Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dexo
Aug 15, 2009

A city that was to live by night after the wilderness had passed. A city that was to forge out of steel and blood-red neon its own peculiar wilderness.
I dunno, dunking on Simmons is probably just a natural reaction to those at Deadspin.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Carlosologist
Oct 13, 2013

Revelry in the Dark

I miss Grantland; outside of Simmons' columns, there was some really incredible writing and reporting there. The Ringer is much more lowkey, but it's also really good

I think that Magary's point was that Simmons has so much influence, being given carte blanche with both Grantland and Ringer, that his me me me attitude is what remains extremely grating. Of course, that's what how he got to the very top, but he stopped being the fan as a sportswriter once he started bumping elbows with the athletes. he's entirely unrelatable at this point in his career, just coasting off what made him famous

MourningView
Sep 2, 2006


Is this Heaven?

Feels Villeneuve posted:

Why are they getting so self-rightously mad about Bill Simmons writing a dumb homer column for the 5000th time and why is it in like the same "SIR HOW DARE YOU SIR" tone that you'd use on like the president saying the n word or something

I don't think it's like that at all? It's super fun to call Bill Simmons a dummy

BWV
Feb 24, 2005


making fun of Simmons for only knowing 6 movies, for being a tech bro/ Boston sycophant, and for generally being terrible at structuring and making an argument is fantastic and I enjoy reading it.
The fact that he places himself in the same discussion of David Halberstam to attack a perfectly reasonable story about inter-office politics is a new level of WTF.

Mahoning
Feb 3, 2007

BWV posted:

making fun of Simmons for only knowing 6 movies, for being a tech bro/ Boston sycophant, and for generally being terrible at structuring and making an argument is fantastic and I enjoy reading it.
The fact that he places himself in the same discussion of David Halberstam to attack a perfectly reasonable story about inter-office politics is a new level of WTF.

And, as Magary pointed out, he praised how Halberstam didn’t need quotes, but then Simmons himself just quotes his buddies, seemingly nobodies.

Godzilla07
Oct 4, 2008

Carlosologist posted:

I miss Grantland; outside of Simmons' columns, there was some really incredible writing and reporting there. The Ringer is much more lowkey, but it's also really good

I know The Ringer carries over much of Grantland’s staff and writers, but that Deadspin piece that called The Ringer inessential was spot-on. Granted they likely don’t have nearly the same budget that Grantland did, but I don’t see many links to Ringer content on my timeline, nor do I feel compelled to check it out even weekly.

axeil
Feb 14, 2006
This article is awesome and like a Jon Bois video in word form.

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/21986511/what-happen-baseball-game-went-50-innings

Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair

axeil posted:

This article is awesome and like a Jon Bois video in word form.

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/21986511/what-happen-baseball-game-went-50-innings

Sam Miller and Jon Bois are very much on the same wavelength.

C. Everett Koop
Aug 18, 2008

MourningView posted:

I don't think it's like that at all? It's super fun to call Bill Simmons a dummy

It's also an easy write and way to get clicks on a Friday.

AsInHowe
Jan 11, 2007

red winged angel
Personally, I think Bill made some great points

ChickenMedium
Sep 2, 2001
Forum Veteran And Professor Emeritus of Condiment Studies

MourningView posted:

I don't think it's like that at all? It's super fun to call Bill Simmons a dummy

Dunking on Bill Simmons is like dunking on a small child: it's easy, fun, and everyone should do it.

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend

Inspector_666 posted:

Sam Miller and Jon Bois are very much on the same wavelength.

In this current climate where literally any show/movie can get green-lighted, could we please get a 17776 faux-documentary?

Or like a full 30 for 30 series set in the 17776 universe?

Timby
Dec 23, 2006

Your mother!

I think this got missed in all the Bill Simmons / John Skipper / ESPN stuff last month, but Deadspin's looking for a new editor in chief, as Marchman was promoted to run Gizmodo's "special projects desk."

