|
aware of dog posted:Snap thinks people still want their dumb glasses, and will reportedly be shipping Spectacles 2.0 this fall It's going to be Spectacular. 
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 02:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 07:02 |
|
|
Did specs 1.0 ever get hacked?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 02:41
|
|
|
RandomPauI posted:Did specs 1.0 ever get hacked? Since all they are is a camera with bluetooth functionality to move things to a phone or tablet, the only hacks that seem to have come out are people finding ways to make it record more than 10 seconds of video at once. And of course, people determining the best way to cover over the "i'm recording now" LED indicators.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 03:04
|
|
|
Albinator posted:Apparently SV can't even manage to keep a few chickens without making it abhorrent: Of course not. The whole point isn't that you think chickens are cool or that you want high quality eggs (though chances are the chickens are getting terrible dietary supplements and/or are eating soylent rendering that point moot). The point is to do something ~new and special~ that makes you hip and remarkable and lets you smugly pretend you're ~connecting with your roots~ while just happening to also show off your money in a roundabout way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 09:00
|
|
I CANNOT EJACULATE WITHOUT SEEING NATIVE AMERICANS BRUTALISED!
|
suck my woke dick posted:Of course not. The whole point isn't that you think chickens are cool or that you want high quality eggs (though chances are the chickens are getting terrible dietary supplements and/or are eating soylent rendering that point moot). The point is to do something ~new and special~ that makes you hip and remarkable and lets you smugly pretend you're ~connecting with your roots~ while just happening to also show off your money in a roundabout way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 09:20
|
|
|
It could also imply being hill folk.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 09:24
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:Having an actual yard in this town implies being a multi-millionaire. I don't see how the chickens are relevant. “yo i have a yard” is a bit too on the nose “yo i, a brogrammer, have chickens” lets everyone know you also have a yard
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 09:25
|
|
|
I think maybe '45 year old tech worker guy with some kids and some chickens' is too far an extension of the term 'brogrammer'.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 15:11
|
|
|
Raising chickens as egg laying family pets has been a thing forever, being upset about this seems really weird. Pretty much every picture in the whole article shows a family with a little kid. What a weird thing to be angry about.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 15:37
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Raising chickens as egg laying family pets has been a thing forever, being upset about this seems really weird. Pretty much every picture in the whole article shows a family with a little kid. What a weird thing to be angry about. Most people don't keep them in $20000 coops and feed them steak and organic watermelon. Also, consider that this is Silicon "gently caress the poor and long live our property values" Valley. These same people will gladly block homeless housing assistance while spending a full family's income on chickens. It's just one more plop on a big poo poo sundae.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:00
|
|
|
Sundae posted:Most people don't keep them in $20000 coops The guy in the story has 13 chickens and three sheep, the dude built a barn, what a monster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:09
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:Having an actual yard in this town implies being a multi-millionaire. I don't see how the chickens are relevant. they're also breeding and tracking the traits of heirloom varieties which is pretty inverted from throwing corn amongst the yard birds Owlofcreamcheese posted:Raising chickens as egg laying family pets has been a thing forever, being upset about this seems really weird. Pretty much every picture in the whole article shows a family with a little kid. What a weird thing to be angry about. you realize this is actually the designated "let's laugh at silicon valley" therad and not the "argue with fishmech about linux" thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:they're also breeding and tracking the traits of heirloom varieties which is pretty inverted from throwing corn amongst the yard birds I thought this was the self-driving cars thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:The guy in the story has 13 chickens and three sheep, the dude built a barn, what a monster. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
suck my woke dick posted:Of course not. The whole point isn't that you think chickens are cool or that you want high quality eggs (though chances are the chickens are getting terrible dietary supplements and/or are eating soylent rendering that point moot). The point is to do something ~new and special~ that makes you hip and remarkable and lets you smugly pretend you're ~connecting with your roots~ while just happening to also show off your money in a roundabout way. "our chickens end up eating grilled salmon, steak, fresh lettuce and organic watermelon.”" 
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:16
|
|
|
Andrast posted:I thought this was the self-driving cars thread self driving chickens running chrome OS thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
Elias_Maluco posted:self driving chickens running chrome OS thread We've sucessful used birds as guidance systems: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...elTTNJmkBlN3mZA
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:40
|
|
|
i wanna shove evan spiegel in a goddamn locker. also lmao: quote:Kerr described Spiegel as "very traditional" and said that he believes in sex after marriage.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:you realize this is actually the designated "let's laugh at silicon valley" therad and not the "argue with fishmech about linux" thread Did you run out of actual things to whine about and had to move on to freaking out someone built a barn for their 20 chickens?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:55
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Did you run out of actual things to whine about and had to move on to freaking out someone built a barn for their 20 chickens? there's only one person whining and freaking out itt at this moment. stay tuned for the shocking reveal! "haha look at these idiots doing the hipster chicken coop thing but like, way more expensive. lol dorks" "why is this funny? i dont get the joke?! this is normal? everyone's freaking out, stop it you whiners aaaaRRRGH" *angrily installs firefox*
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 16:56
|
|
|
boner confessor posted:"haha look at these idiots doing the hipster chicken coop thing but like, way more expensive. lol dorks" I mean, it's talking about people with like 20 chickens and some sheep and stuff. I am sure you can build a barn or whatever for less than 20,000 but that is not even any sort of crazy amount. Not so crazy anyone needs to clutch pearls over it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 17:15
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese is the living embodiment of annoying consumerist culture so of course he feels the need to defend even the most cartoonishly excessive instances of social signaling.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 17:25
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:I mean, it's talking about people with like 20 chickens and some sheep and stuff. I am sure you can build a barn or whatever for less than 20,000 but that is not even any sort of crazy amount. Not so crazy anyone needs to clutch pearls over it. im sure if you keep insisting everyone but you is Extremely Mad it will eventually come true
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 17:27
|
|
|
Facebook clarifies (?) its stance on child grooming.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 17:34
|
|
|
quote:Facebook asks users: should we allow men to ask children for sexual images? can't wait to hear the nuanced, thoughtful, libertarian, ancap thoughts
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 18:23
|
|
|
"This content should be allowed on Facebook, and I would not mind seeing it" is a great line to be admitted as evidence after Facebook sends the results of their honeypot survey to the authorities.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 18:29
|
|
|
Grooming partners as children has been a thing forever, being upset about this seems really weird. Pretty much every picture in the whole article shows a family with a little kid. What a weird thing to be angry about. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 18:54
|
|
|
Trabisnikof posted:Grooming partners as children has been a thing forever, being upset about this seems really weird. Pretty much every picture in the whole article shows a family with a little kid. What a weird thing to be angry about. I loved your movie Manhattan. Great cinematography.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2018 19:51
|
|
|
9-Volt Assault posted:"our chickens end up eating grilled salmon, steak, fresh lettuce and organic watermelon.”"
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 00:02
|
|
|
lol that Facebook poll indicates how the folks making decisions there are fuckin out of the loop of normal irl society "a piece of the puzzle we just can't figure out is seeing if the unwashed sub-millionaires are down with grooming children as sex partners- one this that is baffling: how do they afford the private jet?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 00:15
|
|
|
ShadowHawk posted:This is journalist for "I asked them if they feed leftovers to the chickens instead of throwing them in the trash, they said yes, then I made them clarify and took it out of context". edit: VVV I was wrong! pangstrom fucked around with this message at 03:53 on Mar 6, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 00:52
|
|
|
Proactively policing private messages is not a thing any major form of communication does. If Facebook wants to move in that direction it’s not necessarily bad but it makes sense they would proceed with a lot of input on how to make those policies. Like it’d be really wild if a phone company announced it was going to actively screen all calls for pedophiles and it might be good if they did but they probably would do survays too on how to figure out a policy like that. Especially if they were looking at a range of policing, like if an email company was going to search all messages for drug deals that would be horrific but looking for pedophiles sorta doesn’t bother me and figuring out where people break on that stuff seems not crazy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:08
