Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BrigadierSensible
Feb 16, 2012

I've got a pocket full of cheese🧀, and a garden full of trees🌴.

Seconding the Buffy movie is cool and good.

It's not clever, it doesn't think it's clever, AND it has Luke Perry.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Whedon is someone clever enough to play around within the rules and conventions of network tv but totally unable to break them or to exist without them. Medium talent defined by restriction. Also he’s a piece of poo poo who hates women and abandoned his wife and daughter.

Rockman Reserve
Oct 2, 2007

"Carbons? Purge? What are you talking about?!"

Jedit posted:

Dude, there was an entire episode about how their brainwashing technician was allowed to program a doll to be his perfect friend as a birthday present. The head of the house was secretly in love with one of the dolls. You were absolutely meant to sympathise with them.

The things you just typed and the conclusion you draw from it are completely and totally incongruous.


Hughlander posted:

And an awesome Paul Ruben vampire that let him be in my favorite scene of all time in the What We Do In the Shadows TV Series... Check it!

Paul Ruben’s costume in the film is based on his porn theater mugshot, at his own request.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

food court bailiff posted:

The things you just typed and the conclusion you draw from it are completely and totally incongruous.

Presented sympathetically and deserving of sympathy are two different things. The head boss lady eventually turns against her bosses because they treat the sex slaves worse than she does, and she’s the leader of the resistance in the postapocalyptic future. You’re absolutely meant to see her as deserving of your sympathy (which she does not deserve by any objective standard), as the narrative ignores and excuses the facts of her situation.

Ambitious Spider
Feb 13, 2012



Lipstick Apathy

Len posted:

What?

I stopped when the local community college ended up being monster hunters and that was almost a decade ago now. But uh

:chloe:

The swim team rapists were when she was still in high school.

CommonShore
Jun 6, 2014

A true renaissance man


The Buffy Movie is a mediocre movie with some killer casting propping it up.

e. and it works much better as a one- off than as an origin story, which from what I understand it was never intended as.

FilthyImp
Sep 30, 2002

Anime Deviant
Kind of love that they called back to burning down the gym in the series.

In retrospect Buffy's arc being 'naive vapid cheerleader' to 'cynical, disillusioned put-upon foster mom' really wasn't as progressive as I thought it was at the time.

Nor was her relationship with an older dude with anger issues.

FilthyImp has a new favorite as of 16:00 on May 25, 2019

Mister Mind
Mar 20, 2009

I'm not a real doctor,
But I am a real worm;
I am an actual worm
Not aging well: Kristy Swanson is a MAGA chud.

Casey Finnigan
Apr 30, 2009

Dumb ✔
So goddamn crazy ✔

FactsAreUseless posted:

You're not crazy. Avengers mega-sucked and it especially did a poor job with Black Widow because Joss Whedon deeply hates women.

Well, if it makes you feel better, they continued to keep doing an incredibly poor job with Black Widow all the way through to the end of the Avengers film series. Especially since Black Widow is, like another poster mentioned, really just straight-up Solid Snake and deserved a much larger role in the movies.

Seriously, (Endgame spoilers) why the gently caress did Hawkeye, a guy who ended up becoming a crazy murderer after the snap, survive? And then the fact that the rest of the Avengers seemed to chuck her down the memory hole instantly. It was heinously bad and not something I'll be able to forget. It's just really obvious that the exact same character, but male, would be treated very differently by the writers.

That said, I don't read comics and have no understanding of the characters outside the movies so they could all be replaced with completely new and different characters and I wouldn't be able to tell.

e: Oh yeah and Disney/Marvel's queerbaiting "Check it out we have a real gay character!! His name is Gay Man #1!!" poo poo will definitely age poorly.

Casey Finnigan has a new favorite as of 18:25 on May 25, 2019

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

Pick posted:

Cabin in the Woods is one of my most hated films of all time for pretending it was clever when it was re-hashing other actual deconstructions, poorly. God it is loving bad.

I need to sit down and watch it properly but I really feel like the movie had a sarcastic undertone. It knew how stupid it was being and just ran with it and then ran way longer than it needed to for precisely the same reason. I don't think anything in that movie was played straight at all. Kind of like being a deconstruction of a deconstruction.

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

rodbeard posted:

I feel like I'm crazy because I seem to be the only one who thinks he did a terrible job with the avengers. The movie ignores everyone's existing personality and replaces them with stock quirky Joss Whedon characters.

:same:

I stopped watching Avengers movies after that, and eventually lost interest in the MCU. Can't complain, it has saved me quite a bit of time and money.

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

food court bailiff posted:

Paul Ruben’s costume in the film is based on his porn theater mugshot, at his own request.

