|
you know the drill: a bunch of dudes assembles a nonsense paper and submits it to an academic journal in a field that everybody already knows to be trash which proceeds to eat that poo poo right up this time it's gender studies, the paper is about dicks, and the journal is open access https://twitter.com/peterboghossian/status/865678045369085952 quote:We conclude that penises are not best understood as the male sexual organ, or as a male reproductive organ, but instead as an enacted social construct that is both damaging and problematic for society and future generations. The conceptual penis presents significant problems for gender identity and reproductive identity within social and family dynamics, is exclusionary to disenfranchised communities based upon gender or reproductive identity, is an enduring source of abuse for women and other gender-marginalized groups and individuals, is the universal performative source of rape, and is the conceptual driver behind much of climate change.
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:44
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 05:37 |
|
|
more like Gender Suckies haha
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:48
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:you know the drill: a bunch of dudes assembles a nonsense paper and submits it to an academic journal in a field that everybody already knows to be trash which proceeds to eat that poo poo right up I disagree with nothing in that conclusion.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:49
|
|
|
of course this is getting a few people very worked up https://twitter.com/teresawymore/status/865694816436445184 https://twitter.com/mithicalraven/status/865698346698231808 especially if dick dorkins tweets about it https://twitter.com/mesosuchus/status/865685478246428674
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:of course this is getting a few people very worked up I like dick dorkins a little bit more. But he is still a pompous oval office.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
Cogent Series isn't all that different from self-publishing an ebook on Amazon
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
My HONEYYYY
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:54
|
|
|
Stinky_Pete posted:Cogent Series isn't all that different from self-publishing an ebook on Amazon wait until the entire field springs to the journals defence in like a day or two lol
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
Hmmm
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
hey, turns out if you write a pseudo-academic paper that adds nothing new to a field of study (usually humanities) but checks off the right buzzwords, a bunch of idiots will eat that poo poo up
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:05
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:hey, turns out if you write a pseudo-academic paper that adds nothing new to a field of study (usually humanities) but checks off the right buzzwords, a bunch of idiots will eat that poo poo up Welcome to postmodernism.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:21
|
|
|
my penis is literally responsible for the Armenian genocide I'm sorry everyone
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:26
|
|
|
lmao
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
Les Os posted:my penis is literally responsible for the Armenian genocide I'm sorry everyone do turkish women pretend your penis doesnt exist or do they just all do that regardless
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
please stop calling me dick dorkins
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
gimme the GOD drat candy posted:please stop calling me dick dorkins no
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
OP's penis is so small they classify it as conceptual lol
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Destructive, unsustainable hegemonically male approaches to pressing environmental policy and action are the predictable results of a raping of nature by a male-dominated mindset. This mindset is best captured by recognizing the role of the conceptual penis holds over masculine psychology. When it is applied to our natural environment, especially virgin environments that can be cheaply despoiled for their material resources and left dilapidated and diminished when our patriarchal approaches to economic gain have stolen their inherent worth, the extrapolation of the rape culture inherent in the conceptual penis becomes clear.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
get that OUT of my face posted:hey, turns out if you write a pseudo-academic paper that adds nothing new to a field of study (usually humanities) but checks off the right buzzwords, a bunch of idiots will eat that poo poo up
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:45
|
|
|
Anything that trolls the right wing of good in my book.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:45
|
|
|
On her deathbed, Judith Butler will announce that her entire career was a hoax.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
Somebody needs to get laid...
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:46
|
|
|
T.S. Smelliot posted:My HONEYYYY gimme the GOD drat candy posted:please stop calling me dick dorkins
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:47
|
|
|
VikingSkull posted:Destructive, unsustainable hegemonically male approaches to pressing environmental policy and action are the predictable results of a raping of nature by a male-dominated mindset. This mindset is best captured by recognizing the role of the conceptual penis holds over masculine psychology. When it is applied to our natural environment, especially virgin environments that can be cheaply despoiled for their material resources and left dilapidated and diminished when our patriarchal approaches to economic gain have stolen their inherent worth, the extrapolation of the rape culture inherent in the conceptual penis becomes clear. Still seems legit to me.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:48
|
|
|
Gender studies is usually like a 100 level course where can skip 90% of the classes and still get a C+. 
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
ClamdestineBoyster posted:Gender studies is usually like a 100 level course where can skip 90% of the classes and still get a C+. So like most 100 level courses.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
Okay, this doesn't really mean anything OP. what was the journal? you realize there are lots of journals that will publish anything, including those in the "legitimate" sciences?
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:49
|
|
|
mods perma op pls
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Unfortunately, this isn't a hoax:
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Pick posted:So like most 100 level courses. Nah why not go to half the classes and swap notes and get an A?
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:51
|
|
|
"Sokal exposed an infatuation with academic puffery that characterizes the entire project of academic postmodernism. Our aim was smaller yet more pointed. We intended to test the hypothesis that flattery of the academic Left’s moral architecture in general, and of the moral orthodoxy in gender studies in particular, is the overwhelming determiner of publication in an academic journal in the field. That is, we sought to demonstrate that a desire for a certain moral view of the world to be validated could overcome the critical assessment required for legitimate scholarship. Particularly, we suspected that gender studies is crippled academically by an overriding almost-religious belief that maleness is the root of all evil. On the evidence, our suspicion was justified."
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Repo Man posted:"Sokal exposed an infatuation with academic puffery that characterizes the entire project of academic postmodernism. Our aim was smaller yet more pointed. We intended to test the hypothesis that flattery of the academic Left’s moral architecture in general, and of the moral orthodoxy in gender studies in particular, is the overwhelming determiner of publication in an academic journal in the field. That is, we sought to demonstrate that a desire for a certain moral view of the world to be validated could overcome the critical assessment required for legitimate scholarship. Particularly, we suspected that gender studies is crippled academically by an overriding almost-religious belief that maleness is the root of all evil. On the evidence, our suspicion was justified." Scientists don't know how to test a hypothesis, more at 11 edit: nevermind he's not even a scientist he's an atheist advocate 
Emmideer fucked around with this message at 01:17 on May 20, 2017 |
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:14
|
|
|
wow an article was published in an open access journal so insignificant that it doesn't even have an impact factor not that any of you will care since you all gotta rush in here to do risky move of insulting gender studies on the internet
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
This is good, but stuff like the real peer review Twitter is better because you can just see sincere articles. Parody is fine but unnecessary.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:21
|
|
|
Gender Studies is so weird. They spend all that time, money, and effort to get a piece of paper that tells employers "I will cause trouble don't hire me".
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
jon joe posted:edit: nevermind he's not even a scientist he's an atheist advocate I love gbs because every 2 years they become what they were mocking
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:22
|
|
|
ArtIsResistance posted:wow an article was published in an open access journal so insignificant that it doesn't even have an impact factor Lol if you think gender studies is real, the people doing all the work are the mentally ill people who claim to be 12 genders at once. What's next? A child abuse taskforce run by pedophiles?
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:23
|
|
|
Rape in the 23rd century and the rise of the digital penis dimension.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:28
|
|
|
theperminator posted:Lol if you think gender studies is real, the people doing all the work are the mentally ill people who claim to be 12 genders at once.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 05:37 |
|
|
FactsAreUseless posted:U mad bro? Nah, gender studies is the "the great race space" of the academic world.
|
|
#
?
May 20, 2017 01:37
|
|