|
What do you think about :b-minus1 posted:I mean you're welcome to investigate me if you want lol. it would just be a waste and yes this is a hardclaim that i am vanilla town and Hal Incandenza posted:Generally agree its better not to vote pERA today even though she is being suspiciously quiet
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 02:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
1) "why me fry me", investigate b- ffs 2) I'm not seriously entertaining anything specifically designed to get to me, but fwiw I think it's pretty fuckin weird to intentionally chill my desire to engage and then call my absence suspicious. would vitriol vote
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 03:25
|
|
|
Retro is always scum tbh
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 03:38
|
|
|
bminus’s conduct thus far reminds me a lot of his play in “Death of the Author,” where he flipped scum. It’s the same jokey, mechanics-focused posting. I have expressed issue with Hal’s equivocating before, but bminus’s most investigation posts give me a worse vibe. I would lean toward a discussion focused on him/her tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 03:41
|
|
|
"maybe we should not kill peranene on day 1 and instead investigate another player" "here are two people that have mostly been afk, perhaps we could start with them" - why these two and not you instead?!?! "Investigate if you want but I'm town" ^^^^can you please tell me how you would respond?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 03:54
|
|
|
I have surveyed all the evidence and I believe we should be investigating Tired Moritz
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 04:43
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:bminus’s conduct thus far reminds me a lot of his play in “Death of the Author,” where he flipped scum. It’s the same jokey, mechanics-focused posting. I wasn't equivocating, I was making a mechanics related point.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 04:45
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:Retro is always scum tbh I've never been scum in my life
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 04:46
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:I've never been scum in my life Sounds like something scum would say.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 05:15
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:think about it. theres no game in history where everyone but 1 player, who was confirmed town, was lynched day 1. this is the chance to have your name forever enshrined in the hall of mafia legends until it's bulldozed in 2020 due to this website shutting down then Not against this idea. It'd be possible if everyone voted themselves just once and gulag voted pera for her +1 over everyone else. Pmom brings down the hammer. Town wins.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 07:28
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:bminus’s conduct thus far reminds me a lot of his play in “Death of the Author,” where he flipped scum. It’s the same jokey, mechanics-focused posting. Is it your previous experience with him that makes you lean scum? Because a lot of other people have discussed a pragmatic mechanics-based vote. I have to run to work. I'll be back in the evening and I'll do what I can to make something out of this mess. 1 last question Jeabus Mahogany. Is Pera talking to you a lot in your masonry? And what besides makes you feel so certain that she's town? That is to say, besides the role you play as her attorney do you think she's come off as truthful and sincere to you in your chats, and why exactly?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 07:31
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:Why else would she be on trial? Innocent people don't go to jail. Only if we do our jobs properly! Diqnol posted:I once saw Peramene take a lady's cane, break off the end and give it back to the lady to cause her back problems! The courts have addressed this! The cane was too big for her, it was an act of assistance! The lady in fact provided recompense in the form of a home-baked cookie! Diqnol posted:Another time Peramene played forums survivor and should therefore surely be executed. Bigotry will not be tolerated in these venerable halls. Diqnol posted:And finally, does your client seem innocent? She sought your council over such great orators as I and Pinterest Mom. She picked you because she's looking to get off on the "my lawyer is a bumbling stuntman from The Lion King" defense. Stop doing backflips and open your eyes. This court is not one of "seems".It is one of COLD. HARD. FACTS. In the interest of keeping these proceedings dignified, I shall ignore your blatant attempt to discredit my integrity. Pinterest Mom posted:Peramene is the only person in the game I know is not the DA, so that makes her mathematically most likely to be scum. Your research has flawed reasoning, as evidenced: Jonathan Fisk posted:Could be a slick DA gambit actually this is a stickup posted:"peramene" directly translates to "myself guilty" in old bunun In Old Angiln it directly translates to "completely innocent". Diqnol posted:I look at Pera's posts and what do I see? Very little. She's hiding something. Well I see a poor falsely accused soul. It is my duty to ensure that the court see it too. Diqnol posted:*in shrill voice, voice thrown to the back of the room* Burn the witch! If I could ask the police to arrest this arsonist? They have no place here. Hal Incandenza posted:Generally agree its better not to vote pERA today even though she is being suspiciously quiet Others have addressed this, but I include it here for completion's sake. 100YrsofAttitude posted:1 last question Jeabus Mahogany. Is Pera talking to you a lot in your masonry? And what besides makes you feel so certain that she's town? That is to say, besides the role you play as her attorney do you think she's come off as truthful and sincere to you in your chats, and why exactly? I have consulted with my client, and while I refuse to break confidentiality, I will say I am confident in this case, as I am in all cases!
