 Just got approved to come back in place by the senate! Apparently the people in the US still have a tiny bit of influence over the leaders, this is kick rear end. If you live in a swing state, or even if you don't consider contacting your senator/whoever is running to tell them that net neutrality is awesome. Trump does a lot of stuff based on popular support and has a history of firing anyone who isn't popular, so write to Fox News! Or Breitbart. Or some other conservative paper to tell them how as a lifelong republican you support net neutrality and this is a big deal to you and you might even vote :hillary: for the first time ever if net neutrality isn't restored. It can happen, certainly won't go to the line for Ajit if Fox runs an article about how it'll cost the GOP the mid-terms, polling or facts be damned.I get that everyone here is cynical, but the senate just passed it. This can be restored. Maintain your right to lightening fast SA shitposting, porn, and vidja games. Just make as much noise about this wherever else you shitpost as you can, your pants-making GBS threads twitter, your racist vlog, your 1994 ultimate video game list website. And if you can, get Fox to run articles in favor of net neutrality.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 22:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:35 |
|
|
It looks solidly partisan. Only a few Republicans supporting it and all the rest of them against. I am not optimistic, but I am hopeful.
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 22:19
|
|
|
imma net neuter you OP
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 22:33
|
|
|
cant wait to vote cory gardner out of office
|
|
#
?
May 16, 2018 22:36
|
|
|
Yo check this out...net JEWtrality
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 04:47
|
|
|
Peetown Manning posted:Yo check this out...net JEWtrality well now I'm against it!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 04:48
|
|
|
the house will block this. close thread.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 04:50
|
|
|
Dang It Bhabhi! posted:the house will block this. close thread.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 04:50
|
|
|
Even if the house somehow doesn't. Trump gonna tell the American people to gently caress off.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 04:54
|
|
SLICK GOKU BABY posted:Even if the house somehow doesn't. Trump gonna tell the American people to gently caress off. I think if enough of the people he cares about say they care, then he cares. there's a buncha goons that voted for him that also care about net neutrality.
|
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:06
|
|
|
And here's who was for and against: For: Baldwin, Tammy (Democrat - Wisconsin) Bennet, Michael F. (Democrat - Colorado) Blumenthal, Richard (Democrat - Connecticut) Booker, Cory A. (Democrat - New Jersey) Brown, Sherrod (Democrat - Ohio) Cantwell, Maria (Democrat - Washington) Cardin, Benjamin L. (Democrat - Maryland) Carper, Thomas R. (Democrat - Delaware) Casey, Robert P., Jr. (Democrat - Pennsylvania) Collins, Susan M. (Republican - Maine) Coons, Christopher A. (Democrat - Delaware) Cortez Masto, Catherine (Democrat - Nevada) Donnelly, Joe (Democrat - Indiana) Duckworth, Tammy (Democrat - Illinois) Durbin, Richard J. (Democrat - Illinois) Feinstein, Dianne (Democrat - California) Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (Democrat - New York) Harris, Kamala D. (Democrat - California) Hassan, Margaret Wood (Democrat - New Hampshire) Heinrich, Martin (Democrat - New Mexico) Heitkamp, Heidi (Democrat - North Dakota) Hirono, Mazie K. (Democrat - Hawaii) Jones, Doug (Democrat - Alabama) Kaine, Tim (Democrat - Virginia) Kennedy, John (Republican - Louisiana) King, Angus S., Jr. (Independent - Maine) Klobuchar, Amy (Democrat - Minnesota) Leahy, Patrick J. (Democrat - Vermont) Manchin, Joe, III (Democrat - West Virginia) Markey, Edward J. (Democrat - Massachusetts) McCaskill, Claire (Democrat - Missouri) Menendez, Robert (Democrat - New Jersey) Merkley, Jeff (Democrat - Oregon) Murkowski, Lisa (Republican - Alaska) Murphy, Christopher (Democrat - Connecticut) Murray, Patty (Democrat - Washington) Nelson, Bill (Democrat - Florida) Peters, Gary C. (Democrat - Michigan) Reed, Jack (Democrat - Rhode Island) Sanders, Bernard (Independent - Vermont) Schatz, Brian (Democrat - Hawaii) Schumer, Charles E. (Democrat - New York) Shaheen, Jeanne (Democrat - New Hampshire) Smith, Tina (Democrat - Minnesota) Stabenow, Debbie (Democrat - Michigan) Tester, Jon (Democrat - Montana) Udall, Tom (Democrat - New Mexico) Van Hollen, Chris (Democrat - Maryland) Warner, Mark R. (Democrat - Virginia) Warren, Elizabeth (Democrat - Massachusetts) Whitehouse, Sheldon (Democrat - Rhode Island) Wyden, Ron (Democrat - Oregon) Against: Alexander, Lamar (Republican - Tennessee) Barrasso, John (Republican - Wyoming) Blunt, Roy (Republican - Missouri) Boozman, John (Republican - Arkansas) Burr, Richard (Republican - North Carolina) Capito, Shelley Moore (Republican - West Virginia) Cassidy, Bill (Republican - Louisiana) Corker, Bob (Republican - Tennessee) Cornyn, John (Republican - Texas) Cotton, Tom (Republican - Arkansas) Crapo, Mike (Republican - Idaho) Cruz, Ted (Republican - Texas) Daines, Steve (Republican - Montana) Enzi, Michael B. (Republican - Wyoming) Ernst, Joni (Republican - Iowa) Fischer, Deb (Republican - Nebraska) Flake, Jeff (Republican - Arizona) Gardner, Cory (Republican - Colorado) Graham, Lindsey (Republican - South Carolina) Grassley, Chuck (Republican - Iowa) Hatch, Orrin G. (Republican - Utah) Heller, Dean (Republican - Nevada) Hoeven, John (Republican - North Dakota) Hyde-Smith, Cindy (Republican - Mississippi) Inhofe, James M. (Republican - Oklahoma) Isakson, Johnny (Republican - Georgia) Johnson, Ron (Republican - Wisconsin) Lankford, James (Republican - Oklahoma) Lee, Mike (Republican - Utah) McConnell, Mitch (Republican - Kentucky) Moran, Jerry (Republican - Kansas) Paul, Rand (Republican - Kentucky) Perdue, David (Republican - Georgia) Portman, Rob (Republican - Ohio) Risch, James E. (Republican - Idaho) Roberts, Pat (Republican - Kansas) Rounds, Mike (Republican - South Dakota) Rubio, Marco (Republican - Florida) Sasse, Ben (Republican - Nebraska) Scott, Tim (Republican - South Carolina) Shelby, Richard C. (Republican - Alabama) Sullivan, Dan (Republican - Alaska) Thune, John (Republican - South Dakota) Tillis, Thom (Republican - North Carolina) Toomey, Patrick J. (Republican - Pennsylvania) Wicker, Roger F. (Republican - Mississippi) Young, Todd (Republican - Indiana) Not voting McCain, John (Republican - Arizona) BOTH PARTIES THE SAME!!!!!!11
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:11
|
|
|
1st_Panzer_Div. posted:I think if enough of the people he cares about say they care, then he cares. there's a buncha goons that voted for him that also care about net neutrality. Woah Trump people supported this? /Lights cable modem and self on fire
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:11
|
|
|
The rules phased out a month ago. Has anything changed yet?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:12
|
|
|
do u know jenny posted:
just because gop is cancer doesn't mean the dems are good though
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:12
|
|
|
ChesterJT posted:The rules phased out a month ago. Has anything changed yet? It was discovered since then that AT&T gave Trump boatloads of money to repeal net neutrality
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:13
|
|
|
Dang It Bhabhi! posted:the house will block this. close thread.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:14
|
|
|
Hell yea you rock Trump most kick azz pres ever!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:21
|
|
|
do u know jenny posted:It was discovered since then that AT&T gave Trump boatloads of money to repeal net neutrality Yes and? Now that the reins are off, what has AT&T actually done differently? I'm not saying bad poo poo won't happen but I'm curious if this will turn out to be similar to the idiots screaming about how Trump was going to get the planet nuked the first week he's in office and a year later nothing is different.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:22
|
|
|
Back in 2003ish I remember this coming up and net neutrality was overwhelmingly bipartisan.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:25
|
|
|
do u know jenny posted:And here's who was for and against: I'm shocked. Shocked! That a bunch of Republicans want another Ma Bell.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 05:35
|
|
|
do u know jenny posted:
lol observe, citizen quote:The Senate today voted 52-47 to disapprove the FCCs recent order replacing 2015s net neutrality rules, a pleasant surprise for internet advocates and consumers throughout the country. Although the disapproval will almost certainly not lead to the new rules being undone, it is a powerful statement of solidarity with a constituency activated against this deeply unpopular order. In case you need it spelled out, this won't actually do poo poo all besides be fodder for Dems to say "see, we do something we fight for you." I for one am pretty loving sick of begging my government to not ream me up the rear end every few months then celebrating when there is a stay of rear end in a top hat tearing while more lube is awaited; aren't you? Moridin920 fucked around with this message at 09:15 on May 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 09:13
|
|
|
ChesterJT posted:Yes and? Now that the reins are off, what has AT&T actually done differently? I'm not saying bad poo poo won't happen but I'm curious if this will turn out to be similar to the idiots screaming about how Trump was going to get the planet nuked the first week he's in office and a year later nothing is different. lol yeah bro AT&T pays ~ $17m a year to dozens of lobbying firms for no reason at all e: jesus gently caress what is a "powerful statement of solidarity with the constituency" just VOTE FOR poo poo THAT WE WANT YOU SCUM FUCKS HOLY HELL. that is a literal "well we know what you want and we have to votes but you know we're just gonna pass this statement of solidarity instead. It won't actually do anything, no. but we feel you!" Moridin920 fucked around with this message at 09:26 on May 17, 2018 |
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 09:18
|
|
|
trump supporters deserve every bad thing that happens to them tbh.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 09:23
|
|
|
ChesterJT posted:Yes and? Now that the reins are off, what has AT&T actually done differently? I'm not saying bad poo poo won't happen but I'm curious if this will turn out to be similar to the idiots screaming about how Trump was going to get the planet nuked the first week he's in office and a year later nothing is different. The old rules have not yet expired, so no one has done anything differently. They will expire June 11th and probably nothing will change that day either. ISPs will slowly change thier service over time to minimize push back.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 09:30
|
|
|
Pawn 17 posted:The old rules have not yet expired, so no one has done anything differently. They will expire June 11th and probably nothing will change that day either. ISPs will slowly change thier service over time to minimize push back. Interesting, I read the FCC did the ruling back in December then congress had 60 days or something to redo it but didn't do they went away back in April. Do you have a link for the June 11th date you have?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 17:36
|
|
|
If destroying net neutrality wasn't an inherently noble act why did the NRA give that guy an award?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 17:39
|
|
|
ChesterJT posted:Interesting, I read the FCC did the ruling back in December then congress had 60 days or something to redo it but didn't do they went away back in April. Do you have a link for the June 11th date you have? Try the FCC's website https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2018/db0510/DOC-350644A1.pdf
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 18:22
|
|
|
Will this ruling affect my access to prolapse porn?
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 18:40
|
|
|
Jose Mengelez posted:trump supporters deserve every bad thing that happens to them tbh. I agree, but the problem is the rest of us have to deal with the fallout as well. Rad-daddio posted:Will this ruling affect my access to prolapse porn? Can't say for sure, but it might affect your access to piss tapes.
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 18:41
|
|
|
Next step is the House, here's a site which tracks which members have agreed to save Net Neutrality: https://www.battleforthenet.com/scoreboard/
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 21:11
|
|
|
Let's turn nyet neutrality into dah neutrality!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 21:13
|
|
|
Oh god they might turn on QoS its the end of the internet!!!!!
|
|
#
?
May 17, 2018 23:55
|
|
|
The house has like a 40 something person Republican majority. The Senate's vote will be meaningless.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 00:17
|
|
|
soy posted:Oh god they might turn on QoS its the end of the internet!!!!! that's not at all what this is about but way to be contrarian i guess
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 00:54
|
|
|
I hope they turn the whole loving thing off so I can go get some yard work done. ...and maybe stop jerking it to the newly found Mormon porn. Jesus that stuff is hosed up.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 01:18
|
|
|
Moridin920 posted:lol Yeah they're just setting themselves up with fodder for the mid terms, where even if they win big Trump can still veto it.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 03:15
|
|
|
Rad-daddio posted:I hope they turn the whole loving thing off so I can go get some yard work done. Dude its the only porn available where the women have full bush and no tattoos.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 03:40
|
|
|
Rad-daddio posted:Will this ruling affect my access to prolapse porn? It will likely stop and start sporadically like the stream.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 04:15
|
|
|
bad day posted:Dude its the only porn available where the women have full bush and no tattoos. You recommended it in the other thread, so I thought I'd give it a go. I don't know, man. I think the thing that gets me is the cult vibe. I mean, BDSM is all consensual. At the end of the day, all the horrible stuff is voluntary on both sides. When you mix dubious consent with all that ceremonial stuff it gets really weird. But, you were right about the scenes and dialogue.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 04:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 24, 2024 02:35 |
|
|
Yeah I dunno theres like storylines or whatever. Thats all there to keep subscribers.
|
|
#
?
May 18, 2018 04:46
|
|