|
Orv posted:Oh no friend, read closer. That is a mod for Skyrim, which is a sequel to a weird fetish mod for Oblivion. Maid fetish fiction is Elder Scrolls canon.
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 01:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
i'll wait for the Touch The Skyrim episode on it
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
If you don't spend 30 hours deciding how to dress your maid every time I don't know what to tell you
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 02:23
|
|
|
HenryEx posted:i'll wait for the Touch The Skyrim episode on it Goddamn I hear that theme every time I read those three words.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 03:06
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:25
|
|
|
Argonian lizard tits?
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:27
|
|
|
Kavak posted:Argonian lizard tits? Surprisingly smooth lizard tits at that. Must take a lot of sanding and waxing to get results like that.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:30
|
|
|
Kavak posted:Argonian lizard tits? Deathclaw
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:33
|
|
|
Brainamp posted:Deathclaw I couldn't really tell you why but I always find it hilarious that a scaly monster turned into something vaguely human, even if she still has a monster head, still has perfectly smooth boobs. Even if the rest of her is a hideous, scaly, sharp monster that can be dangerous just kind of standing next to you her breasts will be immaculate.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:I couldn't really tell you why but I always find it hilarious that a scaly monster turned into something vaguely human, even if she still has a monster head, still has perfectly smooth boobs. Even if the rest of her is a hideous, scaly, sharp monster that can be dangerous just kind of standing next to you her breasts will be immaculate. How do you think most modders probably perceive actual women? 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 04:42
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:I couldn't really tell you why but I always find it hilarious that a scaly monster turned into something vaguely human, even if she still has a monster head, still has perfectly smooth boobs. Even if the rest of her is a hideous, scaly, sharp monster that can be dangerous just kind of standing next to you her breasts will be immaculate. Slightly  : http://oglaf.com/dimorphism/
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 05:18
|
|
|
Pocket Sand Returnsquote:Additionally there is a new hat: Dale's Hat. While wearing Dale's hat pocket sand will collect in your pockets every 4 in-game hours. It also channels the essence of Dale, increasing your ability to sniff out a conspiracy by 2, as well as providing a very very minor resist to common methods the government uses to control your mind. It can be crafted at the chem bench in the UTILITY category.
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2017 09:55
|
|
|
Skellybones posted:There's a part of a book where the King of Cormyr yells at his daughter about the importance of never resurrecting a King or Queen, even himself, even if it's from assassination or war, because it would upset too many nobles and violate ancient bullshit laws. That's at least clever.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 04:14
|
|
|
Midnight Voyager posted:That's at least clever. Girl Genius end-ran around the ethical qualms of not resurrecting a person because they were politically significant by societies having laws that vacate any titles you hold at death, even if you're later resurrected. Hope you didn't abuse your family and connections! (Or you can cover up the fact you died  ) Presumably radical longevity treatments and credentials that are a simple matter of competency and experience don't present the same legal kerfuffles.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 04:28
|
|
|
dont be mean to me posted:Girl Genius end-ran around the ethical qualms of not resurrecting a person because they were politically significant by societies having laws that vacate any titles you hold at death, even if you're later resurrected. Hope you didn't abuse your family and connections! (Or you can cover up the fact you died See I feel like it would be more interesting to tell a story based on a society society where resurrection IS fairly commonplace, and what the consequences of that would be, rather than trying to have it mirror historical settings more or less exactly. I think in standard D&D rules there are a few exceptions for even the most powerful resurrection spells (I think the main one is that the person has to WANT to be resurrected for it to work - although I also think death by old age also can't be reversed by resurrection? That one might be a bit fuzzy because of all the various ways people can extend their natural lifespan in that setting so what constitutes "old age" is vague), so it's not like nobody would die ever, but it also means that you can't just kill someone to make your problems go away. It also kind of suggests that if you do kill someone accidentally or in the heat of the moment, the punishment would be a lot less severe than real life. I dunno if anyone who has ever written a D&D book has ever really played with that though. They aren't exactly written by top tier authors. Or even top tier by fantasy standards.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 04:37
|
|
|
Isn't the reagent requirement that most of these systems have a way to get around it? If you can only resurrect someone with a pouch full of diamond dust or a unicorn's horn or something, it becomes a far greater barrier than anyone could deal with normally.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:See I feel like it would be more interesting to tell a story based on a society society where resurrection IS fairly commonplace, and what the consequences of that would be, rather than trying to have it mirror historical settings more or less exactly. I think in standard D&D rules there are a few exceptions for even the most powerful resurrection spells (I think the main one is that the person has to WANT to be resurrected for it to work - although I also think death by old age also can't be reversed by resurrection? That one might be a bit fuzzy because of all the various ways people can extend their natural lifespan in that setting so what constitutes "old age" is vague), so it's not like nobody would die ever, but it also means that you can't just kill someone to make your problems go away. It also kind of suggests that if you do kill someone accidentally or in the heat of the moment, the punishment would be a lot less severe than real life. The Vlad Taltos novels by Steven Brust have exactly that kind of a world, although there are ways to prevent resurrections. Assassination can actually just be a warning in that setting, since you can get better unless they're REALLY pissed and have you killed with a certain variety of soul eating weapon.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
Or if they confiscate the head.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 05:02
|
|
|
The Lone Badger posted:Or if they confiscate the head. I was going to say that you could always zombie or Highlander rules where people can only be resurrected so long as their heads are intact and still connected.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 06:16
|
|
|
IIRC in Taltos the head doesn't have to be connected, but you do have to have it. If some rear end in a top hat takes it with them that'll prevent resurrection.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 06:19
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:See I feel like it would be more interesting to tell a story based on a society society where resurrection IS fairly commonplace, and what the consequences of that would be, rather than trying to have it mirror historical settings more or less exactly. I think in standard D&D rules there are a few exceptions for even the most powerful resurrection spells (I think the main one is that the person has to WANT to be resurrected for it to work - although I also think death by old age also can't be reversed by resurrection? That one might be a bit fuzzy because of all the various ways people can extend their natural lifespan in that setting so what constitutes "old age" is vague), so it's not like nobody would die ever, but it also means that you can't just kill someone to make your problems go away. It also kind of suggests that if you do kill someone accidentally or in the heat of the moment, the punishment would be a lot less severe than real life. It's sci-fi rather than fantasy, but go read Altered Carbon.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 06:21
|
|
|
dont be mean to me posted:Girl Genius end-ran around the ethical qualms of not resurrecting a person because they were politically significant by societies having laws that vacate any titles you hold at death, even if you're later resurrected. Hope you didn't abuse your family and connections! (Or you can cover up the fact you died Then they even goobered that up too to show how screwed up the world is in the comic. Baron Wulfenbach is a construct that has probably died at least once. He was powerful enough to just go "lol gently caress y'all I'm a baron and I run Europe now." He set up Gilgamesh as his heir but it's implied that he's a construct as well or, at the very least, Klaus would "break him down for parts" if his son wasn't good enough. ... Girl Genius is a good comic. Memento posted:Isn't the reagent requirement that most of these systems have a way to get around it? If you can only resurrect someone with a pouch full of diamond dust or a unicorn's horn or something, it becomes a far greater barrier than anyone could deal with normally. Generally yeah. That or the spells to bring back the dead can't bring you back if you died naturally or they bring you back worse than you were. In D&D in particular Raise Dead damages an attribute (always Constitution I think? Or at least it used to be...haven't played since 3.5), Reincarnate brings you back as something different, and Resurrect is crazy expensive. That's really a big question, though; if you can have a priest just go "lol cure X wounds" instead of giving you stitches or splinting a broken arm how will people respond to that? ToxicSlurpee fucked around with this message at 07:26 on Jun 2, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 07:23
|
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Girl Genius is a good comic. Surprising too considering its creators are famous for their weird fetish porn comics that would fit right in with the mods we discuss here.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 07:40
|
|
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:It's sci-fi rather than fantasy, but go read Altered Carbon. Seconding this.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 07:51
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Surprising too considering its creators are famous for their weird fetish porn comics that would fit right in with the mods we discuss here. iirc it got started because (one of ?) the creators wanted to be able to show their kids their work when asked about it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 13:47
|
|
|
Neddy Seagoon posted:It's sci-fi rather than fantasy, but go read Altered Carbon. Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy has a pretty good through-line about the social ramifications of widespread (but not ubiquitous) anti-aging technology as well.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 14:20
|
|
|
It's funny because Foglio is also notorious for also drawing a ton of goofy, cartoonish Magic: The Gathering card art that old school players either love or hate.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 14:23
|
|
|
Agents are GO! posted:Seconding this. thirded
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 14:29
|
|
|
Foglio's art is fuglio. Also gently caress your "Gaslamp Fantasy".
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 14:30
|
|
|
Both of the Foglios drew old-school Magic cards, and they're some of my favourite art from the early sets. (And it's probably worth noting that while their old XXXenophile output can be seriously weird, it's also vastly more sex-positive than the poo poo we've ewwed and arghed at in here.)
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 14:30
|
|
|
I mean the stuff in here is pretty positive about sex.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 15:17
|
|
|
Ahh, Foglio and Oblivion mods, two great sources of lumpen potato people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 16:23
|
|
|
sex......................good??????????????????
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
Bieeardo posted:Both of the Foglios drew old-school Magic cards, and they're some of my favourite art from the early sets. I haven't read much of that but I really don't think Foglio gets into really, really weird fetish territory. He's even said a few times where he draws lines with an attitude of "yeah no that's too far go away." Things can be sexy without being creepy if you do it right. In the case of weird mods it isn't being sexy in a healthy, sex-positive way it's often treating women like they're objects to be used more than anything. Foglio's female characters aren't just sex objects to be ogled. They have actual personalities. It's a pretty big difference.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:Surprising too considering its creators are famous for their weird fetish porn comics that would fit right in with the mods we discuss here. I used to have a set of XXXenophile (six issues). I'd recommend reading it if you ever find copies, it's really funny. It's kinda fetishy but not creepy. From what I've heard from con-goers, Phil and Kaja are awesome people.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
Kokoro Wish posted:Foglio's art is fuglio. Also gently caress your "Gaslamp Fantasy". It's so loving ugly
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:12
|
|
|
Looking it up, hahaha, poo poo, THAT art. Yeah, that style is really loving ugly, but I love it. It's so campy and weird and gross, and it's also over-expressive and wild. Art can be ugly but still have strong merits and be good art, and I loved just looking at that weird poo poo. I seem to recall that an awful lot of the novels I grew up with with that cover art were unfortunately also of the 'campy, weird, and gross' variety, in hindsight.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 03:23
|
|
|
Girl Genius is cool, and good.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 07:28
|
|
|
Girl Genius is contraindicated for persons with a known sensitivity to Foglio art, but it's good. I wish to see more awful mods, please, however.
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 07:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 13:23 |
|
|
Why be chased around by a cosmic horror that looks like a giant blob of bubble gum when you can have a Sexy Erchius Ghost? It's just so sexy. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 3, 2017 10:47
|
|
