Nintendo? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Nintendon't | 45 | 22.73% | |
Nintendoomed | 22 | 11.11% | |
Nintendrone | 13 | 6.57% | |
Nintendovahkiin | 55 | 27.78% | |
Nintend'oh! | 63 | 31.82% | |
Total: | 198 votes |
|
oddium posted:no the cheapest 1050 ti's run about $150 and that's about the best you can hope for: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814126172&FM=1 anything cheaper and you're basically paying for an integrated graphics card that isn't integrated
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:27 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:38 |
|
in related news my new case arrived today so time to spend the next 4 hours pulling parts out of one case just to put them all back in a different case
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:29 |
|
oddium posted:hmm i am strongly considering You could be like me and play games on consoles You just put the disc in/wait for the 9GB patch to download + you're good to go
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:31 |
|
50 - Super budget option w/ last gen tech basically 60 - Workhorse for med-high settings on current gen 70 - Sweet spot for price/performance on high-ultra 80 - PC nerd cards who can't abide anything below max settings ti -
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:34 |
|
Help Im Alive posted:You could be like me and play games on consoles my personal bias notwithstanding i get the feeling even a used console is going to run you more than $160 smackers unless you're buying like a ds or something
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:34 |
|
fwiw I have a 1060 and it runs pretty much everything at high/ultra. It'd run even better but I have an ultrawide monitor so I run games at a super high resolution. I'll probably start having to drop settings in a year or two though.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:36 |
|
The Silver Snail posted:I'm not sure you can have a late breakfast if a big loving basket of french fries is involved. I think you'll just have two lunches today. Wrong, I broke my twelve hour fast with it
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:37 |
|
I've still got a 970 I bought three years ago and it has yet to disappoint.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:37 |
|
always buy the graphics card that costs ~$300 at the time of your purchase. that is the correct amount to pay for a graphics card.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:38 |
|
The Silver Snail posted:I'm not sure you can have a late breakfast if a big loving basket of french fries is involved. I think you'll just have two lunches today. When you have breakfast for dinner it's still dinner
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:38 |
|
PantsBandit posted:fwiw I have a 1060 and it runs pretty much everything at high/ultra. It'd run even better but I have an ultrawide monitor so I run games at a super high resolution. I kind of welcome prolonged console generations because it means PC cards remain totally overpowered for longer periods of time.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:38 |
|
Serf posted:I've still got a 970 I bought three years ago and it has yet to disappoint. Yeah same, I upgraded about the time Witcher 3 came out and it's ran everything fine
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:51 |
|
exquisite tea posted:50 - Super budget option w/ last gen tech basically exquisite tea, 2018 posted:80ti - can't even run assassin's creed egypt on medium settings
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 21:54 |
|
i don't think that's how that works
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:17 |
|
Cowcaster posted:in related news my new case arrived today so time to spend the next 4 hours pulling parts out of one case just to put them all back in a different case I hate this part of PC upgrading but it is an essential (literally) part of being a PC gamer
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:18 |
|
Wamdoodle posted:I hate this part of PC upgrading but it is an essential (literally) part of being a PC gamer for me it's worse because i assembled 95% of my new rig reusing the old case from my last pc and just used my old graphics card while waiting for my new one to arrive, then when the card arrived earlier this week i found out it doesn't fit in the old case. so this is the second time i'm doing it.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:21 |
|
I made my PC back when Fallout 3 came out, so late 2008. Since then, I've upgraded my graphics card twice: once for Human Revolution (2011) and again in 2016 for Dark Souls 3. I had to switch out my power supply at some point, but otherwise I'm using all the same parts. Right now, I think the limiting factor is the actual processor, but I'm no computer scientist PC is good
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:27 |
|
I've had a 970 for a few years now and it's been great but I turn down graphics a lot because I don't care
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:29 |
|
Jay Rust posted:I made my PC back when Fallout 3 came out, so late 2008. Since then, I've upgraded my graphics card twice: once for Human Revolution (2011) and again in 2016 for Dark Souls 3. I had to switch out my power supply at some point, but otherwise I'm using all the same parts. Right now, I think the limiting factor is the actual processor, but I'm no computer scientist 2008? Yeah probably a little bit. Still though, 10 year is insane.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:32 |
|
Yeah as long as I keep a steady frame rate of 30+ I'm content
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:32 |
|
I've had a 960 for I don't know how long and I can play new releases just fine. That said I have a 1680x1050 monitor because idgaf. I'm sure I'd have terrible performance if I tried going to 4k.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:34 |
|
