|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Libs Anomalous Amalgam posted:Libs And just for the record, since it can be quoted, the top is his list from less than 24 hours ago.
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 14:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
hmmm... so this means.... cpig...... may be good guy??
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 14:27
|
|
|
I will do a list too Libs Pig Kb Byers Kumba DB TMM Capn Pmush RF AA Fascist
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 14:59
|
|
|
##Nominate KB
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:13
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:The only way to put me that low is because you are a fascist or because you are just being oblivious. Sorry that list is admittedly bad. I'm sick today, it's a poor excuse but an honest one. I'd say your push for Kumba probably puts you in a "likely liberal" category. That also makes KB look good It makes RF bad Pig is bad P Mush might be bad capn is might be bad Kumba is tinfoil bad but probably good Byers is probably bad, it was a scummy move to pull that wording into the context of a scumslip. A unanimous A-ha! I think he's trying hard to look good and I feel like that was a scum playbook play. Fascists libs for scummy bad good respectively. Please forgive readability, typing on an unwieldy tablet laying down. Uh whoo else DB might be good I realize I look bad, but that's just usually the case.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:14
|
|
|
##vote No
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:20
|
|
|
 ##vote no
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:28
|
|
|
#vote no
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:30
|
|
|
##vote no
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:32
|
|
|
##vote no
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:33
|
|
|
Just for the record, with 3 liberal cards out of 12 there is like a 60% chance that the next President will pull a liberal card in the new shuffled deck.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:35
|
|
|
##vote no
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 15:39
|
|
|
Fall 1931 Splinters are starting to show as a president fails to form a government for the first time. The populace is patient for now. Game status: 2 cards in the policy deck 10 cards in the discard pile 2 Fascist policies passed 3 Liberal policies passed Presidency order: kumba Anomalous Amalgam TMMadman Byers2142 PMush Perfect CapnAndy King Burgundy CapitalistPig Dick Bastardly Retro Futurist Previous administration was Dick Bastardly and kumba. Nomination deadline: 19th May, 16:00 GMT
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:11
|
|
|
okay so this turn is going to be pretty pivotal, i am open to suggestion about nomination. i'm currently thinking tmm i'd also like to talk about who we should put up for special election if we end up passing fash today. i'm thinking db or maybe byers. i've cooled on my 'maybe bad guy' read on byers
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:14
|
|
|
I'd be ok with TMM today. I'd be ok with a Byers or DB special election.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:21
|
|
|
to DB and Byers: if you were to be specially elected, who would you nominate as chancellor?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:27
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I'd be ok with TMM today. I agree with this with a slight leaning toward byers over db.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:27
|
|
|
TMM is doing good work
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:28
|
|
|
kumba posted:to DB and Byers: For the record, we'd be at Hitler zone if they got special elected, at which point I'd suggest the closest person to confirmed non Hitler we have. Me. Even the couple people who claim to think I'm fascist like RF, can't possibly think I'm Hitler. But most people agree that I'm liberal at this point and I've been investigated, making me the safest choice.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:33
|
|
|
So I slept through being able to quote AA's list, but it was absurd; kumba is by a wide margin the most trustworthy person in this game right now. Anomalous Amalgam posted:TMM is doing good work Also for the record I don't trust TMM and would vote no. I'd take DB, or CPig in a pinch -- yes I know CPig's in lockout but if I had to guess between him and RF, I guess him. Also also, rules question: Next fascist power is getting to preview the next three policies in the deck, right? Will the President be aware of their order as well -- i.e. this is on top, this will be drawn second, this will be drawn third?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:39
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:Also also, rules question: Next fascist power is getting to preview the next three policies in the deck, right? Will the President be aware of their order as well -- i.e. this is on top, this will be drawn second, this will be drawn third? Next power is the special election. The policy peek only happens in a 5-6 player game. (and, just for the record: yes, the president would be aware).
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
kumba posted:to DB and Byers: I would nom Byers.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:46
|
|
|
Dancer posted:The policy peek only happens in a 5-6 player game. wtf i don't see that in the rules anywhere. what are these shenanigans!!!
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:47
|
|
|
Welp. I'm only now realizing that the way I presented the exem powers may have not been entirely clear. They are these, in that order:Dancer posted:I think the last thing I absolutely need to point out is the list of executive powers. Reminder that these are one-time powers that can be used by the sitting president when a Fascist policy is passed. They go as follows:
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 16:52
|
|
|
CapnAndy posted:So I slept through being able to quote AA's list, but it was absurd; kumba is by a wide margin the most trustworthy person in this game right now. I'm curious if this concerns you at all?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:03
|
|
|
I'd also be okay with Byers.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I'm curious if this concerns you at all?
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:11
|
|
|
kumba posted:to DB and Byers: Probably DB. You and TMM would be blocked due to term limits, Andy I feel like is clearly fascist, and between DB and PMush I think she's the more likely Hitler.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:32
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Probably DB. You and TMM would be blocked due to term limits, Andy I feel like is clearly fascist, and between DB and PMush I think she's the more likely Hitler. No term limits I don't think, for special election. Also, no one has commented on my great idea of myself once we enter Hitler Zone. 
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:35
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:No term limits I don't think, for special election. Oh, looked it back up, I guess chancellor is still limited. Only president pick for the special election isn't limited.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:38
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Oh, looked it back up, I guess chancellor is still limited. Only president pick for the special election isn't limited. You're being slightly ambiguous and I'm not sure if you're wrong or not. To clarify: Both members of the previous administration are term-limited, regardless of how special the election is, and cannot be nominated as chancellor. They can only be in government by having the Presidency rotate to them (in which case it doesn't matter what their role was in the previous admin).
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:42
|
|
|
Dancer posted:You're being slightly ambiguous and I'm not sure if you're wrong or not. To clarify: Both members of the previous administration are term-limited, regardless of how special the election is, and cannot be nominated as chancellor. They can only be in government by having the Presidency rotate to them (in which case it doesn't matter what their role was in the previous admin). Right, but anyone but the current president can be picked as president for special election right? Term limits don't apply to that. Just to the chancellor pick. That is all I was saying with my correction.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:55
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:For the record, we'd be at Hitler zone if they got special elected, at which point I'd suggest the closest person to confirmed non Hitler we have. Me. Even the couple people who claim to think I'm fascist like RF, can't possibly think I'm Hitler. But most people agree that I'm liberal at this point and I've been investigated, making me the safest choice. I was thinking about this; if we get to three fascist policies, there is some validity to the idea that we select the likely liberal(s) from the frozen players for Chancellor, with a zero tolerance policy. Simply put, if they get into an argument with the President over cards, they never are Chancellor again. It risks a fascist Chancellor, but tries to avoid a Hitler Chancellor. As long as we don't see KB making fascist plays or getting into conflict, having him as one of our two Chancellors isn't a bad idea. But we need two that we can alternate between, and for my second I'm leaning DB from the choices in front of me, which if I've done the math right doesn't risk needing a third Chancellor down the line.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:56
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Oh, looked it back up, I guess chancellor is still limited. Only president pick for the special election isn't limited. Right
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:56
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Right, but anyone but the current president can be picked as president for special election right? Term limits don't apply to that. Just to the chancellor pick. That is all I was saying with my correction. No, anyone in government last time can't be picked. So if kumba-TMM government plays a third fascist, both are term-limited and can not be selected.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:57
|
|
|
I do like the idea of pegging someone currently locked out for Chancellor once we hit the Hitler Zone. They're probably either lib or a regular fascist, since I don't think Hitler would out himself so easily. There's also the outside chance that Hitler + a fascist made a really ballsy play, but without OoT communication, that feels incredibly unlikely.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 17:59
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:No, anyone in government last time can't be picked. So if kumba-TMM government plays a third fascist, both are term-limited and can not be selected. Hmm, here is the section of the rules I'm looking at: quote:The President chooses any other player at the table to be the next Presidential Candidate. Any player can become President—even players that are term-limited. I mean, I don't think we are suggesting this anyway, but I just want to make sure I understand the rules.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 18:02
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Hmm, here is the section of the rules I'm looking at: Oh, apparently my friends and I have been playing it wrong then.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
yea if i get the special election, i can pick anyone, but the person i pick cannot pick me or my chancellor of this turn for the special chancellor is how i read the rules
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 18:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
Does anyone think it's odd that Cap says that kumba is the most trustworthy player but he isn't willing to trust kumba if I'm picked chancellor? Especially in this situation. We're at 3L2F, so there is no danger in terms of immediately winning the game. If a fascist policy does get passed (regardless of why) then Caps most trustworthy player would get the power. Plus if a fascist power is passed and there is a conflict in between me and kumba then he would be in a better position to convince people that I'm a fascist.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 18:24
|
|