Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Zedd
Jul 6, 2009

I mean, who would have noticed another madman around here?



sponges posted:

We’re 3 movies into Disney Star Wars and we’ve got one measly lightsaber duel.
Finn stumbling around vs Kylo, Rey vs Kylo, Rey+Kylo vs totally-not-lightsaber-sticks Guards makes 3 I think.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sponges
Sep 15, 2011

Zedd posted:

Finn stumbling around vs Kylo, Rey vs Kylo, Rey+Kylo vs totally-not-lightsaber-sticks Guards makes 3 I think.

Kylo and Rey vs. those guards doesn’t count imo

Dishwasher
Dec 5, 2006

Congratulations on not getting fit in 2011!

Wheat Loaf posted:

I don't think most people really care about what spaceships are in it all that much, just that there are some. :shrug:

Growing up, Star Wars was always merely a delivery device for space battle (and occasional snow speeder) porn along with related space battle games. I was all that Dat Pew Pew. The prequels disappointed mainly because the battles weren't good and, most of all, I thought the ship designs were total rear end. But the sequels and R1 delivered in spades by just giving me the old poo poo with a new coat of paint and lots of splosions, even tho this cycle isn't exactly Shakespeare either.

Dishwasher fucked around with this message at 02:43 on May 20, 2018

cuntman.net
Mar 1, 2013

LORD OF BOOTY posted:

i mean, it makes sense in the context of the new trilogy- the First Order is basically a cargo cult version of the Empire, so of course all their kit is pretty much based off imperial designs, and the Resistance just straight up can't afford new ships and is using old Rebellion gear.

even disregarding the fact that they decided to use the old designs first and came up with the justification later, its still a pretty lovely justification because the x wings are different models

cuntman.net
Mar 1, 2013

also lol the space battles in the sequels are mediocre at best

KVeezy3
Aug 18, 2005

Airport Music for Black Folk

The Cameo posted:

Also for whatever reason the idea of a black man kissing a white woman or there being any sort of consensual passion between the two is alarming to executives. White man and black woman? Perfectly fine. Black man and latina? Perfectly fine. Gay couples of any sort of intermixed race? A-okay! Asian man, white woman? "Well, no one finds Asian men attractive, but we'll let it go." Black man, white woman? Now hold your horses here, bucko, we're afraid that could be offensive to some folks.

poo poo, it took Will Smith until like Bright before he had an on-screen marriage with a white woman. Denzel has maybe had one or two on-screen mixed relationships like that? But hell if they'll anchor the love story of a blockbuster with it.

It's the strangest, stupidest hurdle. But then you remember some people lost their poo poo over a Cheerios commercial that did BM/WW, and you go "well, I suppose they have some actual evidence that they don't think it's worth the trouble."

Is it strange? America is structured on exploiting race relations and "civilized" society has subjected women to a state of nearly permanent subjugation. It's only natural that the idea of a black man and a white women is the most trangressive of all to America's identity.

cuntman.net
Mar 1, 2013

the real reason poe is a lovely character isnt because he makes bad decisions or whatever its because he is never in any threat in his space battle scenes and they are completely boring

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

sponges posted:

Kylo and Rey vs. those guards doesn’t count imo

i like the bad choreography + digitally removing guard weapons so rey isn't in danger

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

Dishwasher posted:

Growing up, Star Wars was always merely a delivery device for space battle (and occasional snow speeder) porn along with related space battle games. I was all that Dat Pew Pew. The prequels disappointed mainly because the battles weren't good and, most of all, I thought the ship designs were total rear end. But the sequels and R1 delivered in spades by just giving me the old poo poo with a new coat of paint and lots of splosions, even tho this cycle isn't exactly Shakespeare either.
Growing up, the sequel movies were the same to me. But when I look back on TFA, which came out in 2015, I feel I appreciate the 'talkie' bits a lot more.

Brother Entropy
Dec 27, 2009

cuntman.net posted:

the real reason poe is a lovely character isnt because he makes bad decisions or whatever its because he is never in any threat in his space battle scenes and they are completely boring

it's because focus testing denied him the death he was fated for after helping finn out at the start of tfa

poe only exists as a person for about 20 minutes of film, everything after he's a soulless husk imitating one

Pops Mgee
Aug 20, 2009

People all over the world,
Join Hands,
Start the Love Train!

sponges posted:

We’re 3 movies into Disney Star Wars and we’ve got one measly lightsaber duel.

I'm fine with it. It'll make the duels more meaningful when they do happen. Otherwise you end up with poo poo like the Anakin vs Dooku duel from Attack of the Clones which always felt like it was only there because of the thought "It's Star Wars, there has to be a lightsaber fight at the end." That duel is such a wet fart letdown after everything in the Battle of Geonosis right before it.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
I suppose at the end of the day it doesn't really matter so long as people watch the movies and enjoy them.

chiasaur11
Oct 22, 2012



Pops Mgee posted:

I'm fine with it. It'll make the duels more meaningful when they do happen. Otherwise you end up with poo poo like the Anakin vs Dooku duel from Attack of the Clones which always felt like it was only there because of the thought "It's Star Wars, there has to be a lightsaber fight at the end." That duel is such a wet fart letdown after everything in the Battle of Geonosis right before it.

It's a good point, but I'd say that the sequel trilogy has the same problem with lack of impact, coming from a different direction.

In the OT, there were three lightsaber duels, four if you count Luke's fight with himself in the cave. And they all worked to build up the stakes. First we see Darth Vader kill Obi-Wan, a character established as A Big Deal. Empire has its climax with Vader finally fighting Luke, and absolutely handing him his rear end.

The whole arc of the first two films builds up Darth Vader as an unstoppable challenge, unshakable by both force and argument, which made Luke's triumph in Jedi much more compelling. There was tension, emotional stakes, all the good stuff.

The prequels went in for a bunch more lightsaber fights, and made most of them much less impact. There wasn't much telling one flashy laser sword fight from the rest.

The Disney films haven't had many proper duels, but they've already undermined every antagonist. Kylo lost to Rey, and has only gotten to be more of an internally conflicted wreck since. Snoke was a nothing character who got killed in the first scene he shared with any of the heroes. And introducing brand new villains in the last film... does not seem a wise call, structurally.

It's difficult to imagine a duel for the finale that would actually carry narrative weight, is what I'm getting at.

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Brother Entropy posted:

it's because focus testing denied him the death he was fated for after helping finn out at the start of tfa

poe only exists as a person for about 20 minutes of film, everything after he's a soulless husk imitating one

Nah they added him back in pretty early in production, it wasn't done in last minute reshoots.

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'
It does kind of make me wonder how the end of the film would've played out without him.

Dave Syndrome
Jan 11, 2007
Look, Bernard. Bernard, look. Look. Bernard. Bernard. Look. Bernard. Bernard. Bernard! Bernard. Bernard. Look, Bernard! Bernard. Bernard! Bernard! Look! Bernard! Bernard. Bernard! Bernard, look! Look! Look, Bernard! Bernard! Bernard, look! Look! Bern

chiasaur11 posted:

It's difficult to imagine a duel for the finale that would actually carry narrative weight, is what I'm getting at.

I think I'd like to see a duel between Kylo's constantly-in-danger-of-overheating firesword and Rey's inexpertly fixed Lukesaber that ends with both weapons useless, and the duel ultimately being decided without lightsabers at all.
Sort of a reverse of the Yoda/Dooku duel ("It is obvious that this contest cannot be decided by our knowledge of the Force, but by our skills with a lightsaber"), and also a nice tie-in to the whole "kill the past" theme they seem to have going on.

Brother Entropy
Dec 27, 2009

Doctor Spaceman posted:

Nah they added him back in pretty early in production, it wasn't done in last minute reshoots.

you wouldn't know it from watching the finished product though

Super-NintendoUser
Jan 16, 2004

COWABUNGERDER COMPADRES
Soiled Meat
The force is moving rocks around with your mind

No the force is more than

Wins the day my moving rocks

CONSIDER MY EXPECTATIONS SUBVERTED

Kevin Palpatine
Dec 20, 2017

Dave Syndrome posted:

I think I'd like to see a duel between Kylo's constantly-in-danger-of-overheating firesword and Rey's inexpertly fixed Lukesaber that ends with both weapons useless, and the duel ultimately being decided without lightsabers at all.
Sort of a reverse of the Yoda/Dooku duel ("It is obvious that this contest cannot be decided by our knowledge of the Force, but by our skills with a lightsaber"), and also a nice tie-in to the whole "kill the past" theme they seem to have going on.

their lightsabres get destroyed and they get in a fistfight with the rolling stones street fighting man playing in the background

there will be eye gouging and hair pulling and then kylo will sit on rey and fart on her (pls dont kinkshame)

Edgar Allen Ho
Apr 3, 2017

by sebmojo

Wild Horses posted:

End battle in ep1, jango chase and geonosis battle in 2 and opening battle in 3


Also notably new, unique designs in every single one of those battles.

