|
Wild EEPROM posted:dehumanize yourself and faceos to bloodshed what do you meant by this? 
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2017 23:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
thanks, mike i tried dragging an icon like that, but it apparently only works when combined with the slide-up move
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
Binary Badger posted:feces? fasces: the mobile choice of the alt-right
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2017 23:17
|
|
|
apple only has one OS, Darwin. on top of Darwin are several platforms.
|
|
#
?
Nov 8, 2017 23:44
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:swipe up to bring up the dock, grab the icon of the app you want to add, drag it over to the side you want it on in it voted 5
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 00:11
|
|
|
hard to call tvos a major os
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 02:06
|
|
|
easy to call it a major pos tho
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 02:09
|
|
|
it’s the best tv os on the market
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 08:50
|
|
|
YA BOY ETHAN COUCH posted:hard to call tvos a major os What's watchos then
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 09:23
|
|
|
Millstone posted:What's watchos then wearable pos
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 11:00
|
|
|
Millstone posted:What's watchos then not much! watchOS with you?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 12:33
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:we are NOT evading taxes the amount of blogger thinkpieces screaming about how IT IS APPLE'S MORAL DUTY TO AVOID AS MUCH TAX AS LEGALLY POSSIBLE is loving sickening ngl Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:that tax poo poo is pretty bad and not cool clearly they fell into the water in 2016 as her phone was exploding in her pocket causing severe burns
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 13:38
|
|
|
Generic Monk posted:the amount of blogger thinkpieces screaming about how IT IS APPLE'S MORAL DUTY TO AVOID AS MUCH TAX AS LEGALLY POSSIBLE is loving sickening ngl i wouldn't say they have a moral duty to do so, but they do have a duty to their shareholders to maximize their profits within the confines of the law. if the law lets them do so then change the law. now i'm no expert on tax law, so if all this is illegal, nail them to the wall.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 14:09
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:but they do have a duty to their shareholders to maximize their profits within the confines of the law. they literally don't but thanks for keeping this stupid meme alive
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 14:34
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:they literally don't but thanks for keeping this stupid meme alive my friend have you heard about capitalism?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 15:03
|
|
|
corporations are people. specifically, really rich people who are legally obligated to behave like sociopaths
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 15:14
|
|
|
companies and individuals don’t have a moral imperative to avoid taxes, but they also don’t have a moral obligation to pay more taxes than legally required. it is the right of every person and legal entity to use the law to their advantage to minimize their tax burden. if you’re angry about this then amend the laws to close loopholes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:they literally don't but thanks for keeping this stupid meme alive they do if the shareholders demand it
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Bulgogi Hoagie posted:it’s the best tv os on the market webos
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 17:08
|
|
|
*windows
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 17:10
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:they literally don't but thanks for keeping this stupid meme alive please tell me then why anybody invests in a company, certainly it's not with the expectation of making the least amount of money?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:please tell me then why anybody invests in a company, certainly it's not with the expectation of making the least amount of money? Ask the investors in the 95% of companies that don't have extensive tax avoidance arrangements.
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 18:00
|
|
|
The Management posted:companies and individuals don’t have a moral imperative to avoid taxes, but they also don’t have a moral obligation to pay more taxes than legally required. it is the right of every person and legal entity to use the law to their advantage to minimize their tax burden. if you’re angry about this then amend the laws to close loopholes. yeah i'm not singling apple out specifically, it would be a bit rich to do that for something that's more of a nebulous institutional injustice and perpetrated by most multinational companies. the main thing i was saying was that the amount of apologism for it in the tech media when they're not outright avoiding the issue entirely is pretty loving contemptible, imo
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
The Management posted:companies and individuals don’t have a moral imperative to avoid taxes, but they also don’t have a moral obligation to pay more taxes than legally required. it is the right of every person and legal entity to use the law to their advantage to minimize their tax burden. if you’re angry about this then amend the laws to close loopholes. it is morally and ethically correct to pay the least amount of tax legally possible
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:05
|
|
|
Chalks posted:Ask the investors in the 95% of companies that don't have extensive tax avoidance arrangements. only because they can't afford to implement them yet
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:08
|
|
|
apparently iphone ecks cant into cool weather
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:11
|
|
|
Chalks posted:Ask the investors in the 95% of companies that don't have extensive tax avoidance arrangements. i thought every multinational based in america does something similar
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:14
|
|
|
i really do hope these like 50 posts i just saw about screen malfunctioning after 30s exposure to temperatures lower than 5c are bollocks
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
cvs lost a cool billion coz they dropped tobacco, are they public? did that effect like shareholders losing dollars like they have to maximise profits? but like? in every single quarter or can they look toward making more later for less now?
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:29
|
|
|
lol not only does the iface or itouch not function if you're not a lily white programmer, now it won't work if your environment isn't roughly that of california
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:32
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:it is morally and ethically correct to pay the least amount of tax legally possible correctness would have to have reference to a particularly moral philosophy or ethical code but yeah
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:33
|
|
|
the implication being a code in which keeping the money is more ethical and moral than giving it to the government which while defensible in some respects, is mostly to rile pro-tax yosposters
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:35
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:the implication being a code in which keeping the money is more ethical and moral than giving it to the government which while defensible in some respects, is mostly to rile pro-tax yosposters i think you were supposed to leave this out on the script
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:37
|
|
|
yeah fair enough. it was just to say the vast majority of actions are generally neutral in a vacuum and the law itself is neither a moral or ethical code you could even argue that certain us governments, maybe even the current one, are morally unworthy of receiving anything more than the bare minimum of required tax dollars, due to corruption, incompetence and dereliction of fiscal duties to the american public. you could do that for sure Kenny Logins fucked around with this message at 19:41 on Nov 9, 2017 |
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:38
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:the implication being a code in which keeping the money is more ethical and moral than giving it to the government which while defensible in some respects, is mostly to rile pro-tax yosposters this is only true in the US where theres a 100% chance your money will be used to murder brown people
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:40
|
|
|
its not quite 100% cause we both spend more than we take in and we also spend more on keeping boomers alive than we do on the military (tho its a close second) so theres a chance your money goes there instead!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
its me im the guy who pays more tax than he could. im ethical as gently caress
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
apple clearly isn't the only company to do this and it is certainly fine by law and professional ethics. That being said, professional ethics and tax law don't define what is good or what ought to happen and I feel that articles couched in that way kind of miss the point. the point seems to be that this example might provide a good vehicle to consider whether we should change things so that the wealthiest corporation pays appropriately for access to us markets, IP protections, and workers. anywho i'll shut up now
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 20:09
|
|
|
at least we know why shaggar elected lepage
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 20:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:56 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:its not quite 100% cause we both spend more than we take in and we also spend more on keeping boomers alive than we do on the military (tho its a close second) so theres a chance your money goes there instead!! also don't forget we're still paying off the 4 trillion+ in 30 year treasuries reagan sold at the end of the cold war
|
|
#
?
Nov 9, 2017 20:59
|
|