|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:Project sketch: This looks like an interesting idea. Good luck!
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 14:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX7gFl7xnOE Seasons greetings
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 14:41
|
|
|
BigMouthSingers posted:I think we're missing the woods for the trees. Lumberyard may well be have been easy to join with starengine, but there must be a significant amount of custom platform scaffolding unrelated to the engine that means the jig is up for their devops guys. Something just doesn't add up. StarEngine supposedly has vast custom improvements like 64-bit precision, yet it only took a short time to get the whole game working on Lumberyard? It seems to me, either all their changes were isolated to a few objects/classes or they never made any significant changes. Looking at the documentation, I can't even tell if you can make changes to the base engine; if somehow you can't, that would be incredibly damning to their StarEngine story.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 14:46
|
|
|
Crazy_BlackParrot posted:In dutch they're called "blauwe Rus", blue Russian. Chartreux and Russian Blues are different breeds, though their coats are very similar. Chartreux are sturdier than Russian Blues. #StarCatizen
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 14:51
|
|
|
VealCutlet posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX7gFl7xnOE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQYbyZvkM2c
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 14:57
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXjgJ9P71PY
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:25
|
|
|
Chin posted:As evidenced by him getting Citcon completely wrong. Yeah that thing was a train wreck, but a source would have told them they were trying to get so and so out. Which lends credence to: HycoCam posted:About 50 pages back someone figured out MoMa's source is none other than Chris Roberts, himself. Which would explain why he is wrong so often. If any of the goons have actual sources its by someone(s) so low level they aren't even privy to an engine change which is pretty freaking hilarious. But if this thread has taught me anything it's probably that they got nothing. Cause its a complete poo poo show all the way down.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:31
|
|
|
equivalent easter egg in star citizen would cost 15k in mo-cap and actors.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:38
|
|
|
Lladre posted:Yeah that thing was a train wreck, but a source would have told them they were trying to get so and so out. More than likely is that there has been no engine change, and this is just a boondoggle to prep citizens for the upcoming engine changes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:41
|
|
|
DogonCrook posted:I dont know where you got the impression that it troubles me at all to laugh at you. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:46
|
|
|
Sandweed posted:I made a new friend omg switch!!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:54
|
|
|
New Year's eve in the stimpire is the most sickening holiday yet devised. All citizens must inject their gonads with a single pain-causing bacteria that is drug resistant. For each millimeter the ball drops closer to midnight the bacterial population divides. The total height the ball must drop is 42 meters.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
WhyteRyce posted:The amount of people trivializing a git merge has me Not just you. Several folks. As someone mentioned before even upgrading your development software a version can cause all sorts of poo poo breaking. TheAgent posted:everyone I knew or drank with is now long, long gone. the best I currently have are 4th or 5th hand rumors You were a lot more fun to read when you would just post the rumors and not try to bait Moma. This thread doesn't seem to realize how silly it looked trying to justify 2.6 getting out. People should go back 500 pages and re read the last few days again. It is hilarious. It's all comedy to me, keep doing what you're doing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:03
|
|
|
Chunjee posted:Something just doesn't add up. StarEngine supposedly has vast custom improvements like 64-bit precision, yet it only took a short time to get the whole game working on Lumberyard? It seems to me, either all their changes were isolated to a few objects/classes or they never made any significant changes.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
Chunjee posted:Something just doesn't add up. StarEngine supposedly has vast custom improvements like 64-bit precision, yet it only took a short time to get the whole game working on Lumberyard? It seems to me, either all their changes were isolated to a few objects/classes or they never made any significant changes. https://aws.amazon.com/lumberyard/faq/ I guess the shitizen fantasies about CIG licensing out its custom revolutionary engine are dashed. quote:Q. Can I take Lumberyard and make my own game engine and distribute it? What about any situation where sharing source code might be beneficial? quote:Q: Can I redistribute source code modifications to Lumberyard? 50 lines of code. lol quote:Q. Where can I tell you about my Lumberyard game? Crobbler has a while to let them know on that one.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:11
|
|
|
XK posted:50 lines of code. lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:14
|
|
|
Have the citizens discovered yet that lumberyard isn't for mmos or any game with persistence?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
Gradis posted:then read something else and meltdown there bendon poo poo like this is  as poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:16
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Croberts can easily do 50 lines in one sitting. He's a grizzled veteran, a couple of hours during the night, tops.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:17
