|
SimonCat posted:He should probably just kill himself, he's got nothing to contribute to society. Ehhh, plenty of places need people to flip burgers.
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 01:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:04 |
|
|
John Lasseter to leave Disney https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/08/business/media/john-lasseter-leaves-disney.html
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 01:58
|
|
|
Tarantino is also rumored to be trying to involve Polanski in some capacity 
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 02:08
|
|
|
Is he making a Gross Dudes Shared Universe?
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 02:14
|
|
|
Tars Tarkas posted:Is he making a Gross Dudes Shared Universe? Still plugging away at the podophiliaverse last I checked.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 02:20
|
|
|
davidspackage posted:I don't think there's anything related sexually to Tom Sizemore that could surprise me. What if you found out he only did it in the missionary position once a year while in a regular, consenting, functional relationship? Goddamit Emile Hirsch.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 03:09
|
|
|
Looking up Emil Hirsch on IMDB, I see that he has a role in Trollhunters (A Del Toro project). With Del Toro's support of Polanski too, it seems like he is perfectly fine with ignoring people's lovely behavior.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 04:38
|
|
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Tarantino is also rumored to be trying to involve Polanski in some capacity I thought this turned out to just be casting someone as Polanski, given his tangential involvement in the Manson murders.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 04:39
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:I thought this turned out to just be casting someone as Polanski, given his tangential involvement in the Manson murders. I’m pretty sure having your wife and unborn child murdered makes you a little more than tangentially involved.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 04:57
|
|
|
Macdeo Lurjtux posted:I’m pretty sure having your wife and unborn child murdered makes you a little more than tangentially involved. Yeah, okay.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 05:02
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:Ehhh, plenty of places need people to flip burgers. show some respect 2 people doin minimum wage jobs...smh
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 05:23
|
|
|
Coffee And Pie posted:Tarantino is also rumored to be trying to involve Polanski in some capacity this is only ok if he's trying to trick Polanski into coming back to Cali to shoot something under dead of night and then hands him over to the police if this whole thing is an LAPD setup to capture Roman Polanski i will buy fifty tickets to this movie
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 07:22
|
|
|
Tarantino makes a movie that exclusively hires infamous Hollywood abusers and sex offenders. It’s all a plot to lure them into a room wired with explosives.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 08:08
|
|
|
Some Guy TT posted:That's hardly a Mike Judge exclusive delusion. Liberals to this day and probably in this thread also blame the dumb poors for Trump's election. It really is remarkable how a few thousand white unemployed factory workers in the Rust Belt get all the blame rather than the usual Republican constituency which numbers in the tens of millions, I guess because Democrats have for some bizarre reason decided that the latter group is more likely to vote for them. I wonder how much of that stuff is overemphasized by the narration. The movie isn't perfect but the narration is really bad, especially when it's playing over scenes that would probably move the story forward just fine (but using actual jokes instead of exposition.)
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 14:05
|
|
|
Hat Thoughts posted:show some respect 2 people doin minimum wage jobs...smh Around me burger flipper pays more starting than day care worker. Which is insane when you think about how much parents pay to send their kids to be taken care of by a stranger all day.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 14:27
|
|
|
DC Murderverse posted:this is only ok if he's trying to trick Polanski into coming back to Cali to shoot something under dead of night and then hands him over to the police Roman Polanski shows up for his first day of shooting only for Chris Hansen to step out from behind a curtain and tell him to take a seat.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 16:20
|
|
|
LIVE AMMO ROLEPLAY posted:I wonder how much of that stuff is overemphasized by the narration. The movie isn't perfect but the narration is really bad, especially when it's playing over scenes that would probably move the story forward just fine (but using actual jokes instead of exposition.) The narration, I believe, was added to cover for the scenes they were unable to finish because Fox killed their budget.
|
|
#
?
Jun 9, 2018 16:26
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1005846102799802368 Problem solved!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 01:33
|
|
|
This had to actually be codified? Jesus Christ.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 01:44
|
|
|
Timby posted:This had to actually be codified? Jesus Christ. It's not actually saying "We no longer allow filmmakers to demand sex in return for parts." It's just saying that SAG-AFTRA will be limiting the ability to conduct auditions in homes or hotel rooms, a likely area for this to occur.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 02:10
|
|
|
Excuse me?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 02:12
|
|
|
Hearty handshakes all around: Tinseltown agrees to turn off the rape spigot. We did it Reddit!
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 02:12
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:It's not actually saying "We no longer allow filmmakers to demand sex in return for parts." It's just saying that SAG-AFTRA will be limiting the ability to conduct auditions in homes or hotel rooms, a likely area for this to occur. yeah this is actually a legitimately good move that will probably genuinely stop at least some sexual assaults. it's probably not going to be taken as such, though, because nobody actually reads articles if the headline tells them it's something bad.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 02:50
|
|
|
It's a legitimately good move, it's just insane that it took until the middle of 2018 for SAG-AFTRA to actually convince the studios to do something about it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 03:08
|
|
|
Timby posted:It's a legitimately good move, it's just insane that it took until the middle of 2018 for SAG-AFTRA to actually convince the studios to do something about it. It's very reminiscent of laws being passed in 2018 that say that police having sex with people in custody is actually sexual assault. Sure that's a good move but it seems horrifying that seemingly didn't come up until now.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 04:08
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:It's very reminiscent of laws being passed in 2018 that say that police having sex with people in custody is actually sexual assault. Sure that's a good move but it seems horrifying that seemingly didn't come up until now. Britain is currently going through the fun debate of 'if an undercover police officer spends years deceiving a woman about his true identity and character specifically to spy on her and her friends and fathers a child with her has he committed rape and is he responsible at all for the child?' with the garbage met predictably arguing no to both.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 04:40
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:It's very reminiscent of laws being passed in 2018 that say that police having sex with people in custody is actually sexual assault. Sure that's a good move but it seems horrifying that seemingly didn't come up until now. Yeah, precisely. Like, again, I'm not arguing that this is not a good move, but it stuns me that it wasn't until 2018 that the unions got it in writing that "no, you actually have to hold auditions at a studio or in a meeting room, not your loving hotel room." It's like how Madison's police department continues to oppose its officers wearing body cameras while the jail is packed with people on weed charges, like, "What the gently caress is wrong with you?"
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 05:10
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:It's very reminiscent of laws being passed in 2018 that say that police having sex with people in custody is actually sexual assault. Sure that's a good move but it seems horrifying that seemingly didn't come up until now. Again, I feel like you should go look at what they're actually doing. This isn't just them saying "don't gently caress your auditioners," it's them banning auditions in homes and hotels, even if no sexual assault occurs, to make it less likely that anyone will try casting couch bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 07:49
|
|
|
Doesn't virtually every Weinstein story take place in a hotel?
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 09:35
|
|
|
There’s that story where he came on a plant in a restaurant
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 11:39
|
|
|
In all honesty who hasn't had sexual intercourse with a plant at least one point in their lives.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 13:01
|
|
|
I know Adrienne Barbeau definitely did, at least.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 14:12
|
|
|
LORD OF BOOTY posted:Again, I feel like you should go look at what they're actually doing. This isn't just them saying "don't gently caress your auditioners," it's them banning auditions in homes and hotels, even if no sexual assault occurs, to make it less likely that anyone will try casting couch bullshit. Yeah, I read it. That they're just now considering banning something so obviously unseemly is a little jarring, to say the least. Timby posted:like, "What the gently caress is wrong with you?" Exactly. From a legal standpoint: what the gently caress.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 15:15
|
|
|
I do think there's been some instances where auditioning someone at your house hasn't been a ploy, like when filmmakers want to cast their friends and just invite them over for a quick audition just to make sure. On the other hand, I'm not sure Harvey Weinstein actually had any friends who weren't fellow rapists.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 15:25
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm gonna say the longevity of the practice is just 50% lazy upper-middle class poo poo/nepotism and the other 50% is a veiled ploy to 'seduce' someone.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 15:51
|
|
|
Catfishenfuego posted:Britain is currently going through the fun debate of 'if an undercover police officer spends years deceiving a woman about his true identity and character specifically to spy on her and her friends and fathers a child with her has he committed rape and is he responsible at all for the child?' with the garbage met predictably arguing no to both. I dunno, the cop is definitely responsible for the child, but ultimately the other person did consent even if they didn't have all the facts. You can't retroactively retract consent just because you found out something you didn't like about a person. It'd be like someone trying to claim rape because they found out their sexual partner was trans.
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 17:17
|
|
|
IShallRiseAgain posted:I dunno, the cop is definitely responsible for the child, but ultimately the other person did consent even if they didn't have all the facts. You can't retroactively retract consent just because you found out something you didn't like about a person. I think you can if that person actively lied about the facts. Alhazred fucked around with this message at 18:59 on Jun 11, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 17:24
|
|
|
Alhazred posted:I think you can if that person actively lied about the facts. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 11, 2018 18:04
|
|
|
IShallRiseAgain posted:I dunno, the cop is definitely responsible for the child, but ultimately the other person did consent even if they didn't have all the facts. You can't retroactively retract consent just because you found out something you didn't like about a person. It'd be like someone trying to claim rape because their partner was trans and deliberately lied about it for years. It's still a bad comparison, but less bad.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 02:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 15:04 |
|
|
Sounds like there should be a blanket ban of police reenacting telenovela plots.
|
|
#
?
Jun 12, 2018 02:53
|
|
