|
exquisite tea posted:Don't forget Jake Lloyd having like 10,000 hours on Steam. And schizophrenia
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 06:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
I can't imagine welcoming Ryan Reynolds into your heart Sorry I do NOT recognize your right to exist
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 07:30
|
|
|
Lion King teaser just aired during Thanksgiving football.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:34
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/disneylionking/status/1065734854778572800 edit: Youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CbLXeGSDxg Teenage Fansub fucked around with this message at 23:37 on Nov 22, 2018 |
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:34
|
|
|
OH BOY, A LIVE ACTION LION KING!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN'T CONTAIN MY EXCITEMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:36
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:LIVE ACTION This is gonna continue to annoy me until the movie has come and gone.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:37
|
|
|
Well, that looks beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:38
|
|
|
that's a very cute baby lion
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:39
|
|
|
I guess CG is more appropriate than live action in this case Either way, who loving cares? The animated one exists and it's a classic. It didn't even come out that long ago (1994). What the gently caress is a CG remake gonna bring to the table?
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:40
|
|
|
I dunno if giving them totally realistic animal movement mannerisms works. It just makes them look confused, or like they've been cruelly trained into bowing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:43
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:I guess CG is more appropriate than live action in this case We've had three different Spider-Men within nine years. We're hosed.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:43
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:What the gently caress is a CG remake gonna bring to the table? I thought Jungle Book (also by Favreau) worked pretty well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:45
|
|
|
Teenage Fansub posted:I thought Jungle Book (also by Favreau) worked pretty well.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:48
|
|
|
Imagine how bad this is gonna look in 10 years time compared to the animated version.
|
|
#
?
Nov 22, 2018 23:49
|
|
|
I'll admit it -looks- good. But for how shot-for-shot it was, it ends up feeling really unnecessary. Though I am really interested to see how Billy Eichner's Timon ends up being.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:08
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Either way, who loving cares? The animated one exists and it's a classic. It didn't even come out that long ago (1994). What the gently caress is a CG remake gonna bring to the table? Probably around $1.4 billion.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:10
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:Probably around $1.4 billion. id be genuinely amazed if it doesnt make more than that. an absolute trash Beauty was 1.4 right? lion king will set all time records
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:15
|
|
|
This poo poo is so sad. They keep turning out these forgettable regurgitated remakes over and over again and all they're concerned about is money. It has nothing to do with legitimate art or vision. Disney is a corporation, though. I guess money is their primary interest, after all.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:18
|
|
|
Disney is creatively bankrupt. gently caress all their poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:18
|
|
|
i'm struggling to see the practical difference between this and something like the Psycho remake. What's the point if you're just gonna make the same thing but you cut and paste different models in there. It looks like a video game HD remake. Granted it doesn't have Vince Vaughn and Ann Heche but it does have Seth Rogen and Beyonce
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:20
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Disney is a corporation, though. I guess money is their primary interest, after all. Hey, fair enough, it's my primary interest as well if I'm honest. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:22
|
|
|
This is actually extra sad to me because I just watched a video about how Disney purposefully made Treasure Planet a flop so that they can close their traditional animation division and go full CG.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 00:27
|
|
|
Happy Noodle Boy posted:It’ll be hard to beat the Onion review of Winnie the Pooh’s last movie. They'll never top this one for me: https://voices.clickhole.com/i-don-t-let-my-kids-watch-winnie-the-pooh-because-i-don-1825124045
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 01:18
|
|
|
Pooh fucks
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 02:39
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:This poo poo is so sad. They keep turning out these forgettable regurgitated remakes over and over again and all they're concerned about is money. It has nothing to do with legitimate art or vision. Lol over and over at this post
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 03:55
|
|
|
Ammanas posted:id be genuinely amazed if it doesnt make more than that. an absolute trash Beauty was 1.4 right? lion king will set all time records It has Beyonce in it. This movie is going to make ridiculous amounts of money (in America at least).
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 04:37
|
|
|
Disney wants to appeal to new audiences, not just people in their 20's or 30's who have already seen all their movies. I haven't seen any of their other live-action remakes and I'm not planning on seeing this one, but I can certainly see why a 5 year old kid in 2018 would want to. I wouldn't expect most young kids to really give a poo poo about all my favorite movies that came out decades before they were born.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 06:08
|
|
|
LesterGroans posted:We've had three different Spider-Men within nine years. We're hosed. We were living in the Spiderverse the entire time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 06:26
|
|
|
Dr. S.O. Feelgood posted:Disney wants to appeal to new audiences, not just people in their 20's or 30's who have already seen all their movies. I haven't seen any of their other live-action remakes and I'm not planning on seeing this one, but I can certainly see why a 5 year old kid in 2018 would want to. I wouldn't expect most young kids to really give a poo poo about all my favorite movies that came out decades before they were born. You know Disney used to be really good about making everyone care about their old and new movies both. When I was a child I certainly didn't care that Alice in Wonderland was from the loving 50s. I don't know that a remake of it would have excited me back then but impossible to tell I guess.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 08:23
|
|
|
Hakkesshu posted:You know Disney used to be really good about making everyone care about their old and new movies both. When I was a child I certainly didn't care that Alice in Wonderland was from the loving 50s. I don't know that a remake of it would have excited me back then but impossible to tell I guess. It's funny that when Disney first started digging up the corpses of their old properties, they at least tried to do something different with them. Burton's Alice was a sequel of sorts and Maleficent was a retelling. Then they realized that they didn't need to put in so much work. Remember when Jon Favreau made a movie about not wanting to be a soulless sellout, and then followed it up with Jungle Book and Lion King remakes and a Star Wars show?
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 08:38
|
|
|
I want a meteor to strike me immediately as the credits roll in theatres after The Lion King cause I know my life won't get better and I'm proud to contribute to the $5 billion it will make opening weekend.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 08:43
|
|
|
live with fruit posted:Remember when Jon Favreau made a movie about not wanting to be a soulless sellout, and then followed it up with Jungle Book and Lion King remakes and a Star Wars show? 
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 08:46
|
|
|
live with fruit posted:Remember when Jon Favreau made a movie about not wanting to be a soulless sellout, and then followed it up with Jungle Book and Lion King remakes and a Star Wars show? Favreau also directed Iron Man; he started the MCU. He was going to direct Avengers as well (I presume with the never-published Zak Penn script) until the entire thing was junked and Whedon replaced them both.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 09:18
|
|
|
Chef was more about creativity being shoved into a pre conceived hole, and stifling the creative process. The food truck is basically what Jungle Book was. A easily accessible venture that anyone can enjoy made with love and care as opposed to someone barking at you to do it a certain way. I mean I’m adding another layer too it, but I don’t think it’s about selling out vs not selling out: I really like Chef but that ending is dumb as hell. The last like 2 minutes suck so hard it almost ruins the film.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 11:52
|
|
|
live with fruit posted:It's funny that when Disney first started digging up the corpses of their old properties, they at least tried to do something different with them. Burton's Alice was a sequel of sorts and Maleficent was a retelling. Then they realized that they didn't need to put in so much work. They've been digging up those corpses for a long time, experimenting with different business models and seeing what would stick. Back in the 90s and 00s they pumped out dozens and dozens of cheap animated direct-to-DVD sequels to their classic movies which sound pretty awful (Cinderella 2?? Really??) but apparently sold millions upon millions of copies. They also went through a phase in the 90s of remaking some of their 'classic' live action films like That Darn Cat , Flubber, The Parent Trap, The Computer Wore Tennis Shoes, The Love Bug, etc. which were mostly pretty unsuccessful.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 12:58
|
|
|
I think I saw both live-action 101 Dalmatians movies in the cinema. The prototype for all this is arguably Hook but it wasn't a Disney movie.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 13:30
|
|
|
Wheat Loaf posted:The prototype for all this is arguably Hook but it wasn't a Disney movie. It was originally! Spielberg developed the project with Disney in the early 80s (and had plans to make it a musical starring Michael Jackson) but then it moved to Paramount, and then Spielberg dropped out, and then it moved to TriStar who convinced Spielberg to come back.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 14:18
|
|
|
No Jeremy Irons, no watch.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 14:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/robtrench/status/1065837592002781184
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 15:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 21:03 |
|
|
CelticPredator posted:Chef was more about creativity being shoved into a pre conceived hole, and stifling the creative process. I have a complete opposite view of Chef, minus the ending - I thought the whole movie was going so far up Favreaus rear end about how he was the super good chef and ousted, with a super hot wife and then he has the best drat truck ever. It was disgusting and I finished the movie having wished I never saw this poo poo. At least the grilled cheese looked good.
|
|
#
?
Nov 23, 2018 15:16
|
|