|
|
|
I guess 50 lines of code means the end of BugSmashers. They've claimed this transition has been going on for a year, but they've had multiple episodes of BugSmashers. Have they already broken this term?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:18
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Croberts can easily do 50 lines in one sitting. Code or coke?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:31
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
DigitalMocking posted:Have the citizens discovered yet that lumberyard isn't for mmos or any game with persistence? They believe Croberts has been working on a networking Cheezus patch (3.0) non-stop over the holiday break. It will revolutionize computer games for decades when released. It meshes cloud servers into instances dynamically, and in high fidelity. It's basically physicalized virtual server farms. Amazing tech.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
Lladre posted:Not just you. Several folks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:33
|
|
|
Lladre posted:poo poo like this is I appreciate that the holidays can be a stressful time but this is just a dumb thread about a stupid non-game that's scamming gullible idiots. You really don't need to have a breakdown here about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:38
|
|
|
DigitalMocking posted:Have the citizens discovered yet that lumberyard isn't for mmos or any game with persistence? Only Gamelift isn't designed for persistence. There is nothing stopping you from using other Amazon services to run persistent servers. XK posted:I guess 50 lines of code means the end of BugSmashers. Showing code on a screen in a video isn't exactly the kind of redistribution they are worried about. You'll also have to get Amazon or Crytek lawyers to give a poo poo. quote:You also may not use Lumberyard to distribute your own game engine, to make improvements to another game engine, or otherwise compete with Lumberyard or Amazon GameLift. Now this might be a problem depending on how it is phrased in the actual License.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqXi8WmQ_WM
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:42
|
|
|
AP posted:I appreciate that the holidays can be a stressful time but this is just a dumb thread about a stupid non-game that's scamming gullible idiots. You really don't need to have a breakdown here about it. poo poo like this is as poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Tokamak posted:You'll also have to get Amazon or Crytek lawyers to give a poo poo. This is true. I doubt they would care all that much about code showing up in some dumb CIG video.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:46
|
|
|
Lladre posted:poo poo like this is Have you considered just not reading this thread? You don't seem to be enjoying it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:54
|
|
|
The Titanic posted:First you need to get through the souls of the dead and sharks. Then maybe you can have some crabs. this is like the 3rd time some random goon has popped in to talk about your sex life. where you involved in some goon orgy or something??
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
Sunswipe posted:Have you considered just not reading this thread? You don't seem to be enjoying it. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:02
|
|
|
MilesK posted:They're still adding stretch goals. So when they say "adding thousands of lines of code" are they just laughing now? Or was this the old version? Or the new version? My Lumbarjank is acting funny and I need a good massage with some wild hands. I think Chris could seriously get into massage with those hands. "Tell me about your ideas, Chris!" *hands go wild* "Ahhh yeah, right there! The backers will never know!"
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
Look! A Horse! posted:this is like the 3rd time some random goon has popped in to talk about your sex life. where you involved in some goon orgy or something?? James Cameron drove his submersible right into her, recorded the whole thing, and publicly released a movie about it.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:07
|
|
|
Lladre posted:poo poo like this is how so
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
So, should we yell Timber! every time CIG fails now?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
I'd settle for replacing "commando" with "lumberjack"
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
WTF is going on, did everyone eat ergot contaminated gingerbread? Why is everyone so stressed less than a week after such a Chrismas miracle?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
MeLKoR posted:WTF is going on, did everyone eat ergot contaminated gingerbread? Overdosing is never a joke, even if it's an overdose of joke development.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
MilesK posted:They're still adding stretch goals. What the hell was mega map? edit: And was it in their lovely open roadmap/ Gantt charts?
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 19:18 |
|
|
Ok, so yeah, they might be doing better on the engine front. They might even get functioning net code. So what? This does nothing to balance out all the other fuckery they have to deal with. One look at the checks that Crobberts wrote with his mouth and stretch goals will tell you how hosed they still are. No design documents. No gameplay foundation. Not even attempts at balancing the ships. Non-existant flight model. 140 million dollars of pre-sold commodities that will utterly wreck any attempt to create a functioning economy. A (relatively) tiny player base that can never sustain continued operations. Mo-cap reshoots that apparently still are ongoing. Merry christmas, CIG! May you see another!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2016 17:21
|
|
