|
Trogdos! posted:They realized their mistake and changed it so that you get a full scrap and dust refund now for premiums. No dust->scrap conversion anymore. drat thats a shame
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 08:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
My last two animated cards have been Lubberkins. Stop giving me this card I don't even understand how it works.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 12:35
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:My last two animated cards have been Lubberkins. Stop giving me this card I don't even understand how it works. It's a unit that gets locked every single time it's played, making it a 5 strength silver so not good at all
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 13:56
|
|
|
when it gets locked, decoy it! imagine the value!
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 16:06
|
|
|
All the flying ghost babies. Do we have an eta in the patch going live? I always sort of stall playing waiting for the changes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 18:24
|
|
|
Flipswitch posted:All the flying ghost babies. I would imagine early next week, like last time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2017 18:52
|
|
|
Ran into a rare scenario where the opponent passed a tied first round to me. I was trying to wrap my brain around it, but I think it's definitely in your interest to pass there too? If you play a card you'll win the round but go into round 2 down a card and have to play first. A tie though turns round 2 into sudden death, which depending on your hand/board/faction can be a huge advantage.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 15:04
|
|
|
If you are equal in cards you can play something and gain the card advantage back in r2. If you dry pass in r2 and the opponent had no carryover you're going to get the last play in r3 provided the opponent doesn't gain CA via spies or Tibor for example. However, going from 1 card down to 2 down to win an otherwise tied round probably isn't going to end well for you.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 15:28
|
|
|
Trogdos! posted:However, going from 1 card down to 2 down to win an otherwise tied round probably isn't going to end well for you. Well, you're probably playing the last round one card down either way. It really depends on the specific situation.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
Verify your caches cause patch is out! notes posted:Update 0.9.8 (05 July 2017)
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 16:24
|
|
|
Haha they actually buffed bears again. I guess I wasn't really seeing them anymore now that weather axemen is the new hotness, but lol. Anyways, looks like NR is gonna be the way to go now. I don't see weather monsters being very good anymore, and Consume is probably fine. NG...still looks pretty bad, but maybe it's better than it seems on paper. SK seems like it will still be decent but not nearly as capable of total bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Oh, so Geralt Igni totally ignores the quen shield I gave to my spotters. 57 strength down the drain. GG.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
Turin Turambar posted:Oh, so Geralt Igni totally ignores the quen shield I gave to my spotters. 57 strength down the drain. GG. Yeah, Igni doesn't actually deal damage.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 17:52
|
|
|
Turin Turambar posted:Oh, so Geralt Igni totally ignores the quen shield I gave to my spotters. 57 strength down the drain. GG. Yeah, Shields protect against damaging effects, but not kill effects.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 17:53
|
|
|
Shields are dumb and almost useless. Mechanic could use some help.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
Played 3 ranked matches and not a single weather card was played. Happy loving day Also I think the ranked search might be hosed up. It's crashed twice now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
After milling all of my nerfed cards I went to delete my old decks. The axemen deck had 6 cards left in it. I think it's dead.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
Subvisual Haze posted:Yeah, Shields protect against damaging effects, but not kill effects. Does it protect from Reset effects?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
Turin Turambar posted:Does it protect from Reset effects? Not sure if this interaction was patched in or not, but last time I checked Shield will not protect from Reset effects, but it WILL protect from weaken effects that are resolved at the same time as the Reset (i.e., with Peter Saar, shield will not protect the reset from occurring, but it will shield the weaken).
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
you don't want to live in a world where Quen is hexproof
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
currently playing weather monsters at 3k and on a 5 games winning streak, so, huh,
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
Wow, five whole games huh?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 19:54
|
|
|
Machines got hosed hard, huh? Ballista and Trebuchet limited to 3 targets now, also none of the machines ignore armor anymore. I'd say that's enough to kill the deck(s).
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 20:10
|
|
|
Anyone use the Alba pikemen/spearmen? They seem pretty decent but I'm not sure I get them vs like, golems.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
a bronze that needs to be locked is pretty okay imo
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 21:21
|
|
|
The upside of CDPR's wild flailing re: card balance is that I now have an absolute shitload of scraps. The game is fairly generous as is but all these nerfs have made all my kegs retroactively way more valuable. I can probably get away with not spending money on this game for years and still craft whatever I want.
Magic Underwear fucked around with this message at 22:12 on Jul 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 21:49
|
|
|
These dwarves seem pretty cancerous 
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
Dwarves have been on the cusp of being really good for a long time, so I could definitely see them leaping ahead if some of the tools that are usually really good against them suddenly stop seeing play. They can pull out some ridiculous point swings and they have a ton of board mobility for setting up buffs / getting out of weather, etc.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
man CDPR is being the exact opposite to Blizzard as far things go in their card games, it's hilarious
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
Succubus currently goes off even when both players have passed. It's a fun way to bamboozle someone. Normally the 2nd pass immediately ends the round and end of turn effects don't go off.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:00
|
|
|
Have they talked about bringing this to phones at all?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:02
|
|
|
Reality Winner posted:Have they talked about bringing this to phones at all? I'm sure they're thinking about it, but I doubt it's a priority before the release.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
So can we label this game dead and go back to Hearthstone now?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:08
|
|
|
Hmm. What a strange bug? I won a ranked game, gained more than enough points to rank up from 8 to 9, but it didn't display any rewards on the end o game screen. When I looked at the leaderboards, it shows my points as 1299 instead of what it should be, like 1343 or something.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
General Morden posted:So can we label this game dead and go back to Hearthstone now?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Been playing with this Reveal deck, now without all the nasty weather axemen, it's fun again and has it's success. Behaves pretty good against Consume/Weather monster, not much bothered by NR I have seen so far. Scoia'tel are so far the hardest matchups, but largely cause the ST lists are far more varied so I'm never sure what to predict(and scorch, they run scorch). On the bronze slot I think it's all pretty much good. The bearer is there cause weather didn't go anywhere, and people have discovered that scorch is a thing. The 1xScorpion and the second alchemist are the more flex spots. On the Silver side Cynthia is still the whatever silver spot. Had initially ADC, but I found that this deck goes to 0 cards in last round pretty much every game so cut it out for Cynthia now. Can't really think of anything I'd prefer over her right now, my other idea was Operator to get an extra footmen or spotter but there's already enough card draw, and I tend to mulligan away Spotter and getting an extra on the later rounds after all the big reveals have been played already is not that useful. Might change her for Auckes if I keep seeing more dorf, or even decoy for double Vanhemar/Peter. On the golds nobody playing Avallach right now, so you get to play your whole deck without getting punished. Picked Vilgefortz at first for roasted Roach stuff, ended up keeping him for roasted Vrans and some sneaky cards that Igni struggles to burn. Up Circle posted:Hmm. What a strange bug? I won a ranked game, gained more than enough points to rank up from 8 to 9, but it didn't display any rewards on the end o game screen. When I looked at the leaderboards, it shows my points as 1299 instead of what it should be, like 1343 or something. Quit and enter the game again. It's been like that whole day since patch.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
Reality Winner posted:Have they talked about bringing this to phones at all? It'll come eventually but not until the game is at least out of beta. Look how long Hearthstone's took to come out.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:20
|
|
|
No Wave posted:I sort of see it as a weird experiment in game design that I get to participate in more than I see it as an actual game to ever try at. But we can agree that Blizzard is a billion times better at balancing than CDPR right?
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
No Cahir? I find him too crucial for even more reveals, I tend to also run triple Fire Scorpions. I don't run Roach but I do take Auckes to try to throttle out Consume stuff like Vrans. I don't run any alchemists though but they are pretty nice. I've been running Alzurs to go find that last Spotter in my deck as well and that's been pretty clutch in a few games. Kinda think Emhyr should be able to pick up golds. Might get a bit silly with some cards like Letho or Yennefer though. Flipswitch fucked around with this message at 23:30 on Jul 5, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 00:22 |
|
|
General Morden posted:But we can agree that Blizzard is a billion times better at balancing than CDPR right? The problem is Blizzard takes like 6 months to nerf something and never buffs anything.
|
|
#
?
Jul 5, 2017 23:41
|
|