|
The Cheshire Cat posted:What happened in 1973 that made muttonchops make a comeback? Mu][onchops
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 14:12 |
|
|
spog posted:True dat. Battlefield 2: Electric Boogaloo
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:07
|
|
|
Is that only men?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:12
|
|
|
Carados posted:Is that only men? What could've made you think that.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
cinci zoo sniper posted:What could've made you think that. I'd assume it would be included in the title if it was, but the data says otherwise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 04:21
|
|
|
Carados posted:I'd assume it would be included in the title if it was, but the data says otherwise. In 1973 less than 10% of university graduates were women?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 07:36
|
|
|
I'm not sure if "cleanshaven" is a facial hair style that would apply to most women, technically speaking.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 11:25
|
|
|
VitalSigns posted:I'm not sure if "cleanshaven" is a facial hair style that would apply to most women, technically speaking. If a woman runs a razor over her face, she counts as clean shaven. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 12:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
Ooh boy took me a while to figure that one out.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 13:52
|
|
|
So the bars are a probability distribution of the total points at the end of the season, and the cumulative percentage is the odds of being in the top 4 when Arsenal has the amount of points indicated for that bar? I wonder how difficult that would be to decipher if you don't know about the premier league.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:01
|
|
|
Yeah that's how I understand it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2017 14:38
|
|
|
Antti posted:So the bars are a probability distribution of the total points at the end of the season, and the cumulative percentage is the odds of being in the top 4 when Arsenal has the amount of points indicated for that bar?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 11:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 11:11
|
|
|
mobby_6kl posted:The histogram is clear enough by itself, but the percentages are definitely confusing as they look like cumulative probabilities but don't actually correspond to the y labels (70pt looks like should be >10% but is labeled 5%) It's because they don't correspond to the Y values at all it's the probability at most 3 other teams finish with a higher points total. While the Y axis is the probability that Arsenal obtain that many points. Rumda has a new favorite as of 12:12 on Apr 13, 2017 |
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 12:10
|
|
|
It's actually a perfectly fine chart, you just need to be the kind of person who looks at that sort of chart; which is who the chart is for (the kind of person who would read that chart). A perfectly fine chart.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 12:14
|
|
|
Somfin posted:It was to avoid too much poo poo breaking. There's a startling amount of code out there that specifically does not work on any OS that identifies itself as "Windows 9[*]". Late, but this actually became a huge issue 10 years ago when Opera 10 was released. At the time, Firefox was still around version 3 and IE was still 6, and a lot of websites (especially banks) would check the version and go "Hey, no, this is Opera 1, you need to go upgrade because we support only 7 or later". Pretty sure an update was pushed out to make it report Opera 9.9 or whatever. Then Chrome came out and that problem (and Opera) very quickly disappeared  On-topic:  There's probably some context that makes this make sense but on its face this graph just seems totally useless.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 17:59
|
|
|
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/04/google-deprecates-octane-javascript-benchmark-because-everyone-is-basically-cheating/ It's not a direct rebuttal of this specific claim. But Google found that everyone was cheating on the Octane Benchmark.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
5% on a synthetic benchmark is the best they can show? That’s damning with faint praise.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Little Boy was 15 KILOtons TNT, not 15 tons. Big difference.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
 So, how many tons of TNT is the Tarbosaurus?
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 23:18
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:
Six, it says it right there
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 23:30
|
|
|
Holy moley, better stay away from dinosaurs.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2017 23:45
|
|
|
still trying to recover from this i see 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 00:36
|
|
|
steinrokkan posted:Holy moley, better stay away from dinosaurs. Yeah, no poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 01:11
|
|
|
So I guess humans are about 17 tons of TNT? 18?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:So I guess humans are about 17 tons of TNT? 18? Well sure if you're blue. What's the yield on pink through black coloured people? This diagram smells like the prelude to a bunch of race supremacy bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 05:45
|
|
|
Phanatic posted:So I guess humans are about 17 tons of TNT? 18? Outrail posted:Well sure if you're blue. Have you even seen/read Watchmen dude. Dr. Manhattan's yield is pretty sick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 08:40
|
|
|
SaltyJesus posted:Have you even seen/read Watchmen dude. Dr. Manhattan's yield is pretty sick. Yeah but who watches the Watchmen?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 09:52
|
|
|
Katyiah posted:Yeah but who watches the Watchmen? I did. I remember Rorschach being acted well, young lady superheroine being generic, and CGI Dr. Manhattan orgy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 09:55
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:I did. I remember Rorschach being acted well, young lady superheroine being generic, and CGI Dr. Manhattan orgy. Plus a sex scene that was waaay too graphic.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 10:31
|
|
|
So at least two people saw that unfortunate movie.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 11:01
|
|
|
There's a reason people called it unfilmable.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 14:09
|
|
Tater Love 
|
hallelujah
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 14:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 19:49
|
|
|
What's up with the little islands above Georgia?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 19:52
|
|
|
I'm Kaliningrad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
SaltyJesus posted:What's up with the little islands above Georgia? Georgian enclaves. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...d-Abkhazia.html
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 20:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 14:12 |
|
|
Nope, those are in Georgia and clearly visible on the map.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2017 20:30
|
|