|
Iglocska posted:If that's the case, what took them 2 days?... Chris decided to design another bomber jacke.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:09 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 15:27 |
|
Iglocska posted:If that's the case, what took them 2 days?...
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:11 |
|
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/259596-The-Star-Citizen-Thread-v5?p=4943682&viewfull=1#post4943682Ben Parry posted:I think I explained further up, but it's probably buried. Oh. He actually said this. I thought the reasonable assumption was that they were using new Lumberyard stuff for Star Marine, and their existing code for the rest. But this, wow. I would feel like a completely immoral sociopath by telling my $140m backers that I switched engines, without detailing that the change is currently only licensing related, and almost no functionality or implementation (code) has changed. I'm still hesitant to believe that's what actually happened.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:20 |
|
CrazyLoon posted:I love how goons can't even remember his actual name, just the name his old AV got remembered by and which drove him mad.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:21 |
|
Tippis posted:The licensing move to LY is boring, so I choose to further harp on the 100 sextillion “kilometres”… It's also 100 sextillion cubic kilometers of featureless black void with gently caress all to do inside of it.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:22 |
|
XK posted:https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/259596-The-Star-Citizen-Thread-v5?p=4943682&viewfull=1#post4943682 Woaaah. Someone should let the cultists know, there are dozens of threads on reddit talking about how they've managed to port their stuff to the LY engine already and it's in.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:22 |
|
He's also promoted himself from Captain to Major. Not realizing that Captain is a higher rank in the Navy (than an Army Major) and that Major isn't even a Naval rank.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:25 |
|
Before, I proposed that no person from CIG has used the name "Star Engine". Ben Parry is using that name in the Frontier forums thread, so, welp.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:25 |
|
This is not how you respond to someone making an offhand quip that your name reminds them of something. Oh, and Bester did nothing wrong.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:29 |
|
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/259596-The-Star-Citizen-Thread-v5?p=4943734&viewfull=1#post4943734Ben Parry posted:Ah, I think I see your misunderstanding. You think SC has switched from StarEngine to Lumberyard. Actually StarEngine has switched from being a modification of CryEngine to being a modification of Lumberyard. Dude, wtf? It looks like that is seriously what happened. Edit: Fixed quote attribution. XK fucked around with this message at 17:42 on Dec 29, 2016 |
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:29 |
|
Iglocska posted:If that's the case, what took them 2 days?... Chris explanations, redactions, refactoring of his idea: 47 hours and 13 minutes Implementing new LJ logo = 26 minutes Telling Ben he should go/move to the very next room to tell Chris it's done and he can publish his xmas chairman letter: 21 Minutes
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:30 |
|
Roflan posted:This is not how you respond to someone making an offhand quip that your name reminds them of something. It is, however, how you open up one of the most hilarious episodes of autism and stupidity that I have ever encountered. The kind of experience that convinces you that, no matter what, loving with the community alone will make the time worthwhile.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:32 |
XK posted:https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/259596-The-Star-Citizen-Thread-v5?p=4943734&viewfull=1#post4943734 So Parry's response to people going "How is it possible that CIG could have done an engine changeover in a couple days" is to literally just be like "Oh that? No no no, they were lying about there being any changeover at all! So it's all okay!" lmao
|
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:33 |
|
Okay, let me see if I understand this. Lumberyard is based off of CryEngine 3.8, which is based off of CryEngine 3.7. StarEngine is based on CryEngine 3.7. Therefore StarEngine is Lumberyard.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:34 |
|
Donald Trump is descended from white people. I am descended from white people. Therefore I am Donald Trump.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:35 |
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Donald Trump is descended from white people. Technically speaking, we're all fish.
