Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
surfacelevelspeck
Oct 1, 2008

communism's sleepiest soldier

GalacticAcid posted:

huh, I didn’t realize proud boys were a thing outside of New York

they're all over the place, it's really weird. here in austin we basically have a small contingent of every fash and supremacist group in the US even though they ever only send like 2-3 people to events, it's pretty :sad:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Pomp
Apr 3, 2012

by Fluffdaddy
What used to be one of Sac DSAs favorite bars got taken over by proud boys over the past year

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

GalacticAcid posted:

huh, I didn’t realize proud boys were a thing outside of New York

astroturfed probably

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977

R. Guyovich posted:

astroturfed probably
they're mostly just losers with no friends, the proud boys here hang out with the iii%ers and the actual Nazis and it's like a gaggle of 8 chubby/stick like losers who obv don't have any friends then one super ripped skinhead

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Proud Boys are an internet thing. It makes sense that there's going to be little groups of them in big cities anywhere.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Ace of Baes posted:

they're mostly just losers with no friends, the proud boys here hang out with the iii%ers and the actual Nazis and it's like a gaggle of 8 chubby/stick like losers who obv don't have any friends then one super ripped skinhead
Last time I paid any attention to them, the Proud Boys were desperately trying to rebrand themselves as something more akin to the Moose Lodge; just a social club for ordinary men to drink beer together.

...which is a losing proposition, because they're just admitting that they have to join some weird tiny movement created on the Internet, with a lame uniform and a dress code, to have someone to drink beer with.

RiotGearEpsilon
Jun 26, 2005
SHAVE ME FROM MY SHELF

Halloween Jack posted:

...which is a losing proposition, because they're just admitting that they have to join some weird tiny movement created on the Internet, with a lame uniform and a dress code, to have someone to drink beer with.

Hey, don't knock it, imagine how many socialists we recruit that way :V

Dmitri-9
Nov 30, 2004

There's something really sexy about Scrooge McDuck. I love Uncle Scrooge.

Halloween Jack posted:

Last time I paid any attention to them, the Proud Boys were desperately trying to rebrand themselves as something more akin to the Moose Lodge; just a social club for ordinary men to drink beer together.

...which is a losing proposition, because they're just admitting that they have to join some weird tiny movement created on the Internet, with a lame uniform and a dress code, to have someone to drink beer with.

Just imagine Squeaky Voice Teen saying "I created Western Civilization"

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

RiotGearEpsilon posted:

Hey, don't knock it, imagine how many socialists we recruit that way :V

This, I mean you'll probably have to convince them that it's "patriotic" socialism. But plenty of them hate getting cucked by their boss. I know a former proud boy and that's one of his biggest complaints.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

Halloween Jack posted:

Last time I paid any attention to them, the Proud Boys were desperately trying to rebrand themselves as something more akin to the Moose Lodge; just a social club for ordinary men to drink beer together.

...which is a losing proposition, because they're just admitting that they have to join some weird tiny movement created on the Internet, with a lame uniform and a dress code, to have someone to drink beer with.
that's pretty much why i joined DSA tho

Dreddout
Oct 1, 2015

You must stay drunk on writing so reality cannot destroy you.

Crowsbeak posted:

This, I mean you'll probably have to convince them that it's "patriotic" socialism.

Some form of Socialism that is National, perhaps?

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Dreddout posted:

Some form of Socialism that is National, perhaps?

Hey, the guy is one of those types that is obsessed with being a civic nationalist. Getting him to support UHC is more important in my mind, then international solidarity. Also Social Nationalism is keeping The Lion in power in Syria.

Rated PG-34
Jul 1, 2004




renewed membership today despite reservations

here's a depressing read: https://platypus1917.org/2017/10/01/millennial-left-dead/

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

millenials are livng in the past. i'll name my website 1917 and use 3 trotsky quotes to start my article

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

Rated PG-34 posted:

renewed membership today despite reservations

here's a depressing read: https://platypus1917.org/2017/10/01/millennial-left-dead/

It's a depressing read, but it also isn't founded in any real world data. It's more accurate to say that a millenial Left didn't even exist in any real sense before 2016 accelerated political discourse. The DSA, for all the problems it has, isn't the same Harringtonian organization it used to be even 2 years ago, and while it's not organized politically in any sort of electoral sense it is constructing the basis of a left wing political tradition which was destroyed by the 80s. To say they're repeating the same problems as the New Left feels farcicle on its face, because the New Left rejected Marxism as a basis for theory to embrace hippie individualism, and what Marxist organizations did exist were violently radical and isolated themselves from society under the assumption of a belief in the propaganda of the deed. The American left is at least broadly, finally, rejecting individualism as a basis to resist capitalism, and is beginning to engage in work which could form the basis of a real socialism.

To declare it all prematurely dead feels like another attempt to claim the mantle of the true left by an obscure group.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
I concur

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Their thesis is that by joining the dsa they'd become new democrats, which is absurd on its face, because even as little as 4 years ago, the idea of the dsa becoming a legitimate political force was absurd, it being insufficientlt triangulating.

In an era where neoliberal austerity has a sufficating hegemonic power, even solid social democracy is at least something. Interpreting that as a pre-emptive betrayal of real change is being way too myopic, and probably a symptom if their own failures to achieve relevance, which they're projecting.

Gunshow Poophole
Sep 14, 2008

OMBUDSMAN
POSTERS LOCAL 42069




Clapping Larry

Rated PG-34 posted:

renewed membership today despite reservations

here's a depressing read: https://platypus1917.org/2017/10/01/millennial-left-dead/

ive never read a book and don't think any of this is right

Yinlock
Oct 22, 2008

Crowsbeak posted:

Hey, the guy is one of those types that is obsessed with being a civic nationalist. Getting him to support UHC is more important in my mind, then international solidarity. Also Social Nationalism is keeping The Lion in power in Syria.



please do not malign the ninja star party

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977

rudatron posted:

Their thesis is that by joining the dsa they'd become new democrats, which is absurd on its face, because even as little as 4 years ago, the idea of the dsa becoming a legitimate political force was absurd, it being insufficientlt triangulating.

In an era where neoliberal austerity has a sufficating hegemonic power, even solid social democracy is at least something. Interpreting that as a pre-emptive betrayal of real change is being way too myopic, and probably a symptom if their own failures to achieve relevance, which they're projecting.

social democracy? you mean social fascism?!

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
i mean, you joke, but the criticism isn't entirely without merit. social democracy fell for the same reason it can't really get a foothold now, and anything constrained to that, and no further, is destined to be left behind and destroyed.

but at the same time, the current situation is very difficult, and you have to take what you can get. it's only been a couple of decades since the fall of the USSR, and domestically, the scene is still dominated by the reactionary revival of reaganism, and the counter acting capitulation of the mainstream left into new labor/left (which Margaret Thatcher credited as her greatest achievement).

did this guy honestly expect everyone, or even just the millennials, to suddenly pick up red books and become full party comrades overnight? it's a totally unrealistic expectation that's been advanced, that social democracy cannot ever be a transitionary phase, and instead that everyone has to jump from neoliberalism immediately to full communism, because your little reading club is low on numbers or whatever.

realistically, you have to start from somewhere, and getting into the tall grass of purity politics, before you even have a coherent political organization representing the left, is defeating yourself, before the battle even begins.

and the assumptions behind social democracy at least have the potential for revolution, because the logic of social democracy is that the economy has to serve the interests of the people, and if it doesn't, you change it. that's totally counter to the ideology dominating contemporary politics, which is that everything is personalized, individualized, and human beings must collectively prostrate themselves before the whims of market forces. the interests of the public is subordinated to the interests of the market, or more exactly, of capital holders.

i've always maintained that the chance of a revolution within the next couple of decades is less than 1%, but that's short term guesswork, and i'm always suspicious of anyone making long-term or, worse, historically unanchored predications treated as laws - 'it is always true that'. long term, nothing is set in stone, and nobody knows what the gently caress they're talking about. there's always some faulty assumption, that nobody questioned, that ends up being upended, and there's always the black swan/x-factor, that ends up determining everything.

Gene Hackman Fan
Dec 27, 2002

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
https://twitter.com/DSADogCaucus/status/955672400821211136

If y'all were wanting snippets of Capital juxtaposed with pictures of dang doggos, have I the thread for you, Conrads.

R. Guyovich
Dec 25, 1991

i'm gonna make a rudatron longpost bingo card

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
https://twitter.com/jetta_rae/status/955550133164285953
Can you guess which chapter?

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977

rudatron posted:

i mean, you joke, but the criticism isn't entirely without merit. social democracy fell for the same reason it can't really get a foothold now, and anything constrained to that, and no further, is destined to be left behind and destroyed.

but at the same time, the current situation is very difficult, and you have to take what you can get. it's only been a couple of decades since the fall of the USSR, and domestically, the scene is still dominated by the reactionary revival of reaganism, and the counter acting capitulation of the mainstream left into new labor/left (which Margaret Thatcher credited as her greatest achievement).

did this guy honestly expect everyone, or even just the millennials, to suddenly pick up red books and become full party comrades overnight? it's a totally unrealistic expectation that's been advanced, that social democracy cannot ever be a transitionary phase, and instead that everyone has to jump from neoliberalism immediately to full communism, because your little reading club is low on numbers or whatever.

realistically, you have to start from somewhere, and getting into the tall grass of purity politics, before you even have a coherent political organization representing the left, is defeating yourself, before the battle even begins.

and the assumptions behind social democracy at least have the potential for revolution, because the logic of social democracy is that the economy has to serve the interests of the people, and if it doesn't, you change it. that's totally counter to the ideology dominating contemporary politics, which is that everything is personalized, individualized, and human beings must collectively prostrate themselves before the whims of market forces. the interests of the public is subordinated to the interests of the market, or more exactly, of capital holders.

i've always maintained that the chance of a revolution within the next couple of decades is less than 1%, but that's short term guesswork, and i'm always suspicious of anyone making long-term or, worse, historically unanchored predications treated as laws - 'it is always true that'. long term, nothing is set in stone, and nobody knows what the gently caress they're talking about. there's always some faulty assumption, that nobody questioned, that ends up being upended, and there's always the black swan/x-factor, that ends up determining everything.

didn't read any of this

IM DAY DAY IRL
Jul 11, 2003

Everything's fine.

Nothing to see here.

the one where there are a lot of mobilized activists being completely squandered via a dysfunctional and toxic steering committee ??

oh, you wanted me to be specific? sorry, wouldn't want to be un-comradly!

IM DAY DAY IRL
Jul 11, 2003

Everything's fine.

Nothing to see here.
one thing I will say is that if your local has vague bylaws that allow expulsion based on very subjective definitions of adherence to democratic socialism ideology, local/national policies, or any other witch-hunt fodder then get those bylaws defined in more detail ASAP. I'm afraid things are going to get awful messy with november on the horizon

Slanderer
May 6, 2007

this is actually extremely good

GunnerJ
Aug 1, 2005

Do you think this is funny?

Rated PG-34 posted:

renewed membership today despite reservations

here's a depressing read: https://platypus1917.org/2017/10/01/millennial-left-dead/

This is kind of a confusing mish-mash that all seems predicated on "the left" as a formation that needs to swing Presidential elections or die. Nothing I have seen in my time organizing in DSA convinces me that this is the orientation of the organization, but hey who knows what will happen a year after the 2019 convention.

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

To declare it all prematurely dead feels like another attempt to claim the mantle of the true left by an obscure group.
That's ridiculous, socialism only dies forever when a popular podcaster has a bad take.

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Slanderer posted:

this is actually extremely good

why

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

i just read it as another "durrrr millenials are killing us with their avocado toast and rear end eating"

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy

Karl Barks posted:

i just read it as another "durrrr millenials are killing us with their avocado toast and rear end eating"

Remember, it is written by troskyists, so to them the Left has always been dead.

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy
the platypus society puts out interesting things and they pour ice water on stuff when it needs it, but their general line seems to be "the left is dead and everything is hosed" and any kind of practical organizing is insufficiently revolutionary in that trot rabbit hole kind of way

Ace of Baes
Jul 7, 1977

IM DAY DAY IRL posted:

the one where there are a lot of mobilized activists being completely squandered via a dysfunctional and toxic steering committee ??

oh, you wanted me to be specific? sorry, wouldn't want to be un-comradly!

based on pics of like 100+ people going our to canvas for m4a it doesn't look like it's being squandered

Halloween Jack
Sep 12, 2003
I WILL CUT OFF BOTH OF MY ARMS BEFORE I VOTE FOR ANYONE THAT IS MORE POPULAR THAN BERNIE!!!!!
I understand the appeal of fascism now. When I see one of these things where someone tweets a screencap of a Facebook post that's a snippet of a conversation about another tweet quoting an article that no one in the flamewar has actually read, I just want to throw everyone involved in a big burlap sack, and throw the sack down the Gemonian Stairs.

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy

Karl Barks posted:

i just read it as another "durrrr millenials are killing us with their avocado toast and rear end eating"
the jacobin article is interesting, it's nothing to do with millennials, it tries to skewer callout culture as a side effect of a wider culture of individualist perfectionism, cultivated by neoliberal capitalism.

drama is bad though

StashAugustine
Mar 24, 2013

Do not trust in hope- it will betray you! Only faith and hatred sustain.

i have a theory question and im not sure where to ask it: when and how did 'capitalism' become synonymous with 'market economies'

ScrubLeague
Feb 11, 2007

Nap Ghost
if you're asking when capitalism became bad it's forever but if you're asking when people became obsessed with capitalism as meritocratic religion it's the start of the cold war and matriculation with reagan

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

emdash
Oct 19, 2003

and?
Why does that DSA person and their twitter thread think the Jacobin article is about them/their chapter in particular

(it's because some people have egocentricity brain worms)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply