Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005


It’s super hard to choose which Waterford I’d want to see die more.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Crow Jane
Oct 18, 2012

nothin' wrong with a lady drinkin' alone in her room

veni veni veni posted:

It’s super hard to choose which Waterford I’d want to see die more.

If Serena died, I'm not sure Fred would care or be inconvenienced much. If Fred died, I'm not sure Serena would care about him, but could potentially have to deal with a massive loss in status one way or another. Did we ever hear what happens to wives when their husbands die?

Anyway, the only correct answer is both, of course, but they probably need to keep at least one around. Strahovski's the better actor, so maybe kill Fred first.

Crow Jane fucked around with this message at 03:23 on Jun 21, 2018

PostNouveau
Sep 3, 2011

VY till I die
Grimey Drawer
Stravinski is the better actor playing the better character, so if we're talking which Waterford we want dead first, it's gotta be Fred. He's just an abusive prick; it's not as interesting.

For some wild speculation, I think June successfully escapes by doing something intense. I guess that's not really that out there a prediction, but it seems like Hannah questioning if she's really tried hard enough will spur her to new lengths.

Also conveniently, Alexis Bleidel needs a new assignment, hey how about that what a coincidence.

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
Casting spoilers made me aware of where Emily's plot is probably going, and it sounds really good

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Big Bug Hug posted:

Hardest part was watching Nick not do anything in an almost ideal escape opportunity.

Seriously. All of three people knew where they were besides them, and Nick could have taken care of them with a couple quick bullets and peaced out with the whole fam. I don't think Nick actually wants June to escape. As far as tonights episode goes, why the gently caress didn't nick just flash his Eye badge and get those guardians to gently caress off? Am I not understanding the hierarchy here?

Doorknob Slobber fucked around with this message at 06:51 on Jun 21, 2018

Nairbo
Jan 2, 2005
I finished it a couple hours ago and was kind of annoyed at ending the season on a cliffhanger.

I'm glad I read this thread and discovered it was not the end of the season. Whoops!

Also I felt almost nothing about the kid, I'm a total monster. The fake birth scene with Serena getting ready to "give birth" creeped me way the gently caress out more than the rest of the episode.

Propaganda Machine
Jan 2, 2005

Truthiness!
I thought they showed the whole thing fully last season when Janine gave birth. Still creepy of course.

succ
Nov 11, 2016

by Cyrano4747

Doorknob Slobber posted:

Seriously. All of three people knew where they were besides them, and Nick could have taken care of them with a couple quick bullets and peaced out with the whole fam. I don't think Nick actually wants June to escape. As far as tonights episode goes, why the gently caress didn't nick just flash his Eye badge and get those guardians to gently caress off? Am I not understanding the hierarchy here?

It seemed like a setup to me?

Timeless Appeal
May 28, 2006
I am worried that Serena's fate is her becoming a handmaid since she is most likely fertile. It would be an interesting plot, but as much as I want Serena to die, being ritualistically raped as comeuppance is gross.

succ posted:

It seemed like a setup to me?
Yeah, I think it's very likely that Waterford was trying to kill June and Nick since he knows that it's not his baby. The whole thing was a set-up. Waterford was in his twisted mind showing kindness to June by letting her see Hannah before she died/had a baby in captivity and then died. Nick seems to have known it was a set-up the whole time which is why he had June hide. Nick didn't shoot because gunfire would have potentially brought more people to the house and put June in danger.

Timeless Appeal fucked around with this message at 12:12 on Jun 21, 2018

Matt Zerella
Oct 7, 2002

Norris'es are back baby. It's good again. Awoouu (fox Howl)
I thought Serena literally got shot in her uterus?

Both of em.

Ouhei
Oct 23, 2008

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:

precision posted:

yeah, that was really rough to watch, but also a very good episode. maaaan.

still yelling at the screen for Nick to just be like "hey, you realize that in the Long Long Ago people didn't get assigned teenage wives, right? Just chill out" but i guess we're meant to think she's so brainwashed she'd rat him out for even saying that much?

Nick is such a frustrating character to watch. Like there's so much he could have done to placate his teen bride so at the very least she doesn't rat his rear end out in the near future without having to pretend he was all in on the sudden marriage thing. Hell, June had the right idea in being kind/reassuring to her since she's a brain washed child that doesn't know any better.

I know this show is a dystopian hellscape, but I'm really hoping things start really hitting the fan for Gilead by the end of this season, the end of the book implies that Gilead no longer exists, so lets get to that part as opposed to 2 more seasons of crippling depression.

Matt Zerella posted:

I thought Serena literally got shot in her uterus?

Both of em.
She was shot in the gut for sure, and based on the framing of when they showed it, implied that it caused her to not be able to carry children.

Angrymantium
Jul 19, 2007
Resistant to everything

succ posted:

It seemed like a setup to me?

Considering Fred kept telling Nick not to let anyone see him, and how Nick instinctively knew something bad was going to happen when he saw people coming, I thought it was just that the meeting was arranged in a super off limits place for the sake of secrecy.

Also since Fred got angry when June suggested it might not be within his power to arrange a meeting with her daughter, I thought it was just a cheap diaplay of how much control he really had over Gilead. I half expected him to say something along the lines of "God giveth, and gotld taketh away", though that's probably too cheesy for this show

Doorknob Slobber
Sep 10, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

Angrymantium posted:

Considering Fred kept telling Nick not to let anyone see him, and how Nick instinctively knew something bad was going to happen when he saw people coming, I thought it was just that the meeting was arranged in a super off limits place for the sake of secrecy.

Was one of the guardians the one that eden kissed? My wife said this morning maybe she was watching nick and had that dude follow him up there. Would explain why the guardians didn't look for June after they shot Nick, because if it was a set up by waterford he probably for sure would have been like make sure to off the handmaid too.

double nine
Aug 8, 2013

How is this show? Reviews are pretty good but it also sounds depressing and bleak as gently caress?

Ouhei
Oct 23, 2008

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:

double nine posted:

How is this show? Reviews are pretty good but it also sounds depressing and bleak as gently caress?

Yes.

It's really well made and the plot is well written, but it is also incredibly depressing. I am personally just trying to hang in there until we get to the fall of Gilead, so all these evil fucks start getting theirs.

Bamabalacha
Sep 18, 2006

Outta my way, ya dumb rah-rah!

Ouhei posted:

Yes.

It's really well made and the plot is well written, but it is also incredibly depressing. I am personally just trying to hang in there until we get to the fall of Gilead, so all these evil fucks start getting theirs.

I still don’t think the fall of Gilead will happen for a loooooong time, if st all, on the show.

The epilogue mentions that the events of the book and what happens immediately after all take place in the “Early” Gilead period.

Ouhei
Oct 23, 2008

:minnie: Cat Army :minnie:

Bamabalacha posted:

I still don’t think the fall of Gilead will happen for a loooooong time, if st all, on the show.

The epilogue mentions that the events of the book and what happens immediately after all take place in the “Early” Gilead period.

I think the show runner said they had ~10 seasons worth of ideas, including What the fall would look like and the aftermath. I just can't imagine another full season of what we've had for the first 2 seasons, that's a lot of suffering with no "pay off". I sincerely hope they don't do 10 seasons...I know they've got a 3rd coming, but they've also said they don't want to do too much not in the book (said they're telling the book content, just slower and more filled in).

ulex minor
Apr 30, 2018
I really enjoy this show and I don't think fiction has to be 'realistic' at all (what matters is the story being told) but even so it's hard not to get caught up on some of the blatant plot holes in this thing.

Owlbear Camus
Jan 3, 2013

Maybe this guy that flies is just sort of passing through, you know?



This show is good, but will be bad if they try to stretch it to ten seasons. Especially if June doesn't escape soon and it turns into a grimdark gilligans island as someone upthread put it.

Bamabalacha
Sep 18, 2006

Outta my way, ya dumb rah-rah!

Owlbear Camus posted:

This show is good, but will be bad if they try to stretch it to ten seasons. Especially if June doesn't escape soon and it turns into a grimdark gilligans island as someone upthread put it.

“Grimdark Gilligan’s Island”, hahahahaha.

And yeah, I agree about the length, I think 5 or 6 seasons would be ideal.

Cory Snyder
Jan 27, 2004

People have compared me to Cal Ripken...
Am I reading to much in to something to think that Bledel poisoned the captain somehow? Didn't she do that in the camps?

Owlbear Camus
Jan 3, 2013

Maybe this guy that flies is just sort of passing through, you know?



Cory Snyder posted:

Am I reading to much in to something to think that Bledel poisoned the captain somehow? Didn't she do that in the camps?

No that 100% seemed to me to be what was going on.

Ubiquitous_
Nov 20, 2013

by Reene
Given the paucity of scientific knowledge allowed in Gilead, I hope she quietly keeps poisoning man after man without anyone figuring out how.

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames

Timeless Appeal posted:

I am worried that Serena's fate is her becoming a handmaid since she is most likely fertile. It would be an interesting plot, but as much as I want Serena to die, being ritualistically raped as comeuppance is gross.

Even if she were fertile, she wouldn't become a Handmaid. Wives who are fertile just have normal marriages, as we saw with the Prole family and in this episode they talked about how that one Commander was lucky to have a fertile wife so they didn't have a Handmaid.

Timeless Appeal
May 28, 2006

precision posted:

Even if she were fertile, she wouldn't become a Handmaid. Wives who are fertile just have normal marriages, as we saw with the Prole family and in this episode they talked about how that one Commander was lucky to have a fertile wife so they didn't have a Handmaid.
It's been heavily implied that Fred is sterile which is why Serena had Nick hook up with June and that women aren't the ones who are suffering from infertility. I'm also thinking in terms of a downfall of the Waterfords scenario that seems pretty likely.

I guess the conversation with the American operative made me think she was at least potentially fertile? I suppose I misinterpreted the scene.

veni veni veni
Jun 5, 2005


The whole infertility issue in this show seems like it would be...not that hard to study? Like, even it wasn't easy to solve due to environmental reasons or whatever, wouldn't they really easily be able to pinpoint that it was men who are infertile?

veni veni veni fucked around with this message at 00:57 on Jun 22, 2018

Chef Boyardeez Nuts
Sep 9, 2011

The more you kick against the pricks, the more you suffer.
I loved how :smuggo: the newly promoted fertile commander was and eagerly look forward to the gang that couldn't shoot being purged.

Edit: was the book written before IVF took off? Getting people pregnant is pretty easy these days, the problem is with women for whatever reason not being able to bring the ferilized eggs to term. If that were the case wives like Serena would be having miscarriages instead of not getting pregnant.

Chef Boyardeez Nuts fucked around with this message at 02:00 on Jun 22, 2018

Propaganda Machine
Jan 2, 2005

Truthiness!
I think it was written shortly before my aunt went through ivf to make my cousin (call that 1988). I don't know how much that process has changed but at the time it was very intense and involved.

Mulva
Sep 13, 2011
It's about time for my once per decade ban for being a consistently terrible poster.
I feel like religiously motivated patriarchal authoritarian dystopian rape cult is a bit too many words, so just remember they are evil and stupid. That's it. "Why do they have to have so much rape?". They are evil. "Wouldn't it be easier to study the problem and deal with it so that you have more people being born in your country?". They are stupid. "Why do they so relentlessly punish women for even minor offenses, further depleting their work force and driving them closer and closer to social implosion?". They are evil and stupid.

"Surely people this evil and stupid couldn't amass so much power?". Watch the news. Or don't. At least you can remind yourself this show is fiction.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Repressive regimes aren’t rational, or pursue power in ways that make things inefficient. It may be more important to them to enforce certain theological principles over the simplest solution, or any solution. There were people in America at the height of the polio epidemic who said it was immoral to spend tax dollars giving it away for free and that the only moral solution was to let capitalism do the rationing, so great was their investment in the idea of markets as arbiters of morality.

Wafflecopper
Nov 27, 2004

I am a mouth, and I must scream

Most people are sterile, men and women. Gilead just blames the women.

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Owlbear Camus posted:

This show is good, but will be bad if they try to stretch it to ten seasons. Especially if June doesn't escape soon and it turns into a grimdark gilligans island as someone upthread put it.
If June is still with the Waterfords by the end of this season I'm not going to watch the next one, because it's already dragging and they need to shake up the status quo, not find every possible excuse to return to it.

Timeless Appeal posted:

It's been heavily implied that Fred is sterile which is why Serena had Nick hook up with June and that women aren't the ones who are suffering from infertility.
Most women are infertile. So are most men. I don't think it's been definitively shown whether Serena is capable of having kids but it certainly seems that Fred isn't. Given their wealth and status in the pre-Gilead world though, it seems weird that they apparently don't know themselves. And Serena certainly didn't know about Fred, because otherwise it wouldn't have taken her so long to work out an alternative solution.

BattyKiara
Mar 17, 2009

Chef Boyardeez Nuts posted:

I loved how :smuggo: the newly promoted fertile commander was and eagerly look forward to the gang that couldn't shoot being purged.

Edit: was the book written before IVF took off? Getting people pregnant is pretty easy these days, the problem is with women for whatever reason not being able to bring the ferilized eggs to term. If that were the case wives like Serena would be having miscarriages instead of not getting pregnant.

But there are no sterile men in the Bible, only women who can't bring forth children who resort to having their slaves get pregnant on their behalf. So in Gilead it would probably be blasphemy to even hint at men being the reason there are so few babies. And there is no IVF in the Bible, so that is probably illegal too. Surrogacy has scriptural presidency, IVF do not.

My ex-mother-in-law truly believed that IVF caused birth defects, while surrogacy was perfectly acceptable, using the Bible as her guide. Of course, she also believed women didn't have souls until they gave birth to a son, among other WTF??? religious ideas.

Chef Boyardeez Nuts
Sep 9, 2011

The more you kick against the pricks, the more you suffer.
Sure but the inferity crisis is what drove the formation of Gilead in the first place. I doubt they would have gotten traction if they were self-limiting.

But then people are bitching now about Millennials choosing not to take on the massive income hit of having kids so I guess it's not all that far off.

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

veni veni veni posted:

The whole infertility issue in this show seems like it would be...not that hard to study? Like, even it wasn't easy to solve due to environmental reasons or whatever, wouldn't they really easily be able to pinpoint that it was men who are infertile?

wait i thought you were american too? why would white christian americans would handle the issue of massively declining birthrates in a not-batshit way?

Kanine
Aug 5, 2014

by Nyc_Tattoo

business hammocks posted:

Repressive regimes aren’t rational, or pursue power in ways that make things inefficient. It may be more important to them to enforce certain theological principles over the simplest solution, or any solution. There were people in America at the height of the polio epidemic who said it was immoral to spend tax dollars giving it away for free and that the only moral solution was to let capitalism do the rationing, so great was their investment in the idea of markets as arbiters of morality.

i mean look at how america handled the AIDS crisis

tetrapyloctomy
Feb 18, 2003

Okay -- you talk WAY too fast.
Nap Ghost
The scene with Hannah Agnes was a loving gut-punch. "It's okay, I have new parents now." Jesus Christ.

PaybackJack
May 21, 2003

You'll hit your head and say: 'Boy, how stupid could I have been. A moron could've figured this out. I must be a real dimwit. A pathetic nimnal. A wretched idiotic excuse for a human being for not having figured these simple puzzles out in the first place...As usual, you've been a real pantload!

tetrapyloctomy posted:

The scene with Hannah Agnes was a loving gut-punch. "It's okay, I have new parents now." Jesus Christ.

I was sad they reeled it back in, I thought they were totally going to just have her resent June. I suppose given everything else in the episode they needed a hope spot.

That was much more effective that this week's comically evil torture porn moment, in having the Waterford's hate gently caress their handmaid to teach her a lesson. I don't think it would be a stretch to call it rape but Gileadean society probably would believe the old wives tale that you can use sex to induce labor. Though I think the implication here is that Serena and the Commander knew it was "wrong" in this instance, that there's actually a difference between this 'Ceremony' and any of the other ones is pretty flimsy.

I don't really know how many legs the show has if June escapes to Canada or gets reassigned. I'm already feeling like it's going to be a giant cop-out to have June survive and continue on given the way in which they're sort of wrapping up her various arcs while building up Emily.

I worry we're going to get even further into Game of Thrones territory with the antagonists becoming more of more comically evil to the point that nobody believes their character or cares about them.

JazzFlight
Apr 29, 2006

Oooooooooooh!

PaybackJack posted:

I was sad they reeled it back in, I thought they were totally going to just have her resent June. I suppose given everything else in the episode they needed a hope spot.

That was much more effective that this week's comically evil torture porn moment, in having the Waterford's hate gently caress their handmaid to teach her a lesson. I don't think it would be a stretch to call it rape but Gileadean society probably would believe the old wives tale that you can use sex to induce labor. Though I think the implication here is that Serena and the Commander knew it was "wrong" in this instance, that there's actually a difference between this 'Ceremony' and any of the other ones is pretty flimsy.

I don't really know how many legs the show has if June escapes to Canada or gets reassigned. I'm already feeling like it's going to be a giant cop-out to have June survive and continue on given the way in which they're sort of wrapping up her various arcs while building up Emily.

I worry we're going to get even further into Game of Thrones territory with the antagonists becoming more of more comically evil to the point that nobody believes their character or cares about them.
Part of me wants June to contact and be saved by the Mayday resistance people and become an underground freedom fighter, but that might veer too close to an action-packed "Man in the High Castle" style that doesn't match up with the first two seasons of this show. Like, it would definitely become a less powerful show, but I'd love every minute if she's blowing up/sniping commanders and freeing handmaids.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

precision
May 7, 2006

by VideoGames
When June said "Do you remember me?" I was just expecting Hannah to say "No"

  • Locked thread