If they promote Petchesky to take over... :barf:

morestuff
Aug 2, 2008

You can't stop what's coming
David Roth could be a pretty good if slightly boring EIC but I doubt he's been there long enough

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend
I hear Daulerio is available

R.D. Mangles
Jan 10, 2004


i am the new deadspin editor in chief, our biggest story: is derrick rose back

C. Everett Koop
Aug 18, 2008

R.D. Mangles posted:

i am the new deadspin editor in chief, our biggest story: oddibe mcdaniel's water bill

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


https://twitter.com/bustedcoverage/status/953372423587618817

Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair

The media (or in this case pretty much THE media) wondering why things don't get media coverage will never stop being hilarious to me.

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


I get the wondering from OTL, and they're not entirely wrong to ask it because there really hasn't been that much coverage about Nassar, but come the gently caress on, guys.

Nissin Cup Nudist
Sep 3, 2011

Sleep with one eye open

We're off to Gritty Gritty land




DJExile posted:

I get the wondering from OTL, and they're not entirely wrong to ask it because there really hasn't been that much coverage about Nassar, but come the gently caress on, guys.

Compares to how much coverage the Aziz Ansari story got, Nassar is flying completely under the radar which is unfortunate

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


The scope of it and the cover-up arguably dwarfs even the Sandusky scandal.

quote:


Penn State, unlike MSU, made their investigation into how they mishandled allegations of sexual abuse against Jerry Sandusky available almost immediately to the public after the board trustees had a chance to see it. The Freeh Report did not make Penn State look good, to say the very least, and major figures at Penn State were forced to resign or were fired in the wake of the Sandusky molestation scandal, including legendary football coach Joe Paterno and university president Graham Spanier. Spanier and two others at Penn State faced criminal charges and were sentenced to prison.

Denhollander was among those who noticed that Michigan State, at least so far, has not lived up even to that standard. Penn State had previously been viewed as the poster child of how not to address a child molestation crisis at your institution, Denhollander pointed out after Nassar’s sentencing. She said, “MSU has eclipsed them by a long shot.”

Kalli
Jun 2, 2001



Nissin Cup Nudist posted:

Compares to how much coverage the Aziz Ansari story got, Nassar is flying completely under the radar which is unfortunate

Most of that is based off of the sheer number of people defending Ansari and the people getting indignant at those people for defending him.

As opposed to this guy who everyone just wants to see buried in a hole. It's not appropriate, but that's culture for you.

AsInHowe
Jan 11, 2007

red winged angel

It's worse than Sandusky, except in the backlash.

Inspector_666
Oct 7, 2003

benny with the good hair

Kalli posted:

Most of that is based off of the sheer number of people defending Ansari and the people getting indignant at those people for defending him.

As opposed to this guy who everyone just wants to see buried in a hole. It's not appropriate, but that's culture for you.

Also, people know who Aziz Ansari is. People only know who Nasser is in relation to the people he assaulted, which makes it a much less...zeigeisty? type of story.

Truther Vandross
Jun 17, 2008

Kalli posted:

Most of that is based off of the sheer number of people defending Ansari and the people getting indignant at those people for defending him.

As opposed to this guy who everyone just wants to see buried in a hole. It's not appropriate, but that's culture for you.

Well it also blew up because the previously unknown outlet that broke the Ansari story knew about the girl’s experience somehow and went to her about putting it on their site, so there’s a whole subset of people that aren’t defending him but are making GBS threads all over this site for basically exploiting the movement to make a name for themselves.

And not that this excuses anything, but from the second the story broke, the whole world knew the book was being thrown at Nasser so there’s no suspense element there. Again, that doesn’t justify it, but when it’s essentially a foregone conclusion, it kills a lot of the General interest. Raisman was on 60 minutes about it though.

Truther Vandross fucked around with this message at 18:21 on Jan 17, 2018

DJExile
Jun 28, 2007


sportsgenius86 posted:

And not that this excuses anything, but from the second the story broke, the whole world knew the book was being thrown at Nasser so there’s no suspense element there. Again, that doesn’t justify it, but when it’s essentially a foregone conclusion, it kills a lot of the General interest. Raisman was on 60 minutes about it though.

This is a fair point.

Pozload Escobar
Aug 21, 2016

by Reene
The PSU outrage was turned to 11 because the dumb idiots vocally and repeatedly defended their god-coach

FMguru
Sep 10, 2003

peed on;
sexually
Also, PSU and JoePa were big, important parts of a big, important American institution (college football). Women's gymnastics is that thing people fitfully pay attention to for two weeks every four years.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010
I don't think it's very constructive to rank mass child molestations and their cover-ups. But as has been pointed out before, people care about football at all times, and gymnastics for two weeks every four years. Thus, minimal coverage.

On the bright side, that means you won't have massive groups of students and alumni saying that the enablers were treated unfairly, and there won't be any NASSAR INNOCENT truthers.

Hopefully Twistars gets taken down.

Feels Villeneuve
Oct 7, 2007

Setter is Better.
paterno was a massive figure that nobody in the Nassar story can touch, he was famous enough that people who never watched college football heard of him

Truther Vandross
Jun 17, 2008

It didn’t help that of the two people anyone cared about, Raisman had already gone to 60 Minutes and Maroney had an NDA from USA Gymnastics (which is a whole different disgusting discussion), so there wasn’t really a face for ESPN to put forward that people knew or cared about.

Vertical Lime
Dec 11, 2004

i think the fact we only care about gymnastics for 2 weeks 2-3 times a decade doesn't help

Mahoning
Feb 3, 2007

sportsgenius86 posted:

It didn’t help that of the two people anyone cared about, Raisman had already gone to 60 Minutes and Maroney had an NDA from USA Gymnastics (which is a whole different disgusting discussion), so there wasn’t really a face for ESPN to put forward that people knew or cared about.

I thought I saw a headline today or yesterday stating that USAG wouldn't pursue any lawsuits in regards to Maroney's NDA. Which is good in a "if you did it, it would be the worst possible look for an organization that is already in the crosshairs" kind of way.

uggy
Aug 6, 2006

Posting is SERIOUS BUSINESS
and I am completely joyless

Don't make me judge you
The Paterno poo poo was crazy too because it felt like it was unfolding in real time. I remember following what was happening and seeing live looks at PSU to see how students were reacting. Statues were getting defaced, people were saying weird things. It felt nuts.

iospace
Jan 19, 2038



It's obvious as to why this is happening:
1. Football > Gymnastics in terms of the public eye.
2. Joe Pa was a much more famous coach, in part due to 1.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010
How did the Sandusky thing break again? With Nassar one of the craziest parts is that he's not in jail for molestation, but having 37 THOUSAND images of child porn.

C. Everett Koop
Aug 18, 2008
There's also the underlying current that society is far more offended by male on male pedophilia then male on female.

General Dog
Apr 26, 2008

Everybody's working for the weekend
The Sandusky thing is easier to digest and feel appropriate outrage over- covering a up rape to protect a football program is comprehensible, it confirms a long-held feelings and suspicions about football wielding disproportionate power on campus. It's a terrible thing, but it's something we can assign motive to.

Nassar (despite his tenure and office) seems so comparatively small-potatoes and low stakes (in the grand scheme of college athletics) that it just kind of boggles the mind why he'd be worth protecting, even looking at it from an amoral perspective. There's sort of nowhere you can run with it narratively beyond shrugging your shoulders and saying "man, I guess people are really averse to having to be the one to deal with this stuff."

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

General Dog posted:

The Sandusky thing is easier to digest and feel appropriate outrage over- covering a up rape to protect a football program is comprehensible, it confirms a long-held feelings and suspicions about football wielding disproportionate power on campus. It's a terrible thing, but it's something we can assign motive to.

Nassar (despite his tenure and office) seems so comparatively small-potatoes and low stakes (in the grand scheme of college athletics) that it just kind of boggles the mind why he'd be worth protecting, even looking at it from an amoral perspective. There's sort of nowhere you can run with it narratively beyond shrugging your shoulders and saying "man, I guess people are really averse to having to be the one to deal with this stuff."

Even the parents didn't want to deal with it. The dad who didn't believe his daughter until he loving choked her, then eventually killed himself, is a story all it's own.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply