merk posted:In fact, ##vote Sandwolf Is your entire case on me really “where’s your alternative casework?” when your vote on me is the only basis you, yourself, have for any “alternative casework”? Flimsy
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:22 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 23:45 |
##vote merk
|
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:22 |
|
merk posted:Where is your case work identifying an alternative candidate? Wait the gently caress? ##vote merk The case here is literally "You haven't done legwork" when literally nobody in the game has done legwork.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:25 |
|
Sandwolf posted:I don’t have any yet, I was hoping someone would respond to that last quote doubling down on quid being scummy so I could vote THAT person. What’s different?
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:51 |
|
Sandwolf posted:Is your entire case on me really “where’s your alternative casework?” when your vote on me is the only basis you, yourself, have for any “alternative casework”? My case on you is that you’re scum talking negatively about the upcoming lynch without doing any scum hunting yourself. You want to distance yourself from a lynch or help your scum buddy avoid a lynch. You’ve done nothing to find scum until now.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:52 |
|
Scum distance themselves from culpability of lynches on town. Scum try to help their scum buddies avoid lynch. Scum don’t want to do anything that actually finds scum. My case on sand wolf is he did all of those things by speaking negatively about the Quidnose case without doing any scum hunting himself. Now that he’s voted me, he is scum hunting now though.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:54 |
|
I loving hate the post-joke scramble to find a suitable vote on day 1.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:55 |
|
Also I sure wish the mod would fix whatever makes the discord constantly show me there’s a new post even though I can’t see anything in the discord.
|
# ? Nov 14, 2019 23:56 |
|
Merk is still a tryhard, I see.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:11 |
|
Ok let’s play a content game Everyone pick a number between 1 and 11, no repeats I’ll take 7
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:13 |
|
merk posted:##vote Quid Bad reason to vote someone, not content based but presented as such. HMMMM.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:30 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Quid lurking hard too, I can get on board with this Lurking?? There had been like 20 posts lmao
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:30 |
|
I see you all passing up the gold that is my infallible pmush case and i wag my righteous finger at you. Open your eyes plebeians. See the scum right in front of you. She has made it clear.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:36 |
|
Yeah, I’d be OK with a merk vote. His “this is now a serious vote” is a real weak after the fact revision to justify a bad but easy vote, and he’s getting a bit too “here’s the mafia theory behind why I am right and good” which never strikes me as very town to me. AA defending me rather than being immediately susp of me and jumping down my throat is also pinging me but that’s just gut
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:41 |
|
I also think it’s worth side eyeing the people who were saying I was “lurking and not creating content” during jokephase, but I realize that holds less weight cause I was the one being side eyed initially
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:50 |
merk posted:My case on you is that you’re scum talking negatively about the upcoming lynch without doing any scum hunting yourself. You want to distance yourself from a lynch or help your scum buddy avoid a lynch. "the upcoming lynch"? excuse me? you'd be better served at playing this off as a joke, you have nowhere near enough evidence to feel so strongly about some contrived scenario you cooked up it looks like you're forcing way too hard, I think you're being inauthentic
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:53 |
merk posted:My case on sand wolf is he did all of those things by speaking negatively about the Quidnose case without doing any scum hunting himself. Now that he’s voted me, he is scum hunting now though. hey, merk, what quidnose case?
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:54 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:Yeah, I’d be OK with a merk vote. His “this is now a serious vote” is a real weak after the fact revision to justify a bad but easy vote, and he’s getting a bit too “here’s the mafia theory behind why I am right and good” which never strikes me as very town to me. In my old age, I've grown. I've mastered my meta. Join me in the town victory of tomorrow.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:54 |
|
Ok! ##vote merk
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:55 |
|
Quidthulhu posted:Ok! What.. no... vote pmush, she is scum
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:57 |
|
This is standard fare merk
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:57 |
Anomalous Amalgam posted:What.. no... vote pmush, she is scum you sure are being willfully ignorant to this merk stuff?
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:58 |
Anomalous Amalgam posted:This is standard fare merk this is not standard fare merk, lol
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:58 |
|
It’s standard fare merk Standard fare scum merk
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 00:59 |
|
Hmmm. Iyss
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 01:00 |
|
merk posted:Scum distance themselves from culpability of lynches on town. But there was no case on Quid. Like at all. Quid got to loving -1 on jokevotes. It's correct to question that. The logic here is that anyone who argues against a lunch at any point within 24 hours of deadline is necessarily scummy which is amazingly shortsighted.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 01:18 |
Hum, what do you think of merk
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 01:39 |
|
Sandwolf posted:Hum, what do you think of merk The more he posts the worse I feel
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 01:59 |
Mr. Humalong posted:The more he posts the worse I feel Disappeared just as the heat was rising too
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 02:01 |
Is deadline tomorrow morning at 9am EST? Or our Saturday morning at 9am EST?
|
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 02:03 |
|
Sandwolf posted:Is deadline tomorrow morning at 9am EST? Or our Saturday morning at 9am EST? It's D1, so honestly, I'm good with hitting whoever.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 02:20 |
|
PMush Perfect posted:Tomorrow. AA you might be on to something
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 02:27 |
|
Sandwolf posted:Disappeared just as the heat was rising too Yeah Murk Merk ##vote merk
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 03:25 |
|
merk was spicy chocolate all along, the fucker ##vote merk
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 03:41 |
|
also: mafia theorics posts always feel scum to me because it's town that has to generally follow rules to deduce scum; scum by default play outside the standard ruleset and can just as easily elect to Not Do What Scum Do, this is a scum play I've done quite a bit
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 03:43 |
|
Sandwolf posted:hey, merk, what quidnose case? Natural 20 posted:But there was no case on Quid. merk posted:This is now a serious vote. It's: 1) LAMIST; and 2) a scum being awkward.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 04:01 |
|
I'm sorry that I got all this content going in a dearth of nothing happening (and immediately after Humalong complained nothing was happening in the game). I guess we better lynch me for it! Great idea! I'm headed to bed. If I go down, at least use what I generated please.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 04:04 |
|
I, personally, will not vote merk today and, furthermore, find it suspicious a bunch of players that have been exceptionally quiet have suddenly appeared to vote him.
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 04:09 |
|
4 of the 5 people voting merk have less than 10 posts in this game the other is sandwolf lol
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 04:10 |
|
|
# ? Mar 28, 2024 23:45 |
|
Mr. Humalong posted:4 of the 5 people voting merk have less than 10 posts in this game So who do you think of those 4 players is the scummiest and why?
|
# ? Nov 15, 2019 04:52 |