Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
snergle
Aug 3, 2013

A kind little mouse!

Tiresias2 posted:

I'm assuming this is found. Where did you find this?

If these are seriously your ideas, there is a lot of abstract talk about being-able-to-meme, and the existence of a theory of mimesis and its absence on the left, so, okay, what is memeing as such?

his gimmick is white noise crazy he found somewhere else. its the same as lottery of babylon. Corn bread communism is one of the all time best memes check mate guy the sad rhino is quoting.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.

Henchman of Santa posted:

You can find all you need on Wikipedia

No one uses the terms right anyway. If you look over all the literature and decide you're an anarcho-techno-social-transconstructionalist, the right will still hear that as "commie" and the left will hear it as "what".

Grraarrgghh
Feb 12, 2012

"Bernard, float over here so I can punch you."


Mak0rz posted:

One of my friends went off the deep end and thinks Petersen is cool and an intellectual and she* was recently lamenting on Facebook about missing one of his lectures despite all of the evidence that he's a nonsense talking lunatic.

* Yeah I don't get it either. She's extremely white and lonely and sexless so I guess she still hits most of the squares on the Petersen Fan Bingo card

Wait wait wait.

You're in Calgary, yeah (I think? You and couple of other folks that lurk PYF). I think I am good friends with this same friend.

Are we friends friend?

Gynocentric Regime
Jun 9, 2010

by Cyrano4747

OldMemes posted:

or the people who would claim that a lesbian not wanting a physical relationship with a pre-op mtf trans person is a bigot

:yikes:

Absurd Alhazred
Mar 27, 2010

by Athanatos
https://twitter.com/SearsAl/status/1024060424751407104

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Leavemywife posted:

I'm not entirely sure what Marxism is, to be completely honest.

Read The Communist Manifesto.

Siljmonster
Dec 16, 2005

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Then read everything Friedrich Engels wrote

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

Mak0rz posted:

One of my friends went off the deep end and thinks Petersen is cool and an intellectual and she* was recently lamenting on Facebook about missing one of his lectures despite all of the evidence that he's a nonsense talking lunatic.

* Yeah I don't get it either. She's extremely white and lonely and sexless so I guess she still hits most of the squares on the Petersen Fan Bingo card

I encountered a Tinder profile a while back for a very conventionally attractive woman whose dream dinner party included Peterson, Bill Hicks, Sam Harris and Bill Burr for some reason. Her list of interests other than that included Rick and Morty and “140+ IQ” among others and apparently her Instagram has 16,000 followers. Easily the most cursed dating profile I’ve ever seen.

Mak0rz
Aug 2, 2008

😎🐗🚬

Henchman of Santa posted:

Peterson, Sam Harris

Required reading (thread):

https://twitter.com/TheKavOfficial/status/1018202333614878720

MageMage
Feb 11, 2007

I SUCK AND LOVE TO YELL PERFORMATIVE HOT TAKES AND NONSENSE LIES WHEN I GET WORKED UP. SOMETIMES AUTOBANNED IS BETTER. MAYBE ONE DAY WHEN I STORM OFF I'LL ACTUALLY STOP SHITTING UP THE SITE FOR REAL

I got that reference.

Tell me about Grim Fandango.

kirbysuperstar
Nov 11, 2012

Let the fools who stand before us be destroyed by the power you and I possess.
https://twitter.com/alexisparade/status/1024083307867168768

:stonklol:

Trig Discipline
Jun 3, 2008

Please leave the room if you think this might offend you.
Grimey Drawer

https://twitter.com/Porttampa3636/status/1024105750459834370

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon

The Saddest Rhino posted:

No, you really don't understand. The left cannot meme, not just because they are unfunny, but because they are trying to navigate through the Great Mimetic War with a map drawn by Hegel, and they are trying to win this Great War with a strategy devised by Marx.

The left doesn't understand mimesis, because they approach it from a dialectical standpoint, as if things were really that cute and simple; as if the machinations of mimesis could be deduced a priori by a mind subjected to these very laws of 'reality'. Need we elaborate? I think not. I think anyone who conceives of reason alone as the sole force of justification for a theory this massive - this all-encompassing - must be some kind of genius.

The left doesn't understand how to win this Great War, because the only trick up their sleeve is slave and peasant revolt. This technology of ressentiment is certainly a powerful one when wielded masterfully, but the left is stuck without an energy source for this weapon of mass depression. Why? Because we're already living in their utopia - or at the very least we have made successful strives toward it - and our nearing 'das Ende der Geschichte' certainly must be retarding 'der Dialektischeprozess' they claim is an actual thing (no really).

21st century America certainly has slaves - sex slaves to be exact - but I'm saddened to say these women are of no use to the left in this War. For some odd reason, they just don't seem to go viral unless Congress is trying to pass some new telecommunications regulation. Oh, well. Besides, focusing on the problem of brutal sexual exploitation is just distracting us from overthrowing the root cause - propriété, aka vol!

21st century America doesn't have peasants, it has paupers. Paupers can always rely on a good ol' English-style welfare state to keep them full of the essentials - booze, corn syrup, Pizza Hut, the works. Paupers have about this much in common (the rest - e,g, ethnic identity - is incidental). Peasants, on the other hand, are a direct creation of the nobility. The left can wield peasants because peasants necessarily have everything in common via their common class immobility. Paupers do not have this dilemma. Paupers have actual options, they just consequently revert to functional peasantry - hyper-accumulation of debt - because this is their actual nature to begin with. It is because of this that paupers cannot be wielded, and have never been wielded like Marx claimed would occur. Paupers have no 'Kollektivgeist', because they have the apparatus at their disposal - capital - that will deliver them from their stasis if they are cunning or fortunate enough to use it in such a manner.

The left is without peasants. The left is without slaves (without useful ones, at least). And to top all of it off, ol' Georg Friedrich provides the left with no proper theory of mimesis. What is the left to do? How shall the left meme?

In the 21st century, the only thing that resembles a 'capitalist class' - a nebulous concept if there ever was one - is either dominated by the left's own ideology, or (more likely) a fungible form of egalitarianism that acts as a functional equivalent in the western system. The great powerhouse of that very neoliberalism they claim to despise is just a more efficient producer of their ends than any number of Great Leaps Forward could ever be.

They do not realize that if they were to actually seize the means of production, preventing complete cultural and economic disaster would require that very same transformation from Biolenin to Biostalin. Neoliberalism is the only thing keeping their ethics alive. The problem is always the same, it has never changed: the don't know where they want to draw the line, they just know they want it drawn somewhere else. Once they have gained the authority to draw lines, they understand that the line is not drawn arbitrarily, but to preserve the state, and so they redraw the line within proximity to where it once was in order to preserve the vanguard, touting it to the masses as a 'victory'.

It's not enough to have liberal democracy. It's not enough to have bourgeois gay rights. It's not enough to "abolish slavery" by creating a leviathan state. No, we must rid our societies of property in its entirety... And... Then... Maybe privatize a few industries... For practical purposes, of course... Viva la Revolucion!... R-right, guys?

My point here is that the left is actually operating at its full mimetic capacity right now. The neoliberal state is the only conduit by which their ideas will survive, even though they will never, ever admit this; even though they will argue unto death this is a strawman created by reactionaries, and that they - the champions of the proletarian - are the 'true' anti-establishmentarian. If they manage to win the war of flesh (a possibility, despite not having peasants and slaves at present time), they will eventually lose the war of ideas. Their ideas cannot create a society, not even a shithole society. Even a shithole society has property, and by extension hierarchy. The left cannot meme because they don't understand mind and they don't have ideas worthy of mind.

did you just trick me into reading jordan peterson words

you fucker


Leavemywife posted:

I'm not entirely sure what Marxism is, to be completely honest. I'm not even sure how to accurately describe socialism, beyond it being better than what's in America right now. I know there's generally higher taxes, but not enough to bankrupt anyone, there's better healthcare, and the government is more involved in helping citizen welfare, and better pay.



I think. I'm not sure, and I'm honestly scared to say that, because I don't want everyone coming down on me for it.

Well, the main maxim to take away from Marx is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need." He predicted that capitalist society would eventually collapse on itself and be replaced by largely anarchic, tight-knit communes (hence communism), where private property and financial incentive stopped being a thing and people would look out for each other through a sense of group obligation. Modern Marxism/communism is really hard to pin down, since the term is also used to describe the governments of the Soviet Union and China, even though they're basically the exact opposite of the system Marx originally described.

Praseodymi
Aug 26, 2010

Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Modern Marxism/communism is really hard to pin down, since the term is also used to describe the governments of the Soviet Union and China, even though they're basically the exact opposite of the system Marx originally described.

This is red scare bullshit. Those states never described themselves as communist, only ever working towards communism.

Werther they were actually working towards communism is still a topic of debate today though, but usually they'd be described as socialist, if anything.

felch me daddy jr.
Oct 30, 2009

there wolf posted:

It's worth remembering that, like politically correct before it, SJW was an insult crafted on the left for other leftists. After the right latched onto it, it was just a matter of time until it got beaten into total meaninglessness.

Do you have a source for this claim? I'd previously heard it (specifically used as an insult) originated with neo-nazis on Tumblr, but a little googling doesn't back up either of those.

Zulily Zoetrope
Jun 1, 2011

Muldoon

Praseodymi posted:

This is red scare bullshit. Those states never described themselves as communist, only ever working towards communism.

Werther they were actually working towards communism is still a topic of debate today though, but usually they'd be described as socialist, if anything.

Fair enough. I had typed up more words, but I tried to pare down my post to be as Cliff's notes as possible. The specific term for a system wherein a central government owns basically everything is State Capitalism, which is a form of socialism but antithetical to communism since the latter prescribes a stateless society, but it's also the system that is colloquially known as communism. I don't know how political scientists deal with the dissonance, but I think you need to recognize that it exists in any informal setting.

E:

felch me daddy jr. posted:

Do you have a source for this claim? I'd previously heard it (specifically used as an insult) originated with neo-nazis on Tumblr, but a little googling doesn't back up either of those.

I don't have a specific source, but it was used quite frequently on these very forums before I ever saw it in the broader public, and it was mostly targeted at people using the mantle of social justice to defend things like furdom or pedophilia and insist they should get the same recognition as the LGBT movement, as well as the aforementioned chiding of white people learning Spanish or eating Asian foods from people who'd just learned the term "Cultural Appropration" with no understanding.

Zulily Zoetrope has a new favorite as of 09:28 on Jul 31, 2018

Proteus Jones
Feb 28, 2013




:stare:

That poor, poor man. His friend owes him a HUGE favor for dragging him to that anti-intellectual clown-show.

Katt
Nov 14, 2017

Henchman of Santa posted:

Enders Game is extremely well known lol. The author is also a notorious homophobe.

I wouldn't be surprised. He did a whole Ender book just on the theme of abortion where there's a super smart commando soldier. Him and his wife were having children in vitro fertilization. But a villain stole the fertilized eggs. Said commando spends a whole book chasing the villain in an attempt to get them back and it culminates in a stand-off where the villain has the container of fertilized eggs as a hostage at gun point.

They also call them "our babies" about a million times.

I brought my Drake
Jul 10, 2014

These high-G injections have some serious side effects after pulling so many jumps.

And one of the tags talks about becoming human. jfc

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Zulily Zoetrope posted:

Well, the main maxim to take away from Marx is "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

This core tenet right here is really hard for Americans to get past, even those who understand communism at a deeper level than what their gym teacher told them. High achievers get punished? If you work harder your extra output just gets taken away and given to someone else who doesn't want to/can't work as hard? Fuuuuck that! The American Dream means I can get ahead if I try, and if I'm given certain advantages then it's my God-given right to use them to their fullest, for my own benefit!

Communism seems to depend on there being a lot more altruistic people in society than selfish ones, and since actually there seem to be more of the latter, you need heavy enforcement, which becomes oppression.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Data Graham posted:

This core tenet right here is really hard for Americans to get past, even those who understand communism at a deeper level than what their gym teacher told them. High achievers get punished? If you work harder your extra output just gets taken away and given to someone else who doesn't want to/can't work as hard? Fuuuuck that! The American Dream means I can get ahead if I try, and if I'm given certain advantages then it's my God-given right to use them to their fullest, for my own benefit!

Communism seems to depend on there being a lot more altruistic people in society than selfish ones, and since actually there seem to be more of the latter, you need heavy enforcement, which becomes oppression.

doesn't really matter what we think, we're coming up on a moment when people have so little that something's gonna have to be done. either we eat the rich or they eat us, there's no way around that

Tiggum
Oct 24, 2007

Your life and your quest end here.


Data Graham posted:

This core tenet right here is really hard for Americans to get past, even those who understand communism at a deeper level than what their gym teacher told them. High achievers get punished? If you work harder your extra output just gets taken away and given to someone else who doesn't want to/can't work as hard? Fuuuuck that! The American Dream means I can get ahead if I try, and if I'm given certain advantages then it's my God-given right to use them to their fullest, for my own benefit!

Communism seems to depend on there being a lot more altruistic people in society than selfish ones, and since actually there seem to be more of the latter, you need heavy enforcement, which becomes oppression.

The problem is the scale. People already behave this way among small family and friendship groups. We're generally fine with helping people we know even if we don't believe they'll ever be in a position to repay that help, but when you scale it up to include strangers then suddenly we start to suspect that we're being taken advantage of.

RareAcumen
Dec 28, 2012




OldMemes posted:

SJW has become such a meaningless term. It made sense when it was used to describe the kind of people who tried to be woke and were really bad at it: the tumblr types who would claim that non-Mexicans speaking spanish is racist, then deny the existence of Spain, or the people who would claim that a lesbian not wanting a physical relationship with a pre-op mtf trans person is a bigot, or the people who would get really angry about white people eating asian food.

Now it's just become a term for 'thing I don't like' or 'media where a woman/non white/LGBT person does something' or 'people to the left of Nixon'. I just checked the reviews for the Incredibles 2 and there's a minority calling it SJW propoganda because elastigirl....did stuff in the plot (ignoring that it was a good movie!). It's become such a meaningless buzzword.

This is a good post.

Data Graham
Dec 28, 2009

📈📊🍪😋



Tiggum posted:

The problem is the scale. People already behave this way among small family and friendship groups. We're generally fine with helping people we know even if we don't believe they'll ever be in a position to repay that help, but when you scale it up to include strangers then suddenly we start to suspect that we're being taken advantage of.

Monkeysphere in action

there wolf
Jan 11, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

felch me daddy jr. posted:

Do you have a source for this claim? I'd previously heard it (specifically used as an insult) originated with neo-nazis on Tumblr, but a little googling doesn't back up either of those.

I have the incredibly reliable and precise source of my memory of pre-tumblr social justice blogs and forums. Like I remember it coming up on feminist blogs during the whole dickwolves controversy because a lot of people had problems with shakesville at that point. Sorry, I don't have anything more concrete.

Henchman of Santa
Aug 21, 2010

Those are just local area codes

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

Data Graham posted:

This core tenet right here is really hard for Americans to get past, even those who understand communism at a deeper level than what their gym teacher told them. High achievers get punished? If you work harder your extra output just gets taken away and given to someone else who doesn't want to/can't work as hard? Fuuuuck that! The American Dream means I can get ahead if I try, and if I'm given certain advantages then it's my God-given right to use them to their fullest, for my own benefit!

Communism seems to depend on there being a lot more altruistic people in society than selfish ones, and since actually there seem to be more of the latter, you need heavy enforcement, which becomes oppression.

If you believe the New Testament, it was also how early Christians following Jesus' teachings lived:

quote:

Acts 4:32–35: 32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common. 33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, 35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

Krispy Wafer
Jul 26, 2002

I shouted out "Free the exposed 67"
But they stood on my hair and told me I was fat

Grimey Drawer

Tiggum posted:

The problem is the scale. People already behave this way among small family and friendship groups. We're generally fine with helping people we know even if we don't believe they'll ever be in a position to repay that help, but when you scale it up to include strangers then suddenly we start to suspect that we're being taken advantage of.

I have to wonder how much better or worse Russian communism would have worked without vodka. Reading people's accounts of life in Soviet Russia, it's all just one big drunken binge that can't possibly have helped productivity.

At least meth makes you get up and do stuff.

Byzantine
Sep 1, 2007

Leavemywife posted:

I'm not entirely sure what Marxism is, to be completely honest.

It's an ideology that history is dominated by the struggle between the proletariat class (who actually do the work) and the bourgeois class (who profit from the work). The tension between the two, exasperated by the industrial revolution and the increasingly brutal measures the rich take to ensure their power, will eventually boil over into revolution. The old order will be swept away, replaced by the workers having shared ownership of factories and other means of production, establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. Eventually even that state will dissolve as it is no longer necessary, as everyone works according to their ability and is provided for according to their need, a true classless society.

That's the theory, anyway. In practice it's when the armed guards on the border wall face in.

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

OldMemes posted:

SJW has become such a meaningless term. It made sense when it was used to describe the kind of people who tried to be woke and were really bad at it: the tumblr types who would claim that non-Mexicans speaking spanish is racist, then deny the existence of Spain, or the people who would claim that a lesbian not wanting a physical relationship with a pre-op mtf trans person is a bigot, or the people who would get really angry about white people eating asian food.

Now it's just become a term for 'thing I don't like' or 'media where a woman/non white/LGBT person does something' or 'people to the left of Nixon'. I just checked the reviews for the Incredibles 2 and there's a minority calling it SJW propoganda because elastigirl....did stuff in the plot (ignoring that it was a good movie!). It's become such a meaningless buzzword.

https://twitter.com/anarcho_slut/status/1023961334252220416

Bit of a backlash to this as you might imagine, but this sums it up pretty well
https://twitter.com/AnaMardoll/status/1024038772223234048


also
https://twitter.com/chick_in_kiev/status/1024268343136673792

Pththya-lyi
Nov 8, 2009

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2020
To be clear, the IoSM is Senator Brakey for thinking the poll would turn out any other way:

https://twitter.com/SenatorBrakey/status/1023719477123469312



E: f,b. But at least you can vote!

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
How do you vote for liberty.
at least the other two have solid positions to point to.

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011

Byzantine posted:

It's an ideology that history is dominated by the struggle between the proletariat class (who actually do the work) and the bourgeois class (who profit from the work). The tension between the two, exasperated by the industrial revolution and the increasingly brutal measures the rich take to ensure their power, will eventually boil over into revolution. The old order will be swept away, replaced by the workers having shared ownership of factories and other means of production, establishing a dictatorship of the proletariat. Eventually even that state will dissolve as it is no longer necessary, as everyone works according to their ability and is provided for according to their need, a true classless society.

That's the theory, anyway. In practice it's when the armed guards on the border wall face in.

So what you're saying is

https://twitter.com/SenatorBrakey/status/1024044021692485632

Serf
May 5, 2011


capitalism: well known for not having state violence of any kind. definitely no wars or massacres or slavery under capitalism, no sir

zoux
Apr 28, 2006


The private ownership part is a good start.

vyelkin
Jan 2, 2011
Definitely no guys with machine guns telling you what to do in capitalism, no definitely not

zoux
Apr 28, 2006

I'm with the mailbox, personally.

Perestroika
Apr 8, 2010

Serf posted:

capitalism: well known for not having state violence of any kind. definitely no wars or massacres or slavery under capitalism, no sir

No, you see, if people die under communism, it's obviously communism's fault. But if people die under capitalism, that's just like, human nature, man.

Serf
May 5, 2011


Perestroika posted:

No, you see, if people die under communism, it's obviously communism's fault. But if people die under capitalism, that's just like, human nature, man.

i do like how the victims of communism number includes all the nazis killed by the red army lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wendell
May 11, 2003

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1024263146008207361?s=20

JeeeeeeeeeeeeeSUS

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply