|
bandaid.friend posted:https://clips.twitch.tv/CharmingCovertHyenaStoneLightning Tits tax 
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 12:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:32 |
|
|
So many appropriate Malcolm Tucker gifs...    Congrats to CIG for thoroughly owning goons by releasing a few percent more of broken game only 6 years into development.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 12:43
|
|
|
I woke up yesterday thinking I had woken up in Wonderland when I heard that 3.0 had been suddenly and unceremoniously Am I in a coma? Is this all some crazy dream? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 12:48
|
|
|
Do any ships in SC even have rivets? Where and why?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 12:51
|
|
|
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/203844783 WTFO takes another one for the team.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 12:52
|
|
|
bandaid.friend posted:https://clips.twitch.tv/CharmingCovertHyenaStoneLightning lol. By the way, is mobiglass in any way connected to their Spectrum poo poo or is Spectrum still pointless. Yes, the answer can be "it's both", though obviously I still prefer "parp".
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Do any ships in SC even have rivets? Where and why?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:01
|
|
|
SomethingJones posted:So how come Eurogamer and Kotaku Australia have a one hour video in 4k of 3.0 that isn't a clusterfuck? Because we are desperate to exaggerate the issues. Its really not this hard when you put aside the bias for two seconds. Yea its janky but it fundamentally works
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:02
|
|
|
bandaid.friend posted:https://clips.twitch.tv/CharmingCovertHyenaStoneLightning Lol does the UI need to query the server or something because why the gently caress would it take so long to pull it out.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:02
|
|
|
Could someone post live funding tracker updates here when CIG starts their sales. Tia.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:06
|
|
|
Spiderdrake posted:The rivets thing totally reminds me of something, but I can't place it. Like something out of Robocop or whatever 80s film with some genuine satire that he's just ripping off. Maybe this? "... rivulets of molten metal splashed to the valley floor ..." (Stackpole overused that a bit in his Mechwarrior books iirc)
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:12
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:The art team is surely up to the task of adding genuine 3D high-poly rivets to every ship in the game. Im excited to hear how they will affect the ship combat!
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:17
|
|
|
Jobbo_Fett posted:Im excited to hear how they will affect the ship combat! Its an exciting new game mechanic. When you take damage you'll have to run around the ship, patching the damage with space rivets in order to stop the
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:28
|
|
|
I like how howls of "You'll see how wrong you are when 3.0 lands!" have turned back into "It's alphaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!"
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:40
|
|
|
Milky Moor posted:Exactly. And sometimes you just have rough writing. But that's usually when you write something you don't care about, and that even happens in works you're passionate about. Sometimes stuff just doesn't come together. Sometimes it's a boring transitional chapter. But that stuff reads like the prose I write in a fit of pique, when I'm just trying to get something out so I'm not staring at an empty chapter, paragraph, exchange or sequence. But it's the stuff you go back and edit so heavily that it probably comes out completely different. Ah, this reminded me of something that bothered me about Star Citizen "lore" in general - despite trying to pass it off as sci-fi, it still feels more like space fantasy. It very much seems to be a result of breaking the rule of sticking to writing about the things you know. The writing team (and Chris) don't know enough about the science part, and the result is a bit of an uncanny valley in written form. Going full space fantasy would've removed this problem for them as everything could be solved through the means of space gods, space wizards and handwavium, but as we know, it's not quite the case. However, that said, how does one gently caress up a newsroom interview script? Our mass media is saturated with this stuff, the format is well established and easily accessible, just turn on one of dozens of news channels and mindlessly ape a debate - how hard can it be? Or do they feel the need to reinvent everything? Tech and management weren't enough, and even the whole xenolinguistics were not the final fronteer, CIG needs to reinvent newsroom drama too now?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:45
|
|
|
Xaerael posted:I like how howls of "You'll see how wrong you are when 3.0 lands!" have turned back into "It's alphaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!" Its still on the ptu
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:51
|
|
|
kilus aof posted:Pure speculation about this trademark filing: No. They are looking to make movies and other media using the IP. That's pretty standard. Just like what happened with Wing Commander. ----------------
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:55
|
|
|
Chris Roberts school of script writing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irc_dew1eYw
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 13:59
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:00
|
|
|
Xaerael posted:Chris Roberts school of script writing: To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand 3.0. The gameplay is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the mechanics will go over a typical players head. The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to appreciate the depths of these mechanics. As a consequence people who dislike 3.0 truly ARE idiots, they couldn't appreciate the humour in Chris's existential catchphrase "Soon tm" which itself is a cryptic reference to CIG literature.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:02
|
|
|
FF to 3:36:00 and watch. Also, the comments are hilarious.  https://www.twitch.tv/videos/203688567 ----------------
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:02
|
|
|
Daztek posted:To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand 3.0. The gameplay is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the mechanics will go over a typical players head. The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to appreciate the depths of these mechanics. As a consequence people who dislike 3.0 truly ARE idiots, they couldn't appreciate the humour in Chris's existential catchphrase "Soon tm" which itself is a cryptic reference to CIG literature. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
I don't care about streamers and your comments here. I'm just waiting for the in-depth 3.0 review from pixelemonade to see if it's now worth to buy a game package and subscribe.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:10
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SP_Ulti/status/926321899789078528
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
Daztek posted:To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand 3.0. The gameplay is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the mechanics will go over a typical players head. The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to appreciate the depths of these mechanics. As a consequence people who dislike 3.0 truly ARE idiots, they couldn't appreciate the humour in Chris's existential catchphrase "Soon tm" which itself is a cryptic reference to CIG literature. The funny part is that they don't even have proper Newtonian mechanics or gravity that makes any sense at all, but instead of ditching realistic physics to make a more entertaining flight model they made ships have super powerful thrusters, pathetic top speeds and noclip in atmospheres. Actually while we're here, how many of the top posters in this thread were responsible for buying into the hype in 2013 or whenever? Shame on you. You should all have to write long blog posts begging forgiveness.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:21
|
|
|
SomethingJones posted:So how come Eurogamer and Kotaku Australia have a one hour video in 4k of 3.0 that isn't a clusterfuck? It looks like they have edited the bugs out of it. Its very obvious even right at the start they seem to have cut their first bug. Watch this: https://youtu.be/RVrsLsvW5-I?t=27
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:28
|
|
|
Risc1911 posted:It looks like they have edited the bugs out of it. Its very obvious even right at the start they seem to have cut their first bug. Watch this: https://youtu.be/RVrsLsvW5-I?t=27 They're passing that video off as the first hour of gameplay from a player pov
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
Daztek posted:To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand 3.0. The gameplay is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the mechanics will go over a typical players head. The fans understand this; they have the intellectual capacity to appreciate the depths of these mechanics. As a consequence people who dislike 3.0 truly ARE idiots, they couldn't appreciate the humour in Chris's existential catchphrase "Soon tm" which itself is a cryptic reference to CIG literature. It's true. I once thought that all of the physics and collisions were irredeemably broken because the underlying engine had been butchered, hacked and ruined, but then I realised that the gameworld is inside a bose-einstein condensate, the ships are constructed in real time around a point mass using first order differential invariants and the commando's nipple jets are an artistic abstraction of Kirchhoff's law of thermal emissions
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
This is literally my first time ever watching anything about Star Citizen on a stream and this happens within 30 seconds: https://clips.twitch.tv/LongTsunderePastaArsonNoSexy
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
Gamers aren't even buying the retail copies of EA's new Star Wars themed running around a corner simulator, does this mean that the big game review sites who gave it top reviews are finally loosing relevancy?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:52
|
|
|
Teikanmi posted:This is literally my first time ever watching anything about Star Citizen on a stream and this happens within 30 seconds: These clips are amazing I'd love to know which videogame these CIG guys were crunching on, because it sure as poo poo wasn't Star Citizen
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
Let's get down to the important gameplay questions. Can you move a box?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
SomethingJones posted:I'd love to know which videogame these CIG guys were crunching on, because it sure as poo poo wasn't Star Citizen So SQ42 in 2017 confirmed?
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 14:57
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Let's get down to the important gameplay questions. Don't be silly, this is alpha. Box moving arrives in beta.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:08
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:18
|
|
|
Teikanmi posted:LongTsunderePastaArsonNoSexy[/url]
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
Lmao
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:Let's get down to the important gameplay questions. One streamer I saw couldn't pick up a box because it displayed the wrong command and then he got stuck in the floor and couldn't move.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:39
|
|
|
The dozens of Twitch streamers playing Alpha 3.0 on PTU yesterday, to thousands of eager viewers, must have done wonders for the day's funding right? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 14:32 |
|
|
Quavers posted:The dozens of Twitch streamers playing Alpha 3.0 on PTU yesterday, to thousands of eager viewers, must have done wonders for the day's funding right? Lets wait for the sale.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2017 15:47
|
|