Lol, that rules

Krispy Wafer
Jul 26, 2002

I shouted out "Free the exposed 67"
But they stood on my hair and told me I was fat

Grimey Drawer
I feel like people in this thread would have liked Cabin in the Woods a lot more had they not know it was a Whedon movie.

It’s a good movie. How much of that is an incredibly likable cast and how much of that is Whedon is up for debate, but it doesn’t take away from the film itself.

I couldn’t care less about his other stuff though.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Casey Finnigan posted:


Seriously, (Endgame spoilers) why the gently caress did Hawkeye, a guy who ended up becoming a crazy murderer after the snap, survive? And then the fact that the rest of the Avengers seemed to chuck her down the memory hole instantly. It was heinously bad and not something I'll be able to forget. It's just really obvious that the exact same character, but male, would be treated very differently by the writers.



He has a family and she doesn’t

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
Cabin in the Woods versus Spider-Man: Spiderverse is a great way to see the difference between a film that's trying to be clever and a film that is actually clever.

hyperhazard
Dec 4, 2011

I am the one lascivious
With magic potion niveous

Casey Finnigan posted:

Well, if it makes you feel better, they continued to keep doing an incredibly poor job with Black Widow all the way through to the end of the Avengers film series. Especially since Black Widow is, like another poster mentioned, really just straight-up Solid Snake and deserved a much larger role in the movies.

Seriously, (Endgame spoilers) why the gently caress did Hawkeye, a guy who ended up becoming a crazy murderer after the snap, survive? And then the fact that the rest of the Avengers seemed to chuck her down the memory hole instantly. It was heinously bad and not something I'll be able to forget. It's just really obvious that the exact same character, but male, would be treated very differently by the writers.

That said, I don't read comics and have no understanding of the characters outside the movies so they could all be replaced with completely new and different characters and I wouldn't be able to tell.

e: Oh yeah and Disney/Marvel's queerbaiting "Check it out we have a real gay character!! His name is Gay Man #1!!" poo poo will definitely age poorly.

You're forgetting the cringey faux-feminist bit in the final battle where all of the female superheroes come together for a few seconds and go "We got this!" Because god, that was bad. They did the same thing in the final fight in the previous movie, and it was just as patronizing then.

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"
Frankly, the Arrowverse does everything the MCU wants to do, and does it better. Granted, that's a low bar, but it's still better.

mllaneza
Apr 28, 2007

Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1993-1952




Hughlander posted:

And an awesome Paul Ruben vampire that let him be in my favorite scene of all time in the What We Do In the Shadows TV Series... Check it!

Paul Ruben has done nothing better in his career. Yes, even that. Yes that was great, his bit in Buffy was better. No, a lot better. I'm not loving with you, it was that great. You should go watch the Buffy movie. I don't care if it isn't on any basic streaming site, pay the four bucks for on-demand and make some loving popcorn.

Ellie Crabcakes
Feb 1, 2008

Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

It still amuses me that some people haven't quite sorted out what that whole porn theater business was actually about.

I AM GRANDO
Aug 20, 2006

Fatty Crabcakes posted:

It still amuses me that some people haven't quite sorted out what that whole porn theater business was actually about.

I don’t actually know. Cruising?

FilthyImp
Sep 30, 2002

Anime Deviant
Everyone always said it was about crashing his kid friendly career.

Gaunab
Feb 13, 2012
LUFTHANSA YOU FUCKING DICKWEASEL

Bogus Adventure posted:

Frankly, the Arrowverse does everything the MCU wants to do, and does it better. Granted, that's a low bar, but it's still better.

You can't be this obvious with a trolling attempt.

FilthyImp
Sep 30, 2002

Anime Deviant
To be fair, they're really done a good job with the yearly crossover episodes and the next one (Crisis) is going to be nerd catnip.

ToxicSlurpee
Nov 5, 2003

-=SEND HELP=-


Pillbug

FilthyImp posted:

Everyone always said it was about crashing his kid friendly career.

I don't think anybody was actually, genuinely out to get him personally but demolishing an otherwise squeaky clean public image was just too much for the media to pass up. He was on hiatus at the time and was way scruffier than people expected him to be. Then he got arrested in a porn theater even though there wasn't even any proof that he was exposing himself. I don't think he was ever even charged with anything but in the American public's eye arrested = guilty. So there was this scruffy mugshot of the main actor from a beloved children's show even though he had never actually done anything wrong and...yeah. The way he was treated was tremendously lovely but it sure as hell got people watching the news.

Pigbuster
Sep 12, 2010

Fun Shoe

Casey Finnigan posted:

e: Oh yeah and Disney/Marvel's queerbaiting "Check it out we have a real gay character!! His name is Gay Man #1!!" poo poo will definitely age poorly.

...oh my God, I mistook Joe Russo for Mark Ruffalo and this whole time I thought Hulk was gay. Nope, just some nameless guy. I haven't face-blinded that bad for a while. :shepface:

Pigbuster has a new favorite as of 21:41 on May 25, 2019

hard counter
Jan 2, 2015





believe me i dislike whedon as much as any decent, God-fearing goon but i don't think his intent was actually to say that infertile women are monsters or that it's something he believes deep down (...necessarily)

it seemed to me like he was trying to draw a parallel between getting dehumanized by being brought up as a human weapon and a tool of the state, tweaked by science, so deep into her double triple quadruple agent cover that bw was without her own persona a while and was never meant to form true relationships outside of the one she abandoned with her country... while the hulk is another kind of living weapon, a freak of science, who is violently forced to lose their persona every so often and also feels like he can never have a true relationship since he thinks of himself as a dangerous outsider; the fact that they're both sterile is supposed to be a bow neatly wrapping things up

so it only looked like whedon was saying infertile women are equally monstrous because he's an awful writer, maybe a one-trick pony at best, who lately just parasitizes other people's IPs

christmas boots
Oct 15, 2012

To these sing-alongs 🎤of siren 🧜🏻‍♀️songs
To oohs😮 to ahhs😱 to 👏big👏applause👏
With all of my 😡anger I scream🤬 and shout📢
🇺🇸America🦅, I love you 🥰but you're freaking 💦me 😳out
Biscuit Hider

CelticPredator posted:

He has a family and she doesn’t

I actually thought it was a nice bookend to the idea that she was looking for a way to clear out the red in her ledger, which Loki implies is so steeped in blood that she'll never be able to make up for it--or at least that she believes it to be that way. So her sacrifice not only protects a dear friend and makes it possible for his family to be saved, but also lets her die knowing she opened the way for half the lives of the entire universe to be saved, which is heroic on such a scale that if any act could serve as an atonement for her past it would most certainly be that one. And, to add to that, since her sacrifice is but one essential step in the total plan, it serves as a final affirmation of the trust and faith she has in her teammates in defiance of the deceit and distrust that comes with the clandestine life of a spy.

Brother Entropy
Dec 27, 2009

hard counter posted:

believe me i dislike whedon as much as any decent, God-fearing goon but i don't think his intent was actually to say that infertile women are monsters or that it's something he believes deep down (...necessarily)

it seemed to me like he was trying to draw a parallel between getting dehumanized by being brought up as a human weapon and a tool of the state, tweaked by science, so deep into her double triple quadruple agent cover that bw was without her own persona a while and was never meant to form true relationships outside of the one she abandoned with her country... while the hulk is another kind of living weapon, a freak of science, who is violently forced to lose their persona every so often and also feels like he can never have a true relationship since he thinks of himself as a dangerous outsider; the fact that they're both sterile is supposed to be a bow neatly wrapping things up

so it only looked like whedon was saying infertile women are equally monstrous because he's an awful writer, maybe a one-trick pony at best, who lately just parasitizes other people's IPs

this is true but at the same time you can't exactly blame people for being less and less willing to give whedon the benefit of the doubt when it comes to how he treats female characters (and it turns out actual women as well)

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

FilthyImp posted:

To be fair, they're really done a good job with the yearly crossover episodes and the next one (Crisis) is going to be nerd catnip.

Exactly. They're fun, they're well written, and they don't break the seasonal story arcs of each series.

Inspector Gesicht
Oct 26, 2012

500 Zeus a body.


Has any action-hero ever got the happy ending where they raise a family of kids they where responsible for orphaning?

Solice Kirsk
Jun 1, 2004

.

Inspector Gesicht posted:

Has any action-hero ever got the happy ending where they raise a family of kids they where responsible for orphaning?

Despicable Me?

hard counter
Jan 2, 2015





Brother Entropy posted:

this is true but at the same time you can't exactly blame people for being less and less willing to give whedon the benefit of the doubt when it comes to how he treats female characters (and it turns out actual women as well)

totally fair

that reminds me tho, there's gotta be a good word for when you're unnerved by how skeevy someone is but no one else notices but then you're totally vindicated when they finally get exposed...because man, that was me when whedon was eventually named as being another hollywood creeper

Remulak
Jun 8, 2001
I can't count to four.
Yams Fan

FilthyImp posted:

Everyone always said it was about crashing his kid friendly career.

Lol, was about money and Anthony Pellicano

https://medium.com/@TheHimmmm/the-right-hand-of-power-a-himmmm-blind-item-story-4ddfabf0a091

E: and of course Les Moonves

Remulak has a new favorite as of 22:27 on May 25, 2019

Ellie Crabcakes
Feb 1, 2008

Stop emailing my boyfriend Gay Crungus

Antifa Turkeesian posted:

I don’t actually know. Cruising?
Absolutely. He just had the bad luck to wave his weenie around when vice was doing a sweep.

Even in 1991, practically no one was going to a porn theater for the actual porn.

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

Fatty Crabcakes posted:

Absolutely. He just had the bad luck to wave his weenie around when vice was doing a sweep.

Even in 1991, practically no one was going to a porn theater for the actual porn.

Which makes it even funnier that Fred Willard got caught doing the same thing in 2012, lol

GoutPatrol
Oct 17, 2009

*Stupid Babby*

Fatty Crabcakes posted:

Absolutely. He just had the bad luck to wave his weenie around when vice was doing a sweep.

Even in 1991, practically no one was going to a porn theater for the actual porn.

We're also ignoring the child pornography charges as well. Imagine if that happened this decade.

Cleretic
Feb 3, 2010


Ignore my posts!
I'm aggressively wrong about everything!

Bogus Adventure posted:

Exactly. They're fun, they're well written, and they don't break the seasonal story arcs of each series.

They're also helped out a fair bit by the fact that they do smaller crossovers and mentions of the other shows all the time, and with a lot of those it's just not treated as a big deal. The MCU always feels like any appearance of a recognizable character that isn't the star of that movie should come with an applause break, but the Arrowverse seems happy to just dump 'hey, Felicity Smoak's in Central City today' or have newspapers mentioning the events of other shows and then move on. It makes their big crossovers feel a lot more natural, and also somehow more exciting. You know that the Atom's around, somewhere, so you don't need to wait for them to spend time establishing that he's going to be there, he can just turn up when it's cool for him to turn up!

And since everyone's rightfully making GBS threads on Endgame's half-assed attempts at Girl Power and gay representation: watch Crisis on Earth-X, their 2017 crossover. Hell, you don't even need to watch the whole thing, pick any random part of that event and it's got more representation--and more meaningful representation--than the whole MCU put together.

Scaramouche
Mar 26, 2001

SPACE FACE! SPACE FACE!

mllaneza posted:

Paul Ruben has done nothing better in his career. Yes, even that. Yes that was great, his bit in Buffy was better. No, a lot better. I'm not loving with you, it was that great. You should go watch the Buffy movie. I don't care if it isn't on any basic streaming site, pay the four bucks for on-demand and make some loving popcorn.

Hah, I saw the buffy movie in the theatre when I was doing movie reviews for a small alt weekly rag and all I remember is his post (mid) credits sequence where he's still moaning after being staked.

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

hard counter posted:

totally fair

that reminds me tho, there's gotta be a good word for when you're unnerved by how skeevy someone is but no one else notices but then you're totally vindicated when they finally get exposed...because man, that was me when whedon was eventually named as being another hollywood creeper
I think general "vindication" is the best term we've got. And yes, it does feel vindicating.

Brother Entropy posted:

this is true but at the same time you can't exactly blame people for being less and less willing to give whedon the benefit of the doubt when it comes to how he treats female characters (and it turns out actual women as well)
Y'know

FilthyImp posted:

Kind of love that they called back to burning down the gym in the series.

In retrospect Buffy's arc being 'naive vapid cheerleader' to 'cynical, disillusioned put-upon foster mom' really wasn't as progressive as I thought it was at the time.

Nor was her relationship with an older dude with anger issues.
I do apologize if I missed a ton of stuff over the last few... years, but I think Buffy gets a bit more poo poo than it deserves.

A lot of the complaints are valid-- it's not as progressive as it thinks, it lets a lot of creepy stuff the male characters do slide, Whedon is only comfortable with his lady characters when they're broken down emotional wrecks--but I think the series works in spite of those shortcomings. It isn't high art, but thanks to bench writers and Sarah Michelle Gellar really committing to the part everything comes across as believably human. Like yes it's lovely as balls that Whedon's MO was "crap on the girl, then crap on her some more, then throw passing shade at the nebulous patriarchy to justify it" but the fallout always felt believable and where the character ended up felt as realistic as one could expect given the ridiculous conceits the show built up.

Like I came to Buffy proper as an adult and went looking for the show to reveal its hand as this secretly regressive pile of garbage, and it really isn't. At best it's well-intentioned and keys in on some surprisingly nuanced stuff for a superhero show; at worst it's aimless and unfocused and falls into bad tropes.

Now Angel... that show deserves some serious shade for how it treats its ladies. Pretty much the instant any lady gets too much agency on that show she gets benched. Hard. Happened at least three separate times.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rodbeard
Jul 21, 2005

Krispy Wafer posted:

I feel like people in this thread would have liked Cabin in the Woods a lot more had they not know it was a Whedon movie.

If Whedon was a better writer it wouldn't be painfully obvious I was watching a Whedon movie to begin with. It would have been better if the two coworkers did anything other than constantly point out how clever the movie was.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply