|
The Cheshire Cat posted:The colour makes this bad enough on its own but what makes it truly special is the apparent category of things which are neither "at an intersection" or "not at an intersection". I'm just trying to work out some logical construction where that could be a thing and can't come up with anything. And they don't add up to 100%! This might be the crappiest pie chart ever made.
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 13:39 |
|
|
The missing percentage accounts for 'Both', clearly.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
"Accidents where pedestrians were knocked through an intersection but the presence of an intersection was not found to be a contributing factor to the accident" didn't fit next to the slice
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
All the slices are the same color too, but I guess that doesn't really matter.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:The missing percentage accounts for 'Both', clearly. Maybe like driveways and other access places where it's hard to say it's an intersection but it's also definitely not not an intersection
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 22:34
|
|
|
Probably just unspecified locations.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 23:05
|
|
|
What so confusing about the graph? 104% of pedestrian accidents occur at an intersection, a location other than an intersection, or neither.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 23:34
|
|
|
Clearly some collisions occur at the intersection of multiple intersections. Intersectional collisions, if you like.
|
|
#
?
Mar 10, 2019 23:59
|
|
|
Hermsgervørden posted:Clearly some collisions occur at the intersection of multiple intersections. Intersectionality?
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 00:10
|
|
|
DarkHorse posted:Intersectionality? I think it’s often inadvertent, actually!
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 02:33
|
|
|
It's not often you get a graph that violates the laws of both logic, mathematics, and color theory at the same time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 02:56
|
|
|
clearly, "other" is the intersection/not intersection superposition that occurs when both the pedestrian and driver are blind and thus unable to observe & collapse it into either.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 09:33
|
|
|
Please don't shame the 10% of quantum traffic accidents they have very real quantum victims, and we are making quantum leaps in fighting for their quantum safety.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 16:06
|
|
|
No Safe Word posted:Please don't shame the 10% of quantum traffic accidents they have very real quantum victims, and we are making quantum leaps in fighting for their quantum safety. are you certain
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
No Safe Word posted:Please don't shame the 10% of quantum traffic accidents they have very real quantum victims, and we are making quantum leaps in fighting for their quantum safety. Oh boy
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:11
|
|
|
No Safe Word posted:Please don't shame the 10% of quantum traffic accidents they have very real quantum victims, and we are making quantum leaps in fighting for their quantum safety. We know exactly how fast the cars were traveling, but we have no loving idea where they were.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:16
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:are you certain Spoeank posted:Oh boy SiKboy posted:We know exactly how fast the cars were traveling, but we have no loving idea where they were.  super of you to all collapse on this post with good positions
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:19
|
|
|
No Safe Word posted:
Super positions, even
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:26
|
|
|
spooky collision from a distance
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 22:47
|
|
|
the times when the objects pass through each other as if neither exists really fucks with statistics.
|
|
#
?
Mar 11, 2019 23:47
|
|
What if pedestrians are bosons 
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 01:06
|
|
|
Watermelon Daiquiri posted:What if pedestrians are bosons What if they're bo daughters?
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 01:13
|
|
|
Good job everyone
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 06:22
|
|
|
Control Volume posted:What so confusing about the graph? 104% of pedestrian accidents occur at an intersection, a location other than an intersection, or neither. A Saints Row 4 Insurance Fraud graph!
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 09:48
|
|
|
Brawnfire posted:What if they're bo daughters? What if they're Bo Jackson 
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 14:50
|
|
|
Watermelon Daiquiri posted:What if pedestrians are bosons I just hope they're not ample, that might distract drivers.
|
|
#
?
Mar 12, 2019 15:50
|
|
|
 Finally, Brexit is doing some good to the pound.
|
|
#
?
Mar 13, 2019 21:19
|
|
|
is using wikipedia cheating in this thread
|
|
#
?
Mar 14, 2019 23:57
|
|
|
I'm max flexibility
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2019 10:46
|
|
|
well im max. flexibility
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2019 19:26
|
|
|
(standing up defiantly) I'm Max Flexibility!
|
|
#
?
Mar 16, 2019 22:58
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 15:41
|
|
|
Wow that is an impressively ugly .... attempt to represent data visually
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 15:52
|
|
|
I guess it's supposed to be a moon?
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 18:00
|
|
|
MrUnderbridge posted:I guess it's supposed to be a moon? Gotta be. A moon drawn with a mouse.
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 18:09
|
|
|
The dog is good
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 20:10
|
|
|
MrUnderbridge posted:I guess it's supposed to be a moon? That’s no moon
|
|
#
?
Mar 18, 2019 20:48
|
|
|
A moon, eclipsing another moon, with areas of shadow supposedly representing different places but also not really to scale and also in a confusing area format
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 01:19
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/brendankoerner/status/1105943375738478592
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 21:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 25, 2024 13:39 |
|
|
We're all eating from the trash can of ideology now
|
|
#
?
Mar 19, 2019 21:27
|
|