|
I post mostly outside of work or during lunch because I don't have time most days, because I'm working.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 09:11 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 01:45 |
|
qhat posted:I post mostly outside of work or during lunch because I don't have time most days, because I'm working. you have this the wrong way it is your duty to steal as much as possible from your employer.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 09:16 |
|
My figgies don't earn themselves unfortunately
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 09:53 |
|
i don't see how there is a conflict here between earning as much as possible and stealing as much time / salary / office supplies
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 10:15 |
|
qhat posted:My figgies don't earn themselves unfortunately They do for those exploiting your labor.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 12:03 |
|
posting is my career
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 13:10 |
|
HoboMan posted:i def mostly post at work I am posting from work right now
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 14:45 |
|
HoboMan posted:i def mostly post at work
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 14:53 |
|
qhat posted:I post mostly outside of work or during lunch because I don't have time most days, because I'm working. look at this idiot who sucks at his job
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 14:53 |
|
Appearing busy and productive while farting around most of the day is the most important skill Also getting a day's worth of work done in an hour or two, because you're actually turbo-productive when you need to
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 15:22 |
|
HoboMan posted:i def mostly post at work
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 15:38 |
|
always be posting
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 16:28 |
|
I have some sort of 2.5hr "non-technical" webcam-based skills test tomorrow.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 16:39 |
|
Schadenboner posted:I have some sort of 2.5hr "non-technical" webcam-based skills test tomorrow.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 16:43 |
|
as with all remote meetings, pants are optional
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 16:45 |
|
Schadenboner posted:I have some sort of 2.5hr "non-technical" webcam-based skills test tomorrow. Rip
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 19:22 |
|
Poor 'ol Schadenboner, thought of career advancement and died. Schadenboner fucked around with this message at 19:27 on Jan 30, 2018 |
# ? Jan 30, 2018 19:25 |
|
having lunch with a hiring manager in another group. first date jitters until he shows up, ugh.
|
# ? Jan 30, 2018 21:12 |
|
The Management posted:having lunch with a hiring manager in another group. first date jitters until he shows up, ugh. How did it go?
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 01:09 |
|
Schadenboner posted:How did it go? second date looking promising.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 02:12 |
|
internal transfers suck because you always end up still getting called for help from your previous group
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 02:34 |
|
cheque_some posted:internal transfers suck because you always end up still getting called for help from your previous group Even in the hell hole that was my old job it was expected that I would tell my previous teams to gently caress off if they tried to pull me away from current responsibilities.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 02:35 |
|
their poo poo was broken before I got there. they tried it with the guy who actually wrote it and he blew them off so I’m pretty sure I can do it too,
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 03:50 |
|
cheque_some posted:internal transfers suck because you always end up still getting called for help from your previous group
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:17 |
|
like geez i learned that one back when i was bagging groceries
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:18 |
|
If a recruiter comes up to you on LinkedIn, does anyone else right off the bat ask what the compensation range is? Most of these guys just want to speak to me for half an hour on the phone or at coffee or whatever, half an hour that I don't got to just realise they want to pay less than what I already earn.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 07:44 |
|
qhat posted:If a recruiter comes up to you on LinkedIn, does anyone else right off the bat ask what the compensation range is? Most of these guys just want to speak to me for half an hour on the phone or at coffee or whatever, half an hour that I don't got to just realise they want to pay less than what I already earn. don’t talk to recruiters unless you absolutely need a job and you won’t have this problem
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 08:50 |
|
meatpotato posted:don’t talk to recruiters unless you absolutely need a job and you won’t have this problem A truth that never stops being true
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 09:43 |
|
cheque_some posted:internal transfers suck because you always end up still getting called for help from your previous group I got that but with please help us with an incident, roughly a year after I had quit that job
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 13:11 |
|
qhat posted:If a recruiter comes up to you on LinkedIn, does anyone else right off the bat ask what the compensation range is? Most of these guys just want to speak to me for half an hour on the phone or at coffee or whatever, half an hour that I don't got to just realise they want to pay less than what I already earn. I tried this a few times and it’s a guaranteed way to kill the conversation. what you want is for them to decide that they need you first. then the hiring manager can put pressure on the recruiter to come up with the number you want. one time, for a change, I decided to try the opposite approach. very early in the conversation I said “my total comp is this much. are we playing in the same ballpark?” she stammered out some half-hearted thing about stock and whatever and said she’d get back to me. she never got back to me. I do ask for a detailed job description in email before I waste any time on the phone.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 14:31 |
|
qhat posted:If a recruiter comes up to you on LinkedIn, does anyone else right off the bat ask what the compensation range is? one of my colleagues had the bright idea of adding a google form to his profile and ignoring any recruiters who don't use it first question: how much
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 15:33 |
|
interviewed a dude who was technically very proficient and we intentionally threw some easier vague beginner technical questions like "explain to me how x works" or "can you tell me the difference between x and y?", and the guy seemed visibly flustered as if that stuff was beneath him and later ended up leaving very quickly without waiting for info on when he'd be called back. I think the dude implicitly failed the "can you, as a technical leader, explain things to junior members of the team" part of the interview without realizing it.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 16:13 |
|
qhat posted:If a recruiter comes up to you on LinkedIn, does anyone else right off the bat ask what the compensation range is? Most of these guys just want to speak to me for half an hour on the phone or at coffee or whatever, half an hour that I don't got to just realise they want to pay less than what I already earn. no one cold calling you off linkedin is ever worth your time recruiters are a necessary evil, sure, but the ones who are trolling linkedin are the bottom-feeders' bottom-feeder. they literally had nothing better to do than pitch long shots.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 16:21 |
|
The Management posted:I tried this a few times and it’s a guaranteed way to kill the conversation. what you want is for them to decide that they need you first. then the hiring manager can put pressure on the recruiter to come up with the number you want. yeah the comp range advertised by hr is not like, a hard and fast rule. when it comes time to negotiate all things are flexible it's more important to find companies you want to work for, and recruiters who have connections to those firms, than it is to try and winnow opportunities by comp early in the process (remember, the companies are also trying to winnow candidates by comp demand, early in the process, so the best you can ever get out of it is mutually screening each other out for a reason that could have easily been overcome during negotiations)
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 16:22 |
|
only ever respond to in-house recruiters at firms you'd actually like to work for. delete everything else.
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 16:24 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:no one cold calling you off linkedin is ever worth your time if you have a very specific niche that actually narrows down the pool a bunch it can be useful but that's about it
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 17:15 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:yeah the comp range advertised by hr is not like, a hard and fast rule. when it comes time to negotiate all things are flexible Ideally, you'd not even consider wasting your time at an on-site interview if the starting point for their salary expectations is so low it's laughable. There are companies here in Vancouver that think C$70-80k is a competitive salary for an engineer with almost a decade of experience, even when you've got Amazon knocking at their door offering over 120k on the low end. I guess it does just come down to ignoring the peasants trolling LinkedIn and actively contact in-house recruiters directly. qhat fucked around with this message at 19:28 on Jan 31, 2018 |
# ? Jan 31, 2018 19:25 |
|
it's probably a perfectly fine salary for the candidates they'll take tons of company will put on an internal/external face of wanting the best and the brightest but then offer no comp and no work that would be even interesting to anyone and then filling up the place with people that are cool with it for one reason or another
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 20:58 |
|
i dont program in my free time, why would i have a github why would any company willingly contribute to open source serious q
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 22:12 |
|
|
# ? Apr 19, 2024 01:45 |
|
Share Bear posted:i dont program in my free time, why would i have a github You make changes and upload it for someone else to maintain
|
# ? Jan 31, 2018 22:14 |