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 08:22
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Is it your previous experience with him that makes you lean scum? Because a lot of other people have discussed a pragmatic mechanics-based vote. Reminds me of past behavior. b-minus1 posted:"maybe we should not kill peranene on day 1 and instead investigate another player" Probably by stating my reasoning from the get-go and finding a justification that didn't revolve solely around lurking.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 12:06
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:In Old Angiln it directly translates to "completely innocent". I cannot dispute this bold claim
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 12:59
|
|
|
Right I'm off to bed for a bit.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
I'm not going to be engaging with people roleplaying as lawyers tbh
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 13:37
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I'm not going to be engaging with people roleplaying as lawyers tbh mostly same but it's fine this early imo
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 14:09
|
|
|
im gonna roleplay as a psychic tho
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 14:14
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:im gonna roleplay as a psychic tho who wins
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 15:49
|
|
|
Diqnol posted:Another time Peramene played forums survivor and should therefore surely be executed. This statement is 100% true but has nothing to do with this game
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 15:51
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:I'm not going to be engaging with people roleplaying as lawyers tbh There seem to be enough nuggets of truth for me to believe that Jebus at least believes whatever pera's been saying in their masonry. Now they just have to convince us to believe it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:15
|
|
|
peramene posted:who wins i need someone to die first have we agreed to choose someone already
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:i need someone to die first I think it was you!
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
do you reallly want to waste a clear on me though
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:42
|
|
|
No. we do not. everyone vote for yourself so we can carry out the plan to destroy lm's psyche
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
lol sure ##vote tired moritz
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:46
|
|
|
Confused. Thought the only possible votes were to declare perm innocent or guilty
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 17:56
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Confused. Thought the only possible votes were to declare perm innocent or guilty you can vote for anyone! the defendant system is a cosmetic add-on to the mafia game that allows the judge to fudge with the execution, and might give a couple players a boon. (voting for me is probably useless, but besides that.)
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:02
|
|
|
I'm awake
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:09
|
|
|
Coming to you live from innovation in game design think tank something awful dot com, direct from today's judge: people having fun is bad
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:18
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:you can vote for anyone! the defendant system is a cosmetic add-on to the mafia game that allows the judge to fudge with the execution, and might give a couple players a boon. Well, poo poo! ##vote: bminus
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:25
|
|
|
peramene posted:Coming to you live from innovation in game design think tank something awful dot com, direct from today's judge: people having fun is bad as it should be!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 18:36
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:No. we do not. everyone vote for yourself so we can carry out the plan to destroy lm's psyche it would be really funny. ##vote100yrs
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:09
|
|
|
Court is now in session.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:20
|
|
|
My observations after thoroughly reading what's been said: Mord's dismissiveness towards the game structure is far more vitriolic than say, pmom's. Plus they vouch for pera for some reason. I get the impression that Mord has been granted extra information about the game that makes them feel above the rules, and I can't see how that benefit would be granted to town this early in the game. this is a stickup posted:##vote peramene Are you still thoroughly confident in your vote? You also seemed to drop any ideas you had towards me despite saying I wasn't properly explaining myself. Hal Incandenza posted:I have surveyed all the evidence and I believe we should be investigating Tired Moritz It's a surprising choice honestly. Do you think Moritz is a particularly good town player, enough so that it's worth confirming them, or what? They're brand of irreverent non-posting isn't all that unique compared to the stuff we've been seeing in-game. Tired Moritz posted:yeah that's why I suggested 100yrs. Are you though? You always seem to have some sort of idea of what you're doing. And you suggest me because you think I'm hard to read? Any other reasons besides that? Pinterest Mom posted:I'm going to be pretending this is just straight maf So why be pragmatic and game the system? I realize it's the best choice, but it feels way less fun... b-minus1 posted:I prefer an investigation over killing peramene. Top choices to investigate are vector_to and Retro Futurist. Subtle lurker call-out. While it's true that RF and Vector haven't been around, this is a really sneaky way of calling them out of it. You may have been crucified for it but it'd of been more honest to just say "we should investigate lurkers". I get what QPQ is saying about b-minus BUT they were pretty awkwardly executable last game too so... I don't know. I don't like them calling out the lurkers in such a fashion though.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:I have consulted with my client, and while I refuse to break confidentiality, I will say I am confident in this case, as I am in all cases! Does this mean you would defend scum as town, even if you knew them to be scum? Jeabus Mahogany posted:The onus is on the accuser to present the first evidence. Until that happens, I see no reason for my client to address this statement. This is tricky because we're forced to accuse pera of something. She's wisely staying out of the day to not give us any fodder (odd as that may seem to some people). The only reason I have to vote her is to get my boon (I declared her guilty before realizing we could vote elsewhere), but frankly I don't think it's worth losing a town player to earn it. And while I'm not prepared to declare pera town, I've got little reason to think she's out-and-out scum. Though the post below is questionable: peramene posted:Not yet. I could throw darts if I wanted but just tossing darts at shitposting isn't exactly good play. I've learned to mostly keep my mouth shut d1 - I'm either totally off-base or I get steamrolled. Difficult for me to focus on anyone else in that environ. I don't agree with this at all. Not generating content will result in a stagnant came and player apathy, which generally works towards the scums advantage. Why promote this if your town as you claim?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
After a short recess, my team of investigators have brought me piles of information on posters in this game. After reviewing the packets on my desk, I have the following observation to report: - 100 yrs is going to great pains to demonstrate to the court that he seeks justice, but what do his posts truly represent? Fingering (THIS IS A COURT OF LAW!) QPQ due to a poorly executed joke, fingering me for a series of perfectly executed jokes, spewing words from his little pencil lips without any true meaning but with many, many words like "Exhibit A posted:In other words, I'd rather have a rambunctious and fun kitten who attacks anything who moves and is just as often as wrong than not, but is still an adorable kitten, than a 15 year old lazy cat who sleeps all day. The latter are nice in their own way, but in this setting the former is by far the one I'd rather be certain of. And on top of it all? The tenacity to clear suspicion of Taste because he said one substantive thing. Please. Ladies, Gentlemen and Human Beings of the court, ask yourselves; is this the demeanor of an innocent man? Sweaty palms, nervous word soup, self depreciating content? I say no. He should be investigated. ##vote 100yrsofplatitude - Hal Incandenza posted:Generally agree its better not to vote pERA today even though she is being suspiciously quiet This makes no sense. Why are you protecting Peramene? - Mord is playing hard into being an rear end. Is this normal for him? I've placed him under observation by some of my best people. - Defense counsel took a long time formulating a response to some basic accusations. Maybe if he'd stop driving around the courtroom doing a handstand on his dirt bike we'd get more done, your honor. Also, what alternative to his client's guilt has the defense presented to the court? I have seen little to no attempt at clearing his clients name with his own investigations. Is this because he knows of her guilt? - The defendant has yet to say or do anything to persuade me from my attack course. Why should we believe she is not guilty?
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:45
|
|
|
I just haven't really had anything to do add yet and I'm still learning the ropes for this style. I mean if you guys want to investigate me so I'm confirmed town that's fine, but I do agree it's odd that B's top two picks for scum are lurkers. You'd think he'd have found something useful in the multiple pages of actual content we've had.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:46
|
|
|
i dont play with 100yrs enough to understand their meta
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 19:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 06:44 |
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:I don't agree with this at all. Not generating content will result in a stagnant came and player apathy, which generally works towards the scums advantage. Why promote this if your town as you claim? Generating content just to have content isn't valuable, detracts from more meaningful content coming from others, and necessarily draws negative attention towards myself. I say things when there are things to say. Almost every game I've seen recently had multiple people complaining about post counts, word counts, or "lots of words that don't mean anything". I'm not going to willfully contribute to those and especially not on day one, the dumbest day.
|
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 20:05
|
|