Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Finger Prince
Jan 5, 2007


Elviscat posted:

That's a real mic drop from WOW, should we wind down operations? Nah, gently caress it we're out

That's how it always goes. Lock the front door and head out the back, preferably with your pockets full of advanced bookings, and let the creditors sort out the rest.
Booking on some rando low cost that appeared out of nowhere, especially if it's not publically traded, is always a high risk activity that at some point will leave you holding your dick.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane
No, I've found the One Weird Trick to make money in aviation while providing incredibly low prices and reliable services, actually. This time it's sure to work!

There's a flight school opening up near me that's promising fixed-price training, long-term instructors and aircraft rental without a per-day fee if you're going on an extended trip. Like, I get customers want those things to be available, but the owner is going to lose his rear end because there's no way in hell that plan can work profitably.

Acid Reflux
Oct 18, 2004

buttcrackmenace posted:

my view this morning



zoom for :stare:

"tropical environment," sure, but just how long do engine cowling screws have to remain untouched in order to appear so fuckin rusty

Hi-ho, Silver!

e - Also, sorry about your 10 dB, because dimes to dollars says the noise cancelling system is either broken or disabled.

Kebbins
Apr 9, 2017

BRAK LIVES MATTER

Mazz posted:

The wing is gorgeous, the rest is not

The wings really do it. I saw someone else post a while back the 380 was just the first "baby" version and as the future-of-air-travel-a-la-Popular-Mechanics-covers became a reality that the plane would be stretched and take on a more elegant shape, any veracity to that?

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Captain Postal posted:

Huh? The warhead is at the back of the thing?

Robert Goddard's first rockets also had the nozzle at the top and the fuel bottle/payload at the bottom. Apparently the idea was that by having the center of gravity lower than the center of thrust it would self-stabilize like a pendulum, or a horse pulling a cart.

Later they did some math and realized that that effect only occurs when the horse and cart are connected by a movable coupling. The cart might begin to go off track, but the horse keeps heading in the right direction and pulls it back in line. Because the rocket nozzle is rigidly mounted and rotates with the vehicle, the thrust axis changes too, so the nozzle location doesn't affect stability.

So I would guess that either the Nazis had the same incorrect idea as Goddard, or they correctly understood the physics, realized it didn't matter, and put the nozzles at the top for some other reason like weight distribution.

marumaru
May 20, 2013



Kebbins posted:

The wings really do it. I saw someone else post a while back the 380 was just the first "baby" version and as the future-of-air-travel-a-la-Popular-Mechanics-covers became a reality that the plane would be stretched and take on a more elegant shape, any veracity to that?

i need mockups. right now.

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

The A380 is ugly entirely because of its fivehead. Everything else about it is pretty or at least neutral. They just really hosed up on the plane's "eyes."

q.v.:

drgitlin
Jul 25, 2003
luv 2 get custom titles from a forum that goes into revolt when its told to stop using a bad word.
Yeah it looks a lot better with the cockpit up top.

I got several emails asking me not to refer to it as hydrocephalic when I wrote a thing about the plane a few weeks ago.

marumaru
May 20, 2013




i will literally never tire of this image. the reason that's not what the a380 looks like is because we dont deserve it

Mortabis
Jul 8, 2010

I am stupid
"Sell the same thing as everyone else but at a lower price" isn't an amazing business model.

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009
Stealing this from Rozzbot in the spaceflight thread, since you folks have been talking helicopters:
https://twitter.com/NASAJPL/status/1111388028046499843

babyeatingpsychopath
Oct 28, 2000
Forum Veteran

buttcrackmenace posted:

"tropical environment," sure, but just how long do engine cowling screws have to remain untouched in order to appear so fuckin rusty

Untreated high-strength steel screws? Six seconds. Maybe 10.

I get screws brand new, open the package, and put corrosion-preventative compound in the package immediately. Otherwise, the phillips indentions get orangey on the corners AS THEY'RE BEING INSTALLED.

PT6A
Jan 5, 2006

Public school teachers are callous dictators who won't lift a finger to stop children from peeing in my plane

Mortabis posted:

"Sell the same thing as everyone else but at a lower price" isn't an amazing business model.

Provided you can do so while still making a profit, it's an excellent business model.

This is clearly not the case when it comes to aviation though; it's a business where it's hard as gently caress to make any profit at all, and random bullshit usually comes along to gently caress with your plan to the degree it's irresponsible not to consider "the universe randomly fucks us over" as a continual operating expense. It's a constant balance between maintaining high utilization and having enough slack to handle the vicissitudes of the industry -- weather delays, Boeing engineering a lovely plane, something randomly breaking, a pilot getting drunk on a layover and then calling in sick, whatever. If you look at the industry from the outside, it's easy to say "hey, these planes are just sitting around and we're paying way too much for staff! We can efficiency/disrupt that away and make mad stacks!" Well, that's true, until things start loving up and you have no way to recover and you're liable to a whole bunch of passengers for delays and the airline industry claims another bright-eyed optimistic doofus.

Jonny Nox
Apr 26, 2008




PT6A posted:

Provided you can do so while still making a profit, it's an excellent business model.

This is clearly not the case when it comes to aviation though; it's a business where it's hard as gently caress to make any profit at all, and random bullshit usually comes along to gently caress with your plan to the degree it's irresponsible not to consider "the universe randomly fucks us over" as a continual operating expense. It's a constant balance between maintaining high utilization and having enough slack to handle the vicissitudes of the industry -- weather delays, Boeing engineering a lovely plane, something randomly breaking, a pilot getting drunk on a layover and then calling in sick, whatever. If you look at the industry from the outside, it's easy to say "hey, these planes are just sitting around and we're paying way too much for staff! We can efficiency/disrupt that away and make mad stacks!" Well, that's true, until things start loving up and you have no way to recover and you're liable to a whole bunch of passengers for delays and the airline industry claims another bright-eyed optimistic doofus.

Gonna have to take issue with this post.





Boeing didn't engineer a lovely plane, they hosed up a really good plane. :cheeky:

MrChips
Jun 10, 2005

FLIGHT SAFETY TIP: Fatties out first

The 737 is an airplane that only an accountant could love, sorry.

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

MrChips posted:

The 737 is an airplane that only an accountant could love, sorry.



:colbert:

ewe2
Jul 1, 2009

PT6A posted:

Provided you can do so while still making a profit, it's an excellent business model.

Hard Landing: if you haven't read it, go read it. Still very applicable, the degree of difficulty is hard to explain without a lot of detail.

edit: The Economics of Airlines would also be a good read, I've yet to read it though.

I'm more of a 737-400 guy, I like the squashy engines.

ewe2 fucked around with this message at 04:10 on Mar 29, 2019

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

MrChips posted:

The 737 is an airplane that only an accountant could love, sorry.



i love the 737-100



squee

SeaborneClink
Aug 27, 2010

MAWP... MAWP!
So WOW airlines ceased all operations today. Who's next?

Big Mean Jerk
Jan 27, 2009

Well, of course I know him.
He's me.
Am I the only person here who finds almost all large commercial aircraft incredibly boring and ugly? Even the different liveries can only improve so much.

goatsestretchgoals
Jun 4, 2011

Hot take: large commercial aircraft should be boring. Exciting is at best a ride down the ankle breaker slide.

pthighs
Jun 21, 2013

Pillbug

Big Mean Jerk posted:

Am I the only person here who finds almost all large commercial aircraft incredibly boring and ugly? Even the different liveries can only improve so much.

I agree friend, you and I were meant to break Mach 1 straight up, and caress the face of God herself.

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Big Mean Jerk posted:

Am I the only person here who finds almost all large commercial aircraft incredibly boring and ugly? Even the different liveries can only improve so much.

Most of the everyday people haulers are extremely dull, yes. Airlines have optimized the hell out of the tube-with-two-engines-in-three-sizes system and I doubt I could reliably pick the manufacturer, let alone the model, in a field of A3whatevers and 7X7s.

But there are still some neat airliners around, like the adorable little 731 up there. If I ever got the money for a private jet I'd build it from one of those, turbojet noise be damned

Elviscat
Jan 1, 2008

Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

pthighs posted:

I agree friend, you and I were meant to break Mach 1 straight up, and caress the face of God herself.

Felix Baumgartner parachute account spotted.

I would blow Dane Cook
Dec 26, 2008
The 747 will be beautiful forever

ThisIsJohnWayne
Feb 23, 2007
Ooo! Look at me! NO DON'T LOOK AT ME!



I would blow Dane Cook posted:

The 747Constellation will be beautiful forever

Fixed it for you.

drunkill
Sep 25, 2007

me @ ur posting
Fallen Rib

AzureSkys
Apr 27, 2003

I think the Comet is pretty sweet looking. I also liked the look of the DC-8.

david_a
Apr 24, 2010




Megamarm

SeaborneClink posted:

So WOW airlines ceased all operations today. Who's next?
Norwegian from what I hear

MrYenko
Jun 18, 2012

#2 isn't ALWAYS bad...


Its amazing how much better liveries were until ~1988 or so.

e.pilot
Nov 20, 2011

sometimes maybe good
sometimes maybe shit

david_a posted:

Norwegian from what I hear

I can only get so erect.

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


Speaking of 737s I just saw one land with a classic swoop winglet on the left and a split scimitar on the right :pwn:

Jealous Cow
Apr 4, 2002

by Fluffdaddy

HookedOnChthonics posted:

Speaking of 737s I just saw one land with a classic swoop winglet on the left and a split scimitar on the right :pwn:

Spirit or Ryanair?

HookedOnChthonics
Dec 5, 2015

Profoundly dull


Alaska

e: gently caress, wish stopping for a photo wouldn’t make me late for work, it’s parked nose-to-nose with a pair of eagles :(

HookedOnChthonics fucked around with this message at 16:49 on Mar 29, 2019

Jonny Nox
Apr 26, 2008




HookedOnChthonics posted:

Speaking of 737s I just saw one land with a classic swoop winglet on the left and a split scimitar on the right :pwn:

I see that all the loving time.

For awhile I thought that was how it was designed.

Phy
Jun 27, 2008



Fun Shoe

Elviscat posted:

Felix Baumgartner parachute account spotted.

Isn't every Felix Baumgartner account a parachute account

e: I've got a soft spot for the 737 cause I spent a fair amount of time in one hunched over eatin' Bits n Bites when my fiancee and I weren't living together yet

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


Sagebrush posted:

The A380 is ugly entirely because of its fivehead. Everything else about it is pretty or at least neutral. They just really hosed up on the plane's "eyes."

q.v.:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0Qmtm7_VFk

evil_bunnY
Apr 2, 2003

e.pilot posted:

I can only get so erect.
What’s your beef?

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Jonny Nox posted:

I see that all the loving time.

For awhile I thought that was how it was designed.

Why would they have asymmetrical wingtip devices? Surely they can't just pull whatever's in the stockroom when a plane goes in for maintenance.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jonny Nox
Apr 26, 2008




Sagebrush posted:

Why would they have asymmetrical wingtip devices? Surely they can't just pull whatever's in the stockroom when a plane goes in for maintenance.

I'm not an aeronautical engineer?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply