|
Oh my God I just found X-Men and Spiderman series from the 90's in Disney+. I'm going back to being a teenager again.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2019 20:59 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 23:06 |
|
Rad Valtar posted:Oh my God I just found X-Men and Spiderman series from the 90's in Disney+. I'm going back to being a teenager again. I hope you can really get yourself into that 90s mindset because they really don't hold up.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2019 21:01 |
|
Yes both of those suck rear end Most children’s cartoons regardless of era suck rear end
|
# ? Nov 13, 2019 21:03 |
|
Tim Whatley posted:FWIW I think this is kind of overshadowed but it sounds like even if you have Hulu w/ no ads you can get a $6 monthly credit towards Disney+ Ah bummer, there's no bundle that is just Disney+ and Hulu without Ads. The $5.99 credit is off of the $12.99 Disney/Hulu/Espn+ bundle. So it adds up: Hulu Ad Free - 11.99 Disney/Espn/Hulu - 12.99 5.99 credit - (5.99) Total of 18.99 per month. I was hoping to add Disney for some kind of discount but it's either pay full price for each separately or do this bundle and get ESPN+ for the same price.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2019 21:09 |
|
Basebf555 posted:It also never occurred to me that they could easily just have the Mandalorian meet different individual droids of the same model. It's IG-88, I won't be convinced otherwise, there isn't anyone I could be confusing him with this time, and any promo material with him is a GoT Sean Bean type thing, head canon Inspector Hound fucked around with this message at 02:58 on Nov 14, 2019 |
# ? Nov 13, 2019 22:19 |
|
Blast Fantasto posted:Yes both of those suck rear end I queued up Spider Man and his Amazing Friends, and quickly realized that 7 year old me was a loving idiot.
|
# ? Nov 13, 2019 23:47 |
|
Please tell me that Gargoyles still rules
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 00:14 |
|
beanieson posted:Please tell me that Gargoyles still rules It's better than most of the rest from that time, just because the animation is better and the characters were actually pretty well written for a kid's show.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 00:28 |
|
So far I am enjoying Disney+. I just have one problem with their presentation. If a title is not available to stream on the platform, don't list it. Especially if it's a year or more out from being available. There were some movies I was thinking about watch only to see a message on the page about the previous streaming agreements making the title unavailable till later. Most of these seem to be titles that would become available in late 2020 and some in 2021.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 01:12 |
|
mateo360 posted:So far I am enjoying Disney+. I just have one problem with their presentation. If a title is not available to stream on the platform, don't list it. Especially if it's a year or more out from being available. There were some movies I was thinking about watch only to see a message on the page about the previous streaming agreements making the title unavailable till later. Most of these seem to be titles that would become available in late 2020 and some in 2021. Yeah that's pretty cynical on their part, but I guess they figure "new service, let them know that the things that aren't here yet will be eventually" but there's so much stuff already they probably didn't need to
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 02:58 |
|
https://deadline.com/2019/11/disney-content-warnings-in-films-causes-stir-1202785527/article posted:
What kind of "outdated cultural depictions" are in any of those films they said didn't get the warning? I'm pretty sure they at least did research for Pocahontas and Mulan
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 04:42 |
|
Snow White’s depiction of dwarves is pretty Problematic.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 04:47 |
|
mateo360 posted:https://deadline.com/2019/11/disney-content-warnings-in-films-causes-stir-1202785527/ Wikipedia posted:
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 04:53 |
|
Presumably the standard for what content gets the "outdated cultural depictions" message is more like "Does this movie contain racist caricatures?" and less like "Is this movie an inherently problematic depiction of colonialism?"
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 04:56 |
|
that's more a historical problem and not a cultural depiction problem EDIT: mystes posted:Presumably the standard for what content gets the "outdated cultural depictions" message is more like "Does this movie contain racist caricatures?" and less like "Is this movie an inherently problematic depiction of colonialism?" Yeah that's why I question why the article called out those movies specifically.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 04:57 |
|
I figure Disney isn’t going to put content warnings on their relatively recent movies like Pocahontas and will just use it for stuff that’s like 50 years old. It’s a bit harder to use the “well, it was a different time back then...” excuse for things from the 90s.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 06:00 |
|
Pre title reminder to make sure you schedule 101 vaccinations
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 16:47 |
|
To me at least, The Mandalorian feels like the type of thing Disney should have been doing with Star Wars in the first place. I find myself liking all the side story type stuff (this, Rogue one, even Solo) so much more than the new trilogy. They should have earned it for a few years, sold people on Disney Star Wars, then busted out new trilogy. Of course the new trilogy makes an insane amount of money so I’m sure Disney doesn’t give a gently caress, but I think I’d be more open to it in general if they had spent a few years to make Disneys take on SW grow on me.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 02:46 |
|
This Jeff Goldblum show is like Snakes on a plane levels of running a meme into the ground Also Green Eggs and Ham, the series? Really?
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 09:30 |
I've enjoyed the newest trilogy stuff so far. That said, Rogue One was the best SW film since the originals imo.
|
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 13:37 |
|
Have anyone watched High School Musical: The Movie: The Series yet? I thought it's a simple reboot, but apparently it's a mockumentary about students at the high school where they filmed High School Musical organising a play based on High School Musical.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 14:03 |
|
That Works posted:I've enjoyed the newest trilogy stuff so far. Yeah I thought the non-trilogy trilogy was better than the new actual episodes they came up with
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 15:03 |
|
Inspector Hound posted:Yeah I thought the non-trilogy trilogy was better than the new actual episodes they came up with There’s only two non-trilogy movies??
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 15:33 |
|
Blast Fantasto posted:There’s only two non-trilogy movies?? Oh, I always feel like there's a third one I'm forgetting haha. E though I guess this does make it a non-trilogy in the purest sense vv the gorax is canon vv
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 15:38 |
|
They're talking about the other non-movie trilogy: the ewok movies and the holiday special.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 15:39 |
|
Clearly the original theatrical release of Star Wars, which wasn't titled "Episode IV" yet, is part of the non-trilogy trilogy with Rogue One and Han Solo.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 15:44 |
|
feedmyleg posted:They're talking about the other non-movie trilogy: the ewok movies and the holiday special. The first Ewok movie is deathly boring, but the second one is watchable at least. Mainly because Wilford Brimley is in it
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 16:47 |
|
Steve Yun posted:This Jeff Goldblum show is like Snakes on a plane levels of running a meme into the ground Have tried watching it in a house? With a mouse? Have you watched it in a box? Or with a fox? Because its actually really good. Like absurdly good. Assuming your into animation, that is.
|
# ? Nov 16, 2019 23:44 |
|
Barring the Mandalorian, looking through Disney+ and realizing this service has virtually nothing for me.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:04 |
|
Can't believe how amazing stuff like the theatrical cartoon shorts look and the 4K HDR versions of The Sword in the Stone and The Black Cauldron. They only released a single volume Blu-ray of HD versions of some Mickey shorts, but there's some quite stunning versions of 30s Silly Symphonies up. Not just looking good, the sound remastering on stuff like The Three Little Pigs is impressive.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:31 |
|
Paper Kaiju posted:Have tried watching it in a house? With a mouse? Really? It’s terrible! None of the jokes are funny!
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:41 |
|
Paper Kaiju posted:Have tried watching it in a house? With a mouse? If you will leave me be, I will try it. You will see.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:43 |
|
Egbert Souse posted:Can't believe how amazing stuff like the theatrical cartoon shorts look and the 4K HDR versions of The Sword in the Stone and The Black Cauldron. Yeah it's really awesome that they gave some of those older toons some love. Everyone needs to dig into those shorts, Pixar included.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 00:45 |
|
veni veni veni posted:Barring the Mandalorian, looking through Disney+ and realizing this service has virtually nothing for me. This is my issue. Outside of Star Wars stuff I could not give a poo poo about anything Disney has made.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 01:15 |
|
Klaus on Netflix has gorgeous art and animation. The story is both something you expect from a Christmas movie (there's plot about a jerk finding his conscience, a man recovering from tragedy, and both ending a conflict), but also interesting since it's technically about the origin of Santa Claus but it's not entirely fantasy except for maybe the ending. Props for the including the Sami people in a movie set way up North in Europe too.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 01:18 |
|
High Rise is on TubiTV. It's the movie that finally made me like Ben Wheatly after going through several of his movies and thinking I hate this but he could make a really good movie.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 01:47 |
|
veni veni veni posted:Barring the Mandalorian, looking through Disney+ and realizing this service has virtually nothing for me. Yeah once Mandalorian is over I don't see any reason to stay subscribed.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 01:59 |
|
You can always come back for the Obi Wan series.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 02:44 |
|
I was all excited that we were experiencing the greatest period in TV ever, with the most tv shows with best production value and best writing. But now it’s becoming apparent that the writers are being stretched thin and we are drowning, absolutely flooded in a bunch of B- TV that I just don’t have the time for
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 03:39 |
|
|
# ? May 8, 2024 23:06 |
|
mystes posted:Clearly the original theatrical release of Star Wars, which wasn't titled "Episode IV" yet, is part of the non-trilogy trilogy with Rogue One and Han Solo. Why not consider the original 1977 Star Wars in its original form a separate stand alone movie different from Star Wars Episode IV -- A New Hope which includes all the edits and added and restored stuff? They'd be able to sell the same product twice and have it fit into two different groups of movies.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2019 09:04 |