|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't know, I think you might be overthinking. like this is such a small game, would the mafia really be given a fake pm? Lol that's not a hint bro. He outright said it. And if the mod changed poo poo, why wouldn't he? Laziness sure, not to throw the mod under the bus, but yeah he could leave the OP as is and all and say, "gently caress it" to the scum, but... It's wiser to be cautious as town than totally accepting of any and every claim ever. That's just basic logic.
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 21:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
Usually when the mod puts the VT description in the OP, they don't give scum fakeclaims. So yeah, I jumped on the differences in hopes that AA didn't, out of an abundance of caution, send scum the "new" role PM that's different from what's in the OP. I'd play with it more, but I imagine he's given it to them by now since I'm trying to break his game with it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 21:54
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Usually when the mod puts the VT description in the OP, they don't give scum fakeclaims. Thoughts on Tired Moritz? And yes, I acknowledge that they usually don't send the scum new role PMs. Again, I maintain my stance that until I see a card flip on a player, I'm not going to call them confirmed town. In addition, I hold in suspicion those who automatically refer to someone as "sure" town. That's an easy stance to take on a player. And no, once the first one or two people have responded, you can no longer "break" the game. In a small game like this that's helpful, for sure, but...
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 21:56
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:huhh I have a pro-town win condition so I am very town This pings me a little. The description in the OP talks about eliminating scum, but the actual role PM doesn't mention them. Is it a slip, or just an interpretation of the actual town role PM? I'm not sold on it 100%, but I think it's worth putting pressure on him. With 6 players, we probably have 2 scum, making today MYLO (if you ignore the vigs or they all fail). I think we probably get one lynch, we're going to take our shots tonight, and the game is going to be over N1. If that's true, this is our only day of discussion, so we need to hear from everyone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 22:16
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:This pings me a little. The description in the OP talks about eliminating scum, but the actual role PM doesn't mention them. I agree on hearing from everyone. I have my vote down as pressure. I'm off work for the rest of today, so I can remove it if necessary. If someone else has someone they think is worth looking at, I think it's worth them putting a vote on, but I think only one vote on a suspect is the way to go. That is to say, I don't think anyone should add another vote to Tired Moritz. Also, where in what he said mention scum? If you could expand on what you're saying I'd appreciate it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 22:25
|
|
|
windshipper posted:I agree on hearing from everyone. I have my vote down as pressure. I'm off work for the rest of today, so I can remove it if necessary. If someone else has someone they think is worth looking at, I think it's worth them putting a vote on, but I think only one vote on a suspect is the way to go. That is to say, I don't think anyone should add another vote to Tired Moritz. Maybe I was reading into him too much, but when he says "I have a pro town win condition so I am town" it makes me think of the sample VT role PM in the OP, where it's mentioned that scum need to be eliminated. Of course, the one in the OP also explicitly states alignment. TM's response seemed awkward to me. WRT only having a single vote on someone, I'm inclined to agree. It's 4 to lynch, and with two scum all it takes is for 2 town votes to be on someone for scum to finish the lynch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
Stickup chatting about how he's not posting in this game. Stickup scum. ##vote this is a stickup I am always watching.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2017 23:22
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Maybe I was reading into him too much, but when he says "I have a pro town win condition so I am town" it makes me think of the sample VT role PM in the OP, where it's mentioned that scum need to be eliminated. I would agree with that assessment, that's why I voted him as well. (As I said)
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Stickup chatting about how he's not posting in this game. I hadn't even opened the thread yet
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
windshipper posted:To clarify - I think it's highly likely he's town. I'm not entirely sure tobbs would have the clarity to be thinking that far ahead as scum. he is a pretty timid and withdrawn scum player, and in general that's not something I'd expect tobbs to do as scum moritz is always a very scummy sounding poster though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:29
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:I don't know, I think you might be overthinking. like this is such a small game, would the mafia really be given a fake pm? I don't see any reason they wouldn't have one. it's not like AA would need to come up with a complex fake claim.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:This pings me a little. The description in the OP talks about eliminating scum, but the actual role PM doesn't mention them. this is a strange post. my pm says eliminate threats, which would be a pro-town win condition, and you of all people should know tm posts things like that all the time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 01:35
|
|
|
this is a stickup posted:this is a strange post. my pm says eliminate threats, which would be a pro-town win condition, and you of all people should know tm posts things like that all the time. Yeah, I was wondering about that as well. It's why I asked him to expand on it. I agree the phrasing in it seems awkward, but Tobb's response seems just as awkward in both his response to me asking him about Moritz and his response to me asking for clarification. Part of me has me wondering if that's just because he got put on the spot though. I don't really know any of you, so, I have no meta. I'd appreciate your thoughts on both of them. And if they have any thoughts on you that'd be cool too.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
idk I interpreted my win con as very pro-town. Like there's no other way to read it other than pro-town. im definitely not third because don't third parties roles usually need you to live to win?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:08
|
|
|
I dont think I'd ever played a game where I was scum and got fake claims so the possibility had slipped my mind.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 07:12
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Tired Moritz (1): windshipper this is a stickup (1): Tobbs Gnawed Not Voting (4): chaoslord, Mr. F!, this is a stickup, Tired MoritzWith 6 alive, it's 4 votes to execute. The current deadline is March 01st, 2017 at 11:10 a.m. EST -- that's in about 2 hours, 45 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
Oh hey deadline ##vote TM
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:11
|
|
|
Actually ##vote mr f I want to do this
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
its cool its cool #vote mr f kill afkers
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:19
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:idk I interpreted my win con as very pro-town. Like there's no other way to read it other than pro-town. What is your win con? Also hf chaoslord the gently caress. Any thoughts on tired moritz or tobbs?
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
my win con is to kill anyone that would threaten my precious townie pals 
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
Nobody's here to lynch are they.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:48
|
|
|
im ready for no lynch FOR MAXIMUM GUNS AND BLOOD
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:52
|
|
|
windshipper posted:What is your win con? I agree I don't like TM but you are probably going to vig him as am I. I am more worried about Mr F flying under the radar. Would vote TM to avoid no lunch though
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:I agree I don't like TM but you are probably going to vig him as am I. Why do you not like him? And why vig him over a lurker? I ask because you just popped in here and haven't really been involved in anything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
Making I ask why you're wanting to vig him over a lurker because you have your vote on a lurker. For the reason that you don't want them flying under the radar
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 17:00
|
|
|
I'm actually fine with offing someone who hasn't even posted once. ##vote Mr. F
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
*mainly I ask...
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 17:02
|
|
|
I'll drop the hammer. Let's talk until then though.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 17:03
|
|
|
 or not I guess##vote Mr. F
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 17:08
|
|
|
ANYHOW! No one died. 12 hours from this post for actions, no prodding. Love AA. <3 Anomalous Amalgam fucked around with this message at 20:09 on Mar 1, 2017 |
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
Hashing out a vote discrepancy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 20:08
|
|
|
Mr. F!, TOWN Aligned 1-Shot Cop Vigilante, has been hung. IT is now night 1 from this post.  Sorry for the mix up. VF didn't count a vote in the time frame.
|
|
#
?
Mar 1, 2017 20:12
|
|
|
chaoslord, TOWN aligned Vanilla Vigilante, has died. Tired Moritz, TOWN aligned Saboteur Vigilante, has died. It is now Day 2. Tobbs Gnawed, windshipper, this is a stickup remain alive.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2 Not Voting (3): this is a stickup, Tobbs Gnawed, windshipper With 3 alive, it's 2 votes to execute. The current deadline is March 02nd, 2017 at 11:33 p.m. EST -- that's in about 23 hours, 59 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 05:33
|
|
|
Well gently caress. I shot TM, I thought he was actually scum. I'm extremely surprised there's only 1 this game.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
windshipper posted:Whoops quoted the wrong post but yeah mine says nothing about being town aligned either, just the win condition matches. Giving this a second look, nothing had been posted that matches the actual town wincon.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 05:40
|
|
|
Tentatively think windshipper is scum, but I'm not putting down a vote in LYLO unless I'm sure.
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 05:42
|
|
|
sorry I missed the deadline, I wasn't expecting it to be whatever time it was. gonna lay my thoughts out as I try to collect themTobbs Gnawed posted:Well gently caress. I looked over the thread during night phase and decided on killing chaoslord. I thought it was weird he came in to kill someone who hadn't posted at all, when he had done the exact same thing. my gun jammed  but someone got him anywayTobbs Gnawed posted:Is it a slip, or just an interpretation of the actual town role PM? I'm not sold on it 100%, but I think it's worth putting pressure on him. Tobbs Gnawed posted:WRT only having a single vote on someone, I'm inclined to agree. It's 4 to lynch, and with two scum all it takes is for 2 town votes to be on someone for scum to finish the lynch. I thought it was a little strange you were pushing a 'slip' right away in the manner that you did, unless you interpret eliminating the threats to the town as an anti-town wincon, which doesn't make any sense. the call of 2 scum in the same post was something I noted and part of the reason I thought your posting was a little weird. in a 6 man, all vig micro, I'd assume 1 scum/1 survivor before 2 scum. at the time, I had a slight feeling that you knew a little too much about the setup and were trying to mislead our thought process, but you are being consistent about it, and frankly I don't see the point of lying about it in this game however, I know you are a proponent of keeping your vote on someone that you really think is scum, yet you dropped off of TM to go for an easy lurker lynch. and today, you're going after windshipper for what you're calling another slip. I feel like it's a little opportunistic on your part, and also curious that you managed to catch TM's 'slip' when windshipper was saying he thinks you're town, but now that we're all that's left, you've caught windshipper for the same thing. how did you manage to overlook windshipper apparently slipping on the exact same thing that TM did, and one post before TM did? I think it's an interesting thing you're bringing up, as it's 100% correct to say nothing at that point matches the exact wincon, but drat if it doesn't feel weird in this context
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 18:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 21:20 |
|
|
windshipper posted:To clarify - I think it's highly likely he's town. the simplest explanation here would be tobbs being scum. my meta on him is, in general, based on large games, where he tended to shy away from making alignment calls until pressured; as town, he's more like a rapid fire alignment calling machine with votes all over the place. based on the cases he's made in this game, I'm not sure if it can apply to a small game like this. coming out of the gate to make a post you acknowledge is something you'd do as scum is quite possibly the realest notion of someone being scum in this thread. after looking it all over, though you were actually calling him town at the time, I think you might've been onto something with regards to making that post as scum. but on first read, this post actually pinged me a little. reading the first point from a perspective of you being scum, it almost sounds like you were planning to make that exact post and tobbs beat you to it, but that post and this idea can't become a smoking gun regardless. if we assume scum did get sent the exact win condition, scum tobbs could have jumped on the post as you would have, and you could be remorse about not getting to do it first. it works both ways and doesn't really go any further than that. windshipper has no experience with TM and his reaction to TM's posting style is pretty normal for everyone to have at first. I'd expect tobbs to know better. right now I am leaning tobbs ever so slightly but I'd like to hear from windshipper who is oddly quiet today, considering he was active at pretty much all day on D1
|
|
#
?
Mar 2, 2017 18:58
|
|