|
hsak etov## !desrever esreveR
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 13:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
It's a me, merkio.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 15:25
|
|
|
dammit bif put votefinder in the op I don't want to actually have to open votefinder
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 15:34
|
|
|
##vote PMush
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 15:34
|
|
|
Ok this jokephase has been pretty tame Mod should have added in a dayvig to make things spicy
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 16:56
|
|
|
"I can't mafia unless there's some role-based thing to spice it up!" -Dr. Humalong in VANILLA FUCKIN MAFIA
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 17:03
|
|
|
merk posted:"I can't mafia unless there's some role-based thing to spice it up!" -Dr. Humalong in VANILLA FUCKIN MAFIA Interesting breadcrumb
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 17:08
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Where’s my role PM????? ##vote Quid This joke has never been funny.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 17:10
|
|
|
merk posted:"I can't mafia unless there's some role-based thing to spice it up!" -Dr. Humalong in VANILLA FUCKIN MAFIA
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 17:11
|
|
|
I'm Ron, too, man. The most vanilla of Harry Potter protagonists.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 18:22
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:I'm Ron, too, man. The most vanilla of Harry Potter protagonists. I dunno, he's redheaded enough to be two thirds of Neopolitan
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 18:44
|
|
|
I'm banning Harry Potter discussion.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 18:45
|
|
|
Legit though deadline's tomorrow right?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 18:45
|
|
|
Natural 20 posted:I'm banning Harry Potter discussion. How Snape of you
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:20
|
|
|
merk posted:##vote Quid This is now a serious vote. It's: 1) LAMIST; and 2) a scum being awkward.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:21
|
|
|
Y'all are butts. ##vote A Sometimes Food Avoided rocking the boat in any meaningful way, never really targeted anyone in particular with their joking. Feels like someone trying to avoid rocking the boat, and without power roles, that's sus as hell.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:24
|
|
|
Quid lurking hard too, I can get on board with this ##vote quid
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:25
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:trap sprung ##vote quid ##unvote Votecount for Day 1   Quidthulhu (4): Epsilon Plus, Quidthulhu, PMush Perfect (1): Epsilon Plus, Epsilon Plus (1): PMush Perfect Mr. Humalong (1): SolusLunes A Sometimes Food (1): Kashuno, Mr. Humalong, Kashuno (0): Kashuno, Not Voting (3): A Sometimes Food, Natural 20, SandwolfWith 11 alive, it's 6 votes to execute. The current deadline is November 16th, 2019 at midnight AEST -- that's in about 19 hours, 33 minutes.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:27
|
|
|
Oh poo poo didn’t realize I put him at -1 ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:27
|
|
|
If he's still alive in like twelve hours, I'll throw my vote on just so we don't no-hang because deadline is at balls o'clock in the morning for us US folks.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:28
|
|
|
Since he's self voting, I don't see a reason not to put him at -1. It's not like he can come in and quick hammer.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:30
|
|
|
Scum could, if he's town. Without power roles, TacticsTM are all anyone has. I'm still willing to -1 him well before deadline, but only at the point once we're probably mostly done with constructive conversation. More words is always better.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:34
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:Scum could, if he's town. Without power roles, TacticsTM are all anyone has. I'm still willing to -1 him well before deadline, but only at the point once we're probably mostly done with constructive conversation. More words is always better. This
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:39
|
|
|
Also I will actually be awake and present at deadline
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:40
|
|
|
Ok........... but............ If scum hammer town Quid early to stop discussion, then we found a scum.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:43
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Also I will actually be awake and present at deadline Same actually for once.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:47
|
|
|
merk posted:If scum hammer town Quid early to stop discussion, then we found a scum.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 19:50
|
|
|
We will know Quid is scum when he comes back and unvotes himself
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 20:00
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:It's not for certain that they'd be scum, though. Logic like that is what starts a chain hang. Setting this out up while not actually voting quid makes me concerned that you're setting the out up for yourself or a scumbro.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 21:39
|
|
|
merk posted:Ok........... but............ this feels a little out of character for merk, considering the conclusion is bunk
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 21:54
|
|
|
SolusLunes posted:Setting this out up while not actually voting quid makes me concerned that you're setting the out up for yourself or a scumbro. Why would Pmush vote quid there though?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 21:55
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Why would Pmush vote quid there though? Are you talking about a hammer? Presumably, to scumhammer a town. And then point to their earlier posts about how you can't read too much into a hammering. Incidentally, I do agree that you shouldn't read too much into a D1 hammer, but making it a point of emphasis is weird to me. Both from pmush and merk, but pmush's is the one that's giving me pause.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:05
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:this feels a little out of character for merk, considering the conclusion is bunk I was addressing the assumption which is bunk. The logic did not work on the other side. I ended up not pursuing because it's really a general mafia argument.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:07
|
|
|
merk posted:I was addressing the assumption which is bunk. The logic did not work on the other side. I ended up not pursuing because it's really a general mafia argument. Yeesh, that's a terribly drafted post from me. Read it like this: PMush Perfect posted:Scum could [hammer], if [Quid is] town. merk posted:Ok........... but............ That is the item I wanted to point out. The assumption that only scum could hammer if Quid is town didn't really make sense to me as a reason not to put Quid at -1. Then, I decided it wasn't worth talking about.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:09
|
|
|
I think pmush voting kash for third vote scumvote with that weird backwards vote seemed like trying scum. Quid was obviously having a laugh. I see no problem with the quid votes esp. When we have not even an inkling of hope learning anything at this time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:12
|
|
|
If anyone legitimately thinks quid’s posts are scummy, please let me know
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:16
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:If anyone legitimately thinks quid’s posts are scummy, please let me know I think it's more a combination of a lurker murdering and the fact that quid's three game posts appear to be trying too hard and non-interactional. Which is pretty thin, but literally everything's thin on D1.
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 22:20
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:If anyone legitimately thinks quid’s posts are scummy, please let me know Where is your case work identifying an alternative candidate?
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 23:14
|
|
|
In fact, ##vote Sandwolf
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 23:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 19, 2024 07:58 |
|
|
merk posted:Where is your case work identifying an alternative candidate? I don’t have any yet, I was hoping someone would respond to that last quote doubling down on quid being scummy so I could vote THAT person. The only thing that feels off to me is you, almost like death of Stalin (or w/e the one where you claimed survivor D1), where you’re starting on a different note than I am used to. Is that scummy? I don’t know yet
|
|
#
?
Nov 14, 2019 23:20
|
|