|
Jabor posted:In recent history, they've erratad one of their commander cards for power level reasons, and a standard card purely for digital convenience. Ajani's Pridemate isn't power level errata, as you mentioned. Not familiar with the commander example.
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 18:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:43 |
|
|
It was Xantcha. They changed it so if Xantcha's controller loses the game, she no longer reverts to control of her owner but instead goes to exlie (the command zone). https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/news/oracle-changes-2019-09-27
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
The Sean posted:I made a personal best in draft going 5-3 with this. thank you for posting the sideboard, because it leads to this: Kanfy posted:If you want any insight, this could've 100% been a monocolor deck with the Tome Raider and Moonlit Scavengers in and the black cards out. I probably would've replaced the turtle with a griffin and the egg with a Queen of Ice or something like that as well. don't think taking out an artifact is going to make your Scavengers better i'd have cut the black cards and turtle for Opts and Scavenger
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 18:59
|
|
|
Am I missing something obvious or would it save everyone a lot of time if 0 attack mana dorks weren't automatically included in All Attack
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:05
|
|
|
BioThermo posted:It was Xantcha. They changed it so if Xantcha's controller loses the game, she no longer reverts to control of her owner but instead goes to exlie (the command zone). That's interesting, thanks for the link. It's still not what I would call power level errata (unless there was a rash of people somehow taking advantage of this functionality difference, but if so I'd think the article would mention that; instead it just talked about how they came up with a better templating to make the effect work as intended).
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:06
|
|
|
zoux posted:Am I missing something obvious or would it save everyone a lot of time if 0 attack mana dorks weren't automatically included in All Attack It’s relevant for pump spells like collision colossus where you just need one guy unblocked to pump after blockers
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:09
|
|
|
Also it can be very frustrating when buttons don't do what they say they'll do. There are cards like Gideon's Triumph sometimes which can be relevant.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:27
|
|
|
zoux posted:Am I missing something obvious or would it save everyone a lot of time if 0 attack mana dorks weren't automatically included in All Attack yeah it's the word ALL
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:31
|
|
|
Obviously we need a third button. All Attack No Attacks Attack With Everything A Reasonable Player Would Attack With, All Else Being Equal
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:38
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:Obviously we need a third button. a reasonable player is the 10 year old playing green stompy and thinking combat tricks are "cheap" unless it's giant growth played during first main phase, of course
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:51
|
|
|
Also relevant for those dumb spells that do X based on number of creatures attacking
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:51
|
|
|
Eej posted:Also relevant for those dumb spells that do X based on number of creatures attacking like a goblin token
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:53
|
|
|
Or embercleave getting reduced
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:54
|
|
|
Also cavalcade.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:59
|
|
|
Or sometimes I like booping my opponent's snoot with a goose
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 19:59
|
|
|
Lone Goat posted:thank you for posting the sideboard, because it leads to this: Kanfy posted:If you want any insight, this could've 100% been a monocolor deck with the Tome Raider and Moonlit Scavengers in and the black cards out. I probably would've replaced the turtle with a griffin and the egg with a Queen of Ice or something like that as well. I appreciate the feedback. I started the process as a mono-blue but I was attracted to the three black cards since one of them could (but didn't bc it sucks) mill and two of the others could bring back the mill merfolk. The griffin and/or scavenger would probably have been better. I like the queen for the one-off no-tap but I haven't had luck with her otherwise. Maybe I just need more experiences with her. Overall, lesson learned for splashing out of greed, though I never hurt for mana of any sort. The Sean fucked around with this message at 20:14 on Oct 19, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 20:05
|
|
|
I'm as sick of oko decks as I'm sick of golos decks. *note to self: add oko to golos.dec
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:04
|
|
|
Lone Goat posted:don't think taking out an artifact is going to make your Scavengers better Egg in a monocolor deck which doesn't benefit from draw 2 and doesn't have Emry isn't really worth a card just for Moonlit Scavengers. So Tiny and Charmed Sleep will also cause it to trigger, so between those and the existing artifacts it'll go off plenty reliably by the time you're going to play it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:24
|
|
|
The Golos shell is insane and enables all those random techs like Oko or Nissa. I also saw some people cramming Rotting Regisaur into Gruul Aggro's embercleave setup just to combine those two decks too. Beat it both times I faced it today but it's still pretty nasty. Also saw a Rotting Regisaur knights? deck where this guy slammed out a bunch of knights that I removed into a Regisaur/Embercleave combo I didn't see coming.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:24
|
|
|
Yes obviously there are situations where you want to attack with dorks but for me, it seems like I'm clicking tapping mana creatures out of the attack much more than I'd be clicking them in. It's just kind of exacerbated right now by QBs entry animation and having to literally wait for the dust to settle before I can see if I've unclicked my geese or not. Unless you guys just say gently caress it and smorc your geese Anyway some stats about the first day of the MC Two decks went 5-0 A more or less out-of-the-package Bolos list and a Simic Food list. The day 2 meta looks like this  (4C Golos is maindecking 3 Oko so it's both) I think people were hoping that GB Adventures would compete but I guess not. Two of the three Mardu Knights lists made it through though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:25
|
|
|
Mardu Knights is 3-0! Selesneya Adventures is 1-2 tho and so is Mono Red :'( . Gruul is 2-1 tho
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:33
|
|
|
Kanfy posted:Egg in a monocolor deck which doesn't benefit from draw 2 and doesn't have Emry isn't really worth a card just for Moonlit Scavengers. So Tiny and Charmed Sleep will also cause it to trigger, so between those and the existing artifacts it'll go off plenty reliably by the time you're going to play it. when your deck has some cards that matter (the mill stuff) and everything else is a means to an end, shrinking your deck with cantrips like egg and opt accelerates your win condition. the life gain is a nice bonus. in short, don't be this guy: 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:57
|
|
|
When they go los We go high
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 21:58
|
|
|
I jammed Oko and Goose and Wolf into Fires, turns out its ok. Turn 3 Fires + Oko is alright, Oko + wolf is cool, Nissa + wolf is good, Nissa + any Hydra is insane. Turns out fires jsut enables some ridiculous turns.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 22:31
|
|
|
im so tired of nissa just ugh
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 23:08
|
|
|
Mardu Knights to TOP8 BABY
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2019 23:45
|
|
|
Can anyone post all the top 8 decks?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 01:18
|
|
|
kater posted:Sloth ban is still only thing that makes sense.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 01:25
|
|
|
JerryLee posted:Obviously we need a third button.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 01:29
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:Can anyone post all the top 8 decks? Nevermind, did it myself copy-pasting the hard way: #1) Bant Ramp by Stanislav Cifka: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379089#paper #2) Bant Food by Andrea Mengucci: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379118#paper #3) Mardu Knights by Ken Yukuhiro: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379146#paper #4) Simic Food by Gabriel Nassif: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379124#paper #5) Simic Food by William Jensen: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379110#paper #6) Bant Golos by Jean-emmanuel Depraz: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379094#paper #7) Mono-Red Cavalcade by Lee Shi Tian: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379137#paper #8) Gruul Aggro by Javier Dominguez: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379096#paper Only one Golos made it... and mono red?!
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 01:45
|
|
|
Bell_ posted:And people were trying to convince me it was garbage when the card was previewed. Grazer was probably underestimated though, yes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 01:48
|
|
|
The ramp decks are going to dumpster all those aggro decks that got through, poor things.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 02:15
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why Golos Field players are the slowest imaginable. Like the deck is basically play lands, then play more lands.
GrandpaPants fucked around with this message at 02:55 on Oct 20, 2019 |
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 02:52
|
|
|
long-rear end nips Diane posted:The ramp decks are going to dumpster all those aggro decks that got through, poor things. I like how decks 4 and 5 are carbon copies of each other down to the sideboards. They couldn't just change one sideboard card to at least give the illusion of originality?
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 03:03
|
|
|
GrandpaPants posted:Can someone explain to me why Golos Field players are the slowest imaginable. Like the deck is basically play lands, then play more lands. One thing that I can understand taking a few more cognitive watts is figuring out exactly which lands you should be searching for to get to 7. But that should be once per game.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 03:19
|
|
|
Zero VGS posted:#3) Mardu Knights by Ken Yukuhiro: https://www.mtggoldfish.com/deck/2379146#paper THAT explains that weird rear end deck I faced twice today. I was wondering how two separate people came up with the same idea but I should have guessed it was a pro deck.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 04:42
|
|
|
zoux posted:Yes obviously there are situations where you want to attack with dorks but for me, it seems like I'm clicking tapping mana creatures out of the attack much more than I'd be clicking them in. It's just kind of exacerbated right now by QBs entry animation and having to literally wait for the dust to settle before I can see if I've unclicked my geese or not. Unless you guys just say gently caress it and smorc your geese Kanister just got an absolutely terrible draw both rounds he lost. I’m convinced that deck still is gas, but I see now that Krasis/Nissa/Oko is the future
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 04:59
|
|
|
Gareth Gobulcoque posted:Still playing stompy, still think it's probably the best Bo1 deck right now. It's very bad in Bo3, and I expect that a fields ban will hurt its standing in the meta pretty hard, but it was fun while it lasted. I was having trouble bouncing around Diamond 4 and 3. I built your stompy green deck and just hit mythic with it a couple of nights later. I like it a lot because it seems to have a fair chance against almost any opponent. Sometimes you just peter out if you get hit hard by removal or sometimes the opponent draws better than you and floods the board with zombies but I think it's a good BO1 deck to compete against almost anything else right now. It can be faster than RDW and it can outpace Golos field, it just depends on the draws. Previously I was playing some RDW, some golos field, and some other random stuff just trying to work my way through Diamond but I had a lot of really severe loss streaks since I guess everyone knows they'll see RDW and Golos FotD so they're ready for it. Monogreen is one that people aren't quite as prepared for. I think my most disappointing losses were to surprise Embercleave decks.
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 05:03
|
|
|
These MCV games have been good to watch but Jesus do I loving hate NummythwNumot/Kenji Igarashi. He seems so smarmy and like the most punchable guy
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 05:39
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 11, 2024 10:43 |
|
|
I did it! Through a combo of drafts and the eldraine pre-ordering I now have a copy of every throne of eldraine rare  Now to see what gets banned on Monday and make some actual decks
|
|
#
?
Oct 20, 2019 06:08
|
|