Hogge Wild posted:

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

Bombadilillo posted:

I feel like these should be a puzzle. Like if I knew enough pop culture I could guess who it was.

As it is, its just a generic "thing died". Step up your memes universe.

gleebster posted:

pillsburysoldier posted:

https://twitter.com/YareYareZawa/status/867111752433102849

Verisimilidude posted:

gleebster posted:

A GLISTENING HODOR posted:

Seriously. When Spock died you use a picture of Kirk and quote Bones.

When Roger Moore dies you use Connery and quote Lazenby: "This never happened to the other guy".

Get your poo poo together, meme thread.

Jamesman posted:

I don't know what this one is, but in my search I found out about this.

Verisimilidude posted:

Mierenneuker posted:

I loved his role in Hot Fuzz.

Jamesman posted:

Cumslut1895 posted:

he shouldn't have broken the law

Jamesman posted:

He didn't. He got de-gloved at his factory job and, in order to save his hand from being amputated, they sewed it into his stomach until it regrew enough tissue to accept a skin graft.

Love Live the New Flesh

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

It was even weirder than that. After they put his hand into the stomach pouch, the existing belly flesh fused to the mangled hand. Then they cut off the belly flesh since it was now hand-flesh. So he got a tummy tuck out of it, as well as a new boxing glove hand. And apparently he's going to get more surgeries to refine the whole thing and give him fingers.

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

It was even weirder than that. After they put his hand into the stomach pouch, the existing belly flesh fused to the mangled hand. Then they cut off the belly flesh since it was now hand-flesh. So he got a tummy tuck out of it, as well as a new boxing glove hand. And apparently he's going to get more surgeries to refine the whole thing and give him fingers.

Bloody Hedgehog posted:

It was even weirder than that. After they put his hand into the stomach pouch, the existing belly flesh fused to the mangled hand. Then they cut off the belly flesh since it was now hand-flesh. So he got a tummy tuck out of it, as well as a new boxing glove hand. And apparently he's going to get more surgeries to refine the whole thing and give him fingers.

Thump! posted:

Stoatbringer posted:

Moving swiftly on...

DontMockMySmock posted:

Why do people always talk about the future having flying cars? I'm sick of this poo poo. Are you an idiot? Flying cars have been around for 100 years. They're called "airplanes". And "helicopters". Maybe you've heard of them??

But those look different to cars, you say? Well maybe it's loving natural that machines which push against the ground and machines which push against the air would have different designs to solve such different problems. If you were to invent a "flying car" (and it's been done before) you'd just be making an airplane/helicopter that artificially and inefficiently resembles a car for no good reason.

But not everyone can own a plane, like people own cars? Well that's because cars will always, ALWAYS be more efficient than aircraft for short distances. There's no reason to spend so much energy not touching the ground. No matter how cheap "flying cars" could get in your weird imagined future, cars will be cheaper for the average person. So there is no realistic future where the Jetsons becomes reality.

DontMockMySmock posted:

Why do people always talk about the future having flying cars? I'm sick of this poo poo. Are you an idiot? Flying cars have been around for 100 years. They're called "airplanes". And "helicopters". Maybe you've heard of them??

But those look different to cars, you say? Well maybe it's loving natural that machines which push against the ground and machines which push against the air would have different designs to solve such different problems. If you were to invent a "flying car" (and it's been done before) you'd just be making an airplane/helicopter that artificially and inefficiently resembles a car for no good reason.

But not everyone can own a plane, like people own cars? Well that's because cars will always, ALWAYS be more efficient than aircraft for short distances. There's no reason to spend so much energy not touching the ground. No matter how cheap "flying cars" could get in your weird imagined future, cars will be cheaper for the average person. So there is no realistic future where the Jetsons becomes reality.

DontMockMySmock posted:

Why do people always talk about the future having flying cars? I'm sick of this poo poo. Are you an idiot? Flying cars have been around for 100 years. They're called "airplanes". And "helicopters". Maybe you've heard of them??

But those look different to cars, you say? Well maybe it's loving natural that machines which push against the ground and machines which push against the air would have different designs to solve such different problems. If you were to invent a "flying car" (and it's been done before) you'd just be making an airplane/helicopter that artificially and inefficiently resembles a car for no good reason.

But not everyone can own a plane, like people own cars? Well that's because cars will always, ALWAYS be more efficient than aircraft for short distances. There's no reason to spend so much energy not touching the ground. No matter how cheap "flying cars" could get in your weird imagined future, cars will be cheaper for the average person. So there is no realistic future where the Jetsons becomes reality.