|
I don't think there's a single comedy podcast whose live eps I can enjoy. There's just something about that dynamic, when you're trying to riff for a crowd that's present.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 06:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 17:44 |
|
Punkin Spunkin posted:I don't think there's a single comedy podcast whose live eps I can enjoy. There's just something about that dynamic, when you're trying to riff for a crowd that's present. I can't imagine going to a live Podcast. To go and pay $20+ to see two to five people sit at a table and talk into microphones for under an hour (live episodes seem to run shorter) baffles me. Especially when people travel serious distances to attend. I'm not saying I'd never do it, but it's nothing I feel I'm missing out on.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 11:29 |
|
Jose Oquendo posted:Man, it's definitely a gotta see it to believe it movie. Track it down. If you get your TV through an antenna and one of your local stations carries the Comet sub-channel, they show it on occasion. That's how I caught it a few months ago for the first time since it came out on home video.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 12:15 |
|
Iron Crowned posted:If you get your TV through an antenna and one of your local stations carries the Comet sub-channel, they show it on occasion. That's how I caught it a few months ago for the first time since it came out on home video. Comet actually has a free live stream on their website. I check it out once in a while.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 13:50 |
|
Indolent Bastard posted:I can't imagine going to a live Podcast. To go and pay $20+ to see two to five people sit at a table and talk into microphones for under an hour (live episodes seem to run shorter) baffles me. Especially when people travel serious distances to attend. The only podcast I want to see live is Todd Glass, dude puts off so much energy it's infectious. And like an hour is just getting warmed up for the real show, most podcasts end before his gets started!
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:39 |
Indolent Bastard posted:I can't imagine going to a live Podcast. To go and pay $20+ to see two to five people sit at a table and talk into microphones for under an hour (live episodes seem to run shorter) baffles me. Especially when people travel serious distances to attend. Can Steve Sajdak puke on you while you're listening to the podcast at your desk? It's a bit baffling to not realize the difference between live vs. listening to a recording. Like, I realize that this isn't a concert or something, but I've gone to live podcasts before (Snap Judgment) and while that show is definitely different, listening to the stories on the podcast vs. live are definitely tangibly different. There's a lot lost when you lose expressions, gestures, etc. Of course Snap Judgment is a storytelling podcast so that's sorta inherently different, but I imagine it's the difference between seeing a comedian live and listening to the act on mp3 afterwards. You lose a lot of the energy of the moment
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 14:48 |
|
I mean, you could make the same arguments for standup comedians. MP3 exists, why bother going to see some guy stand there talking? There's no reason podcasters can't become stand-up (or let's face it) sit-down comics and speakers. Harmontown, for example, is always live, they interact with the audience a lot and get a lot from it. Not all podcasts are low energy table sessions. Hell, Andrew is doing physical bits in the latest episode: https://www.instagram.com/p/BXbw2Otgv9h/?tagged=whmpodcast
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 15:34 |
|
Yeah, haven't been to a podcast but live comedy shows have energy from the crowd that kind of "tricks" you into finding funny stuff much more funny, it's usually a great time. Of course if it's not your thing it's not your thing, don't worry about it.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 15:49 |
Only live podcast recording I've been to is Doug Loves Movies, and that was a really good time. That was before the donut throwing started, though.
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 15:53 |
|
It's okay to like a
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 15:54 |
|
I just wanna see Andrew do the Mac and Me walk, okay
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 16:17 |
|
that's the link i posted up ^ https://www.instagram.com/p/BXbw2Ot...gged=whmpodcast
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 16:38 |
|
Going to see mbmbam this weekend, will be my first live Podcast thing. Hopefully it does not suck
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 18:54 |
|
I think live shows is what killed How Did This Get Made for me because every one was just overblown catchphrases and Jason playing to the audience the whole time.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 19:46 |
|
Dr. Clockwork posted:I think live shows is what killed How Did This Get Made for me because every one was just overblown catchphrases and Jason playing to the audience the whole time.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 19:51 |
|
WHM Live for Suburban Commando and Batman & Robin was awesome live. Actually seeing their expressions and interactions made it that much funnier. Plus Steve spitting on the audience.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 20:54 |
|
I just went and looked up Stewart Raffill's other works; I'm surprised they didn't call out that he also directed Ice Pirates, Mannequin II: On the Move (stay tuned?), or Tammy and the T-Rex.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 21:03 |
Evil Mastermind posted:I agree, but I think that's a different situation than WHM. HDTGM started going bad when they began leaning too hard on their running gags of June not understanding basic things in the movie and Jason doing his gross-out/pervert jokes, but even despite that they never had the "actually discuss the movie from start to finish" structure of WHM. Right, because of this, I actually prefer the live episodes of HDTGM to the studio ones. Their episodes are always a mess of half sentences, interrupting each other, and barely discussing the movie, so if you haven't seen the movie, you won't get the jokes. The live episodes at least have some energy pulled from the crowd, and it's still entertaining to me. The flip side of that is that I can listen to a WHM for a movie I've never even heard of and still get the jokes and enjoy the episode.
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 21:13 |
|
Evil Mastermind posted:I agree, but I think that's a different situation than WHM. HDTGM started going bad when they began leaning too hard on their running gags of June not understanding basic things in the movie and Jason doing his gross-out/pervert jokes, but even despite that they never had the "actually discuss the movie from start to finish" structure of WHM. OH yeah for the record I've enjoyed WHM's live shows so far.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 21:33 |
I'm not generally a huge fan of the live episodes but the Silver Surfer one might just be the best of the whole ding dong series
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:08 |
|
I've come to like the live shows more now that the sound quality has gotten better. Some of the earlier ones were borderline incomprehensible due to the audio issues present in the recordings.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:11 |
|
Evil Mastermind posted:I just went and looked up Stewart Raffill's other works; I'm surprised they didn't call out that he also directed Ice Pirates, Mannequin II: On the Move (stay tuned?), or Tammy and the T-Rex. Mannequin II is the one you call out as a possible stay tuned, and not loving Tammy and the T-Rex?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:28 |
|
Yeah Mannequin 2 is a pale repeat of the first one, which was pretty bad, but still had a little heart at least. The sequel just has...nothing. Tammy and the T-Rex on the other hand is just all sorts of fuckin weird. Plus young Paul Walker and Denise Richards.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:51 |
|
Jose Oquendo posted:Tammy and the T-Rex on the other hand is just all sorts of fuckin weird. Plus young Paul Walker and Denise Richards. This is massively, massively underselling how bonkers Tammy and the T-Rex is. I was going to write a basic plot summary of the film, but then I realized there is no way I can explain this movie without sounding like I'm loving insane, so here's the Wikipedia plot summary: quote:The film opens with Tammy at cheerleader practice, while her boyfriend Michael walks in from football practice to observe. The two of them meet Byron, Tammy's gay friend, who approves of Michael as her new boyfriend. Shortly thereafter, Tammy's violent and jealous ex-boyfriend Billy arrives with his gang and harasses Michael. A violent fight erupts between Billy and Michael, with Billy gaining the upper hand by grabbing Michael by the testicles. Michael retaliates by grabbing Billy by his testicles in the same fashion. The police arrive to break up the fight and get the two boys to release the grip on one another, with Billy clearly in pain, but Michael unfazed due to his wearing a protective cup. The police take Billy into custody, but Tammy, unable to deal with the events, breaks down and runs away in tears. Every loving word of this actually happens in the movie. This is not the result of a particularly creative Wiki vandal, this is a perfectly accurate summary of the movie.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 22:55 |
|
Tammy and the T-Rex is a movie I thought I saw during a fever dream as a kid. Nope, it's just that batshit crazy.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2017 23:15 |
|
How has no bad movie podcast made their way through the Prehysteria trilogy?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 00:40 |
|
Inkspot posted:How has no bad movie podcast made their way through the Prehysteria trilogy? Why would anyone mock those masterpieces. Me irl:
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 00:40 |
|
Jose Oquendo posted:Yeah Mannequin 2 is a pale repeat of the first one, which was pretty bad, but still had a little heart at least. The sequel just has...nothing. ...except a magnificent line reading of "now we fly away, TO BERMUDAAAAA!". Why I remember this ridiculous line from this idiotic movie I haven't seen in 25 years remains a mystery.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 02:00 |
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:Mannequin II is the one you call out as a possible stay tuned, and not loving Tammy and the T-Rex? ...when's Viewer Request Month again? I was thinking of calling in Hudson Hawk but those would be good options too.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:08 |
|
Hudson Hawk?! Are you implying you don't love every second of that film when we still haven't gotten a Thirteen Ghosts episode?
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:27 |
|
Mannequin II might be a fun episode, but I want to see the guys' utter bafflement at Tammy and the T-Rex. It's borderline Miami Connection levels of "what the actual gently caress how does this movie exist."
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:28 |
|
Inkspot posted:Hudson Hawk?! Are you implying you don't love every second of that film when we still haven't gotten a Thirteen Ghosts episode? They can't all be Ultraviolet, people.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:30 |
|
Bonus points if you/your date/anyone in the theater actively vomited during the screening. Speaking of... next RLM I'm requesting Return to OZ.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 03:36 |
|
Return To Oz owns, it's just horrifying
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 05:10 |
|
Evil Mastermind posted:They'd both be great potential episodes. Hudson Hawk should be a We Love Movies, because that movie is a loving glorious trainwreck. I love it so much.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 16:43 |
|
2003's Paycheck, with Ben Affleck, Uma Thurman, Paul Giamatti and Aaron Eckhart. Directed by John Woo. It's a real stinker. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo_wPMW7U48 Gonz fucked around with this message at 17:25 on Sep 7, 2017 |
# ? Sep 7, 2017 17:20 |
|
I appreciate Hudson Hawk in the same way that I appreciate Street Fighter: The Movie, in that despite it being an utter train wreck, it's at least a compelling train wreck to watch. Both movies feel like the people making them felt like they were doing something really important, and that effort goes a long way in making them both more enjoyable viewing experience. If I remember correctly, Hawk was a bit of a passion project for Bruce Willis, which makes its screaming journey into incoherency all the more fascinating.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 17:26 |
|
Fart City posted:I appreciate Hudson Hawk in the same way that I appreciate Street Fighter: The Movie, in that despite it being an utter train wreck, it's at least a compelling train wreck to watch. Both movies feel like the people making them felt like they were doing something really important, and that effort goes a long way in making them both more enjoyable viewing experience. If I remember correctly, Hawk was a bit of a passion project for Bruce Willis, which makes its screaming journey into incoherency all the more fascinating. It was supposed to be a launching pad for his "singing" career.
|
# ? Sep 7, 2017 22:09 |
|
MariusLecter posted:It was supposed to be a launching pad for his "singing" career. you could have a podcast episode just on The Return Of Bruno and how awful it was
|
# ? Sep 8, 2017 05:41 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 17:44 |
|
Whm is doing Samurai Cop this month, I saw it in theaters with a rifftrax live event thing, it was amazing and should make a great episode.
|
# ? Sep 8, 2017 14:43 |