Cowcaster posted:for me it's worse because i assembled 95% of my new rig reusing the old case from my last pc and just used my old graphics card while waiting for my new one to arrive, then when the card arrived earlier this week i found out it doesn't fit in the old case. so this is the second time i'm doing it. My MSI-brand 970 baaaarrreely fit in my old case and the cooling isn't exactly ideal- prob will just buy a new one whenever I need a new motherboard, whenever that is. Current one is like 8 years old. drat so is the power supply- something's gonna break sooner or later but I've been Frankenstein-ing parts in there over time to keep up and it's worked fine so far
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:35 |
|
The Moon Monster posted:I've had a 960 for I don't know how long and I can play new releases just fine. That said I have a 1680x1050 monitor because idgaf. I'm sure I'd have terrible performance if I tried going to 4k. Everyone has terrible performance at 4K. 1440p is where most people top out, but even that requires a shitload of money because people will spring for 110+hz monitors. $800-1000 GPU on top of a $550-700 monitor type stuff.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:41 |
|
I've been trying to finish Yakuza 0 before Kiwami comes out at the end of the month and I've been having a pretty good time. Enjoying the story way more than I expected.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:43 |
|
The Colonel posted:as a close associate of littleorv, i can confirm he is not alright and is in fact a punkish crook and i love him dearly I appreciate your love
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:45 |
|
Propaganda Hour posted:Everyone has terrible performance at 4K. 1440p is where most people top out, but even that requires a shitload of money because people will spring for 110+hz monitors. $800-1000 GPU on top of a $550-700 monitor type stuff. diderot_effect.txt
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:49 |
|
Monkey Fracas posted:My MSI-brand 970 baaaarrreely fit in my old case and the cooling isn't exactly ideal- prob will just buy a new one whenever I need a new motherboard, whenever that is. Current one is like 8 years old. drat so is the power supply- something's gonna break sooner or later but I've been Frankenstein-ing parts in there over time to keep up and it's worked fine so far I have a 3570K but I'm still running it at stock clocks because I didn't realise that pretty much none of the affordable non-stock coolers fit in my case properly (or, at least, none of the ones available at the time did). I keep meaning to get that sorted, but to be honest I've had very few games where my CPU's been the limiting factor (GTA V, maybe?), so I've never bothered. I guess I'll just get a new case when I finally upgrade, but my 970/3570K's been more than enough for 1080p for years now, and I'm certainly not dropping a bunch of cash on a new monitor anytime soon, so
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:50 |
|
i have a gtx 750ti and an amd athlon x4 750k and i can run pc ports of modern jrpgs and bayonetta at 60fps on medium settings at 1680x1050 ama
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:51 |
|
The Colonel posted:i have a gtx 750ti and an amd athlon x4 750k and i can run pc ports of modern jrpgs and bayonetta at 60fps on medium settings at 1680x1050 ama What's you're favorite mega man game
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:54 |
|
Across all iterations and series....could be classic, battle network, legends, Zero etc. it's all on the table
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:55 |
|
In Training posted:What's you're favorite mega man game a tie between mega man zero 3 and 4
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:55 |
|
I like 9 and X
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:56 |
|
My favorite Mega Man game is Mega Man Soccer, second best is the fighting game
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:57 |
|
9 and x are pretty good. i think 9 has better level design than a lot of the classic series but i haven't properly played through the old nes ones in a while, i have a hard time staying interested in playing them
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:58 |
|
The Colonel posted:a tie between mega man zero 3 and 4 I should play the Zero games
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:58 |
|
The Colonel posted:9 and x are pretty good. i think 9 has better level design than a lot of the classic series but i haven't properly played through the old nes ones in a while, i have a hard time staying interested in playing them 2-5 are all pretty awesome imo. By the time you get to 5 the stages are a little too easy and stale but it's still a good time. I wonder how many people are gonna get the second legacy collection
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:59 |
|
In Training posted:I should play the Zero games zero 1 is kind of a mess and some of the boss designs and missions suck and the lives system is utter garbage but it has some neat concepts. zero 2 is a big improvement but the unskippable cutscenes are kind of annoying and the weapon level system is still there. zero 3 and 4 are pretty much the perfect zero games, they let you skip cutscenes, get rid of the weapon level system and are basically just insanely tight action games from start to finish
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 22:59 |
|
Maybe due to being on handheld, but the camera seemed way too close in Zero. Like you could barely see in front of you.
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 23:01 |
|
it gets kind of annoying but the camera is a much bigger issue in zero 1 than it is in the later games, because zero 1 isn't really designed with any consideration of it while the later games are much better about it. zero 1 has a bunch of bits where it's really easy to steer yourself into instant death pits just because you can't see, the only bit i can think of like that off the top of my head in the later games is the water areas in zero 3 and zx and the big tree tower in zx advent
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 23:02 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:38 |
|
That DS collection is the way to go, yeah?
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 23:04 |