|
Tankakern posted:it's the butter fs, it even says so in the name
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 01:30
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 16:47 |
|
|
i can't believe its not butter fs
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 02:00
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:i can't believe its not butter fs ask Hans to spread it for you
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 02:07
|
|
|
butterfs, filesystem bfff (by fats, for fats)
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 08:10
|
|
|
yo’ so wack, you format your drives with buster fs, CJ!
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 14:19
|
|
|
bustin makes me feel good
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2018 18:57
|
|
|
Poopernickel posted:bustin makes me feel good https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tdyU_gW6WE
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2018 10:29
|
|
|
I helped a guy with his BuildRoot initramfs switch_root setup yesterday on IRC. Now my script will be going into Low Earth Orbit. Neat!
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 15:35
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:I helped a guy with his BuildRoot initramfs switch_root setup yesterday on IRC. Now my script will be going into Low Earth Orbit. Neat! Congrats! Hope the mission goes well. I feel that embedded Linux still has a way to go before arriving at a place where physical access is literally impossible. It can be argued that firmware should address these issues but I think the OS has a hand in this too. Anyways, it’s pretty cool that Linux is poised to be the space os of choice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 18:12
|
|
|
it's because you don't need sound in space
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 19:53
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space  
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 20:43
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 21:29
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2018 21:37
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 10:44
|
|
|
el dorito posted:Congrats! Hope the mission goes well. I feel that embedded Linux still has a way to go before arriving at a place where physical access is literally impossible. It can be argued that firmware should address these issues but I think the OS has a hand in this too. He has a whole 3Kb/s upload link.  No idea if the mission will go well, it's not SpaceX according to him. Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 19:38
|
|
|
got xsnow built and running 
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 21:05
|
|
|
:o didn't know about xsnow compiling as we speak
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 21:17
|
|
|
awesome, christmas is saved!
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 22:45
|
|
|
Tankakern posted::o didn't know about xsnow this was forked from xsnow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u07y2A8v0Eo
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2018 22:59
|
|
|
There Will Be Penalty posted:this was forked from xsnow lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 10:06
|
|
|
i didn't see this coming FreeBSD ZFS File-System Code To Be Re-Based Over ZFS On Linux but then again i don't use zfs, i guess it makes sense this year has been one of the weirdest ever in computing
|
|
#
?
Dec 19, 2018 15:34
|
|
|
Best Bi Geek Squid posted:it's because you don't need sound in space heh
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 06:14
|
|
|
Tankakern posted:i didn't see this coming it's because the last remaining open source solaris vendor switched to linux zfs on linux is currently a one man project. i assume delphix moving to linux means there will be at least a handful of full time zfs on linux developers?
|
|
#
?
Dec 20, 2018 19:54
|
|
|
Always in the mood for a good (and 100% justified) Linus rant. Some idiot decided that breaking userspace for containers was a good thing, which broke several other things in userspace. For those of you who don't know, the one unbreakable rule for the Linux Kernel development process is "ya don't break userspace." Eric W. Biederman was notified of his pull request breaking poo poo back in JULY and he responded with: quote:It has never been the case that mknod on a device node will guarantee Linus was notified yesterday about it and he was very VERY angry. quote:Yeah, this is complete garbage. 
FlapYoJacks fucked around with this message at 00:13 on Dec 24, 2018 |
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 00:11
|
|
|
that sensitivity training must have worked, because that is way more restrained than his rants of days prior
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 00:32
|
|
|
do you think is emails are ghost written?
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 02:01
|
|
|
The_Franz posted:that sensitivity training must have worked, because that is way more restrained than his rants of days prior Was thinking exactly the same thing.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 02:16
|
|
|
Disappointed Linus is much more devastating than Ranty Linus.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 03:04
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:Was thinking exactly the same thing. ditto
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 03:24
|
|
|
ratbert90 posted:Always in the mood for a good (and 100% justified) Linus rant. here is the commit message: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/94f82008ce30e2624537d240d64ce718255e0b80 no wonder he used to swear so much. the net effect of this change was to replace a failure that makes sense with one that doesn't ewe2 posted:Disappointed Linus is much more devastating than Ranty Linus. if i was this biederman guy i would get a new job and maybe change my name
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 03:26
|
|
|
ewe2 posted:Disappointed Linus is much more devastating than Ranty Linus.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 03:58
|
|
|
> It has never been the case that mknod on a device node will guarantee that you even can open the device node. Is this even true? lol.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 04:08
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:> It has never been the case that mknod on a device node will guarantee that you even can open the device node. it's fishmech true
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 04:14
|
|
|
ewe2 posted:Disappointed Linus is much more devastating than Ranty Linus. Phoenixan posted:linus not swearing is suddenly an equivalent of making my dad upset
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 04:22
|
|
|
Kevin Mitnick P.E. posted:if i was this biederman guy i would get a new job and maybe change my name
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 04:31
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:> It has never been the case that mknod on a device node will guarantee that you even can open the device node. Sure, what if the device isn't present or driver support isn't available? (Or is the obvious case excluded by context?)
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 04:56
|
|
|
James Baud posted:Sure, what if the device isn't present or driver support isn't available? (Or is the obvious case excluded by context?) you can always create the node but the kernel will just throw an error if you try to use it and it doesn’t work it’s not the filesystem’s job to know if a device at a specific major/minor node exists probably similar to the case of if you have a device that is only intermittently available but you want the device file anyway for whatever reason
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 05:05
|
|
|
Disappointed Linus comes off as a figure of authority. Ranty Linus comes off as a prudulent child. That’s why it’s so devastating. He comes off as collected and you know you just pissed off the boss man to a degree that you don’t even want to reply because of the shame you now have (he never replied to the email chain.). I quite like disappointed Linus and hope he continues to devastate people in this manner.
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 06:19
|
|
|
“Firm but not an rear end in a top hat” is a big improvement
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 06:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 16:47 |
|
|
that doesn’t prevent him from being wrong of course; software that flouts API rules shouldn’t be expected to run forever of course if Linux had a concept of API/ABI epochs, binaries built against an earlier SDK could be kept running while the same code built against a newer SDK could break appropriately (so its developers fix it)
|
|
#
?
Dec 24, 2018 10:12
|
|