|
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:37 |
|
In the neon-stained streets of 2190. the only value placed on a human life is a number in a spreadsheet A squad of Stimperial Commandos relax until a new mission comes in They go to the general vicinity to seek out their target Hacking into the local datanet, they find a person of interest Closer investigation shows a probable match Enhance 78 to 105 Go left 45 and zoom Enhance 11 to 66 Pan up 12 and zoom Enhance and give me a hard copy Target confirmed, they trail him to a nearby massage parlour The target is acting erratically, never stopping in one place for more than a few seconds The commandos have a discussion about how best to fulfill the clients request of "sending a message" They come to an agreement that high explosive is relatively unambiguous Landign sucsessfl commando o9
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:38 |
|
For posterity: gently caress rescaling these, they're in png format, and not very large data wise.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:39 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:It is, however, how you open up one of the most hilarious episodes of autism and stupidity that I have ever encountered. The kind of experience that convinces you that, no matter what, loving with the community alone will make the time worthwhile. Do you, or anyone here, have a copy of the peas agreement we drew up? I'm going to add bester to our drama thread.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:39 |
|
Roflan posted:Oh, and Bester did nothing wrong.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:42 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Do you, or anyone here, have a copy of the peas agreement we drew up? I'm going to add bester to our drama thread. I might at home, I will check later. I miss those days.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:42 |
|
spacetoaster posted:Do you, or anyone here, have a copy of the peas agreement we drew up? I'm going to add bester to our drama thread. Or the screenshots of Coda and his 'nukes launched' incident that prompted it? I seriously regret now counting on Goonrathi obsession to do it instead of me.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:43 |
|
CrazyLoon posted:Or the screenshots of Coda and his 'nukes launched' incident that prompted it? I seriously regret now counting on Goonrathi obsession to do it instead of me. At some point I just made a Star Citizen folder on one of my hard drives and just right click save everything goons put up here. It's at 1 gigabyte now.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:49 |
|
https://forums.frontier.co.uk/showthread.php/259596-The-Star-Citizen-Thread-v5?p=4943715&viewfull=1#post4943715Ben Parry posted:
What What What? What?
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:49 |
|
Here is a beautiful thread of salt against Derek Smart, nasty Goons, and SC haters: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/5ku2ou/cigs_ben_parrys_artistic_rendering_of_starengines/ Funny how most of it is unrelated to the OP's image.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:55 |
|
A woman, called Cate, decides to have a plastic surgery on her... face. This decision is made on 03/07. She takes a picture of herself, that same day, and starts photo-shopping it for a month, saving her work in a file named "SE.parp", trying to visualize how awesome her new face will look. She has no real skills nor any experience with plastic surgery and the result looks awful. A month later, at 03/08 she has the surgery and looks quite different. From both what she looked before and what she had photo-shopped. The woman changes her name to Lucy, that very day. "SE.parp" is still a botched photoshop of an old Lucy/Cate photo, but shows nothing of how Lucy looks, it has none of her new features. It is however an edited photo of Lucy. Is my terrible allegory of what happened with the "switch to Lumberyard".
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 17:55 |
|
XK posted:
It's impossible to track at this point so it's best for sanity's sake to fall back on the standard CIG logic formula: 1) A thing was done 2) CIG did the thing therefore 3) The thing was done wrong
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:03 |
|
AbstractNapper posted:A woman, called Cate, decides to have a plastic surgery on her... face. This decision is made on 03/07. A better allegory would be that Cate took a picture of her face on 03/07 and sent it off to a surgeon to see what he could do with her based on the picture. The surgeon got to work on photoshop to make the adjustments that she should expect. At the same time she took chainsaw and a sledge hammer to her face to "improve it". The surgeon in the meanwhile died of a terrible case of lovely finances, but to Cate's surprise a second surgeon also took a copy of the picture she sent in and created a photoshopped image of what he could sculpt out of her. She was absolutely enthusiastic about the result and partially due to the massive brain damage caused by the sledge hammer, she exclaimed to the world that she switched surgeons and that she now looks like the picture the surgeon created.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:06 |
|
Iglocska posted:A better allegory would be that Cate took a picture of her face on 03/07 and sent it off to a surgeon to see what he could do with her based on the picture. The surgeon got to work on photoshop to make the adjustments that she should expect. This is gold.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:08 |
|
Kinda want to play Bioshock now.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:09 |
|
Iglocska posted:The surgeon in the meanwhile died of a terrible case of lovely finances, but to Cate's surprise a second surgeon also took a copy of the picture she sent in and created a photoshopped image of what he could sculpt out of her. She was absolutely enthusiastic about the result and partially due to the massive brain damage caused by the sledge hammer, she exclaimed to the world that she switched surgeons and that she now looks like the picture the surgeon created. Plus there is no way in hell Cate will ever recover from the damage she's done to her face and look anywhere close to her old self, let alone what the second surgeon photoshopped. But at least she's happy.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:12 |
|
AbstractNapper posted:Yeah, I think this works better too. Here is 19 minutes of how happy she is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWq8ynUq7wM
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:14 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:It's impossible to track at this point so it's best for sanity's sake to fall back on the standard CIG logic formula: Yea, mine is similar, although somewhat simplified 1) A thing was done (or not done) 2) Assume CIG will lie about it
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:19 |
|
XK posted:For posterity: i know we tend to scrape the bottom of the comedy barrel here at the star citizen thread but this is legitimately funny. "If your car starts as a blank blueprint and my car starts as a blank blueprint we can safely say that your Honda civic is just a modified Lamborghini with no extra work." whoever said this guy was just a lighting peon with no idea what he is talking about was pretty much 100% correct. Ben Parry posted:Still no. This is starting to get tedious. "Calling my Honda a Lamborghini is easy, actually converting it into a Lamborghini conceptually is hard. " "converting it into a Lamborghini after construction starts is extra hard" "Whats been done is just calling my Honda a modified Lamborghini" "So it wasn't hard"
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:21 |
|
Mr Fronts posted:Please, allow me. this is what understanding game development looks like
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:21 |
|
Beet Wagon posted:Technically speaking, we're all fish. Technically speaking, there is no such thing as “fish”.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:27 |
|
ben parry cleared it up though. That's why the changeover was instantaneous, they just started calling their current impossible to deliver clusterfuck of an engine something else which gave backers false hope that they might actually be taking steps toward delivering something that isn't hilariously embarrassing. We were actually being way too generous in thinking that CIG had upgraded in any way at all, when really they just slapped a Craftsman sticker on a flaming chinese power tool because they both started conceptually with a power cord in the design process.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:28 |
|
This is all somehow even worse than I had ever imagined , are they really that incompetent and or capable of bold faced lies ? He asks knowing the answer already
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:31 |
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:ben parry cleared it up though. That's why the changeover was instantaneous, they just started calling their current impossible to deliver clusterfuck of an engine something else which gave backers false hope that they might actually be taking steps toward delivering something that isn't hilariously embarrassing. The net effect of this is how Chris perceives his path forward. Before it was: "We're a custom branch off CE 3.7, but Crytek can help us to move forward with our goals." Now it's: "We're a custom branch off CE 3.7, but Amazon can help us to move forward with our goals." The difference will become quite evident when Amazon starts getting these fevered requests for assistance from CIG, reviews what they're trying to do with what is now their systems, and tells them they can eat poo poo.
|
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:32 |
|
|
# ? Apr 24, 2024 15:27 |
|
Fat Shat Sings posted:whoever said this guy was just a lighting peon with no idea what he is talking about was pretty much 100% correct. That was me as well. I'm totally baffled about these explanations he's given, even assuming he's just a lighting guy who's out of the loop. His statements seem to reveal specific things that CIG was trying to skim over and ignore. Ben Parry is going to be told to shut up, and his posts at the Frontier forums will cease. Edit: gently caress imgur since the change. Here's a link to wild animals seeing mirrors. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaMylwohL14 XK fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Dec 29, 2016 |
# ? Dec 29, 2016 18:33 |