|
Meddle. Be my guest.
|
#
?
Sep 28, 2017 23:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:34 |
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:TLDR 100YrsofAttitude posted:My observations after thoroughly reading what's been said: 100, I went back and looked over Mord's posts. While I agree that (s)he is "antagonistic" and "dismissive," I can't think of a good reason for why scum would expose themselves by vouching for another player (1) on D1, especially when there was minimal non-joke pressure on that player. Both the manner in timing strike me as odd strategy for an anti-town role. If Mord does have additional information, I can't see how a scum player could be that confident. I still prefer bminus for the lynch.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:09
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:100, I went back and looked over Mord's posts. While I agree that (s)he is "antagonistic" and "dismissive," I can't think of a good reason for why scum would expose themselves by vouching for another player (1) on D1, especially when there was minimal non-joke pressure on that player. Both the manner in timing strike me as odd strategy for an anti-town role. You know I'm not scum, because you are.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:15
|
|
|
oh no
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:pera I don't mind length, I find it hard you have nothing to add even at this point. solid, that makes literally one of you. please don't post about your boner, it's awkward you would think that would be both the case and the way things would measure out for a logical evaluation but no, it is not, it has never been, have you played mafia with these jerk offs before, who are you, what's in the box, why are we still talking about this I'm really not, and they really aren't. this is a stickup posted:day one is really important, and significant, always
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:25
|
|
|
Remember that this is plurality voting. We can (and should) split the vote.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
I'm glad you brought that up, because I agree. we should split the vote, amongst every player, by having every player vote themselves, except me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:30
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:oh no Do footnotes upset you, PMom? I know it has been a while since I've broken them out (1), but I am sure that you will agree that my David Wallace Foster (2) style posting has been a boon for the town in games past (3), (4). It isn't a perfect tactic. I know that some have criticized it as unnecessary and obtuse. Still others have pointed out that it can be obtuse (5) or unnecessary (6). While the record is ultimately mixed, I feel that it has some utility in building cases (7). I can get carried away with the gimmick, but that is a risk for any poster.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do footnotes upset you, PMom? I know it has been a while since I've broken them out (1), but I am sure that you will agree that my David Wallace Foster (2) style posting has been a boon for the town in games past (3), (4). It isn't a perfect tactic. I know that some have criticized it as unnecessary and obtuse. Still others have pointed out that it can be obtuse (5) or unnecessary (6). ah beans, messed up my own jokes again by failing to preview a post again
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:37
|
|
|
tbqh, there's no votecount in the op and i legit have no idea who is voting for whom
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  b-minus1 (1): QuoProQuid Diqnol (1): Jeabus Mahogany 100YrsofAttitude (1): Diqnol Jonathan Fisk (1): Pinterest Mom Tired Moritz (1): Tired Moritz peramene (1): this is a stickup Mordiceius (1): 100YrsofAttitude Not Voting (8): b-minus1, GulagDolls, Hal Incandenza, Jonathan Fisk, Mordiceius, peramene, Retro Futurist, vector_toWith 15 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is September 29th, 2017 at 6 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 22 hours, 20 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
peramene posted:solid, that makes literally one of you. please don't post about your boner, it's awkward I dunno why you quoted my post at the end as if it's related to 100yrs calling you out for not posting, but I will quote it again as it is important and correct this is a stickup posted:day one is really important, and significant, always
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 01:31
|
|
|
oh man, if we split the vote I get to investigate two people???
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 01:58
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:oh man, if we split the vote I get to investigate two people??? is this true?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:is this true? Little Mac posted:Please note that this game will operate under PLURALITY VOTING rules, and as such there will be no days where no one gets the vote. In fact, the Jury can split the vote to have the Judge render TWO verdicts. Dunno if that's a hard cap
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 04:10
|
|
|
I'm going to bed
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
ty for the summary, 100yrs. okay, let's vote for the one with the ugliest avatar
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 05:26
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:oh man, if we split the vote I get to investigate two people??? I think we can only split the vote if we pera and the other person tie, seeing as you're allowed only 2 verdicts. GulagDolls posted:I'm glad you brought that up, because I agree. we should split the vote, amongst every player, by having every player vote themselves, except me. I will still genuinely do this. It'd be by far the funniest thing I will ever get to do in a mafia game. And if we still want another go, we can all agree to replay again in a more serious fashion.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 09:19
|
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:100, I went back and looked over Mord's posts. While I agree that (s)he is "antagonistic" and "dismissive," I can't think of a good reason for why scum would expose themselves by vouching for another player (1) on D1, especially when there was minimal non-joke pressure on that player. Both the manner in timing strike me as odd strategy for an anti-town role. Personally I think they're bluffing and that they've got nothing. Also the fact that someone is being aggressive shouldn't discount them as scum. While I agree it's safer to keep quiet as scum on D1's that doesn't mean everyone does. You're saying that you don't see them as anti-town, does that mean you see them as pro-town? Because I don't see how anything they've done has been pro-town. I'm not opposed to going after b-minus, but I can accept the narrative they've presented for now. I'd say my 3rd choice is pera, partly because we'll benefit from the boon and the fact that she refuses to engage doesn't really make me feel bad about doing it.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 09:41
|
|
|
I'm awake100YrsofAttitude posted:I think we can only split the vote if we pera and the other person tie, seeing as you're allowed only 2 verdicts. Nothing in the rules says this. 100YrsofAttitude posted:I'd say my 3rd choice is pera, partly because we'll benefit from the boon You'll benefit from the boon.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 12:57
|
|
|
Jeabus Mahogany posted:Nothing in the rules says this. L. Mac specifically wrote two, but that could've been arbitrary. Ninja edit: I'm assuming if it's two it includes the defendant. Jeabus Mahogany posted:
It's good for everyone. That said if pera's town, I'd much rather keep her around then get some silly benefit. I'm personally not wholly convinced.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 13:19
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Ninja edit: I'm assuming if it's two it includes the defendant. This is the point I'm contesting.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 13:24
|
|
|
Which is totally fair, that's my interpretation, but if he includes up to 3-way ties and whatever, the more the merrier. Or maybe it is just the top 2 votes, which maybe means the last 2 to be tied? It doesn't really feel like an important point to argue.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 13:26
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Which is totally fair, that's my interpretation, but if he includes up to 3-way ties and whatever, the more the merrier. Or maybe it is just the top 2 votes, which maybe means the last 2 to be tied? Well I find the fact that you're trying to invent rules that keep pressure on the defendant suspicious. ##vote 100YrsOfAttitude
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 13:43
|
|
|
Talk about over-reacting. I'm happy to accept another interpretation of the rules by someone more in the know. The only thing making pera suspicious are her own actions, specifically her lack thereof. The fact that neither of you is making any effort to prove her innocence isn't all that helpful. And I'd love to say that both of you are at least looking at other players, looking for a culpable individual, but that hasn't even been the case. You may act and grandstand as an attorney, but that hardly makes you one.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Talk about over-reacting. 'Sjust a vote dude, you're the one getting paranoid.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 15:59
|
|
|
I like to use italics and exclamation points when I start getting paranoid. I'm sure you'll note the difference, eagle-eye.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
god, why is everyone so paranoid? i thought we were deciding who to investigate
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:37
|
|
|
let's investigate 100yrs? I don't think there's any problems, unless anyone have another choice? :3c
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 16:43
|
|
|
nah, 100yrs has No Chill, he's not a great person to investigate. I want to investigate someone hard to read!
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:12
|
|
|
we cannot investigate or causwe harm to 100yrs since he has shown himself to be the only non-coward in this town so far.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:16
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:we cannot investigate or causwe harm to 100yrs since he has shown himself to be the only non-coward in this town so far. Pretty sure Tired Moritz voted themselves too. Pinterest Mom posted:nah, 100yrs has No Chill, he's not a great person to investigate. I want to investigate someone hard to read! What's No Chill? And thank you? I hope to be around for deadline. I'm having friends over tonight and who knows how long they'll stick around for (deadline being midnight for me). I hope to be able to pop in from time to time, get a quick idea where we are, and shoot off an idea or two. But I may not be able to do so. If Mord's not gonna happen I'll be happy to vote b-minus. If we are being really pragmatic and are gonna investigate a hard to read person I say we choose Gulag or Fisk. I tend to have trouble figuring them out. The added-bonus is once we confirm Gulag as town for everyone, we can just have everyone killed as they've suggested. I also think Mord falls into this category of what the heck is he thinking
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:25
|
|
|
mmmmm im starting to feel like 100yrs dodging the chance to be clear'd is a bit strange.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:30
|
|
|
I dont think he wants to see the result of a test of his own alignment, because he knows what his alignment is already.
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:32
|
|
|
yeah but if they are town, at least it means people would stop questioning it after all
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:34
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:mmmmm It's not that. It just feels very wasteful. We lose a day altogether and nothing's changed. I also think being confirmed town would paint me as target to the scum. If they can't mis-direct people towards me, what good am I to them alive?
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 17:45
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:yeah but if they are town, at least it means people would stop questioning it after all ##vote tired moritz
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 18:01
|
|
|
I like it ##vote rf
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 18:05
|
|
|
honestly, i just think you're scum. ##vote 100yrs
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 18:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 09:34 |
|
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do footnotes upset you, PMom? I know it has been a while since I've broken them out (1), but I am sure that you will agree that my David Wallace Foster (2) style posting has been a boon for the town in games past (3), (4). It isn't a perfect tactic. I know that some have criticized it as unnecessary and obtuse. Still others have pointed out that it can be obtuse (5) or unnecessary (6). we are friends now
|
|
#
?
Sep 29, 2017 18:31
|
|