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Proactively policing private messages is not a thing any major form of communication does. If Facebook wants to move in that direction it’s not necessarily bad but it makes sense they would proceed with a lot of input on how to make those policies. Like it’d be really wild if a phone company announced it was going to actively screen all calls for pedophiles and it might be good if they did but they probably would do survays too on how to figure out a policy like that. Especially if they were looking at a range of policing, like if an email company was going to search all messages for drug deals that would be horrific but looking for pedophiles sorta doesn’t bother me and figuring out where people break on that stuff seems not crazy. No it makes no sense to ask if adults sexually harassing children is ok. It's already manifestly not ok.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:13
|
|
|
pangstrom posted:Yeah I don't want to defend the millionaire hipster whatever he is in any general sense, but I had exactly the same thought. Nope, they explicitly said they *weren’t* feeding them scraps: quote:“We spend an insane amount of money. We thought we’d feed them leftovers, but our chickens end up eating grilled salmon, steak, fresh lettuce and organic watermelon.” Bonus lol quote:At least one of Citroen’s clients has a personal chef who cooks for her chickens.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:15
|
|
|
fishmech posted:No it makes no sense to ask if adults sexually harassing children is ok. It's already manifestly not ok. Absolutely not ok. But like, no other medium of communication proactively policies something like that. Like it would be an absolutely massive deal if a phone company or something did it. But at the same time it does really make sense for facebook to be in a good position to monitor private messages in a way that is different than other sorts of private messages so it's not crazy to suggest they should. Still, if they are looking to monitor and moderate private communication it makes sense for them to seek input from the public on how to best do it. Like I guess it made a laugh o rama by having generic questions that don't apply well to something so illegal and immoral as sexting children but it was a multi question survey about a bunch of topics and they all had the same set of possible answers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:27
|
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:Absolutely not ok. But like, no other medium of communication proactively policies something like that. Like it would be an absolutely massive deal if a phone company or something did it. But at the same time it does really make sense for facebook to be in a good position to monitor private messages in a way that is different than other sorts of private messages so it's not crazy to suggest they should. Still, if they are looking to monitor and moderate private communication it makes sense for them to seek input from the public on how to best do it. Like I guess it made a laugh o rama by having generic questions that don't apply well to something so illegal and immoral as sexting children but it was a multi question survey about a bunch of topics and they all had the same set of possible answers. It's literally a crime to sexually harass children, and the question is "in an ideal world, what should we do". There can be no other answer than "don't allow this".
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:34
|
|
|
They might not really care about the answer and are trying to out pedos in their userbase
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:44
|
|
|
loving lol at owlofcreamcheese defending pedophiles right to privacy
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:52
|
|
|
fishmech posted:It's literally a crime to sexually harass children, and the question is "in an ideal world, what should we do". There can be no other answer than "don't allow this". I mean, literally every other form of private communication ignores it. maybe they shouldn't but you can call people on the phone or send letters in the mail or through email or text messages or slack or twitter DMs or something and commit all sorts of crimes and they all turn a blind eye and at most passively store things incase a warrant comes. Facebook being proactive about it might be a good thing, but it's not the normal way this stuff works so determining how policy on something like that should be formed isn't a nutty idea. It's gonna be a thing someone is gonna have to figure out the details on. Especially if it's for many types of crime.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 02:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 07:02 |
|
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:I mean, literally every other form of private communication ignores it. a) no, "literally every other form" doesn't b) It's asking for an ideal world, and if your answer for in an ideal world is anything but "no sexual harassment" then you shouldn't be allowed near kids. Owlofcreamcheese posted:maybe they shouldn't but you can call people on the phone or send letters in the mail or through email or text messages or slack or twitter DMs or something and commit all sorts of crimes and they all turn a blind eye and at most passively store things incase a warrant comes. Enough about all the ways you harass kids and get away with it, all sorts of email providers will monitor incoming and outgoing messages (particularly business email servers), Slack will absolutely let administrators monitor direct messages - it's a feature Slack has for paid use to meet records compliance requirements. And all sorts of sites out there do keep track of messages between users that aren't "public". fishmech fucked around with this message at 03:19 on Mar 6, 2018 |
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2018 03:07
|
|