|
Go back and see my post on him
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 16:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 23:28 |
|
|
imgay posted:me personally i think hal is just hollow, a shell of a man who doesn't want to invest effort, and will pretend to show effort with a miasma of articulation that will be undercooked. Sure. I've played with scum Hal (and town Hal) and have seen him be this way on both sides of the coin.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 17:18
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:About four people- most suspicious of Humalong on that vote, then imgay, toal, and hal, in that order. I think I'm probably inordinately suspicious of imgay but I can't ignore that no-content posting. Getting less suspicious of toal as time goes on, but I won't hesitate to jump on a turbo for toal. This kind of stuck out me (bolded part). Getting less suss but also totally ready and willing to turbo seems less than pro town imo
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 17:30
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:This kind of stuck out me (bolded part). Getting less suss but also totally ready and willing to turbo seems less than pro town imo Lol I didn't want to be the one to point that out. Why would you turbo someone you're on the fence about.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 17:36
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:Sure. I've played with scum Hal (and town Hal) and have seen him be this way on both sides of the coin. No hes most probable scum.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 20:40
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Lol I didn't want to be the one to point that out. Why would you turbo someone you're on the fence about. Because I believe you're scum enough to vote for you but not enough to push all that hard for it? I mean I voted for you the last day, why is this a surprise? I haven't hidden anything I'm doing here.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 20:53
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:Because I believe you're scum enough to vote for you but not enough to push all that hard for it? I mean I voted for you the last day, why is this a surprise? I think it's the phrasing you used. Turbo is voting for someone you 100% think is scum. You don't want to turbo someone you aren't sure about.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:08
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:I think it's the phrasing you used. Turbo is voting for someone you 100% think is scum. You don't want to turbo someone you aren't sure about. Oh. Fair enough. I'm still relatively new to SA mafs!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:13
|
|
|
Slamburger posted:I know its the weekend, but I'd like to hear from Humalong. How do you feel about E+ and the IP/Sal situation? Have any of your reads changed on GGN, Toal, IS? How do you feel about the failed DB lynch? Bad weekend at the jail, just catching up on the thread. E+: I think the weird "I did no night action" "wait how do you know my night action failed?" thing is a distraction. Plus now that we know the jail on him lasted through the night it doesn't matter if he submitted a night action or not because it failed regardless. I don't know that I buy the "I thought gyrados was water/dark" defense, but I'll let it slide for now. IP/Sal: This seems pretty cut and dry, though Sal seems to have claimed he's a watcher and has some sort of protection ability? That's pretty strong if so, but I may have misread and he was just asking to be protected tonight. Which would make a lot more sense! I see two possibilities: IP is caught scum or Sal is doing an absolutely insane, Gaspy-level gambit. I see the former being MUCH more likely than the latter. GGN: Still think she's town. I didn't like the attempted push on her day 1 for a relatively innocuous drunk post but I understand why scum would do it. Toal: I want to say their posting seems a little better today? I need to reread, I'm sorry. I read through the thread but I didn't do any deep reads yet. Toal read like a nervous newbie day 1 which is a neutral read imo. IS: IS hopped on an attempted last minute swap to a lurker lunch day 1 with Sal. That's suspicious to me, especially combined with their "gut read" bandwagon vote on GGN earlier that day and then ANOTHER bandwagon vote on DB. Not feeling great about IS at all. Also most of their day 2 posting has been role fishing. They've softly defended IP which is a neutral read but worth pointing out.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:30
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:
Rereading Toal now, give me like 10 minutes and I'll have more content than this. Same with GGN.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:31
|
|
|
Oh, ##evolve Dancer
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:33
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:IP/Sal: This seems pretty cut and dry, though Sal seems to have claimed he's a watcher and has some sort of protection ability? That's pretty strong if so, but I may have misread and he was just asking to be protected tonight. Which would make a lot more sense! I see two possibilities: IP is caught scum or Sal is doing an absolutely insane, Gaspy-level gambit. I see the former being MUCH more likely than the latter. I'm asking for protection.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:35
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Yeah I mean, Sal says they saw poisoner poison. So I'm just going to leave my vote on them. Toalpaz posted:I want AA and Dancer to weigh in on E+ too. I don't really like these posts. It reads like someone trying to bus a scumbro early, then hedging and attempting to foster confusion. Not feeling super good about Toal right now. Toalpaz posted:To be fair, I gave a pretty solid and in my opinion truthful response to that 'slip' that occurred in the jokephase as my very first post after receiving roles. I have a town read on GGN right now so this is also a scummy post to me.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:38
|
|
|
SalTheBard posted:I'm asking for protection. Yeah I figured, your first post about it was juuuuust ambiguous enough that I was like 
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:39
|
|
|
GenericGirlName posted:Dancer, care to divulge how your power changed? GenericGirlName posted:Hi I've been keeping up but I'm adopting a cat and this is my only free time to handle it do I keeps catching up and not being able to post (I deleted three posts for being too old and them caught up again). I want to do the evolve vote on dancer and I have multiple people who I think are good for voting for but I am busy and don't think I'm posting quickly enough to feel comfortable posting any votes so i will vote in the morning after rereading. hopefully while y'all aren't posting >8( Not one, but two "totally gonna post some reads, guys" posts with no actual reads posted. Also some light role fishing and that's really all the content from GGN today. Still leaning town because of her day 1 play but day 2 has not been great from her (like I'm one to talk).
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:45
|
|
|
I like the vote on IP but we have quite a long time left. I'll vote tonight before I go to bed (so in like 7 hours) so I can do my part to avoid a second no lunch.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:47
|
|
|
imgay's posts are something very special and I cherish them, but aside from his ironic read on Hal and his call out of Lumpen lists he's not posted a lot of content. I get that that is his style but, you know, at a certain point it becomes a distraction from scum hunting having to sift through his posts.imgay posted:me personally i think hal is just hollow, a shell of a man who doesn't want to invest effort, and will pretend to show effort with a miasma of articulation that will be undercooked. This is my feeling on Hal this game as well, though. He spent all of day 1 lurking and then came in at the end, said "DB scum" started a push on him that most likely had at least 2-3 scum jump on, then he's gone back to lurking hard aside from letting us all know he would vote DB again. Oh and he slipped up and named IS instead of IP so that's funny.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:54
|
|
|
Atomic Soda posted:hal His "gut read" post was a joke poking fun at me. He never actually gave any reason beyond "I know he's scum" which is lol
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:56
|
|
|
 Looking at this and going off of Solus I'd say Hal, Toal, IS would be my strongest picks for scum in that group. On the fence about imgay and GGN. Would be shocked if AA or Dancer were scum being opportunistic.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 21:59
|
|
|
Ok I apologize for a hundred posts in a row but I'm rereading people that have pinged me and I just went through ASF's posts. Their entire post history is jokes, some role fishing, and random drive by votes. Only other game I've played with ASF they also lurked hard and were scum, but I know meta is not a popular case on SA. I really feel like they're scum, though going off of their posts. Enough that I'll ##vote ASF for right now.Dancer posted:
As an aside, this was completely incorrect because I had not even had a chance to post day 2 before this was posted so I'm not really sure why I was listed here. Probably a case of mistaken identity?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 22:10
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Ok I apologize for a hundred posts in a row but I'm rereading people that have pinged me and I just went through ASF's posts. Their entire post history is jokes, some role fishing, and random drive by votes. Only other game I've played with ASF they also lurked hard and were scum, but I know meta is not a popular case on SA. I really feel like they're scum, though going off of their posts. Enough that I'll ##vote ASF for right now. Yeah, I think that was Toalpaz' vote that I must've read as yours. I imagine it's because of similar colouring of the avatar  .Also totally agree on ASF. Between the several players who I barely register as present in this game (him, Hal, imgay, with DB and E+ not too far behind), he's the one where I feel the strongest that "this person is trying to give the impression that they're saying things when they're really not".
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 22:18
|
|
|
Slamburger posted:This is a very towny callout. There was no sample role PM so scum can't really make this post. Only town would know that town-aligned is the ... town alignment. Isn't this a weird post? Doesn't it look like Slam is trying to give weak towny reads on E+? Slam also calls DB out for being sus of E+ on a earlier post. I personally think it's a strange connection. One day I hope I'll earn town's trust again.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 22:41
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Isn't this a weird post? Doesn't it look like Slam is trying to give weak towny reads on E+? Haven't gotten to my neutral reads yet, hang on. Still decompressing from a 56 hour workweek.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 22:44
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Haven't gotten to my neutral reads yet, hang on. Still decompressing from a 56 hour workweek. Neutral reads prior to day 2, anyway.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2018 22:44
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:
But when DB flips scum what then?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 01:17
|
|
|
Humalong I think you've put forth some good analysis that I generally agree with, so you are lower on my suspicion list now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 02:25
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Isn't this a weird post? Doesn't it look like Slam is trying to give weak towny reads on E+? How are you parsing "This is a very towny thing to do" as a "weak" towny read? I know you're new but I am just not following any of your arguments and I think you're scum.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 02:28
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:I really feel like they're scum, though going off of their posts. Enough that I'll ##vote ASF for right now. Would you rather lynch ASF over IP or is this a pressure vote?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 02:31
|
|
|
Slamburger posted:Would you rather lynch ASF over IP or is this a pressure vote? Pressure vote. IP is caught scum going off of Sal’s night action and the fact IP has presumably given up rather than even try to explain an alternative to him being the poisoner. Just don’t want to put him at -1 right now because I believe there’s still at least a little discussion to be had about different players.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:21
|
|
|
By the end of the day my vote will be on IP
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:21
|
|
|
It's been like super quiet the past 48 hours imo.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:26
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:It's been like super quiet the past 48 hours imo. yeah almost like its the weekend or something
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:28
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:But when DB flips scum what then? Then it's worth reconsidering, but the real suspicious thing was the speed of the lynch, not necessarily the target of the lynch.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:31
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:Then it's worth reconsidering, but the real suspicious thing was the speed of the lynch, not necessarily the target of the lynch. I will note that you're talking about a lynch that was too slow. Like, of course, if enough people are online close to deadline, most of them will be willing to vote on short notice, even on a lovely lynch, to make sure that it actually happens.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 03:35
|
|
|
Sorry all, my weekend did not leave me nearly as much free time as I would have liked. I don't think there's much else left to say for this game day. Deadline is very early tomorrow morning for me, so ##vote IP.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 05:27
|
|
|
I'm going to bed so I'm also ending the day ingame as well since ill prob sleep through deadline ##vote ice phoenix
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 06:08
|
|
|
  IcePhoenixVotecount for Day 2 With 16 alive, it's 9 votes to execute. The current deadline is September 17th, 2018 at 4 p.m. CEST -- that's in about 8 hours, 50 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 06:09
|
|
|
IcePhoenix, Ghastly (Scum-Aligned Poisoner) was lynched Day 2. Dancer evolves! It is now Night 2.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 06:12
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2 IcePhoenix (9): SalTheBard, Anomalous Amalgam, Toalpaz, Slamburger, A Sometimes Food, SolusLunes,  Dick Bastardly (1): Epsilon Plus A Sometimes Food (1): Mr. Humalong SalTheBard (0): Anomalous Amalgam, Dancer (0): Anomalous Amalgam, Epsilon Plus (0): Dick Bastardly, Not Voting (5): Dancer, GenericGirlName, Hal Incandenza, IcePhoenix, SolusLunesWith 16 alive, it's 9 votes to execute. The current deadline is September 17th, 2018 at 4 p.m. CEST -- that's in about 8 hours, 47 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 06:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 23, 2024 23:28 |
|
|
Nobody died Night 2. It is now Day 3.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2018 20:20
|
|