Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

veni veni veni posted:

I don't think he understands how unappealing stuff like Star Trek, Stargate, babylon 5, Farscape etc. is to the average person, because people that actually like those shows live in a bubble of people that actually watch them.

Absolutely this.

veni veni veni posted:

Also, related unpopular opinion. I hate "world building" and prefer to call it bloat.

But how else will I know where my nerdy daydreaming fits in the Expended Timeline or the List of Light Side Paragon Jedi Powers???

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005


Grandmother of Five posted:

sci-fi and fantasy should be considered settings, not genres. that goes for other genres that only define the setting and not the narrative; like westerns and other period pieces. these genres are often and rightfully considered trashy because great literature transcends their setting instead of being defined by it.

genres like; comedy, horror & drama actually says something worthwhile about the narrative of a work. it seems weird imo to place emphasis on setting rather than narrative in defining genre, and i think that the focus on setting over narrative is essentially what world-building is, and authors that place a high emphasis on it will place less emphasis on character and story development.

something that has a sci-fi or fantasy setting can obviously be part of any other genre, as well, but having a preference that focus on setting instead of narrative just seems rear end-backwards to me.

Definetly agree with this. I enjoy both as a setting. Sci fi I enjoy probably more than any other setting. I'd much rather watch something like Alien or Moon or Blade Runner or Mad Max etc. than some drawn out info dump. All of those stories stand on their own but use sci fi to elevate them. A lot of sci fi and fantasy confuses tmi with being good.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Aramek posted:

Star Wars kicks rear end because it's got magic and kung fu and space ships and laser swords. It's like a huge pile of awesome poo poo for winners.

EPIC BACON AWESOMESAUCE FOR THE WIN

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
Why would anybody waste money on all these Star Wars and Star Trek garbage projects, when there is a perfectly good series of Lexx waiting to be made.

hawowanlawow
Jul 27, 2009

lexx blows

Das Boo
Jun 9, 2011

There was a GHOST here.
It's gone now.

veni veni veni posted:

Definetly agree with this. I enjoy both as a setting. Sci fi I enjoy probably more than any other setting. I'd much rather watch something like Alien or Moon or Blade Runner or Mad Max etc. than some drawn out info dump. All of those stories stand on their own but use sci fi to elevate them. A lot of sci fi and fantasy confuses tmi with being good.

Agreed! I was trying to think of how best to say, "I only like sci fi if it's the lesser classification of the genre," but referring to it as a setting instead really clarifies the idea. Alien and Moon were excellent not because they were sci fi, but because they used sci fi elements to strengthen the important factors of their primary genre. They both use sci fi to amplify the loneliness and helplessness of a horror and psychological drama rather than using technology as magic.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

A very appropriate post in this thread.

Power_of_the_glory
Feb 14, 2012
Could Star Wars actually get a little more creative with their planets? If I see another desert world, I will scream.

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.

Power_of_the_glory posted:

Could Star Wars actually get a little more creative with their planets? If I see another desert world, I will scream.

They only have worlds that we have climates here on Earth. Expecting anything different or more creative is crazy.

yeah I eat ass
Mar 14, 2005

only people who enjoy my posting can replace this avatar

Power_of_the_glory posted:

Could Star Wars actually get a little more creative with their planets? If I see another desert world, I will scream.

Sorry, you're stuck with either ice planet, desert planet, or swamp planet. Or space station. That's it.

veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005


Hey now Star Wars also has rock planets.

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.

veni veni veni posted:

Hey now Star Wars also has rock planets.

Those are asteroids.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Das Boo posted:

Agreed! I was trying to think of how best to say, "I only like sci fi if it's the lesser classification of the genre," but referring to it as a setting instead really clarifies the idea. Alien and Moon were excellent not because they were sci fi, but because they used sci fi elements to strengthen the important factors of their primary genre. They both use sci fi to amplify the loneliness and helplessness of a horror and psychological drama rather than using technology as magic.

But but what about rich white men who have never held a human conversation writing about what they think Real Science will do for them in the future?

(The answer usually involves them having twelve year old girlfriends, but you guys it's really good I swear if you just ignore that bit)

hard counter
Jan 2, 2015





yeah I eat rear end posted:

Sorry, you're stuck with either ice planet, desert planet, or swamp planet. Or space station. That's it.

you can thank Zahn for widening the range to include : city planet, mining planet asteroid, ocean planet, industrial wasteland planet, extreme weather planet, volcano planet and mountain planet :smug:

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Hey come on at least gas giant planet was cool, especially at the time, don't you dare deny it :shobon:

Aramek
Dec 22, 2007

Cutest tumor in all of Oncology!

steinrokkan posted:

EPIC BACON AWESOMESAUCE FOR THE WIN

Even this poo poo is better than sad and boring movies.

doverhog
May 31, 2013

Defender of democracy and human rights 🇺🇦

Strategic Tea posted:

But but what about rich white men who have never held a human conversation writing about what they think Real Science will do for them in the future?

(The answer usually involves them having twelve year old girlfriends, but you guys it's really good I swear if you just ignore that bit)

Have you actually read scifi? Philip K. Dick, Iain M. Banks, Hannu Rajaniemi, that kind of stuff?

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Yeah and I really like it.

I'm no fan of the old guard 'future history' type stuff though, and that often seems to be what people mean when they call for serious exploration of technology. At least when it gets to the point of 'xyz isn't real sci fi'.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Aramek posted:

Even this poo poo is better than sad and boring movies.

It takes a sad and boring person to post the sort of commercialist garbage you've been writing in this thread. I hope you are just trolling with that.

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

You can enjoy both dumb poo poo and intellectual poo poo

Sometimes even in the same day(???)

The Saddest Rhino
Apr 29, 2009

Put it all together.
Solve the world.
One conversation at a time.



Having no guilty pleasures is a sign of strong character

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


yeah I eat rear end posted:

They go out of their way to not act like a military, and go out of their way to distinguish themselves from "war-like" races. In DS9 for example they only have one "warship" (even though they could easily make more), despite the fact that their enemies have hundreds. With every other ships the weapons/shields are more of an afterthought.
They have tons of warships. They just also use them as transport and research ships because they're really dumb.

yeah I eat rear end posted:

In star wars they are just religious fanatics that sometimes fight, but that is not their primary function.
Oh yeah, they carry swords around everywhere and are the military leaders because they hate fighting so much.

Jerry Cotton posted:

You're defining sci-fi in a way that makes it a useless phrase. (Sci-Fi is a sub-set of fantasy anyway :mrgw:.)
"Sci-fi" is a useless term, regardless of how you define it (because no one else will ever agree with you on what you're actually talking about).

yeah I eat rear end posted:

The only famous actors star wars has are only famous because they were in star wars. yeah i'm including harrison ford in that
Peter Cushing? Alec Guinness? And that's just the first one, the prequels especially had a bunch of already famous actors in them.

yeah I eat rear end posted:

also I think they are planning reboot(s) of the original movie, but from what I heard the original movie guy is involved and wants it to ignore everything that was established in SG-1/atlantis so I am expecting it to be terrible.
I enjoyed SG-1 and Atlantis, but the original movie was the best Stargate thing by far.

Grandmother of Five posted:

sci-fi and fantasy should be considered settings, not genres. that goes for other genres that only define the setting and not the narrative; like westerns and other period pieces. these genres are often and rightfully considered trashy because great literature transcends their setting instead of being defined by it.

genres like; comedy, horror & drama actually says something worthwhile about the narrative of a work. it seems weird imo to place emphasis on setting rather than narrative in defining genre, and i think that the focus on setting over narrative is essentially what world-building is, and authors that place a high emphasis on it will place less emphasis on character and story development.
Regardless of how you define them, genres are ambiguous, arbitrary, overlapping, reductive and a generally terrible way of classifying anything. The whole concept of genre is dumb and pointless.

yeah I eat rear end posted:

Sorry, you're stuck with either ice planet, desert planet, or swamp planet. Or space station. That's it.
The absolute best bit of SG-1 was when one of the characters makes a desperate escape through a stargate only to end up on an "ice planet" that turns out to be Earth, a possibility that doesn't occur to her because almost every planet in Stargate has only one environment/climate over its entire surface.

Tarantula
Nov 4, 2009

No go ahead stand in the fire, the healer will love the shit out of you.
News shouldn't give up time for sports, I tuned in to learn what's going on in the world not some uninteresting crap about some twat making their first century. Public funds shouldn't be spent on sports unless it's things like public grounds everybody can use. Sports fans are really sensitive to criticism for some weird reason, and lastly Russian dashcams are boring, I get why people watch them but there is something about Russian ones I just find unappealing.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

Tarantula posted:

News shouldn't give up time for sports, I tuned in to learn what's going on in the world not some uninteresting crap about some twat making their first century. Public funds shouldn't be spent on sports unless it's things like public grounds everybody can use. Sports fans are really sensitive to criticism for some weird reason, and lastly Russian dashcams are boring, I get why people watch them but there is something about Russian ones I just find unappealing.

There's a growing wave of sports fans who realize that public funding for stadiums is really dumb (San Diego just told the Chargers to gently caress off) but it's still a minority.

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.
So the Chargers are moving to LA to fail in 6 seasons like the Rams?

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

Solice Kirsk posted:

So the Chargers are moving to LA to fail in 6 seasons like the Rams?

More like two seasons but yes. And the Raiders are moving to Vegas for similar reasons.

Technocrat
Jan 30, 2011

I always finish what I sta
Stargate: Universe is my favourite of the various Stargate series.

yeah I eat ass
Mar 14, 2005

only people who enjoy my posting can replace this avatar

Technocrat posted:

Stargate: Universe is my favourite of the various Stargate series.

Out of all the bad opinions posted in this thread, even mine, this is by far the worst and most offensive.

poptart_fairy
Apr 8, 2009

by R. Guyovich
Eating rear end is not sexy.

JnnyThndrs
May 29, 2001

HERE ARE THE FUCKING TOWELS
Unpopular Replacements Opinion:

Everything they did after Bob Stinson druggied out of the band was pretty mediocre at best, and their last couple albums were just plain bad. Which is really depressing because everything up to and including Let It Be was brilliant.

Possibly Unpopular Replacements Opinion:

everything Nirvana did and won accolades/massive sales for, the 'Mats did first and better.

bean_shadow
Sep 27, 2005

If men had uteruses they'd be called duderuses.

Tarantula posted:

News shouldn't give up time for sports, I tuned in to learn what's going on in the world not some uninteresting crap about some twat making their first century. Public funds shouldn't be spent on sports unless it's things like public grounds everybody can use. Sports fans are really sensitive to criticism for some weird reason, and lastly Russian dashcams are boring, I get why people watch them but there is something about Russian ones I just find unappealing.

The only Russian dashcam I find interesting are the ones when that meteorite entered the atmosphere. There were far too many drivers totally uninterested.

doverhog
May 31, 2013

Defender of democracy and human rights 🇺🇦

poptart_fairy posted:

Eating rear end is not sexy.

Now the thread has really hit a new bottom...

Strategic Tea
Sep 1, 2012

Missiles from Oceania Eurasia Ukraine.

Such is life.

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Tarantula posted:

News shouldn't give up time for sports
I find it really weird that newspapers and TV news shows have sports segments. It's like if they had a whole segment recapping whatever happened on TV last night. It's entertainment, not news. If I want to watch it, I'll watch it, not read about it later.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

Tiggum posted:

I find it really weird that newspapers and TV news shows have sports segments. It's like if they had a whole segment recapping whatever happened on TV last night. It's entertainment, not news. If I want to watch it, I'll watch it, not read about it later.

Newspapers do have entire sections on entertainment

yeah I eat ass
Mar 14, 2005

only people who enjoy my posting can replace this avatar
The news has never been "all serious topics, all the time". They report stories that people want to read. Fortunately most of the world isn't Tiggum and occasionally enjoys reading how their favorite sports team did or how the weather is or whatever.

poptart_fairy
Apr 8, 2009

by R. Guyovich
Looking at things that happened yesterday is for jerks and normies.

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat
I don't understand why a newspaper would carry articles other than train timetables and technical descriptions of new elevator models.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010
Sports are literally the only thing keeping local newspapers alive.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
The "basic income" idea is flawed because people do need to have tasks. If they don't, they flounder. It doesn't matter if the task is ultimately of any use, as long as they think it is of some use. That said, people aren't being given a fair income to survive on, and this undercuts the entire system which relies on a perception of fairness.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply