|
Like I actually did analyze their vote? Where is that comment coming from.
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:56 |
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:What the hell is up with you two i know *cups hands around mouth* "GET A ROOM"
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:18
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:What the hell is up with you two I don't really know.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:18
|
|
|
TMM, fwiw, I looked at the scum game Max linked and its like he's a different person now. That doesn't mean he's town, lots of time has passed and maybe he really is, but just want you to know I am taking you seriously. But can you also comment on the BK thing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:18
|
|
|
Booo that's an awful defense. I'm frustrated because TMM bulldogging me usually means he's town, but I have to put up with him doing this so it's not a lot of fun!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:19
|
|
|
Max posted:This does not answer the question. Why was what they did scummy? I don't know if what they did is scummy yet because I don't know the alignment of IS yet. However, if IS is actually town, then yes, I think it is scummy that hambeet complained about the votes being spread out but then didn't vote to consolidate votes on the people that had 2 votes (and I would have to take a look at those people) and also think that Hal could be scummy for putting two people in a tie at 4 votes, although to be fair, that would be less of an issue at that point. I'd have to go through the votes again to really nail it down.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:21
|
|
|
OK
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:22
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:TMM, fwiw, I looked at the scum game Max linked and its like he's a different person now. That doesn't mean he's town, lots of time has passed and maybe he really is, but just want you to know I am taking you seriously. It's interesting, but it's a Shine game, so I can see odd things happening. Obviously, it's an easy vote and I certainly wouldn't blame anyone for taking it. But right now, I've just got a bad taste in my mouth and I'm paranoid that this is too easy.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:24
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I don't know if what they did is scummy yet because I don't know the alignment of IS yet. If IS is scum, then Beet and Hal both look great. I think you are analyzing these votes before they have any discernible meaning. Like I'm ready to start reanalyzing the game based on a BK scum flip, but I'm keeping it in my pants in case there is some other kind of shenanigans going on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:26
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:If IS is scum, then Beet and Hal both look great. I think you are analyzing these votes before they have any discernible meaning. I understand that, but remember, my issue with beet is more that he complained that the votes were spread out when there were a bunch of people who had 2 votes and then he voted someone who only had 1 vote. There's a contradiction there between words and actions.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:30
|
|
|
Hey KB, can you take a look at Max and tell me what you think?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:33
|
|
|
hambeet posted:Where's the fun in that? Just want to make sure I don’t run out of snacks. Want another one?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:36
|
|
|
hey tmm have you read the flip yet?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Just want to make sure I don’t run out of snacks. can't wait to get my fingerprints all over another scooby snack
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:38
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I don't know if what they did is scummy yet because I don't know the alignment of IS yet. This doesn’t line up for me, what does Hal get from doing that that’s greater than the risk of sticking his neck out. Hal’s an “I don’t give a gently caress” player not a tricksy gambit player. If anything to me that makes Hal look better not worse.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:39
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Hey KB, can you take a look at Max and tell me what you think? Took another look. I was null, but on looking back I think I'm leaning town at the moment. The one problem I have is how he left his vote on the lazy IP vote, but that actually jives with what he did in Scooby where he was doing the same thing with Magnus. He seems to want to punish bad play lately. I'll caveat this with, if BK is scum, that might change things. Since Max, like me(and you I think?), was one of the folks that defended BK yesterday. I'd have to look again in that light.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:46
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I understand that, but remember, my issue with beet is more that he complained that the votes were spread out when there were a bunch of people who had 2 votes and then he voted someone who only had 1 vote. There's a contradiction there between words and actions. it was hardly a contradiction. me observing the spread and me trying to put forward my preferred lynch candidate are not diametrically opposed. i mean it was 2 votes a piece at that stage, why would i not try to push who i think should be lynched in that environment?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:50
|
|
|
hambeet posted:it was hardly a contradiction. me observing the spread and me trying to put forward my preferred lynch candidate are not diametrically opposed. i mean it was 2 votes a piece at that stage, why would i not try to push who i think should be lynched in that environment? I don't know if I'd say you put forward your preferred lynch candidate. It's not like you really pushed for his lynch. You just dropped your vote on him after talking about maybe voting IP or Solus and then you disappeared from the thread.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 03:57
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I don't know if I'd say you put forward your preferred lynch candidate. It's not like you really pushed for his lynch. You just dropped your vote on him after talking about maybe voting IP or Solus and then you disappeared from the thread. i had no super strong feeling on anyone, was slightly suss on a couple of others as mentioned, but IS stuck out more and i actually said so at the time after agreeing with an mmt post on IS. you seem to have missed that like you've missed the repeated attempts to ask you your thoughts w/r/t this mornings flip. and yeah i didn't really want to disappear, i expected i'd be back closer to deadline but irl hit and it was too late when i was finally able to be present.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 04:13
|
|
|
but i'm glad we could agree i wasn't contradicting myself. good chat. so. how about that bottle knight hey? whaddaya think tmm?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 04:22
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Yeah no, obviously day should still progress to near it's normal length regardless so we can hear from everyone, etc. There are plenty of folks who haven't said much. Hi, hello! This is me. Again, apologies on D1, etc. So, I took a little bit of time to get properly caught up while the thread wasn't moving. Glancing over the vote over on IP (hopefully I won't mix up anyone else again, sheesh) - I was mostly curious regarding Gaspy. Vote number three on IP, middle of the pact but one of the votes that helped push IP more forward in the vote count. Also, Asphyxious posted:I didn’t really see pressure on IP and I think his reaction is a bit ott in the circumstances. Asphyxious posted:I’ve just reread illegallysober and I’m not seeing it, from peoples description I was expecting a bit of Dick Bastardly “clearly not reading the thread properly thought salad” kinda stuff but it wasn’t really there. The only thing that looks even kinda bad is asking for other cases, which just left me feeling kinda ehh. Which, both more toward IP's reaction, sure. But, no pressure on IP? Maybe, maybe. But you were also the first to react to IP's vote on TMM- Asphyxious posted:Hmmmmm. -which, that's not very much, no, especially as we were phasing out of jokephase at that point. Sure. You also sure seemed pretty eager to jump on IP's post potentially being a 'scumslip' once Asiina brought it up. Which, sure you weren't alone with, but the whole thing gives off faint vibes of scum trying to nudge the vote along. Not strong enough to place a vote, by any means, particularly with everything going on with beek, but I don't like it! natch i say all of this with the D1 i had so i fully expect some pot, kettle, etc.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 04:58
|
|
|
Also I went with Choice A because I am concerned through cutting through this territory. Choice A certainly seemed to sound a little safer!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 05:02
|
|
|
Oh yeah, I also voted for choice B because Viva Pancho Villa!
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 05:14
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:Oh yeah, I also voted for choice B because Viva Pancho Villa!  I hope it was the right choice!On that, a side note, probably not a terrible idea for people to mention their choice if nobody has any objections? It might not be anything significant at all, but it might be useful information for later. (Also if we wind up with a majority saying they chose A when we went B, well...  )
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 05:17
|
|
|
Social Studies 3rd Period posted:(Also if we wind up with a majority saying they chose A when we went B, well... i don't think that would happen
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 05:20
|
|
|
hambeet posted:i don't think that would happen Nor do I, realistically. Hell, I don't think there will be anything to analyze much in those votes at all. But it's easy information to throw in and knowledge is power, or something.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 05:23
|
|
|
I don’t think the vote on IP needed to be “nudged along” at that point or any point really. I’ve seen plenty of very real and very obnoxious Hurt Feelings meltdowns in the last few games and IP’s read as incredibly fake comparatively. Nothing he posted after that made me think he was town so I was pretty comfy with my vote, despite how wrong it turned out to be.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 06:40
|
|
|
Obviously scum would have been on the vote somewhere but as town I thought he was scummy as gently caress so I figure I wasn’t alone in that assessment.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 06:48
|
|
|
oh poo poo, this Dan Murphy's doesn't have the vaguely affordable Suntory Kakubin, only super fancy expensive Suntory poo poo, even if it's for Shine I'm not spending over a hundred bucks on whisky hope Pod doesn't modkill me
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 08:42
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:oh poo poo, this Dan Murphy's doesn't have the vaguely affordable Suntory Kakubin, only super fancy expensive Suntory poo poo, even if it's for Shine I'm not spending over a hundred bucks on whisky hope Pod doesn't modkill me ?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 08:43
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:oh poo poo, this Dan Murphy's doesn't have the vaguely affordable Suntory Kakubin, only super fancy expensive Suntory poo poo, even if it's for Shine I'm not spending over a hundred bucks on whisky hope Pod doesn't modkill me Aldi
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 08:44
|
|
|
omg no wait, I'm saved, I just found THIS
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 08:48
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:omg no wait, I'm saved, I just found THIS
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 09:09
|
|
|
please make sure to click on my original link instead of Gaspy's unauthorised one. KB you especially need to click it, and Pod obviously. Also Beet cause he said he liked ponchos anyway, I will soon be home to try some of that and get down to business
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 09:17
|
|
|
My link is better
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 09:30
|
|
|
I saw both, I liked both. Not everything is a competition you two.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 09:52
|
|
|
I reread Asiina to see who she was looking at, the only people she really thought were scum were BK and KB. In my experience KB wouldn’t have picked a) someone suspicious of him and b) someone actively contributing so it’s a closed loop, unfortunately.
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 10:03
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I reread Asiina to see who she was looking at, the only people she really thought were scum were BK and KB. uh also TMM
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 10:08
|
|
|
not that I got a scumread on TMM but why leave him out hmmmmm?
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 10:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:56 |
|
|
ok I'm going to look at lurkers and I discovered something shocking Max has more posts than Beet ##vote hambeet (yes yes I will vote BK later just sayin)
|
|
#
?
Oct 4, 2018 10:40
|
|