|
Kavak posted:Breaking News: CIG hires firm of Howard, Fine, and Howard to represent itself. Nah, CIG's likely to go with Black, Hingley and Oohuhu... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCHx7cM8JhM&t=31s
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 03:35 |
|
|
Xaerael posted:Hungadunga, etc I'm fairly sure is a Marx Brothers film. I want to say Animal Crackers. 1/3 and you got the hardest one!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:15
|
|
|
I'd say Squadron 42 release in early 2019, Star Citizen release version goes live in late 2020. I'd say an additional 65 million in funding during that time frame. A conservative estimate, but I like to be surprised.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:20
|
|
|
 more black books: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RedqjMy62HQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:27
|
|
|
BluesShaman posted:1/3 I saw it in "Media studies" during my BA in photography. Media studies being a weekly thing on a Wednesday when we sat around watching old movies with the faculty's total blessing. "We expect you to watch at least 3 movies a week, all on your own initiative, then talk about the movie in groups of 8" was one of the coolest things we were tasked with. I was the rear end in a top hat that brought Grave of the Fireflies one week, and emotionally murdered 30+ students in one sitting.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:28
|
|
|
kikkelivelho posted:I'd say Squadron 42 release in early 2019, Star Citizen release version goes live in late 2020. I'd say an additional 65 million in funding during that time frame. A conservative estimate, but I like to be surprised. This was you in September: kikkelivelho posted:I've watched through the full Gamescom demo a few times now and it's pretty clear that 3.0 is still far too buggy for release (that said, their internal dev build is probably further along). I imagine we wont see a 3.0 release until October. Squadron 42 is probably releasing early next year, though that depends on how much resources Chris wants to put into 3.1. Ultimately I think these delays are going to be worth it. 3.0 has changed and grown a lot since it was originally announced. Overoptimistic much? CIG won't even exist as a functional development shop in 2019.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:30
|
|
|
Abuminable posted:Overoptimistic much? The situation has obviously changed since then. The SQ42 (Squadron 42) demo showed that the campaign is going to be far more ambitious than anyone had expected. We are now looking at a hybrid open world game with a player choice based event system. The additional dev, mocap and testing alone will take time. I still don't believe money will be an issue. In addition to backer funds CIG has access to a number of private investors and other sources of revenue. The actual data based estimates I've seen suggest that development can continue as is for at least another 4 years.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
Abuminable posted:This was you in September: well its "him" in the same way mirificus is actually everyone he quotes
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:42
|
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:well its "him" in the same way mirificus is actually everyone he quotes I figured 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:45
|
|
|
kikkelivelho posted:The situation has obviously changed since then. The SQ42 (Squadron 42) demo showed that the campaign is going to be far more ambitious than anyone had expected. We are now looking at a hybrid open world game with a player choice based event system. The additional dev, mocap and testing alone will take time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqUsrW3JRZM
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 13:46
|
|
|
They are furiously trying to actually swap out cryengine with lumberyard and that's why it's taking so long.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:08
|
|
|
kikkelivelho posted:The situation has obviously changed since then. The SQ42 (Squadron 42) demo showed that the campaign is going to be far more ambitious than anyone had expected. We are now looking at a hybrid open world game with a player choice based event system. The additional dev, mocap and testing alone will take time. I don't want to know where this quote is from so much as which year it's from.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:17
|
|
|
SomethingJones posted:Owns. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:24
|
|
|
Conspiratiorist posted:Remember how even months after realizing SC was a sham, you kept praising the mushmouth fucker's personal charisma and raw animal magnetism? He has $175 million from hundreds of thousands of people, has established a cult of personality, and still manages to get loans from high end banks all while continuing to fail to show anything remotely appealing. He is turning dreams into cash with minimal consequences and scrutiny. Am I a sucker for buying in as much as I did? Absolutely. But Chris Roberts is a very good salesman and a very magnetic personality. He absolutely has charisma. So does Donald Trump. That doesn't mean they're particularly attractive, appealing, or good people. It just means that they inspire devotion, which they clearly do.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:27
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:happy holidays thread The formation of the Red Cross was hinged upon those who decided to witness a great field battle of rifle, cannon and cavalry for entertainment and found the visage in need of doctoral presence I am no doctor, but I am entertained
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:31
|
|
|
Solarin posted:why not fall asleep with your shoes on? do this at a house party and people will gently caress with you it's the law
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:40
|
|
|
You can set aside the default but you aren't gonna win any fans for doing so. A response isn't required to be particularly onerous, and legally speaking CIG is given every advantage here so the court is gonna be like "well, what's your excuse? This gotta be good." What will be just as amusing is if the response is drafted in-house and is filled with egregious errors. Forgot to mention your counterclaims? Whoops, those are gone. Inadvertently admitting to several counts when that wasn't the intention? Wellllll yur honor we kinda already tweeted something out, just ignore it okay? Maybe they do have a colorable affirmative defense and it doesn't get mentioned because they're just not good at their jobs. So many possibilities!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:41
|
|
|
https://giant.gfycat.com/EmotionalWellwornBlueshark.webm lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:42
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:47
|
|
C-Bangin' it 
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:47
|
|
|
better now than never
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:48
|
|
|
no_recall posted:How many more days does CIG have until they respond to Crytek's lawsuit? It’s pretty common for lawyers to only ever file anything on the final day it’s due.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 14:55
|
|
|
I want a shitposting version
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:01
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:01
|
|
|
Oscar Wilde Bunch posted:It’s pretty common for lawyers to only ever file anything on the final day it’s due. It’s also common for CIG to twiddle their thumbs while deadlines go wooshing past.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Can they use this as an proper bailout. They (management) must have enough millions to live on at this time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:06
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:Will Star Citizen have this? Is this game any good? I mean it's a space game so it's probably terrible but I like the art style.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
I have no idea, and it's only 15% off.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:24
|
|
|
https://robertsspaceindustries.com/spectrum/community/SC/forum/3/thread/so-where-are-we-at-2/832931 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
It's amazing that the star citizen demographic is entirely composed of top notch game devs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:36
|
|
|
I'm Sarconius Thirdeye and my day to day life is tracking, identifying and cataloguing the known realities of game development. Currently traveling through the citizen plane right now everybody hold your breath and strike a T that's how they know you're friendly.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
spectrum posted:I backed SC, because I'm tired of formulaic games, tired of rendered trailers promising me the world, and the giving me a nothing like it. You came to the right place commando. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE7TFnSl9y4
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:38
|
|
|
Berious posted:also it sounds like friendship drive Friendship Drive Engaged!
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:52
|
|
|
preorder bushido
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:56
|
|
|
A fool and his money are soon parpted.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 15:58
|
|
|
Virtual Captain posted:You came to the right place commando. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qE7TFnSl9y4 Oh man that masterpiece. They didn't even bother putting the turret in during any scene where parts had to move, the guns are just freefloating above the model. I guess it would have been too hard to import into 3d moviemaker.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 16:03
|
|
|
big nipples big life posted:preorder bushido I swear to god if any of these guys saw EA or Activision deny a refund because they played a preorder demo of a release game that was still 4 years away they'd be all over that saying "See this is why Im backing CIG" completely unironically.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 16:12
|
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:I swear to god if any of these guys saw EA or Activision deny a refund because they played a preorder demo of a release game that was still 4 years away they'd be all over that saying "See this is why Im backing CIG" completely unironically. The flood of NMS refugees shouting never again while pledging into SC put the irony meter into permanent hiatus I'm afraid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 16:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 03:35 |
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:Oh man that masterpiece. They didn't even bother putting the turret in during any scene where parts had to move, the guns are just freefloating above the model. Should have bought the flashfire mount 
|
|
#
?
Dec 27, 2017 17:10
|
|
