|
merk, can you make any sense of that
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 20:51
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
No. But I can’t decide his alignment from it either.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 20:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:01
|
|
|
merk posted:Amoeba, why did you spend so much time in a post saying I’m not good at mafia? How is that relevant at all other than to discredit my vote onto you? It's not that you're not good. It's that you're not as good as people like to pretend.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:02
|
|
|
I’ll try to articulate it better when it matters more, i.e. if fool flips scum. Sorry I’m not as well spoken as you merk  (Voice in my head: maybe it’s not your words that are poo poo, but your logic?) (Second voice in my head: stfu) (Third voice: fool and Fisk AND merk are scum and you’re being gaslit) (Second voice again: stfu)
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:03
|
|
|
You’re not unclear by nature Jj this shut is just half baked
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:04
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:It's not that you're not good. It's that you're not as good as people like to pretend. Who said anything in this game about me being good? Why is this relevant at all to scum hunting? You’re just discrediting my vote. That’s scummy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:09
|
|
|
I can’t believe my fresco of merk as a saint is inaccurate
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:10
|
|
|
merk posted:Who said anything in this game about me being good? Why is this relevant at all to scum hunting? It's about Opop. See, you can't even read, so why is Opop pretending you are infallible and follow a specific code.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:14
|
|
|
Opo didn't even say I was good. He was pointing out what he thinks of my meta.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:22
|
|
|
And Jon, yeah what you're saying makes sense - so if it seems someone is undermining your logic then they are suss.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:23
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:##vote merk Retro Futurist posted:Merk is a mythical ideal standard though Amoeba102 posted:How is not your meta? You aren't that good. Some sort of mafia messiah. People like to pretend you are, and either hide behind an authority they give you, or point to something that doesn't fit an idea of you being perfect and claim it is a scum tell.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:23
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:And Jon, yeah what you're saying makes sense - so if it seems someone is undermining your logic then they are suss. I am half torn between thanking you internally for being a voice to speak out to make sure it isn’t just me, and thinking this was posted by a devil on my shoulder who has a hard on for loving merk (wording intended) I suppose I’d like to see how others feel about my Fisk argument; whether it makes sense
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
Yeah, that thing you quoted was prompted by you asking and not something just out of the blue - you missed a few quotes in that exchange. It's all about Opop trying to make a vote on you based off of "merk wouod not do that or play differently" and "hmm why would merk need discord wink wink nudge nudge".
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:26
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Yeah, that thing you quoted was prompted by you asking and not something just out of the blue - you missed a few quotes in that exchange. Yes, I understand what happened. How does this comment from you relate to that (intentionally snipped): Amoeba102 posted:You aren't that good. Some sort of mafia messiah. People like to pretend you are, and either hide behind an authority they give you
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
Jon Joe posted:I am half torn between thanking you internally for being a voice to speak out to make sure it isn’t just me, and thinking this was posted by a devil on my shoulder who has a hard on for loving merk (wording intended) I don't even care about merk - i only care about Opop and Hal as players in general.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:28
|
|
|
Amoeba, are you seeing what I'm saying here? I'm saying that you didn't start attacking me as being 'not that good' until I decided to vote you. I'm saying that is you discrediting my vote rather than commenting on what Opo did. Should I get out a whiteboard and map this out?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
amoeba has a weird pr this game
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I don't even care about merk - i only care about Opop and Hal as players in general. Holy poo poo. What is your beef with me? Maybe you're just a rude dude and not scum after all?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
Yeah fisk is pinging me too joe jon. It feels like he was asking you to explain yourself just to make it look like you were under pressure when the basic idea 'these two players have accounts that don't match up, no town has come forward with an explanation, resolving it seems useful' is good. I also don't like the vote on me 'to make me pardon myself' pushing me to voting leader along side GK who some people have suggested is joke voting me, however he hasn't come back to on that clarify that. Seems like a lot of hedgy reasons to vote me.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:32
|
|
|
merk posted:Yes, I understand what happened. How does this comment from you relate to that (intentionally snipped): I think it's pretty obvious. People either just defer to you to avoid making content. OR IN THIS CASE they make a merk is too good and perfect to play like this -> must be scum. You had barely done much this game at the point and Opop made a bad vote off of mythical meta, which you have even argued against. Are you just peturbed I implied you aren't gods gift to mafia?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
merk posted:Holy poo poo. What is your beef with me? Maybe you're just a rude dude and not scum after all? I have beef with you, and I wouldn't be posting about you anymore if you stomped prompting me. But is fair to say I went to far to say I don't care about others. I do care about Somber and bowmore as well because they also play hearthstone. And that's why I signed up.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:35
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Yeah fisk is pinging me too joe jon. I know why Jonathan Fisk posted:let's lynch toalpaz and force a self pardon
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:36
|
|
|
Lol, i made a typo. Should be I have no beef with you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:37
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Lol, i made a typo. Should be I have no beef with you. lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
Fisk pings me because they are coattail rider.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:38
|
|
|
I’m now inclined to believe amoeba just temporarily suffered from a case of the “can’t convey full meaning through the screen”Amoeba102 posted:Fisk pings me because they are coattail rider. I was going to mention this earlier but I didn’t because my main argument was in contention and I didn’t want to add more that could confuse, but yes I find it sus that Fisk chose toal as the third vote on him
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:42
|
|
|
Interesting, because jon joe thinks i'm suspicious because i'm dismissing previously suggested theories and creating m own
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
oh, he's changed for convenience play better, yall
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:Interesting, because jon joe thinks i'm suspicious because i'm dismissing previously suggested theories and creating m own That was not my main argument
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:44
|
|
|
you realize that in this form of mafia we have things written downJon Joe posted:Comedy option: infi and all the people he claims to have given an item to are scum voting for their posting, and not my own reasons!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:46
|
|
|
the committee coalescing around me after voting toalpaz makes me think they're probably scum after all. Keeping my vote there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:47
|
|
|
Say it over, what about fools poating made you vote them?
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:51
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:you realize that in this form of mafia we have things written down Please point to in that quote of me where I am accusing you of “creating [y] own [theories]” as the reason you main reason are pinging me. First, the centrality of my argument is that you leapt off fool in a scummy way because I was pushing him - this rests on the assumption that he is your scumbuddy Secondly, you moving to toal out of your three named people of toal/infi/fool is sus because toal is the least possible information Together these are my core Third, which I did not choose to mention until now because my main two points (much more important points) were in contention, is that toal also represents a bandwagon vote as two others were also voting for him at the time. None of these are contradictory, and I feel you are flailing hard. However, again I think fool is smart vote for today.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 21:53
|
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:Say it over, what about fools poating made you vote them? Jonathan Fisk posted:The claim’s fine. This reads like scrambling in response Jon Joe posted:Please point to in that quote of me where I am accusing you of “creating [y] own [theories]” as the reason you main reason are pinging me. I "leapt off" fool because this is his first game. Your bit on toalpaz is word salad. quote:Third, which I did not choose to mention until now because my main two points (much more important points) were in contention, is that toal also represents a bandwagon vote as two others were also voting for him at the time. ah, a sincere "3rd vote scum!!!" quote:None of these are contradictory, and I feel you are flailing hard. However, again I think fool is smart vote for today. nobodly "flails hard" under limp accusations from people who aren't reading the game or playing consistently.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 22:05
|
|
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:ah, a sincere "3rd vote scum!!!” Yes. When it fits, it fits. Though I dunno how many times I can emphasize this properly, it means nothing if fool is town. Anyway I think you’re trying awfully too hard to discredit suspicion of you by any means possible. I’m literally not even willing to vote you for any of this unless fool flips scum, and that you’re treating me like an insane asylums patient for such a contingent and reiterated take reads to me as flailing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
 You care *too much* about this, also here’s another two paragraphs where I clearly don’t
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 22:14
|
|
|
Anyway this clearly isn’t going to go anywhere until many other players weigh in. If you’re reading this, please post with your thoughts, even if they are half baked.
|
|
#
?
Apr 1, 2019 22:14
|
|
|
So while I was at the gym I had a thought on the mystery of the missing jewelery: it seems strange that the inventor would be asked to distribute items with unknown effect to people he hasn't had a chance to interact with yet. At that point the items might as well just be distributed randomly. From the effects of the items we know, they don't seem particularly subtle, so the inventors presumed ability to notice their use is a very minor advantage at best. I'm don't really have a good theory of what this suggests. Just maybe something to consider.
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 00:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 4, 2024 17:28 |
|
|
Amoeba102 posted:I'm talking about air tight reasoning, not air tight cases. this is a scum post ##vote amoeba
|
|
#
?
Apr 2, 2019 00:23
|
|
