|
Skwirl posted:gently caress lol It's an Apple product. Search your feelings and tell me what you think the likelihood is of it having any user-serviceable parts at all.
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 06:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
I'd suck dicks for 15.29 an hour
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 06:09
|
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:I'd suck dicks for 15.29 an hour You should suck dicks professionally then, I'm pretty sure even the starting rate is way higher. Alternative flippant response: You don't need to be 6 figures in debt to learn to suck dicks.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 06:23
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:I'd suck dicks for 15.29 an hour call me a prude if you like but i still find the idea of paying to suck someone's dick a bit strange
|
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 06:58
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/jitka/status/1144337825627803648
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 07:26
|
|
|
*In the style of an MC5 song* RELATE TO THE BEAMS MOTHERFUCKER!! https://twitter.com/marwilliamson/status/186123937724383232
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 09:22
|
|
|
immortalyawn posted:*In the style of an MC5 song* I;m thinking about thos beams
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 10:32
|
|
|
Scathach posted:Okay whoa now there's a place you can hang out with these critters? And they're okay with it? Holy poo poo. And here I was all excited about petting stingrays. You can also feed bears there. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o9H7R9tu9Ko It’s in Niagara Falls, Ontario. They have roller coasters and other rides, and ocean animals.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 11:43
|
|
|
immortalyawn posted:*In the style of an MC5 song* So she's a Posadaist?
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 12:15
|
|
|
Ichabod Sexbeast posted:So she's a Posadaist? Marianne Williamson sends positive imagery and thoughts of the Angels of Pity for five minutes to anyone who attempts to futilely box her into a classification.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 12:27
|
|
|
immortalyawn posted:RELATE TO THE BEAMS MOTHERFUCKER!! on his shell he holds the Earth his thought is slow, but always kind he holds us all within his mind
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 12:31
|
|
|
Memento posted:It's an Apple product. Search your feelings and tell me what you think the likelihood is of it having any user-serviceable parts at all. I literally have a battery-powered apple mouse sitting on my desk. I can't take a picture of the top of it; it's so shiny my phone refuses to focus on it.  I have no idea where I got it though, maybe it's not in production any more. e: since this is the tweets thread, have a good tweet: https://twitter.com/5w0rdFish/status/1144584067574358016?s=20 ewiley has a new favorite as of 13:51 on Jun 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 13:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BigJDubz/status/1141609951418339329
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:01
|
|
|
Milo and POTUS posted:I'd suck dicks for 15.29 an hour
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:19
|
|
|
ewiley posted:I literally have a battery-powered apple mouse sitting on my desk. I can't take a picture of the top of it; it's so shiny my phone refuses to focus on it.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ChurchofSatan/s...r%3D133%23pti31
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:32
|
|
|
Sorry the awful app did the weirdest double post
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:34
|
|
|
Thread: https://twitter.com/Not_shax/status/1144167710802100224
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 14:37
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/MattBlakely8/status/1144427052017127424
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 15:44
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/pablotorre/status/1144438160631508993?s=21
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 17:08
|
|
|
Memento posted:Apple flavor-ade drinkers will tell you that putting it on the bottom was the only way to preserve the smooth perfect curves of the design Apple users are like vegetarians, I've never met an unpleasant one in my entire life but it's impossible to go anywhere online without encountering a bunch of people who are obnoxiously vocal in their insecurity and defensiveness at the thought of other people being one the moment anything even remotely adjacent to the topic if brought up in passing.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:18
|
|
|
Sleeveless posted:Apple users are like vegetarians, I've never met an unpleasant one in my entire life but it's impossible to go anywhere online without encountering a bunch of people who are obnoxiously vocal in their insecurity and defensiveness at the thought of other people being one the moment anything even remotely adjacent to the topic if brought up in passing. Apple did a ton of incredibly lovely elitist ads back in the day that was embraced whole heartedly by the community, and the Apple community is still living that impression down. Especially when Apple products are just the Teslas of tech where the whole idea is to pay more for less and to take pride in needing an adaptor for everything. Vegetarians are their own can of worms. Almost all vegetarians are vegetarians for moral reasons. And when you declare certain foods immoral then you radiate judgement towards people who do eat that kind of food.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:30
|
|
|
I'd buy that for vegans but there are tons of people who are vegetarian for health reasons.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:32
|
|
|
Katt posted:Apple products are just the Teslas of tech Whoa. Hey. C'mon. Let's not go crazy.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
zoux posted:I'd buy that for vegans but there are tons of people who are vegetarian for health reasons. I said "Almost all" specifically to leave room for niche vegetarians. No doctor is going to tell anyone to go vegetarian unless they have some very specific medical condition. They're going to tell them to cut down on the meat and most people probably should.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/1144611395859697664?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:41
|
|
|
Katt posted:Apple did a ton of incredibly lovely elitist ads back in the day that was embraced whole heartedly by the community, and the Apple community is still living that impression down. Especially when Apple products are just the Teslas of tech where the whole idea is to pay more for less and to take pride in needing an adaptor for everything. For both groups, you don't notice the quiet ones.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:43
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/EdGambleComedy/status/1144557174670147584
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:56
|
|
|
Katt posted:Vegetarians are their own can of worms. Almost all vegetarians are vegetarians for moral reasons. And when you declare certain foods immoral then you radiate judgement towards people who do eat that kind of food. Oh yeah, that judgement radiation. Christ 
Farecoal has a new favorite as of 22:07 on Jun 28, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:56
|
|
|
Katt posted:I said "Almost all" specifically to leave room for niche vegetarians. No doctor is going to tell anyone to go vegetarian unless they have some very specific medical condition. They're going to tell them to cut down on the meat and most people probably should. I’ve met many vegetarians who profess it being due to health reasons, but who have no specific medical requirement to eliminate meat. They just feel like it’s healthier for them, and they didn’t feel they needed a doctor’s instruction to eat in a healthier way (or go to the gym, for that matter). I didn’t think this was an unusual case — people often choose their diet due to perceived health impact without the input of a medical professional — but maybe all my vegetarian contacts are weird. It could be!
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 21:57
|
|
|
It’s easily possible for a vegan or vegetarian diet to help someone’s health because it finally forces them to pay attention to what they’re eating. It’s usually someone going from eating 3500 calories of fatty garbage per day to eating a healthy, restrained diet.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2019 22:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/eliyudin/status/1144644467426779141Farecoal posted:Oh yeah, that judgement radiation. Christ I hate vegetarians because they're judgmental, I say as I make huge sweeping judgments on vegetarians and the healthiness and morality of their personal diet decisions that have zero negative impact on my life. https://twitter.com/dpinsen/status/1126629522453991425
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 01:05
|
|
|
That study is bullshit because people count as animals and Paula Deen's recipes must have contributed to thousands of deaths from heart disease and diabetes.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
How do you kill a third of an animal? Destroy its spirit with unnecessarily harsh rejection?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 02:18
|
|
|
Moon Slayer posted:That study is bullshit because people count as animals and Paula Deen's recipes must have contributed to thousands of deaths from heart disease and diabetes. Also, did they count it as two dead animals if a recipe calls for 4 chicken breasts?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 02:20
|
|
|
Antivehicular posted:How do you kill a third of an animal? Destroy its spirit with unnecessarily harsh rejection? You add up the total number of dead animals and then divide it by the total number of animals. If I have a recipe book that's just how to cook a whole pig and a meatless salad that goes well with it my recipe book is .5 dead animals per recipe.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 02:22
|
|
|
Skwirl posted:You add up the total number of dead animals and then divide it by the total number of animals. If I have a recipe book that's just how to cook a whole pig and a meatless salad that goes well with it my recipe book is .5 dead animals per recipe. This makes no sense. It's clearly a subjective idea of how many animals die based on how much of their meat it calls for, as a portion of the amount of average meat per animal composition. If it's two chicken breasts that's two deaths since chickens don't have two breasts. If it's a bunch of sausages I guess you crunch the numbers and end up with an eighth of a pig. You don't even know how many animals there are, if it calls for a whole pig then you've killed one pig don't give me this .5 malarkey because you also made a salad. If it suggests you enjoy with a glass of orange juice has the number gone down to .333 animals per recipe? E: in the replies to the original tweet is this: https://twitter.com/SnakeMannn/status/1126302941743239169?s=20 This idiot has written, and is trying to publish this cookbook in the year of our lord twenty nineteen although his copyright still says last year. jojoinnit has a new favorite as of 08:50 on Jun 29, 2019 |
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 08:45
|
|
|
jojoinnit posted:This makes no sense. It's clearly a subjective idea of how many animals die based on how much of their meat it calls for, as a portion of the amount of average meat per animal composition. If it's two chicken breasts that's two deaths since chickens don't have two breasts. If it's a bunch of sausages I guess you crunch the numbers and end up with an eighth of a pig. You don't even know how many animals there are, if it calls for a whole pig then you've killed one pig don't give me this .5 malarkey because you also made a salad. If it suggests you enjoy with a glass of orange juice has the number gone down to .333 animals per recipe? It's not in any way subjective. You cannot kill a fraction of an animal, but you can kill a fraction of an animal per recipe. If you work out that a pig can be made into 100 sausages then a recipe that calls for 10 sausages kills one pig. A recipe that calls for 101 sausages kills two pigs. If you need three chicken legs for one recipe and one for the next then that's two chickens for the first and one for the second for an average of 1.5 per recipe. You take the minimum number of animals required for each recipe separately and add them all together, then you divide by the total number of recipes. That's it. It's a very basic calculation.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 10:06
|
|
|
So, the 0.5 A presses of animal welfare?
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 12:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 18, 2024 12:47 |
|
|
jojoinnit posted:This makes no sense. It's clearly a subjective idea of how many animals die based on how much of their meat it calls for, as a portion of the amount of average meat per animal composition. If it's two chicken breasts that's two deaths since chickens don't have two breasts. If it's a bunch of sausages I guess you crunch the numbers and end up with an eighth of a pig. You don't even know how many animals there are, if it calls for a whole pig then you've killed one pig don't give me this .5 malarkey because you also made a salad. If it suggests you enjoy with a glass of orange juice has the number gone down to .333 animals per recipe? In the time it took you to write this post you could have just read the article and accepted that you were wrong. It was written as a novelty (the 'winner' had a hugely skewed average because one recipe called for dozens of tiny fish) and a bunch of fragile epic bacon sriracha nerds swarmed it to make the same old Maddox joke because they felt attacked.
|
|
#
?
Jun 29, 2019 15:03
|
|