|
Sorry for double-posting, but I just thought it was kind of funny that we came from this  to that Hulkbuster pic. Stark just recreated his first nemesis.
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 20:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:13 |
|
|
Grendels Dad posted:Sorry for double-posting, but I just thought it was kind of funny that we came from this  That's amazing lmao
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 20:42
|
|
|
Bedshaped posted:When does a comic book become a graphic novel? When it's a single long-form piece rather than a serial spread over multiple issues. Watchmen is a comic book, Habibi is a graphic novel.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 21:25
|
|
|
Bedshaped posted:When does a comic book become a graphic novel? Depends on how many snake hexes Alan Moore has put on it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
Black Panther gets a best picture nod... But not Logan or The Dark Knight. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 22:23
|
|
|
Hell with that! Blade. And he didn't have to sell out to the CIA to murder those bougie suckhead parasites
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 22:26
|
|
|
It’s criminal how little award recognition Logan got.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 22:29
|
|
|
Logan was cool but I don’t think it’s fair to put it anywhere in the same league as The Dark Knight. X-24 was exceedingly lame.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:12
|
|
|
Sir Pat deserved at least a supporting actor nom.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:19
|
|
|
Fart City posted:Sir Pat deserved at least a supporting actor nom. Pretty much, yeah. Logan was otherwise just ok. Best X-Men film at least.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:23
|
|
|
The action scenes in Logan play way worse without sound, much more than the typical action movie, so give it an award for that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:43
|
|
|
I am looking over the Oscar nominations and the whole thing is one giant what the gently caress?
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
Pirate Jet posted:Logan was cool but I don’t think it’s fair to put it anywhere in the same league as The Dark Knight. X-24 was exceedingly lame. Read this as X-23 at first and was ready to fight
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:46
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:The action scenes in Logan play way worse without sound, much more than the typical action movie, so give it an award for that. The movie was pretty technically competent all across the board. Like X-24 is indeed stupid, but the actual composting effects used to create it is pretty impressive. Production design was pretty dece as well.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:48
|
|
|
Logan was pretty good, it wasn't amazing, I really don't think a comic book film making you feel something other than "bad rear end!" should actually be held up a huge achievement. Also Logaan was fine, I kind of love the vs. self being made literal though. It was definitely miles ahead of any MCU nonsense though. I said come in! posted:I am looking over the Oscar nominations and the whole thing is one giant what the gently caress? We live in a hell world.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2019 23:57
|
|
|
I mean this has been happening for years, Oscar bait movies, Weinstein's wheeling and dealing with the Academy, the ads "for your consideration"...it's just another step in the total capture of the institution by massive corporate oligopoly.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:01
|
|
|
The Oscars also did not nominate the Mr Rogers documentary. WTF?!! And all of this is burying the news that Channing Tatum might direct the Gambit movie himself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:17
|
|
|
MelancholyMark posted:Read this as X-23 at first and was ready to fight Hell no, she owned.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:19
|
|
|
Pirate Jet posted:Logan was cool but I don’t think it’s fair to put it anywhere in the same league as The Dark Knight. X-24 was exceedingly lame. They're both "prestige" films in the genre compared to basically everything else.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:32
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:The Oscars also did not nominate the Mr Rogers documentary. WTF?!! What is Tatum’s weird boner for Gambit? Like who is pining for that?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:38
|
|
|
Fart City posted:What is Tatum’s weird boner for Gambit? Like who is pining for that? If dere's one thing I know after all dis time, mon cherie, it's dat e'erybody's pining fo' Gambit.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:44
|
|
|
Fart City posted:What is Tatum’s weird boner for Gambit? Like who is pining for that? Channing Tatum.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:45
|
|
|
Fart City posted:What is Tatum’s weird boner for Gambit? Like who is pining for that? He wants that Ryan Reynolds/Deadpool heat.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:47
|
|
|
Tatum is just a big nerd. Gambit is a sexy dude from the South, probably sees a lot of thing in common with himself.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:48
|
|
|
Sir Kodiak posted:If dere's one thing I know after all dis time, mon cherie, it's dat e'erybody's pining fo' Gambit. drat you for making me remember loving this poo poo, right down to the mon cherie
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
I liked Logan well enough but didn't think it lived up to the hype. Sooner or later I want to see a full on Wolverine mask on screen too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 00:51
|
|
|
Urdnot Fire posted:Or Annihilation, which was also snubbed. Nah. I liked the bear, but nothing in that was award worthy. I will admit it looked better than this: 
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 01:02
|
|
|
Oscar nominated visual effects.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
Jose Oquendo posted:Oscar nominated visual effects. They probably nominated it for the genuine achievement that is Thanos rather than for this singular still image.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:03
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:They probably nominated it for the genuine achievement that is Thanos rather than for this singular still image. I swear to god I'm not trolling, but what about Thanos is a genuine achievement?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:05
|
|
|
Jose Oquendo posted:I swear to god I'm not trolling, but what about Thanos is a genuine achievement? man is big and purple this is the same degree of boundary-pushing as, uh, gollum, who actually did deserve an academy award and received several
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:07
|
|
|
ungulateman posted:man is big and purple Return of the King was 15 years ago too.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:11
|
|
|
thanos is just riding ivan ooze's coattails
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:18
|
|
|
Brother Entropy posted:thanos is just riding ivan ooze's coattails He wishes At least Ivan Ooze's motivation and plans made loving sense
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:21
|
|
|
Fart City posted:What is Tatum’s weird boner for Gambit? Like who is pining for that? A lot of people are pining for Tatum's boner.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:27
|
|
|
Burkion posted:He wishes he wants to kill half the universe because he likes killing. makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:30
|
|
|
Yeah Step 1) Get revenge on Zordon By what method does he enact this step? Just go into his house and loving kill him while his body guards are fighting my henchman in an abandoned construction site. Ok good plan. Step 2) Dig up my giant robots. By what method? Give mind controlling putty to kids that control parents to do so. Also pretty solid. Step 3) Conquer Earth By what method? Giant indestructible robots. Then I assume you flip Earth to movie universe Dark Spectre, go hang out in movie universe Lost Galaxy, and watch the Brady Bunch Reunion on loop.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:30
|
|
|
CelticPredator posted:he wants to kill half the universe because he likes killing. makes sense. I guess a generation raised on "they hate our freedom" would think that's a realistic world view and that masses would flock and fight in support of it (Thanos' army in the flashbacks).
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:43
|
|
|
ruddiger posted:Return of the King was 15 years ago too. Fellowship was out a couple months after 9/11. Kinda crazy to think about.
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 02:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 12:13 |
|
|
Burkion posted:He wishes If it made sense then we would be in support of Thanos wiping out half the universe and he would be the good guy?
|
|
#
?
Jan 23, 2019 04:47
|
|