|
Great close from Jacobs. Very close fight, maybe Jacobs nicked it. That knockdown may decide the fight though.
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 08:59 |
|
|
I think Jacobs took it, but whoever wins they should probably rematch this one.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
GGG by 1 but drat Danny Jacobs deserves tremendous respect
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
yeah, I got GGG by 1, but probably won't be surprised either way
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
Le Saboteur posted:I think Jacobs took it, but whoever wins they should probably rematch this one. i'm inclined to agree. i think the next fight would be better now that they've had a real good look at each other
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:54
|
|
|
there was definitely a bit of the 'jacobs is doing better than expected so i'm scoring more for him' from the boxnation commentators that said, i think it's another one where any none wide result is fine
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
thehappyprince posted:there was definitely a bit of the 'jacobs is doing better than expected so i'm scoring more for him' from the boxnation commentators that's what i figured was happening
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
lmao what the heck
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:55
|
|
|
legit scorecards
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
Marching Powder posted:legit scorecards Ya tbh
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
Hell yeah, good fight
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
fair decision but much too close for comfort really thought that could go the other way drat
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:57
|
|
|
good call, but "escapes with a victory" is right on the button
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:56
|
|
|
Marching Powder posted:that's what i figured was happening For me it might have been a bit of that, but I also saw Jacobs landing lots of flurries, which even if partially blocked always make a good case to me. GGG just seemed so inactive.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:57
|
|
|
CommonShore posted:For me it might have been a bit of that, but I also saw Jacobs landing lots of flurries, which even if partially blocked always make a good case to me. GGG just seemed so inactive. he got a few rounds for exactly that reason. but there were like 4 rounds that honestly could have gone either way and jacobs getting that 114-113 meant he got just about all of them
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:58
|
|
|
I'm glad GGG won for the good of boxing but he didn't deserve it Fought like he was drugged
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:59
|
|
|
Ehhh fair enough, it was close. Just get Saunders' belt and then move up now
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 05:59
|
|
|
So even if Gennady didn't get the knockdown it would have been a majority decision for him. Huh, I'm going to have to watch that again.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
I was rooting for GGG but I thought Jacobs had just done enough to take that fight. I can't judge fights for poo poo though so I kinda wonder if I was just scoring Jacobs more for not getting smashed as much as others have done.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
Lionel Richie posted:move up now errr i think we may want to hold off on that for a bit. he had a bit too much trouble there
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:00
|
|
|
i have done nothing but drink beer and smoke weed and watch people beat each other up all loving day. its been incredible. thanks for posting with me friends.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
would rather see this rematch than canelo/ggg tbh
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
Marching Powder posted:errr i think we may want to hold off on that for a bit. he had a bit too much trouble there If Canelo won't fight him there's nothing else though
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:01
|
|
|
Lionel Richie posted:If Canelo won't fight him there's nothing else though true enough. he'll have cleaned house.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:03
|
|
|
Gay Horney posted:i have done nothing but drink beer and smoke weed and watch people beat each other up all loving day. its been incredible. thanks for posting with me friends. yeah it's been good
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:04
|
|
|
Great card of fights, top to bottom there was a lot to like tonight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:05
|
|
|
Agreed with the co-main and this decision. In close fights every point matters and if you get knocked down you pay the price.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
Lionel Richie posted:Ehhh fair enough, it was close. Just get Saunders' belt and then move up now he's not big enough imo this fight was so close, I agree with these posts: VOTE YES ON 69 posted:good call, but "escapes with a victory" is right on the button ChaosReaper posted:I was rooting for GGG but I thought Jacobs had just done enough to take that fight. I can't judge fights for poo poo though so I kinda wonder if I was just scoring Jacobs more for not getting smashed as much as others have done. Jacobs could have won this, the was about as close as the previous fight.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Great card of fights, top to bottom there was a lot to like tonight. you could put the exact same card on in three months and i'd watch it top to bottom
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:06
|
|
|
The judges scorecards were right on imo, GGG didnt look his best but he did enough to win. Dont particularly need to see him fight anyone bigger if it means he is gonna have to curtail his output that much
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
Really good showing by Jacobs also
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:09
|
|
|
Jacobs fought the fight of his life but the knockdown hosed him. Canelo wasn't impressed and will need to wait another 3 years to see if GGG can bring in some PPV buys to their potential fight. Rematch GGG/Jacobs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:12
|
|
|
manyak posted:The judges scorecards were right on imo every single fight top to bottom without a questionable card, and every fight was between highly competitive and razor close. i've never seen so much good judging in one place in any combat sport
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:14
|
|
|
Clearly the takeaway from this night is Lomachenko's stranglehold on the #1 p4p spot tightens 
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:18
|
|
|
The SituAsian posted:Clearly the takeaway from this night is Lomachenko's stranglehold on the #1 p4p spot tightens Hard to argue with actually. Well, my arguments are Crawford and Ward.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:23
|
|
|
Marching Powder posted:every single fight top to bottom without a questionable card, and every fight was between highly competitive and razor close. i've never seen so much good judging in one place in any combat sport Agreed totally. Great card to watch, GGG is a bad dude, but like everyone is saying so much respect for Jacobs.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:25
|
|
|
eric posted:Jacobs fought the fight of his life but the knockdown hosed him. Canelo wasn't impressed and will need to wait another 3 years to see if GGG can bring in some PPV buys to their potential fight. Rematch GGG/Jacobs. Lol, this fight just made GGG seem beatable, I bet Canelo hops in a ring with him sooner rather than later as a consequence
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
VOTE YES ON 69 posted:Lol, this fight just made GGG seem beatable, I bet Canelo hops in a ring with him sooner rather than later as a consequence That would be huge mistake; Canelo doesn't have the boxing chops of Jacobs and I would assume GBP knows it too. Don't really think this changes anything on that front. If anything it probably makes a Lemieux or Eubank Jr. more possible because it's easier to handwave Golovkin as not being worth the hype anyways
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:32
|
|
|
The Chocolatito fight was the fight of the year, and I can't even get mad that Chocolatito lost because it guarantees a rematch and was such an insane fight. GGG/Jacobs could have gone either way, and Jacobs really proved himself as an elite fighter in his own right. It's too bad that we probably won't see a rematch for at least a year, if ever, but GGG/Canelo is unavoidable as a superfight event.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 06:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 08:59 |
|
|
That was an insane card to be there for. Props to everyone bringing the poo poo. I had it 7-5 GGG I thought Jacobs was flurrying a lot at the last 30 seconds to steal rounds and most of it was landing on GGG'a gloves. Jacobs was having insane success from the southpaw stance and I'm very surprised he didn't just commit to it fully because GGG was loving him up when he went conventional.
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2017 07:31
|
|
