|
Sitting Here posted:vote jonjoe since he's not playing lol. im dumb
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 02:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 05:30 |
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:why those people, specifically? SebMojo because he is corrupt QuoproQuid because he was the first to sling an unironic accusation. I'll be honest, if we are "really" playing I side with Muffin with the no-kill strat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 02:47
|
|
|
I am willing to believe muffin and trex are not horrible murderers QPQ and mojo I am ambiguous on everyone else terrifies me, gtf away
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 02:53
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 03:49
|
|
|
exmond and muffin seem town to me. the former because his reactions read as genuine and the latter because it seems unlikely that scum would backtrack after a call for a no-lynch im most suspicious of sittinghere, t-rex, and b-mond1. my suspicions against sh started as a joke but i havent like her reactions and stuff
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 04:11
|
|
|
oh nooo my reactions started as a joke to your joke suspicion aaaahhh
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:oh nooo my reactions started as a joke to your joke suspicion aaaahhh we all float down hereee
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 04:55
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:exmond and muffin seem town to me. the former because his reactions read as genuine and the latter because it seems unlikely that scum would backtrack after a call for a no-lynch I think that T-rex was kind of suspicious just making a vote against you like that, but you also started poo poo-flinging. I don't think id vote against SH yet. I'd like to hear other peoples reactions to 1) SittingHere being scum 2) SebMojo being scum Also is one of us gonna die at night time? Or two of us?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
I'm not really sure what you're basing the mojo thing on. You kept calling him 'corrupt' earlier and I kinda figured it was joke-phase stuff about him being a mod but I'd like to hear what you're thinking now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 05:35
|
|
|
I'm not scum, and any pick at this point is pure random so only serves the cause of evil. sound monkey would have wanted us to work together people! dangling from a rope twisting in the stagnant air strange fruity ex mod
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 05:38
|
|
|
I didn't think seb was scum until he just denied math.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 05:52
|
|
|
SurreptitiousMuffin posted:I'm not really sure what you're basing the mojo thing on. You kept calling him 'corrupt' earlier and I kinda figured it was joke-phase stuff about him being a mod but I'd like to hear what you're thinking now. Look at this man's avatar. Is it the avatar of a man who lost last weeks thunderdome. NAY IT IS NOT! Thus i say SebMojo is CORRUPT! BURN DOWN THE SYSTEM, BURN THE MODS! I.. I'll be honest I don't know how long I can continue with this lovely joke
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 06:08
|
|
|
Thranguy posted:yronic's the quietest, which might be suspicious. Busy until now. No strong suspicions but I'm re-reading.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 07:00
|
|
|
T-Rex could just be enthusiastic. I agree the vote did not look good. But my first ever game I piled on for dumb town reasons and got turboed for it D1. I was the town cop that game.Exmond posted:My list of suspcious people, ranked in order Feels like fishing for votes. You are the one I'm most focused on so far.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 07:18
|
|
|
sebmojo posted:I'm not scum, and any pick at this point is pure random so only serves the cause of evil. What is the math on a day one lynching where a murderer successfully proposes the target? The murderer knows the random target is going come out of (# townsfolk)+(#scum-1), so its more likely to hit a goodie. What I'm saying is we should prob lynch exmond on account of his unmotivated murderboner for me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 08:59
|
|
|
here's my feelings as a newb playing with other newbs: people who benefit from town people killing each other will probably try to insight the mobbing and get us to vote against our own. people who are crying for level heads and feel reluctant to kill are probably town people trying to look out for each other, especially those of us who haven't played before and are more concerned with the unspeakable horrors outside the windows. (QPQ might possibly be the exception, since he pointed out that not killing anyone on day one would reduce the chance of town victory. If not executing anyone on day one would truly benefit scum, then it would've made more sense to keep quiet about that) Mojo is ambiguous but there's literally no reason to vote for him over any other random person. muffin is muffin. trex....idk man, you backed me up on the QPQ vote but now i'm wondering if that was a jump to start a bandwagon to take out town people. I wanna trust you man but idk i just dk. exmond, i'm starting to suspect you. everyone else is ambiguous at this point. Anyway, i think if the scum take me out at night, it'll be very telling verrry telling indeed as to who's who
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 09:54
|
|
|
Exmond do you have a real reason for suspecting mojo? because im not seeing it
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:01
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:exmond, i'm starting to suspect you. I give you a few scenarios 1) I am the worst scum player ever I immediately call out sebmojo in the first post of the game and stick with it despite having no backup and it being very, very, VERY obvious. Nobody has agreed with me and nobody has suspected seb mojo 2) I am a new player playing with a group that allready knows each other and I am unironically poo poo posting to try and fit it I unironically poo poo posting (Using clone high as a reference so its funny) in an attempt to fit in with a group that already knows each other and hangs out on IRC. i continue to stick wtih the joke (Though I waver because I am Canadian and im worried seb mojo might take it personally) since I want people to think im "Funny" and "Likeable". I'm also new so by making a hilarious post I can hopefully figure out how to play as other people post useful information. And I will use your own words in my defence Sitting Here posted:people who are crying for level heads and feel reluctant to kill are probably town people trying to look out for each other, especially those of us who haven't played before and are more concerned with the unspeakable horrors outside the windows. Exmond posted:I'll be honest, if we are "really" playing I side with Muffin with the no-kill strat. Exmond posted:Also is one of us gonna die at night time? Or two of us? Exmond posted:I.. I'll be honest I don't know how long I can continue with this lovely joke I will let you decide!
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:07
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:Exmond do you have a real reason for suspecting mojo? because im not seeing it #JonJoeshouldGetALosingAvatar I have no reason save for the above, please see my response where I say I cannot continue the lovely joke
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
 Votecount for Day 1   QuoProQuid (2): Sitting Here, Tyrannosaurus Sitting Here (1): QuoProQuid Tyrannosaurus (1): Thranguy Not Voting (5): b-minus1, Exmond, sebmojo, SurreptitiousMuffin, yronic heroismWith 9 people still trapped in the library, it takes 5 votes to execute someone. The current deadline is September 21st, 2017 at 8 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 9 hours, 30 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:29
|
|
|
Him. Reevaluating. ##vote: T-Rex For the most substantively suspicious act.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
Rex, who is your scumbro?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 15:56
|
|
|
I'm not feeling either of these cases that much. T-Rex did something and it's probably enough for a typical D1 case but the second of five votes isn't too much of scum tell. I'm open to a no execute but we will need 5 of 8 to execute tomorrow, means town really needs to stick together on a d2 vote.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:34
|
|
|
By either of these cases I mean Rex or QPQ.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
Other thoughts: I am not very suspicious of sh at all but they could be playing us if they're a decent writer. I personally feel good about seb, solid posting, seems pro-town.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
I thought town had to kill someone every turn tbh
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:39
|
|
|
Why do you want a no lynch after the discussion above?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:42
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Why do you want a no lynch after the discussion above? I don't want to hit town and like I said I'm not feeling these choices. I'd prefer to vote for Exmond.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
In fact, that's my vote for now anyway ##vote exmond
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:49
|
|
|
On mobile. Why Exmond?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Is there anything more than the "fishing" post?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 16:55
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:On mobile. Why Exmond? Phew, you should read my defence post.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:01
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Is there anything more than the "fishing" post? Yeah. I really didn't like it, found it more scum seeming than Rex's vote tbh. Seems like covering his bases to test for momentum against multiple targets.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Yeah. I really didn't like it, found it more scum seeming than Rex's vote tbh. Seems like covering his bases to test for momentum against multiple targets. I like how they are ignoring any posts where I defend myself.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:23
|
|
|
Can see it but am not convinced. See it as more townie not knowing what they are doing. The follow-up defense strikes me as a little more odd, but I would rather lynch someone else.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:47
|
|
|
Exmond posted:I give you a few scenarios The defensiveness here gives me pause but I don't know how much of that is new player anxiety.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
What do you think of b-minus?
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 17:51
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:What do you think of b-minus? Lurking pretty hard. Would.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
yronic heroism posted:Lurking pretty hard. Would. True, I tend to lurk on d1 but I am lurking more than usual. I'll put a stop to that.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 05:30 |
|
|
Battery is dying. That's all I have for now. I'll check back in a few hours.
|
|
#
?
Sep 21, 2017 18:11
|
|