|
DrBouvenstein posted:I assumed it's because Vice is the ultimate "edgy try hard" and teenagers see right through that poo poo. Vice is weird. Their politics stuff is occasionally really good, like their "This is What Winning Looks Like" documentary, then so much of the rest is stuff like "We Gave This Reporter Acid Took Him to a Monster Truck Show" and it's just awful. Also one of their founders is Gavin McInnes which doesn't help things even if he left the organization a decade ago. e: Their HBO show is also good from what I recall, and didn't seem like it was trying to be edgy at all.
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
I don't know anything about Vice Except for a few of their short documentaries that I've seen, but they never came across as edgy to me. They just seemed like a group that wanted to cover unorthodox and sometimes taboo subjects objectively (but let's not discuss that, please). But I guess it's a big network beyond the documentaries.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
NoEyedSquareGuy posted:Vice is weird. Their politics stuff is occasionally really good, like their "This is What Winning Looks Like" documentary, then so much of the rest is stuff like "We Gave This Reporter Acid Took Him to a Monster Truck Show" and it's just awful. Also one of their founders is Gavin McInnes which doesn't help things even if he left the organization a decade ago. VICE News (the HBO show) is basically "We sent your barista to Syria" but it turns out the baristas are actually fairly competent investigative journalists so it's good.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 00:54
|
|
|
vyelkin posted:VICE News (the HBO show) is basically "We sent your barista to Syria" but it turns out the baristas are actually fairly competent investigative journalists so it's good. Probably picked up some good research and interviewing skills from law school
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 02:08
|
|
|
Vice is also good for pretentious interviews with arty jerk-off pictures in them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 05:34
|
|
|
I also think it's bizarre for Vice to do so poorly. Did they just not know what it was?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 06:57
|
|
|
Given that it's pretty low on the awareness axis that seems to be the actual case. Does including awareness not very seriously impact the coolness figures?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 08:37
|
|
|
^^^ No I think that's why it's a separate measure - like that band you haven't even heard of is very cool. Phlegmish posted:I also think it's bizarre for Vice to do so poorly. Did they just not know what it was? Well yeah, that too, as it's fairly low on the y-axis as well. But I would guess that they'd do the rankings just among the people who do know the brand. They should do this with B2B brands and have them estimate coolness based on names/logos. mobby_6kl has a new favorite as of 09:04 on Apr 4, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 08:43
|
|
|
VICE reflects a 30 y.o.'s idea of cool. Or, if I were less charitable, of somebody with a mid life crisis. Not much overlap with what 15 year olds would like.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 09:40
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:VICE reflects a 30 y.o.'s idea of cool. Or, if I were less charitable, of somebody with a mid life crisis. Not much overlap with what 15 year olds would like. Oh there's plenty of overlap, judging the average goon.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 10:06
|
|
|
Teens aren't interested in documentaries, hope that helps.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 10:14
|
|
|
Olive Garden tonight! posted:Oh there's plenty of overlap, judging the average goon. Please leave Aatrek out of this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 13:32
|
|
|
AKA Pseudonym posted:Not bad but it is funny I love how the least aware brand is smack dab in the middle of cool/not cool.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 13:49
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:VICE reflects a 30 y.o.'s idea of cool. Or, if I were less charitable, of somebody with a mid life crisis. Not much overlap with what 15 year olds would like.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 15:32
|
|
|
AKA Pseudonym posted:Not bad but it is funny I wish we had a goon version of this.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
Kennel posted:I wish we had a goon version of this. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 16:04
|
|
|
I always knew that there was something wrong with people who like mint in chocolate.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 16:07
|
|
|
High fallutin lieberals are too fancy for peanuts, they have to have their special "almonds"  Anyway, the main thing that graph proves is that GOP has way better voter discipline.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 16:08
|
|
|
Reminds me of this graph of sports and political affiliations.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:High fallutin lieberals are too fancy for peanuts, they have to have their special "almonds" Yeah 
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
Pakled posted:Reminds me of this graph of sports and political affiliations. It surprises me that the NHL is that far to the right (especially to the right of baseball) considering its popularity is mostly in blue regions and the players are all from socialist utopias. But it's also overwhelmingly white and expensive to play.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 17:11
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:Closest I can offer: I like how Jelly Bellys are on the high turnout Democrat side, when Ronald Reagan was a famous Jelly Belly enthusiast. He was also hated by many Jelly Belly purists, because instead of eating them one at a time, he'd toss a handful in his mouth and mix all the flavors you monster
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
Pakled posted:Reminds me of this graph of sports and political affiliations. Never woulda guessed WWE had a super left-leaning following. Also lol at the WNBA
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 17:33
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:I like how Jelly Bellys are on the high turnout Democrat side, when Ronald Reagan was a famous Jelly Belly enthusiast. Still, that doesn't justify shooting him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 17:38
|
|
|
ranbo das posted:Never woulda guessed WWE had a super left-leaning following. Also lol at the WNBA When this chart's come up before, the explanation I've seen for the WWE is that its fanbase is primarily young and poor and also in recent years more and more Hispanic, though I'm not sure if that was the case when the data was collected in 2008-2009. My own anecdotal evidence is that every wrestling fan I know is a twenty/thirty-something nerd.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
Those are pre-Trump surveys. They'd likely look rather different today.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 20:40
|
|
|
why? what a weird supposition.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:12
|
|
|
Graph doesn't have roller derby, 0/10
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:37
|
|
|
JOHNSON COCKSLAP posted:why? The demographics changed a lot. Trump flipped a lot of working class voters who'd been voting Democratic. College educated whites pretty much split their vote, Republicans have won that demographic comfortably since the 50s.
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:46
|
|
|
no, argue with evidence, not tfya
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 21:48
|
|
|
JOHNSON COCKSLAP posted:no, argue with evidence, not tfya I mean, he's correct, do you really need citations with a link for every single assertion anyone makes?
|
|
#
?
Apr 4, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:He was also hated by many Jelly Belly purists, because instead of eating them one at a time, he'd toss a handful in his mouth and mix all the flavors you monster I don't support the death penalty, but it should be legal to execute "people" who do this
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 01:42
|
|
|
Scratch-O posted:I don't support the death penalty, but it should be legal to execute "people" who do this I don't understand people who don't do this. Do you eat off of military plates too?
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:28
|
|
|
lifg posted:I don't understand people who don't do this. Do you eat off of military plates too? Why don't you just cut to the chase and pour a bunch of sugar in your mouth ya loving commie
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:29
|
|
|
I do this for only the Beanboozled pack. If I'm going to live, it's going to be a mix of highs and lows. None of this M&M middle-of-the-road bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 02:41
|
|
|
I start out eating them individually and then succumb to temptation about halfway through. I'm weak.
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 04:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 5, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Inefficient/redundant, sure, but at least it's not blatantly deceptive like so many other examples posted here.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 13:22
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:Closest I can offer: Werther's originals too far up and to the right to fit on the graph.
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 23:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 16:33 |
|
|
Agnostalgia posted:Werther's originals too
|
|
#
?
Apr 6, 2017 23:33
|
|
