste etc
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:39
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:I would note I'm a one shot, so there would be actual utility out of lynching me tomorrow. I wasn't on board with the Jonathan Fisk lurker lynch but this post is making me reconsider.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:57 |
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:I don't believe in D1. Then no-vote so it's easier to convince people to vote you out please.
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2016 00:42
|
|