I will not go to bat for the prequels, but one thing they legit did well is new spaceship designs. They are all pretty awesome.

They are even more awesome in the wake of the sequels’ “what if X-wing but... X-wing?”

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
I wouldn't be surprised if most Star Wars fans would rather see the exact same stuff they liked in the original trilogy over and over again than anything new and unusual.

pospysyl
Nov 10, 2012



Jerk McJerkface posted:

The force is moving rocks around with your mind

No the force is more than

Wins the day my moving rocks

CONSIDER MY EXPECTATIONS SUBVERTED

The Force isn't just about moving rocks, it's about moving many rocks, all at once.

Mecha Gojira
Jun 23, 2006

Jack Nissan
The weirdest thing about New Star Wars is the emphasis on things rather than characters. Like the Millennium Falcon being center-stage, close-ups of Anakin's lightsaber, the loving dice in the cockpit that you couldn't even loving see if you were watching the movies on VHS back in 1995. Compare Rey discovering Anakin's lightsaber to Obi Wan giving that same saber to Luke. There's close-ups of the prop that lead to visions. Meanwhile, Luke just loving swings it around like it's an old toy. Honestly, that's the most jarring thing about the new trilogy versus the old.

Wheat Loaf
Feb 13, 2012

by FactsAreUseless
I feel like that's more of a general change in the way big expensive movies are shot over the past 40 years than a Star Wars thing in particular.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Mecha Gojira posted:

The weirdest thing about New Star Wars is the emphasis on things rather than characters. Like the Millennium Falcon being center-stage, close-ups of Anakin's lightsaber, the loving dice in the cockpit that you couldn't even loving see if you were watching the movies on VHS back in 1995. Compare Rey discovering Anakin's lightsaber to Obi Wan giving that same saber to Luke. There's close-ups of the prop that lead to visions. Meanwhile, Luke just loving swings it around like it's an old toy. Honestly, that's the most jarring thing about the new trilogy versus the old.

It makes sense considering from 2005 until like...2012, it was all prequel stuff all the time. I'm not gonna lie, ya'll got me with that poo poo in 2015. It was cool to see good things again instead of stupid things.

pospysyl
Nov 10, 2012



The Force Awakens is the most well-acted movie in the series. Getting together good casts with chemistry and evoking friendship is JJ Abrams' unique strength as a director.

pospysyl fucked around with this message at 20:29 on May 20, 2018

SimonCat
Aug 12, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo
College Slice

Mecha Gojira posted:

The weirdest thing about New Star Wars is the emphasis on things rather than characters. Like the Millennium Falcon being center-stage, close-ups of Anakin's lightsaber, the loving dice in the cockpit that you couldn't even loving see if you were watching the movies on VHS back in 1995. Compare Rey discovering Anakin's lightsaber to Obi Wan giving that same saber to Luke. There's close-ups of the prop that lead to visions. Meanwhile, Luke just loving swings it around like it's an old toy. Honestly, that's the most jarring thing about the new trilogy versus the old.

It's so companies can sell 1:1 prop replicas to fan boys. For example, fanboys obsessed over what kind of boots Harrison Ford wore in Raiders of the Lost Ark, zooming in on freeze frames when his shoes were shown. Eventually it was determined that they were Alden 405s. Compare this to Crystal Skull where his boots are given an clear close up in the first sequence he shows up in.

Super-NintendoUser
Jan 16, 2004

COWABUNGERDER COMPADRES
Soiled Meat
The dice are in the OT?

chiasaur11
Oct 22, 2012



banned from Starbucks posted:

The falcon was ok when it was a beat up pile of poo poo. The new iFalcon looks dumb as gently caress.

Every film, it gets worse.

In The Force Awakens, there was a joke in the first focus shot, with the gap between it being something amazing in the eyes of the viewer, and it being a last resort piece of poo poo in the eyes of the characters slightly downplaying the reverence. (On a similar note, there's also the C-3PO red arm bit. The film gushes about how cool old Star Wars was, but there's plenty of moments that realize the obsession is a little ridiculous.)

In The Last Jedi, it's treated as special straight up, still getting focus shots despite the shine being off The Falcon Being Back, and is the ultimate heroic savior of the Resistance, a symbol that brings hope to the galaxy, despite it being, basically, a drug runner's lovely old RV.

And in Solo, it's getting the same "Look! It's that thing you love!" treatment despite not being The Thing You Love, but a mostly similar (worse) design.

The Millenium Falcon is a piece of poo poo that's got it where it counts. That's why it became a beloved icon in the first place. For all its flaws, when it was glorifying the Falcon, The Force Awakens remembered the reasons audiences liked the ship in the first place. Later films don't even manage that.

Calaveron
Aug 7, 2006
:negative:
Now I kinda want the climax of ep 9 to involve the falcon getting completely loving obliterated

Cross-Section
Mar 18, 2009

Reminder that the Falcon is only slightly less hosed up than the Resistance is at the end of TLJ:

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Wheat Loaf posted:

I wouldn't be surprised if most Star Wars fans would rather see the exact same stuff they liked in the original trilogy over and over again than anything new and unusual.

Nobody posting ITT cares about “most people” or “most Star Wars fans” or whatever some imagined majority that doesn’t care about movies to a degree of posting on a message board thinks.

Owlofcreamcheese
May 22, 2005
Probation
Can't post for 9 years!
Buglord

Mecha Gojira posted:

The weirdest thing about New Star Wars is the emphasis on things rather than characters. Like the Millennium Falcon being center-stage, close-ups of Anakin's lightsaber, the loving dice in the cockpit that you couldn't even loving see if you were watching the movies on VHS back in 1995. Compare Rey discovering Anakin's lightsaber to Obi Wan giving that same saber to Luke. There's close-ups of the prop that lead to visions. Meanwhile, Luke just loving swings it around like it's an old toy. Honestly, that's the most jarring thing about the new trilogy versus the old.

Yeah, because the original Star Wars props were made of literal garbage and if they showed them too well it’s too odvious everything is made of fishing pole parts and cameras and ice cream makers

Dr.Radical
Apr 3, 2011
Were the dice visible in any format of the OT? I could infer that they were supposed to be Han’s but at first I thought “What the hell are those?”

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Dr.Radical posted:

Were the dice visible in any format of the OT? I could infer that they were supposed to be Han’s but at first I thought “What the hell are those?”



They're visible in the sense that that are in the shot.

Dr.Radical
Apr 3, 2011
Ok yeah, no way I could see those while watching on VHS as someone said above. I remember seeing the special editions in theaters and not seeing them either. I wasn’t particularly looking too closely though

Vinylshadow
Mar 20, 2017

I'm looking forward to the frame-by-frame side-by-side comparison videos between the Solo Falcon and the Falcon seen in the OT and people saying Star Wars is ruined forever if something that is utterly meaningless doesn't add up

Despite Han being a smuggler and likely moving thing around

Milkfred E. Moore
Aug 27, 2006

'It's easier to imagine the end of the world than the end of capitalism.'

Doctor Spaceman posted:



They're visible in the sense that that are in the shot.

Literally putting quasi-spiritual significance on a background prop that no one knew existed.

Abner Assington
Mar 13, 2005

For I am a sinner in the hands of an angry god. Bloody Mary, full of vodka, blessed are you among cocktails. Pray for me now, at the hour of my death, which I hope is soon.

Amen.
You can see them when Chewbacca bumps his head on them in Mos Eisley just before the stormtroopers show up in the hangar.

Which, again, puts zero significance on them in the movies and unless you were a 12 year old spazlord burning through your VHS copy of the OT, you aren't going to know what the gently caress those things are.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Doctor Spaceman
Jul 6, 2010

"Everyone's entitled to their point of view, but that's seriously a weird one."

Dr.Radical posted:

Ok yeah, no way I could see those while watching on VHS as someone said above. I remember seeing the special editions in theaters and not seeing them either. I wasn’t particularly looking too closely though
They are out of shot most of the time.

The clearest time you see them is when Chewie sits down in the cockpit for the first time and bumps his head on them.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply