Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

CharlestheHammer posted:

the idea that would won’t remember pop culture in the future is pretty funny. Like yeah the forgotten movie jaws

extremely weird point lol. theres tons of crap that was huge in the 70s that nobody remembers

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

BENGHAZI 2 posted:

GoldenEye sucks tho

I think it's fine and one of the better 90s Bronson Bond movies, but you could easily pick even the worst of the Roger Moore movies are mostly rememberable compared to the Marvel movies.

Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

its weird that the bond franchise has been so big for 60 years without there being an equivalent to empire strikes back that everyone can point to as actually good

A Big Fuckin Hornet
Nov 1, 2016

by Nyc_Tattoo

Farm Frenzy posted:

its weird that the bond franchise has been so big for 60 years without there being an equivalent to empire strikes back that everyone can point to as actually good

its From Russia With Love

and like star wars the series only has like a 20% success rate

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

James Bond is weighted down by the fact it's a dumb male wish fulfillment fantasy. Even trash like Golgo 13 is better, solely for the fact it never pretends Golgo is anything other than a murderous psychopath whereas James Bond is a hero for serving - THE BRITISH EMPIRE? uh-oooooh

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
I actually really like the casino Royale 2000whatever version but yeah from Russia with love is the series high point

KomradeX
Oct 29, 2011

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

James Bond is weighted down by the fact it's a dumb male wish fulfillment fantasy. Even trash like Golgo 13 is better, solely for the fact it never pretends Golgo is anything other than a murderous psychopath whereas James Bond is a hero for serving - THE BRITISH EMPIRE? uh-oooooh

Didn't they embrace the Bond is a psychopath with these Craig Bond movies?

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

KomradeX posted:

Didn't they embrace the Bond is a psychopath with these Craig Bond movies?

I dunno, I haven't really bothered watching the post-90s James Bond movies. If I did it'd be the one with Javier Bardem.

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

KomradeX posted:

Didn't they embrace the Bond is a psychopath with these Craig Bond movies?

yes

Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

craig bond is clinically depressed but also loves killing people

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Pener Kropoopkin posted:

James Bond is weighted down by the fact it's a dumb male wish fulfillment fantasy. Even trash like Golgo 13 is better, solely for the fact it never pretends Golgo is anything other than a murderous psychopath whereas James Bond is a hero for serving - THE BRITISH EMPIRE? uh-oooooh

uh Golgo 13 is loving rad thank you very much the French wine culture episode is a greatest of all time loving instant classic

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

KomradeX posted:

Didn't they embrace the Bond is a psychopath with these Craig Bond movies?

Yeah casino Royale in particular is very open about how he's just a freak who loves doing murders and this is how he gets to do it legally

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
The Craig movies are also the closest weve gotten to canonizing the idea that James Bond is a codename attached to the 007 designation given to multiple different agents over the years, which would neatly explain away the tonal differences ovee the decades

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003

Serf posted:

yeah i think the movie is about misogyny in a way, but it isn't misogynistic. it seemed to be about the artistic process, and the muse archetype/stereotype

i thought the relationship between her and the author/god/husband was interesting, because she's everything, and he's really nothing. he's "god," but he's nothing. he has authority because people think he does. she is nature. she is the whole of creation. he's not.

and nature, as a whole, is not as pretty as jennifer lawrence. nature is full of flies and locusts and storms and floods and disease and all kinds of bad things. but to turn that into jennifer lawerence, the fertile, all welcoming Mother Earth, you have to excise all that bad and put it somewhere else. you create a male figure and attribute all the bad things in nature to Him (and then many religions banish him to the sky so he's far away while Mother Earth stays close). but the bad things are also the powerful things: the hurricane, the thunderstorm. making Mother Nature less scary also makes her weak while privileging this illusory male figure.

i havent seen the movie.

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
Anyway the actual best bond film is the short movie you create by clipping out the scene in Dr No where he checks into his hotel and methodically looks for bugs and sets up his traps to see if someone's come in and rooted around, it's played with no dialog and the music is subdued as poo poo and it does an incredible job communicating in the first film that he's done this before, many times, and he's very good at it

Suplex Liberace
Jan 18, 2012



Farm Frenzy posted:

its weird that the bond franchise has been so big for 60 years without there being an equivalent to empire strikes back that everyone can point to as actually good

its both the dalton movies

Serf
May 5, 2011


Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3 posted:

i thought the relationship between her and the author/god/husband was interesting, because she's everything, and he's really nothing. he's "god," but he's nothing. he has authority because people think he does. she is nature. she is the whole of creation. he's not.

and nature, as a whole, is not as pretty as jennifer lawrence. nature is full of flies and locusts and storms and floods and disease and all kinds of bad things. but to turn that into jennifer lawerence, the fertile, all welcoming Mother Earth, you have to excise all that bad and put it somewhere else. you create a male figure and attribute all the bad things in nature to Him (and then many religions banish him to the sky so he's far away while Mother Earth stays close). but the bad things are also the powerful things: the hurricane, the thunderstorm. making Mother Nature less scary also makes her weak while privileging this illusory male figure.

i havent seen the movie.

my issue here is that flies, locusts, storms, floods etc. all rule and are extremely metal. beauty encompasses many things

MizPiz
May 29, 2013

by Athanatos

get that OUT of my face posted:

i'm convinced that a big reason why nu-metal was popular was that middle-school aged boys in the late '90s wanted an alternative to boy bands. i should know, i was one of them

also this nu-metal revisionism is stupid because it's a godawful music genre. it belongs in the dumpster of history

That's kind of exactly my point. It was an explicit rejection poptimism when they were experiencing ever increasing levels in alienation and (to lesser but to still significant extent) becoming aware of the injustices inherent in the system. This often manifested into embarrassing amounts of self-pity, but that's why nu-metal fans had so much potential to be leftists. Unfortunately, most ended becoming politically nihilistic or even outright CHUDs because the people who could've done outreach didn't want to look lame in front of the lifestylists.

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

CharlestheHammer posted:

Hell Harry Potter doesn’t have anything like that and it’s still going strong despite how hard Rowling is trying to kill it
Harry Potter has a ton of commonly known references and it's not just because checkmark libs use it as one of their three things that they refer to. the Hogwarts houses, the terminology, Voldemort, just to name three. nobody's putting Avengers references in their dating bios, and if they are, i haven't seen them

Serf posted:

i like the marvel movies well enough and i think there's plenty of memorable stuff from them, but there's just too loving much. there's an assload of movies and they're putting them out too fast, so by the time you've seen one, there's another one coming up. they put the loving trailer for at least 2 more movies in the credits of the one you're seeing in the theater. and now i'd say its pretty well saturated beyond the ability to hold your interest. i watched the new spider-man movie a few days ago and all i remember is that gyllenhall is hot
that's a good point. i'm not sure whether that was an intended consequence of streaming services, but it's one that creators and especially distributors are taking full advantage of. as for El Camino, i'm not watching it because i don't give a poo poo about what happens after Breaking Bad

Plank Walker posted:

mcu movies are basically let's plays of video games that only the director is allowed to play
it's more like one of those video games that have restrictions on how to stream because the creator (Disney) is a dick

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002

MizPiz posted:

That's kind of exactly my point. It was an explicit rejection poptimism when they were experiencing ever increasing levels in alienation and (to lesser but to still significant extent) becoming aware of the injustices inherent in the system. This often manifested into embarrassing amounts of self-pity, but that's why nu-metal fans had so much potential to be leftists. Unfortunately, most ended becoming politically nihilistic or even outright CHUDs because the people who could've done outreach didn't want to look lame in front of the lifestylists.

one reason among many to accept furries and juggalos

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747

Son of Thunderbeast posted:

one reason among many to accept furries and juggalos

Magic magic ninja whoop

Farm Frenzy
Jan 3, 2007

*mark fisher voice* as the crowd at woodstock '99 threw piss and cum at fred durst, they yearned for something different

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

i need to dig up that long twitter thread of the guy who watched all the videos of Woodstock 99 performances, it's a trip

BENGHAZI 2
Oct 13, 2007

by Cyrano4747
speaking of music the nicest man in punk, jeff rosenstock, is releasing a live album friday with a limited edition triple lp up for preorder and even if you dont buythat you should donate to him/his donation based label that has existed since before kickstarter was a dream someone had http://quoteunquoterecords.com/albums.htm also he makes really good music about feeling hopeless and like you've hosed your life up and having lovely jobs, both as Jeff Rosenstock the band and as Bomb the Music Industry (rip)

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Farm Frenzy posted:

*mark fisher voice* as the crowd at woodstock '99 threw piss and cum at fred durst, they yearned for something different

adam curtis voice: and then the strangest thing happened *image of osama bin laden*

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!

Farm Frenzy posted:

extremely weird point lol. theres tons of crap that was huge in the 70s that nobody remembers

not really. I think the weird point is the one that is objectively incorrect personally.

functionally this whole argument is an argument for why past pop culture is good and new pop is bad using arbitrary metrics

Xaris
Jul 25, 2006

Lucky there's a family guy
Lucky there's a man who positively can do
All the things that make us
Laugh and cry

KomradeX posted:

That's something else that these, besides that these 23+ movies have maybe 5 lines that get quoted between all of them, they're are no stand out set pieces like running from the boulder, ripping the heart out, choosing the wrong grail, the Death Star trench run, the Canal chase from T2, anything from Aliens or any of the other rich stones of well cinema that have been absorbed into culture. It's like the opposite of Avatar that made a billion dollars but left no pop cultural foot print, these Marvel movies make so much money and god knows their toys and other related things are everywhere but nothing from there movies themselves have entered into our cultural history like these other scenes have. Maybe the elevator fight from Winter Solider?
yeah super hero movies are basically design-by-algo digital entertainment equivalent of the soylent nerd drink. like just enough baseline production values, bland sometimes 'quippy' ~whedon~ knockoff writing to just marginally pretend like its smart, and then a whole bunch of unmemorable sequences

imo they're great for plane-rides and that is the only time i ever really sit down and watch em because on a 5-12 hr flight you can bang out a solid 2-6 of them, each way and helps you pass-out

Pener Kropoopkin
Jan 30, 2013

I’m so stoked for Eddy Murphy playing Rudy Ray Moore

https://youtu.be/Ws1YIKsuTjQ

get that OUT of my face
Feb 10, 2007

in a group chat, i asked why The Simpsons aren't anywhere near the universally relatable '90s cultural touchstone today while Friends, of all shows, is. somebody answered and i think he hit the nail on the head: it was a show that was very late to the streaming game, and by the time it had its own section on FX streaming (coming soon Disney+ where it probably won't be promoted very much because gently caress you), Friends had been on Netflix for years

Dr. Killjoy
Oct 9, 2012

:thunk::mason::brainworms::tinfoil::thunkher:
Just noticed that while Family Guy has been running for like twenty years, the terrible Facebook memes (in classic Impact font image macro style) that it inspires utilize the least funny jokes from the first few seasons

kinda follows the Simpsons rule of seasons 1-9 being the good and memorable ones

Plank Walker
Aug 11, 2005

get that OUT of my face posted:

in a group chat, i asked why The Simpsons aren't anywhere near the universally relatable '90s cultural touchstone today while Friends, of all shows, is. somebody answered and i think he hit the nail on the head: it was a show that was very late to the streaming game, and by the time it had its own section on FX streaming (coming soon Disney+ where it probably won't be promoted very much because gently caress you), Friends had been on Netflix for years

no it's because friends depicts an idealized view of the 90s lifestyle with 0 criticism thereof. it's 90s leave it to beaver

an actual dog
Nov 18, 2014

get that OUT of my face posted:

in a group chat, i asked why The Simpsons aren't anywhere near the universally relatable '90s cultural touchstone today while Friends, of all shows, is. somebody answered and i think he hit the nail on the head: it was a show that was very late to the streaming game, and by the time it had its own section on FX streaming (coming soon Disney+ where it probably won't be promoted very much because gently caress you), Friends had been on Netflix for years

the simpsons is absolutely a universally relatable '90s cultural touchstone what are you talking about?

there's a weird phenomenon of zoomers bingewatching friends because it's available on netflix but no one actually gives a poo poo about it and no one will care once its gone to whatever the gently caress

Echo Chamber
Oct 16, 2008

best username/post combo
Huh? On what planet is it where The Simpsons isn't a huge cultural touchstone?

an actual dog
Nov 18, 2014

gifs of the simpsons are more culturally relevant than friends lmao

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002
Gum would be perfection?!

CharlestheHammer
Jun 26, 2011

YOU SAY MY POSTS ARE THE RAVINGS OF THE DUMBEST PERSON ON GOD'S GREEN EARTH BUT YOU YOURSELF ARE READING THEM. CURIOUS!
yeah people watch friends but you will probably hear someone make a simpsons reference without even knowing it. it’s that ingrained

FormerPoster
Aug 5, 2004

Hair Elf

get that OUT of my face posted:

in a group chat, i asked why The Simpsons aren't anywhere near the universally relatable '90s cultural touchstone today while Friends, of all shows, is. somebody answered and i think he hit the nail on the head: it was a show that was very late to the streaming game, and by the time it had its own section on FX streaming (coming soon Disney+ where it probably won't be promoted very much because gently caress you), Friends had been on Netflix for years

A lot of people answered this better than I could but it's also worth noting that Friends had an ending whereas the Simpsons is still loving going.

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002

CharlestheHammer posted:

yeah people watch friends but you will probably hear someone make a simpsons reference without even knowing it. it’s that ingrained

Echo Chamber
Oct 16, 2008

best username/post combo
Even in my more liberal years, Friends was synonymous with privilege and whiteness.

This is entirely through osmosis. I've seen maybe two full episodes of it.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dr. Killjoy
Oct 9, 2012

:thunk::mason::brainworms::tinfoil::thunkher:
America
https://twitter.com/IllyBocean/status/1183288141177712640

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply