|
oh my god why is this a gif I want to murder someone edit: I clicked through looking for the data and not only could not find it but: quote:The poll has a credibility interval of 1 percentage point, meaning that results may vary by about 1 percentage point in either direction. DACK FAYDEN has a new favorite as of 20:45 on May 1, 2018 |
# ? May 1, 2018 20:43 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 21:52 |
|
HerStuddMuffin posted:Lol I guess that’s what happens when people try to register to vote in your party’s primaries and they get told to gently caress off because they missed deadlines or didn't register under the party they want to vote in because they can't be bothered to pay attention.
|
# ? May 1, 2018 20:48 |
|
DACK FAYDEN posted:edit: I clicked through looking for the data and not only could not find it but: Credibility intervals are a sort of Bayesian analog to frequentist confidence intervals (but with respect to the posterior distribution, not the sampling distribution). But I agree that their description is useless because it doesn't quantify how likely it is to be within 1%.
|
# ? May 1, 2018 21:56 |
|
Okay guys we need a chart that shows that US gun violence is not so bad. So what what we do is we just gradually increase the smallest bracket until the US is green like Canada and Europe. Aw poo poo now the whole middle east and Argentina is green too. gently caress it lets run with it. Katt has a new favorite as of 22:07 on May 1, 2018 |
# ? May 1, 2018 22:01 |
|
I was going to say "holy poo poo what is happening in Greenland" but then I remembered that so few people live there that one double homicide case is enough to push it into the second bracket on its own.
|
# ? May 2, 2018 00:03 |
|
ShimaTetsuo posted:Credibility intervals are a sort of Bayesian analog to frequentist confidence intervals (but with respect to the posterior distribution, not the sampling distribution). More pertinently, credible intervals actually are what everyone wants confidence intervals to be.
|
# ? May 2, 2018 00:32 |
|
Katt posted:Okay guys we need a chart that shows that US gun violence is not so bad. So what what we do is we just gradually increase the smallest bracket until the US is green like Canada and Europe. If you want to know just how egregious this is the intentional homicide rate for a few of these countries is USA = 4.88 Putting it in the same bracket as the UK = 0.92 (The UK isn't even particularly good here) The US has as many murders as the whole of Europe added together, so they seem like they should all be green no murder zones. The nearest countries to the US in terms of rate are such luminaries as Rwanda, Somalia,Kazakhstan, North Korea and impressively managed to double the murder rate in Libya.
|
# ? May 2, 2018 09:31 |
|
A nice simple awful graph from the cursed images thread.
|
# ? May 3, 2018 02:10 |
|
Aramoro posted:North Korea How would we know the murder rate in North Korea? Wouldn’t they just say it’s 0?
|
# ? May 3, 2018 03:53 |
|
Powered Descent posted:A nice simple awful graph from the cursed images thread. I think it's okay. It's supposed to illustrate the great famine, and show that, at a time of growth for the continent, Ireland saw a huge decline from which it recovered only recently. The dual axes don't bother me because I don't think anybody would think that Ireland is bigger than Europe, and it makes the trends easier to compare.
|
# ? May 3, 2018 03:57 |
|
Tree Goat posted:I think it's okay. It's supposed to illustrate the great famine, and show that, at a time of growth for the continent, Ireland saw a huge decline from which it recovered only recently. The dual axes don't bother me because I don't think anybody would think that Ireland is bigger than Europe, and it makes the trends easier to compare. Could the same be done with just percentages? The great famine was genocide on the Irish by the UK government and the chart does a lot to illustrate that a famine that struck all of Europe at the time was needlessly amplified in Ireland.
|
# ? May 3, 2018 06:39 |
|
Powered Descent posted:A nice simple awful graph from the cursed images thread. I'm the ten-year datapoint interval in Ireland versus the sixty-year datapoint interval for Europe.
|
# ? May 3, 2018 13:07 |
|
Mikl posted:I'm the ten-year datapoint interval in Ireland versus the sixty-year datapoint interval for Europe. Does that mislead?
|
# ? May 3, 2018 13:14 |
|
Subjunctive posted:Does that mislead? It might, there's a lot more smoothing of the data with sixty-year intervals than with ten-year intervals; Europe's population would always be going up as a trend, but you might miss small variations that correlate more closely to Ireland. I don't think that's what's happening here, but my general point is that when you make a graph comparing two things you should use the same intervals for both of them.
|
# ? May 3, 2018 13:21 |
|
For the two people who haven't heard it before: How many potatoes does it take to kill an Irishman? None
|
# ? May 3, 2018 18:46 |
|
Mikl posted:It might, there's a lot more smoothing of the data with sixty-year intervals than with ten-year intervals; Europe's population would always be going up as a trend, but you might miss small variations that correlate more closely to Ireland. I don't think that's what's happening here, but my general point is that when you make a graph comparing two things you should use the same intervals for both of them. So the graph would be better if they coarsened the Ireland data points to 60-year intervals?
|
# ? May 3, 2018 18:52 |
|
It's actually kind of crazy looking at the population of Europe at that low sampling interval; the two most violent conflicts in European history barely register.
PittTheElder has a new favorite as of 00:33 on May 4, 2018 |
# ? May 4, 2018 00:31 |
|
Yeah it's really deceptive because you're looking at close to or more than 100 million deaths within 30 years but it just looks like a slight decrease in population increase. The fact that the Haber process caused most of those deaths and offset them by increasing agriculture yield many times over is really ironic.
|
# ? May 4, 2018 00:50 |
|
|
# ? May 4, 2018 07:57 |
|
Dare I even ask what theta-1 and theta-2 are supposed to measure
|
# ? May 4, 2018 09:50 |
|
I’m assuming the author took a perfectly valid chart out of a topology paper or whatever and relabeled parts of it. They could just have replaced “war, peace, etc...” with “me, my ex, memes” and posted it on imgur.
|
# ? May 4, 2018 09:55 |
|
I guess we're in the timeline where Ben Goertzel quantum leaps into Jordan Peterson and Ziggy says he has to solve the war in Syria before he can leave.
|
# ? May 4, 2018 11:04 |
|
PittTheElder posted:It's actually kind of crazy looking at the population of Europe at that low sampling interval; the two most violent conflicts in European history barely register.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 16:39 |
|
Label your everything please.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 18:43 |
|
Now I want to make a chart with an x axis of something like 1970-2010 but have it be something like "tens of days after August 22, 1168" E: 2^x milliseconds after the big bang
|
# ? May 5, 2018 19:09 |
|
Outrail posted:Label your everything please. klafbang has a new favorite as of 19:35 on May 5, 2018 |
# ? May 5, 2018 19:31 |
|
this counts, right? also, when did "introvert" turn into another word for "very smart intelligent genius >180 iq" instead of just implying social awkwardness
|
# ? May 5, 2018 20:11 |
|
Telltolin posted:
around 2010 i believe
|
# ? May 5, 2018 21:01 |
|
Telltolin posted:
lol what are you not INTJ or something? Get outta here
|
# ? May 5, 2018 21:03 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2018 21:11 |
|
PittTheElder posted:It's actually kind of crazy looking at the population of Europe at that low sampling interval; the two most violent conflicts in European history barely register. Yeah, population growth in general exploded in the 19th and 20th centuries due to medical advances leading to a much lower rate of infant mortality, so even though millions of people died in two world wars, when zoomed out and looking at the average it STILL works out to a net increase relative to previous centuries.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 22:26 |
|
It's a little bit but it's not really wrong.
|
# ? May 5, 2018 22:37 |
|
Telltolin posted:
yeah people who brag about being introverts are definitely victims of an online myers-briggstest SENSUAL DAD KISS posted:lol what are you not INTJ or something? Get outta here i think i was INTJ too, but its literally 20 years since
|
# ? May 5, 2018 23:20 |
|
Only super hero movies were never good
|
# ? May 6, 2018 00:28 |
|
ikanreed posted:Only super hero movies were never good blade trinity was a fantastic movie
|
# ? May 6, 2018 01:36 |
|
Outrail posted:Label your everything please. Population of Cambodia over 40 years, plotted so that one of the most vicious and evil genocides of the 20th century just looks like a silly little nothing.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 02:27 |
|
Where is this reversing of "few and far between" coming from? This is the second time I've seen this misconception in maybe a week. "Far and few between" doesn't even make much sense.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 02:31 |
|
It's comes from people trying to use ready made idioms without thinking what they actually mean. See also "I could care less" instead of "I couldn't care less". The whole point is that you care so little it's impossible to care less! Also while introvert has become real dumb, the worst is "ambivert", to describe those special people that are sometimes introverts and sometimes extroverts.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 08:15 |
|
Fathis Munk posted:It's comes from people trying to use ready made idioms without thinking what they actually mean. See also "I could care less" instead of "I couldn't care less". The whole point is that you care so little it's impossible to care less! I'm personally ambidextrous about it.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 08:21 |
|
|
# ? Apr 25, 2024 21:52 |
|
My favorite one is people misusing osmosis when they meant to abuse symbiosis instead. I can’t help picturing them exchanging solvent with their best friend through a semi-permeable membrane to balance the molarity of their solutes.
|
# ? May 6, 2018 08:40 |